Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Clinical Immunology | Spotlight

An Opsonic Phagocytosis Assay for Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoites

Ryan W. J. Steel, Brandon K. Sack, Moriya Tsuji, Mary Jane L. Navarro, Will Betz, Matt E. Fishbaugher, Erika L. Flannery, Stefan H. I. Kappe
Patricia P. Wilkins, Editor
Ryan W. J. Steel
aCenter for Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryan W. J. Steel
Brandon K. Sack
aCenter for Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moriya Tsuji
bHIV and Malaria Vaccine Program, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Jane L. Navarro
aCenter for Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Will Betz
aCenter for Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matt E. Fishbaugher
aCenter for Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika L. Flannery
aCenter for Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan H. I. Kappe
aCenter for Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
cDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia P. Wilkins
CDC
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00445-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Plasmodium falciparum malaria remains the deadliest parasitic disease worldwide. Vaccines targeting the preerythrocytic sporozoite and liver stages have the potential to entirely prevent blood-stage infection and disease, as well as onward transmission. Sporozoite surface and secreted proteins are leading candidates for inclusion in a preerythrocytic stage-specific, antibody-based vaccine. Preclinical functional assays to identify humoral correlates of protection in vitro and to validate novel sporozoite protein targets for inclusion in multisubunit vaccines currently do not consider the interaction of sporozoite-targeting antibodies with other components of the immune system. Here, we describe the development of a simple flow cytometric assay to quantitatively assess the ability of antibodies directed against P. falciparum sporozoites to facilitate their phagocytosis. We demonstrate that this sporozoite opsonic phagocytosis assay (SOPA) is compatible with both monoclonal antibodies and human immune serum and can be performed using cryopreserved P. falciparum sporozoites. This simple, accessible assay will aid with the assessment of antibody responses to vaccination with Plasmodium antigens and their interaction with phagocytic cells of the immune system.

INTRODUCTION

The parasite Plasmodium falciparum causes hundreds of millions of clinical malaria infections and half a million deaths annually (1). The parasite is transmitted by deposition of sporozoite stages into the skin through the bite of infected Anopheles mosquitoes. Motile sporozoites then move in the dermis to locate a capillary, gaining access to the circulation, through which they sequester in the liver. Here sporozoites select and infect hepatocytes, and the parasite then develops as a liver stage, producing tens of thousands of red blood cell-infectious merozoites that initiate blood-stage infection. Stages prior to merozoite emergence from hepatocytes are collectively known as preerythrocytic (PE) stages. The PE stages of infection are asymptomatic and are caused by a relatively small number of parasites. Elimination of PE stages prevents progression to blood stages of infection, responsible for the clinical symptoms of malaria and onward transmission of the parasite (2). These features render PE stages attractive vaccine targets.

Sporozoite surface and secreted proteins are rational antibody targets for vaccines that aim to block sporozoite infection. The most advanced PE stage-specific vaccine candidate consists of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP), which is abundantly expressed on the sporozoite surface. Immunization with a CSP-based vaccine, RTS,S/AS01, a virus-like particle expressing CSP adjuvanted with AS01, achieved modest protection in phase 3 pediatric clinical trials in areas where malaria is endemic that was in part mediated by antibodies (3, 4). An alternative approach, vaccination with live-attenuated sporozoites that are unable to progress to the blood stage, also engenders sporozoite-neutralizing antibody responses that, together with cellular responses against the liver stages, confer high-level, sterilizing protection in controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) studies (5–7).

Antibodies against sporozoite proteins can block PE-stage infection in a number of ways, including by immobilizing sporozoites in the skin or in the blood or by directly blocking their entry into the liver parenchyma and subsequent hepatocyte infection (8–10). The effects of PE-stage-specific antibodies on these different sporozoite activities can be partially assessed by in vitro assays modeling the transition of the sporozoite from the skin to the liver. These assays include the sporozoite gliding motility and cell traversal assays that model parasite activities in the skin and liver (7, 11), sporozoite invasion assays for hepatocyte infection (12–14), and assays measuring liver-stage development within primary hepatocytes (15). Antibodies are tested for inhibitory activity in these assays, and the collective results are then used to prioritize candidate antigens for further development (16). However, none of the aforementioned assays currently analyze the downstream effects of anti-sporozoite antibodies in conjunction with the effects of cellular components of the immune system.

In addition to the blocking and neutralizing properties of antibodies, phagocytic cells in the skin and liver have the potential to engulf sporozoites that are decorated with antibodies, eliminate them, and initiate an adaptive immune response through antigen presentation to T cells (17). Indeed, opsonization of sporozoites by antibodies has been shown to increase their phagocytosis and elimination by Kupffer cells of the liver (18), and opsonic phagocytosis of recombinant P. falciparum CSP (PfCSP) has been reported to correlate with protection when plasma from RTS,S-immunized individuals is used (19). However, existing assays do not measure this potentially important role of antibodies, and thus, this aspect is not included in guiding the development of a PE stage-specific vaccine for P. falciparum, despite an increasing awareness of the importance of antibody-mediated phagocytosis of blood-stage parasites. In the study described here, we developed a novel sporozoite opsonic phagocytosis assay (SOPA) that can be included in candidate vaccine antigen screening. The SOPA uses the human Fc receptor-positive monocytic cell line THP-1, suitable for phagocytosis studies (20), and live or cryopreserved P. falciparum sporozoites. We demonstrate that the rapid, flow cytometry-based assay can be used with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against CSP, as well as blood serum and purified IgG (pIgG) from individuals immunized with a genetically attenuated P. falciparum parasite, P. falciparum GAP 3KO (PfGAP 3KO) (21). The resulting assay will be useful in the preclinical analysis of the function of antibodies against sporozoites and analysis of humoral responses to PE stage-specific vaccination in clinical trials.

RESULTS

Development and validation of SOPA.We developed a flow cytometry-based assay to measure the capacity of antigen-specific antibodies to facilitate opsonic phagocytosis of sporozoites by the Fc receptor-positive THP-1 cell line (Fig. 1). In developing the assay, we determined that a ratio of sporozoites/cells of 1:3 with a 15-min incubation was optimal (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Using the sporozoite surface protein CSP as a marker, the assay measures changes in the frequency of intracellular parasites when P. falciparum sporozoites are opsonized with either monoclonal antibodies or clinical immune serum and then phagocytosed. Incubation of P. falciparum sporozoites with a human IgG1 MAb reactive against P. falciparum CSP (3C1) (Fig. S2), but not control nonspecific human IgG (hIgG), increased the frequency of intracellular parasites at concentrations as low as 1 ng/ml (P < 0.05), with a 50% effective concentration EC50 of 7.1 ng/ml (Fig. 2A and B). THP-1 cells not incubated with sporozoites were negative for CSP and used as an additional negative control in all assays (data not shown).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Analysis of SOPA results by flow cytometry. Sporozoites were incubated either alone, in the presence of antibodies, or in the presence of clinical immune serum for 15 min before addition of THP-1 cells at a ratio of sporozoites/cells of 1:3. Sporozoites and cells were centrifuged briefly, and then after a 15-min incubation, cells were fixed and permeabilized and sporozoites were detected using a fluorescently conjugated monoclonal antibody directed against PfCSP. FSC, forward scatter.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Opsonized P. falciparum sporozoites are efficiently phagocytosed by THP-1 cells. (A) Sporozoites were incubated in medium alone (untreated), with hIgG, or with a monoclonal hIgG antibody directed against PfCSP (MAb 3C1) before the addition of THP-1 cells and analysis by flow cytometry. The presence of 3C1 but not hIgG at 10 μg/ml facilitated a significant increase in the percentage of CSP+ cells relative to that obtained with untreated sporozoites. (B) The 3C1 and hIgG antibodies were titrated in the SOPA to determine the sensitivity of the assay. Significant increases in CSP+ cells when sporozoites were opsonized with 3C1 were observed at concentrations of 1 ng/ml and higher with an EC50 of 7.1 ng/ml. A negligible effect of hIgG, which performed similarly to untreated sporozoites (dashed line) at all tested concentrations, was observed in the assay. (C and D) F(ab′)2 fragments of MAb 3C1 lacking the hIgG Fc region did not facilitate phagocytic uptake of sporozoites (C), whereas uptake in the presence of complete 3C1 was reduced by pretreatment of THP-1 cells with 200 μM cytochalasin D (CytoD) (D). (E) The increase in CSP+ cells with 3C1-opsonized sporozoites was not observed when nonpermeabilized cells were used in the assay, demonstrating that the increase observed is due to intracellular sporozoites. Data are means ± SDs from representative experiments and were analyzed by either one-way analysis of variance with Sidak's planned comparison testing (A, C, D) or two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni's multiple-comparison testing. *, P < 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001.

Having shown that antigen-specific antibodies facilitated an increase in the number of phagocytic cells positive for sporozoites, we set out to further substantiate that this was due to opsonic phagocytosis. We generated F(ab′)2 fragments of MAb 3C1 and verified digestion of the Fc region by PAGE under nonreducing conditions (data not shown). When used in the SOPA, these MAb 3C1 F(ab′)2 fragments were unable to mediate the uptake of sporozoites by phagocytic cells when they were used at the same concentration as complete 3C1, instead showing low uptake levels, similar to the results for control hIgG (Fig. 2C). Phagocytosis is an active cell-mediated process requiring actin polymerization in the phagocyte, which can be inhibited by cytochalasin D. To verify that the assay in fact measures active phagocytosis of sporozoites in the presence of MAb 3C1, we pretreated phagocytic cells with cytochalasin D or its vehicle for 30 min, followed by washing the drug out to prevent inhibition of sporozoite motility. Treatment of cells with cytochalasin D but not its vehicle resulted in a significant 3.1-fold reduction in the number of sporozoite-containing phagocytic cells (Fig. 2D). Finally, we performed the SOPA on permeabilized as well as unpermeabilized cells (Fig. 2E). While hIgG-opsonized sporozoites showed similar levels of CSP-positive (CSP+) cells regardless of permeabilization (indicating that some surface-associated sporozoites were detected in the assay), an increase in CSP+ events with MAb 3C1 was seen only in permeabilized cells. Together, these data show that the increase in CSP+ phagocytic cells that we observed in the SOPA requires an antigen-specific antibody (Fig. 2A and B) and an antibody interaction with phagocytic cells via their Fc region (Fig. 2C) that is dependent on actin polymerization in the THP-1 cells (Fig. 2D), resulting in an increase in intracellular sporozoites (Fig. 2E). These data are consistent with the SOPA measuring the opsonic phagocytosis of P. falciparum sporozoites by THP-1 cells.

Measurement of SOPA response with serum from whole sporozoite-immunized volunteers.Having demonstrated the proof-of-concept for the SOPA using a PfCSP-specific MAb, we next sought to determine the compatibility of the assay with serum from humans immunized with whole P. falciparum parasites (21).

Serum from two volunteers that had received a single high dose of a triple gene deletion-attenuated sporozoite (PfGAP 3KO) (21) was tested in a dilution series in the SOPA to identify the dilution range yielding the greatest fold change between naive and immune sera (Fig. 3). Compared to the responses obtained with untreated sporozoites, we observed differences between the responses of the volunteers' naive serum, as well as the maximum fold change between matched naive and immune serum samples in the SOPA. One volunteer showed a negligible increase in CSP+ cells with naive serum at all tested dilutions (Fig. 3A), while in the other volunteer, a significant increase in CSP+ cells was observed at naive serum dilutions of less than 160-fold (Fig. 3B). In both volunteers, the greatest fold change between naive and immune sera was observed at 80- to 160-fold dilutions and at the lowest dilution where naive serum had a negligible effect in the assay. We observed similar differences between volunteers when pIgG rather than whole serum was used in the SOPA (Fig. S3).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Determining parameters for use of human serum in the SOPA. Naive (blue line) and immune (red line) sera from two volunteers (A and B) immunized with PfGAP 3KO were tested in the SOPA across a dilution series. For one volunteer, naive serum performed comparably to untreated sporozoites (dashed line) at all tested dilutions (A), while in another volunteer, a background effect of naive serum was observed at dilutions of less than 160-fold (B). In both volunteers, the percentage of CSP+ cells with immune serum peaked at an 80-fold dilution, with the greatest fold change between naive and immune sera (yellow line) being seen at dilutions of 80-fold or above. Data are means ± SDs from a representative experiment.

To test the reproducibility of the assay, as well as determine its capacity to measure differences in the SOPA response between individuals, we screened the serum of five PfGAP 3KO-immunized volunteers at an 80-fold dilution in the assay (Fig. 4). The maximum fold change between naive and immune sera from these five volunteers revealed significant differences between the responses of their samples (Fig. 4A and B). These differences were reproduced in a second, independently performed assay, and a significant correlation between the two assay runs was observed, demonstrating the reproducibility of the results (Fig. 4C). Although protection data for PfGAP 3KO are not yet available, these reproducible differences demonstrate that the SOPA could be useful for identifying correlates of protection with human clinical samples. Importantly, the magnitude of the response of clinical samples in the SOPA did not always correlate with the titers of antibodies against PfCSP (Fig. 4D) (21), suggesting that sporozoite antigens other than CSP might be able to facilitate opsonic phagocytosis in this assay. Alternatively, the opsonic activity of CSP antibodies could differ between immunized volunteers.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Reproducible differences between clinical serum samples are measured by the SOPA. (A) Matched naive (day 0) and immune (day 13 postimmunization) serum samples from five volunteers immunized with PfGAP 3KO were tested in the SOPA (dashed line, untreated sporozoites). (B) The fold change between matched serum samples for each volunteer was calculated, and statistically significant differences between the responses of the volunteers were observed. (C) The experiment was performed a second time, and the mean fold change between the naive and immune sera for each of the two independent experiments was significantly correlated using Pearson's correlation. (D) No correlation between CSP antibody titers and the fold change obtained by SOPA was seen for either of these two experiments. The data in panels A and B represent the means ± SDs from one representative experiment. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni's post hoc test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. The data in panels C and D were analyzed by use of the Pearson correlation. AU, arbitrary units.

The above-described experiments were performed using freshly isolated P. falciparum sporozoites, the production of which requires specialized insectary facilities and personnel not available in many laboratories. Methods to cryopreserve P. falciparum sporozoites have been developed, making them more broadly available for research. We thus tested cryopreserved P. falciparum sporozoites in the SOPA to determine their compatibility with the assay (Fig. 5). Opsonization of cryopreserved P. falciparum sporozoites with MAb 3C1 or immune serum from PfGAP 3KO-immunized volunteers resulted in an increase in the number of sporozoite-containing phagocytic cells similar to that seen with fresh sporozoites, indicating that the assay is not restricted to use with fresh sporozoites.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Use of cryopreserved sporozoites in SOPA. Cryopreserved P. falciparum sporozoites were tested in the SOPA with the monoclonal antibody 3C1 and hIgG (A), as well as naive and immune sera from a volunteer immunized with PfGAP 3KO (B). A significant increase in CSP+ cells was seen using both 3C1 and immune serum, demonstrating the compatibility of frozen sporozoites with the SOPA. Data are the means ± SDs from a representative experiment and were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (A) and Student's t test (B). ****, P < 0.0001.

DISCUSSION

The contribution of sporozoite-targeted antibodies to protective PE-stage immunity is increasingly recognized for both subunit and whole attenuated sporozoite vaccination (5, 22). These antibodies can act at multiple points during the journey of sporozoites from the dermis to the liver, and a number of in vitro assays are available to measure the inhibition of distinct processes at multiple steps in this journey. These include assays for the inhibition of motility in the skin as sporozoites search for a capillary, traversal of multiple cell types as sporozoites gain access to the circulation and subsequently to the liver parenchyma, as well as, ultimately, the invasion of hepatocytes by sporozoites (16). While these assays are certainly important tools in the analysis of humoral responses against subunit and whole attenuated sporozoite vaccination, they measure only the neutralization of sporozoite protein functions and do not consider the interaction of these parasite-bound antibodies with other immune components.

The significance of antibody effector functions, mediated by the interaction of antibody Fc regions with other immune components, has been recognized in functional assays against the blood stages of malaria infection. The growth inhibition assay (GIA) quantifies reductions in the merozoite invasion of red blood cells with antibodies against merozoite proteins (23). The addition of complement or phagocytic cells to the GIA increases inhibition by most antibodies in this assay and increases the capacity of the assay to predict protection (24–29). Recently, complement fixation by antibodies recognizing glycan residues on sporozoites has been shown to be protective in vivo (30), suggesting that the role of Fc-mediated functions should also be more carefully considered in PE-stage immunity and vaccine development. The SOPA that we report here is the first description of a functional assay using P. falciparum sporozoites that considers the interaction of antibodies with other immune components via their Fc-mediated effector functions.

Opsonic phagocytosis of sporozoites could be expected to augment clearance of the parasite from the host, as well as enhance the initiation of adaptive immune responses by phagocytic cells. Sporozoite traversal of the sinusoidal barrier in the liver has been shown to facilitate their evasion of phagocytosis and clearance by Kupffer cells (31), and incubation of sporozoites with specific antibodies increases parasite clearance by Kupffer cells in vitro (18). These studies indicate that antibodies bound to sporozoites could enhance their clearance at the parasites' final barrier to the establishment of liver-stage infection. In the skin-draining lymph nodes, CD11c+ and CD8α+ dendritic cells appear to be important for the initiation of the protective CD8+ T-cell responses observed in whole sporozoite immunizations (32). Enhanced phagocytosis and enhanced antigen presentation have been described for a variety of pathogens with opsonizing antibodies (17), and antibodies recognizing sporozoites could be expected to enhance adaptive immunity during P. falciparum infection. Finally, opsonic phagocytosis has been investigated in the context of RTS,S immunization. In that study, plasma from immunized volunteers facilitated the uptake of recombinant PfCSP, and this correlated with protection (19). It is noteworthy that the previous assay used a protein corresponding to the immunogen of RTS,S immunization, whereas the SOPA that we describe uses whole P. falciparum sporozoites. The use of sporozoites in our assay constitutes a significant improvement over previous approaches, as all sporozoite antigens are present in their natural cellular context and the activity of antibodies to proteins other than CSP can be investigated.

In the study described here, we developed a simple, medium-throughput in vitro assay able to reproducibly measure the antibody-mediated opsonic phagocytosis of whole P. falciparum sporozoites. This SOPA is efficient with both clinical samples (1 to 4 μl of serum is required per sample per experiment) and sporozoites (1.5 × 106 sporozoites are sufficient to test 14 clinical samples with matched naive and immune serum samples) and can be completed in less than 1 day. Using the SOPA, we observed significant differences in opsonic phagocytosis between five volunteers immunized with a PfGAP 3KO vaccine that did not correlate with anti-PfCSP titers. While the small sample size in this study is a limitation, these data suggest that antigens other than CSP may be able to contribute to the opsonic phagocytosis of sporozoites. It is also possible that the difference in the SOPA response observed between these volunteers is related to the specific IgG subclasses of the opsonizing antibodies present in the samples, but this was not further investigated. It will be important to explore this possibility in future studies. Nevertheless, the SOPA appears to be sensitive enough to enable correlative analyses to be performed in the future using samples from subjects with known protection outcomes.

We performed our analysis using the fold change between naive and immune sera, although it is important to note that alternative methods of analysis are possible. For example, the percentage of CSP+ cells observed at a given dilution of immune serum could be employed. Indeed, where fold change was reported, the worst performer among the analyzed volunteers also exhibited the highest percentage of CSP+ cells using immune serum at an 80-fold dilution (Fig. 4). As protection was not assessed in this PfGAP 3KO phase Ia study, we are unable to resolve which method best reflects the contribution of opsonic phagocytosis to protection in vivo, and the predictive power of the assay remains to be determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

THP-1 cell culture.THP-1 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 complete medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 200 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo), and 2.5 μg/ml amphotericin B (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a cell density of between 0.1 × 106 and 1.0 × 106 cells per ml. Pretreatment of THP-1 cells with cytochalasin D (Sigma) or its vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide) to inhibit actin polymerization in some experiments was performed for 30 min at 37°C, followed by two washes in complete medium to remove residual compound before the addition of cells to sporozoites.

Mosquito rearing, sporozoite production, and isolation.Mosquito rearing and P. falciparum sporozoite production were performed as previously described (33). Briefly, P. falciparum NF54 gametocyte cultures were fed to adult female Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes 3 to 7 days after their emergence. Blood-fed mosquitoes were then maintained according to standard protocols for 14 days, after which their salivary glands were dissected and infectious sporozoites were isolated by grinding and centrifugation. In some experiments, cryopreserved sporozoites were used. Following their dissection, sporozoites to be cryopreserved were first purified using a discontinuous density gradient (34) and then resuspended in Schneider's insect medium (Lonza) containing 300 mM trehalose and 200 μg/ml 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine. Resuspended sporozoites were incubated at room temperature for 10 min before addition of hydroxyethyl starch to a final concentration of 1.7% (vol/vol), followed by rapid freezing by immersion in liquid nitrogen. Prior to their use in the SOPA, cryopreserved sporozoites were thawed at room temperature and pelleted by centrifugation, and the cryopreservation medium was removed.

Generation of PfGAP-immunized clinical samples.Naive and immune sera from human volunteers immunized with a P. falciparum genetically attenuated parasite (PfGAP 3KO) in a phase Ia clinical trial were collected as described elsewhere (21). Briefly, volunteers received a single exposure of 150 to 200 bites from PfGAP 3KO-infected A. stephensi mosquitoes. Serum was collected from volunteers before infection (naive serum) and 13 days after infection (immune serum), and purified IgG (pIgG) was isolated from these serum samples using protein G columns (catalog number 28-9852-55; GE Healthcare). Immunization of volunteers with PfGAP 3KO was approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB) and the United States Army Research and Material Command, Office of Research Protections, Human Research Protection Office.

Generation and human chimerization of monoclonal antibody 3C1 against P. falciparum CSP.The coding sequence of PfCSP (3D7 strain) was cloned into the pET20b vector, expressed in the BL21(DE3) Escherichia coli strain, and protein purified by Ni-affinity chromatography. Subsequent immunization of mice and hybridoma fusion were performed by Green Mountain Antibodies, Inc. (Burlington, VT). Briefly, mice were primed with 50 μg of PfCSP emulsified with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), followed by weekly immunization of 50 μg of PfCSP emulsified with TiterMax adjuvant (Sigma) or Sigma Adjuvant System (Sigma). One week following the seventh immunization, B cells were isolated from lymph nodes and fused with a mouse myeloma cell line, and positive clones secreting anti-PfCSP IgG were selected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The leading clone was selected for expression as a chimeric antibody with human constant regions. The DNA sequences encoding the heavy- and light-chain variable region genes for the leading clone were amplified by PCR and cloned into expression vectors containing the human κ light-chain constant region and human γ1 heavy-chain constant region. The expression vectors were transfected into HEK293 cells for transient production of chimeric MAb 3C1. The cells were grown in chemically defined medium, and full-length 3C1 was purified from the cell culture supernatant by protein A-affinity chromatography (protein A resin; GE Healthcare).

SOPA.An overview of the SOPA workflow is shown in Fig. 1. Salivary gland P. falciparum sporozoites were first prepared in complete medium at a concentration of 8 × 105/ml, and then sporozoites were opsonized with 3C1-hIgG1, nonspecific human IgG (hIgG), or serum or pIgG derived from patients immunized with PfGAP 3KO (21). Sporozoites were then incubated at 37°C for 15 min, before 1.5 × 104 opsonized sporozoites were plated into triplicate wells of a 96-well V-bottomed plate. THP-1 cells, prepared at 1 × 106/ml in complete medium, were added to each well at a 1:1 volume with sporozoites to achieve a ratio of sporozoites/cells of 1:3. The plate was then centrifuged at 500 × g for 3 min and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Cells were then immediately fixed without washing in Perm/Fix buffer (BD Biosciences), blocked, permeabilized in Perm/Wash buffer (BD Biosciences), and then stained with a monoclonal antibody directed against PfCSP conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (clone 2A10). THP-1 cells containing sporozoites were identified by flow cytometry using a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (TreeStar). In some experiments, an F(ab′)2 fragment of 3C1 generated by pepsin digestion of the Fc region (catalog number 44688; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used in place of full-length 3C1.

Statistical analysis.Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (version 6) for Windows, and differences were considered statistically significant when P was <0.05.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center is an affiliate of The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. The Center for Infectious Disease Research was formerly the Seattle Biomedical Research Institute.

The 3C1 monoclonal antibody used in this research was provided as chimeric 3C1-hIgG1 by the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative. We thank the insectary at the Center for Infectious Disease Research for infected and uninfected mosquito preparation.

Work by the authors is funded by the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (grant number NIH 5 F32 AI114113-03).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 September 2016.
    • Returned for modification 2 October 2016.
    • Accepted 8 November 2016.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 23 November 2016.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00445-16 .

  • Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization. 2015. World malaria report 2015. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Vaughan AM,
    2. Aly ASI,
    3. Kappe SHI
    . 2008. Malaria parasite pre-erythrocytic stage infection: gliding and hiding. Cell Host Microbe4:209–218. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2008.08.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. White MT,
    2. Bejon P,
    3. Olotu A,
    4. Griffin JT,
    5. Riley EM,
    6. Kester KE,
    7. Ockenhouse CF,
    8. Ghani AC
    . 2013. The relationship between RTS,S vaccine-induced antibodies, CD4(+) T cell responses and protection against Plasmodium falciparum infection. PLoS One8:e61395. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061395.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    RTS,S Clinical Trials Partnership. 2015. Efficacy and safety of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine with or without a booster dose in infants and children in Africa: final results of a phase 3, individually randomised, controlled trial. Lancet386:31–45. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60721-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ishizuka AS,
    2. Lyke KE,
    3. DeZure A,
    4. Berry AA,
    5. Richie TL,
    6. Mendoza FH,
    7. Enama ME,
    8. Gordon IJ,
    9. Chang L-J,
    10. Sarwar UN,
    11. Zephir KL,
    12. Holman LA,
    13. James ER,
    14. Billingsley PF,
    15. Gunasekera A,
    16. Chakravarty S,
    17. Manoj A,
    18. Li M,
    19. Ruben AJ,
    20. Li T,
    21. Eappen AG,
    22. Stafford RE,
    23. Murshedkar KCN,
    24. DeCederfelt HT,
    25. Plummer SH,
    26. Hendel CS,
    27. Novik L,
    28. Costner PJM,
    29. Saunders JG,
    30. Laurens MB,
    31. Plowe CV,
    32. Flynn B,
    33. Whalen WR,
    34. Todd JP,
    35. Noor J,
    36. Rao S,
    37. Sierra-Davidson K,
    38. Lynn GM,
    39. Epstein JE,
    40. Kemp MA,
    41. Fahle GA,
    42. Mikolajczak SA,
    43. Fishbaugher M,
    44. Sack BK,
    45. Kappe SHI,
    46. Davidson SA,
    47. Garver LS,
    48. Bjorkstrom NK,
    49. Nason MC,
    50. Graham BS,
    51. Roederer M,
    52. Sim BKL,
    53. Hoffman SL,
    54. Ledgerwood JE,
    55. Seder RA
    . 2016. Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination. Nat Med22:614–623. doi:10.1038/nm.4110.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Epstein JE,
    2. Richie TL
    . 2013. The whole parasite, pre-erythrocytic stage approach to malaria vaccine development: a review. Curr Opin Infect Dis26:420–428. doi:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Behet MC,
    2. Foquet L,
    3. van Gemert GJ,
    4. Bijker EM,
    5. Meuleman P,
    6. Leroux-Roels G,
    7. Hermsen CC,
    8. Scholzen A,
    9. Sauerwein RW
    . 2014. Sporozoite immunization of human volunteers under chemoprophylaxis induces functional antibodies against pre-erythrocytic stages of Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J13:136. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-13-136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Vanderberg JP,
    2. Frevert U
    . 2004. Intravital microscopy demonstrating antibody-mediated immobilisation of Plasmodium berghei sporozoites injected into skin by mosquitoes. Int J Parasitol34:991–996. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.05.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kebaier C,
    2. Voza T,
    3. Vanderberg J
    . 2009. Kinetics of mosquito-injected Plasmodium sporozoites in mice: fewer sporozoites are injected into sporozoite-immunized mice. PLoS Pathog5:e1000399. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sack BK,
    2. Miller JL,
    3. Vaughan AM,
    4. Douglass A,
    5. Kaushansky A,
    6. Mikolajczak S,
    7. Coppi A,
    8. Gonzalez-Aseguinolaza G,
    9. Tsuji M,
    10. Zavala F,
    11. Sinnis P,
    12. Kappe SH
    . 2014. Model for in vivo assessment of humoral protection against malaria sporozoite challenge by passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies and immune serum. Infect Immun82:808–817. doi:10.1128/IAI.01249-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mota MM,
    2. Pradel G,
    3. Vanderberg JP,
    4. Hafalla JC,
    5. Frevert U,
    6. Nussenzweig RS,
    7. Nussenzweig V,
    8. Rodriguez A
    . 2001. Migration of Plasmodium sporozoites through cells before infection. Science291:141–144. doi:10.1126/science.291.5501.141.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Seder RA,
    2. Chang LJ,
    3. Enama ME,
    4. Zephir KL,
    5. Sarwar UN,
    6. Gordon IJ,
    7. Holman LA,
    8. James ER,
    9. Billingsley PF,
    10. Gunasekera A,
    11. Richman A,
    12. Chakravarty S,
    13. Manoj A,
    14. Velmurugan S,
    15. Li M,
    16. Ruben AJ,
    17. Li T,
    18. Eappen AG,
    19. Stafford RE,
    20. Plummer SH,
    21. Hendel CS,
    22. Novik L,
    23. Costner PJ,
    24. Mendoza FH,
    25. Saunders JG,
    26. Nason MC,
    27. Richardson JH,
    28. Murphy J,
    29. Davidson SA,
    30. Richie TL,
    31. Sedegah M,
    32. Sutamihardja A,
    33. Fahle GA,
    34. Lyke KE,
    35. Laurens MB,
    36. Roederer M,
    37. Tewari K,
    38. Epstein JE,
    39. Sim BK,
    40. Ledgerwood JE,
    41. Graham BS,
    42. Hoffman SL
    . 2013. Protection against malaria by intravenous immunization with a nonreplicating sporozoite vaccine. Science34:1359–1365. doi:10.1126/science.1241800.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kaushansky A,
    2. Rezakhani N,
    3. Mann H,
    4. Kappe SH
    . 2012. Development of a quantitative flow cytometry-based assay to assess infection by Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. Mol Biochem Parasitol183:100–103. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.01.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Finney OC,
    2. Keitany GJ,
    3. Smithers H,
    4. Kaushansky A,
    5. Kappe S,
    6. Wang R
    . 2014. Immunization with genetically attenuated P. falciparum parasites induces long-lived antibodies that efficiently block hepatocyte invasion by sporozoites. Vaccine32:2135–2138. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.055.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zou X,
    2. House BL,
    3. Zyzak MD,
    4. Richie TL,
    5. Gerbasi VR
    . 2013. Towards an optimized inhibition of liver stage development assay (ILSDA) for Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J12:394. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-12-394.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Steel RWJ,
    2. Kappe SHI,
    3. Sack BK
    . An expanding toolkit for preclinical pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine development: bridging traditional mouse malaria models and human trials. Future Microbiol11:1563–1579. doi:10.2217/fmb-2016-0077.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Joller N,
    2. Weber SS,
    3. Oxenius A
    . 2011. Antibody-Fc receptor interactions in protection against intracellular pathogens. Eur J Immunol41:889–897. doi:10.1002/eji.201041340.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Seguin MC,
    2. Ballou WR,
    3. Nacy CA
    . 1989. Interactions of Plasmodium berghei sporozoites and murine Kupffer cells in vitro. J Immunol143:1716–1722.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. 19.↵
    1. Schwenk R,
    2. Asher LV,
    3. Chalom I,
    4. Lanar D,
    5. Sun PF,
    6. White K,
    7. Keil D,
    8. Kester KE,
    9. Stoute J,
    10. Heppner DG,
    11. Krzych U
    . 2003. Opsonization by antigen-specific antibodies as a mechanism of protective immunity induced by Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein-based vaccine. Parasite Immunol25:17–25. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3024.2003.00495.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Chanput W,
    2. Mes JJ,
    3. Wichers HJ
    . 2014. THP-1 cell line: an in vitro cell model for immune modulation approach. Int Immunopharmacol23:37–45. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2014.08.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kublin JG,
    2. Mikolajczak SA,
    3. Sack BK,
    4. Fishbaugher ME,
    5. Seilie A,
    6. Shelton L,
    7. VonGoedert T,
    8. Firat M,
    9. Magee S,
    10. Fritzen E,
    11. Betz W,
    12. Kain HS,
    13. Dankwa DA,
    14. Steel RWJ,
    15. Vaughan AM,
    16. Sather DN,
    17. Murphy SC,
    18. Kappe SHI
    . 2017. Complete attenuation of a genetically engineered Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites in human subjects. Sci Transl Med9:eaad9099. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aad9099.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Olotu A,
    2. Lusingu J,
    3. Leach A,
    4. Lievens M,
    5. Vekemans J,
    6. Msham S,
    7. Lang T,
    8. Gould J,
    9. Dubois MC,
    10. Jongert E,
    11. Vansadia P,
    12. Carter T,
    13. Njuguna P,
    14. Awuondo KO,
    15. Malabeja A,
    16. Abdul O,
    17. Gesase S,
    18. Mturi N,
    19. Drakeley CJ,
    20. Savarese B,
    21. Villafana T,
    22. Lapierre D,
    23. Ballou WR,
    24. Cohen J,
    25. Lemnge MM,
    26. Peshu N,
    27. Marsh K,
    28. Riley EM,
    29. von Seidlein L,
    30. Bejon P
    . 2011. Efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine and exploratory analysis on anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres and protection in children aged 5-17 months in Kenya and Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis11:102–109. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70262-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Persson KE,
    2. Lee CT,
    3. Marsh K,
    4. Beeson JG
    . 2006. Development and optimization of high-throughput methods to measure Plasmodium falciparum-specific growth inhibitory antibodies. J Clin Microbiol44:1665–1673. doi:10.1128/JCM.44.5.1665-1673.2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Boyle MJ,
    2. Reiling L,
    3. Feng G,
    4. Langer C,
    5. Osier FH,
    6. Aspeling-Jones H,
    7. Cheng YS,
    8. Stubbs J,
    9. Tetteh KK,
    10. Conway DJ,
    11. McCarthy JS,
    12. Muller I,
    13. Marsh K,
    14. Anders RF,
    15. Beeson JG
    . 2015. Human antibodies fix complement to inhibit Plasmodium falciparum invasion of erythrocytes and are associated with protection against malaria. Immunity42:580–590. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kumaratilake LM,
    2. Ferrante A
    . 2000. Opsonization and phagocytosis of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites measured by flow cytometry. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol7:9–13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Tiendrebeogo RW,
    2. Adu B,
    3. Singh SK,
    4. Dziegiel MH,
    5. Nébié I,
    6. Sirima SB,
    7. Christiansen M,
    8. Dodoo D,
    9. Theisen M
    . 2015. Antibody-dependent cellular inhibition is associated with reduced risk against febrile malaria in a longitudinal cohort study involving Ghanaian children. Open Forum Infect Dis2:ofv044. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv044.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Osier FHA,
    2. Feng GQ,
    3. Boyle MJ,
    4. Langer C,
    5. Zhou JL,
    6. Richards JS,
    7. McCallum FJ,
    8. Reiling L,
    9. Jaworowski A,
    10. Anders RF,
    11. Marsh K,
    12. Beeson JG
    . 2014. Opsonic phagocytosis of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites: mechanism in human immunity and a correlate of protection against malaria. BMC Med12:108. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-12-108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hill DL,
    2. Eriksson EM,
    3. Carmagnac AB,
    4. Wilson DW,
    5. Cowman AF,
    6. Hansen DS,
    7. Schofield L
    . 2012. Efficient measurement of opsonising antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum merozoites. PLoS One7:e51692. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051692.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wilson DW,
    2. Fowkes FJI,
    3. Gilson PR,
    4. Elliott SR,
    5. Tavul L,
    6. Michon P,
    7. Dabod E,
    8. Siba PM,
    9. Mueller I,
    10. Crabb BS,
    11. Beeson JG
    . 2011. Quantifying the importance of MSP1-19 as a target of growth-inhibitory and protective antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum in humans. PLoS One6:e27705. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Yilmaz B,
    2. Portugal S,
    3. Tran TM,
    4. Gozzelino R,
    5. Ramos S,
    6. Gomes J,
    7. Regalado A,
    8. Cowan PJ,
    9. d'Apice AJ,
    10. Chong AS,
    11. Doumbo OK,
    12. Traore B,
    13. Crompton PD,
    14. Silveira H,
    15. Soares MP
    . 2014. Gut microbiota elicits a protective immune response against malaria transmission. Cell159:1277–1289. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.053.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Tavares J,
    2. Formaglio P,
    3. Thiberge S,
    4. Mordelet E,
    5. Van Rooijen N,
    6. Medvinsky A,
    7. Ménard R,
    8. Amino R
    . 2013. Role of host cell traversal by the malaria sporozoite during liver infection. J Exp Med210:905–915. doi:10.1084/jem.20121130.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Cockburn IA,
    2. Zavala F
    . 2016. Dendritic cell function and antigen presentation in malaria. Curr Opin Immunol40:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2016.01.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Vaughan AM,
    2. Mikolajczak SA,
    3. Wilson EM,
    4. Grompe M,
    5. Kaushansky A,
    6. Camargo N,
    7. Bial J,
    8. Ploss A,
    9. Kappe SH
    . 2012. Complete Plasmodium falciparum liver-stage development in liver-chimeric mice. J Clin Invest122:3618–3628. doi:10.1172/JCI62684.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kennedy M,
    2. Fishbaugher ME,
    3. Vaughan AM,
    4. Patrapuvich R,
    5. Boonhok R,
    6. Yimamnuaychok N,
    7. Rezakhani N,
    8. Metzger P,
    9. Ponpuak M,
    10. Sattabongkot J,
    11. Kappe SH,
    12. Hume JC,
    13. Lindner SE
    . 2012. A rapid and scalable density gradient purification method for Plasmodium sporozoites. Malar J11:421. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-11-421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
An Opsonic Phagocytosis Assay for Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoites
Ryan W. J. Steel, Brandon K. Sack, Moriya Tsuji, Mary Jane L. Navarro, Will Betz, Matt E. Fishbaugher, Erika L. Flannery, Stefan H. I. Kappe
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Feb 2017, 24 (2) e00445-16; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00445-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Opsonic Phagocytosis Assay for Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoites
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
An Opsonic Phagocytosis Assay for Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoites
Ryan W. J. Steel, Brandon K. Sack, Moriya Tsuji, Mary Jane L. Navarro, Will Betz, Matt E. Fishbaugher, Erika L. Flannery, Stefan H. I. Kappe
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Feb 2017, 24 (2) e00445-16; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00445-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Protozoan
Immunoassay
Opsonin Proteins
phagocytosis
Plasmodium falciparum
Sporozoites
Plasmodium falciparum
antibodies
assay development
malaria
opsonization
phagocytosis
sporozoite
vaccines

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X