Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Clinical Immunology

Protective Immunity against Infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis

Chelsea A. E. Hicks, Barbara Willi, Barbara Riond, Marilisa Novacco, Marina L. Meli, Christopher R. Stokes, Christopher R. Helps, Regina Hofmann-Lehmann, Séverine Tasker
M. F. Pasetti, Editor
Chelsea A. E. Hicks
aSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
dCenter for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Willi
bClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
cClinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Riond
bClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marilisa Novacco
bClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
dCenter for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marina L. Meli
bClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
dCenter for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher R. Stokes
aSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher R. Helps
aSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Regina Hofmann-Lehmann
bClinical Laboratory, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
dCenter for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Facility, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Séverine Tasker
aSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. F. Pasetti
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00581-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    M. haemofelis copy numbers per ml of blood and hematocrit results during this study for groups A (A) and B (B). M. haemofelis copy numbers are reported as log values. All cats in group A became M. haemofelis PCR positive after inoculation by 21 days p.i., whereas the cats in group B remained PCR negative for the vast majority of the time, with only rare very low positive values recorded. Clear cycling was observed in the cats in group A: e.g., cat HCC2 showed a 4-log increase from day 21 to day 24 p.i., followed by a 4-log decline from day 24 to day 28 p.i. Dashed lines indicate hematocrit values.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Percentage of change from preinoculation with B220+ (A), CD8+(B), CD4+ (C), CD5+ MHC-II+ (D), and CD4+ CD25+ (E) cells over the course of the experiment for groups A (■) and B (▲). Each value represents the mean result for the group, and error bars represent the standard error. Time point 0 represents the preinoculation value (mean from time points −14, −7, and 0). *, statistically significant difference between the two groups at PMWU < 0.05.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    The humoral response to an rDnaK protein. Each value represents the mean log-transformed relative antibody level (RAL) for the group of cats, and error bars indicate the standard error. Time point 0 represents the preinfection value (mean RALs from time points −14, −7, and 0). *, statistically significant difference between the two groups at PMWU < 0.05. The threshold represents seropositive status in group A de novo-infected cats.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Percentage of change from preinoculation of Th1-type cytokines IL-12-p35 (A), IL-12p40 (B), and IFN-γ (C) over the course of the experiment for groups A (■) and B (▲). Each value represents the mean result for the group, and error bars represent the standard error. Time point 0 represents the preinoculation value (mean from time points −14, −7, and 0). *, statistically significant difference between the two groups at PMWU < 0.05; **, significance at PMWU < 0.01.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Percentage of change from preinoculation of Th2-type cytokines IL-4 (A) and IL-10 (B) over the course of the experiment for groups A (■) and B (▲). Each value represents the mean result for the group, and error bars represent the standard error. Time point 0 represents the preinoculation value (mean from time points −14, −7, and 0). *, statistically significant difference between the two groups at PMWU < 0.05; **, significance at PMWU < 0.01.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Percentage of change from preinoculation of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 (A), and TNF-α (B) over the course of the experiment for groups A (■) and B (▲). Each value represents the mean result for the group, and error bars represent the standard error. Time point 0 represents the preinoculation value (mean from time points −14, −7, and 0). *, statistically significant difference between the two groups at PMWU < 0.05.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    Ratios of IL-4 to IL-12p35 mRNA (A) and IL-4 to IFN-γ mRNA (B) in groups A (■) and B (▲) over the course of the study. Mean log-transformed values are plotted, and error bars represent the standard error.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Statistical analysis of each test variable for the two groups in this study

    Test variableCat groupStatistical analysis for any significant difference in variable over time (PFriedman value)Day(s) p.i. with significant differences (PWilcoxon*) from preinoculation levelsa
    M. haemofelis rDnaK ELISAAχ2 = 82.859 (<0.001)24, 28, 31, 35, 38, 42, 45, 49, 56, 63, 70, 77, 84
    BNSbNot performed
    IL-12p35 mRNAAχ2 = 51.741 (<0.001)24, 31, 38, 45, 49, 84
    Bχ2 = 31.624 (0.007)17, 31, 45, 49
    IL-12p40 mRNAAχ2 = 35.082 (0.002)1, 3, 10, 24, 31, 38, 45
    BNSNot performed
    IFN-γ mRNAANSNot performed
    BNSNot performed
    IL-4 mRNAAχ2 = 35.100 (0.002)2, 63, 84
    Bχ2 = 26.382 (0.034)24, 31, 77
    IL-10 mRNAAχ2 = 52.094 (<0.001)17, 24, 31, 38, 45, 56, 63, 70
    Bχ2 = 27.159 (0.027)56
    IL-6 mRNAANSNot performed
    BNSNot performed
    TNF-α mRNAAχ2 = 28.200 (0.020)
    Bχ2 = 29.382 (0.014)24, 49, 84
    IL-4/IL-12p35 mRNAAχ2 = 48.371 (<0.001)31, 38, 45, 49, 63, 70, 84
    Bχ2 = 34.2 (0.003)49, 56, 77
    IL-4/IFN-γ mRNAAχ2 = 29.576 (0.014)56, 63, 70
    Bχ2 = 25.129 (0.048)63
    B220+Aχ2 = 54.706 (<0.001)3, 24, 31, 63, 70, 77, 84
    Bχ2 = 31.624 (0.007)77, 84
    CD8+Aχ2 = 49.288 (<0.001)24, 63, 70, 77
    Bχ2 = 30.476 (0.010)
    CD4+Aχ2 = 46.271 (<0.001)24, 31, 38, 45
    BNSNot performed
    CD4+ CD25+Aχ2 = 36.918 (0.001)49, 70, 77, 84
    Bχ2 = 28.588 (0.018)38, 45, 70, 84
    CD5+ MHC-II+Aχ2 = 49.624 (<0.001)24, 38, 45, 63, 70, 77
    BNSNot performed
    • ↵a Blood samples for cytokines and flow cytometry were collected on days 1, 2, 3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 38, 45, 49, 56, 63, 70, 77, and 84 p.i. Only those values that were significant at PFriedman < 0.05 were subjected to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. * indicates z = −2.023 and PWilcoxon = 0.043. Numbers in boldface indicate a significant increase in comparison to preinoculation levels, while numbers not in boldface indicate a significant decrease in comparison to preinoculation levels.

    • ↵b NS, no significant difference.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Protective Immunity against Infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
Chelsea A. E. Hicks, Barbara Willi, Barbara Riond, Marilisa Novacco, Marina L. Meli, Christopher R. Stokes, Christopher R. Helps, Regina Hofmann-Lehmann, Séverine Tasker
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Dec 2014, 22 (1) 108-118; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00581-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protective Immunity against Infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Protective Immunity against Infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
Chelsea A. E. Hicks, Barbara Willi, Barbara Riond, Marilisa Novacco, Marina L. Meli, Christopher R. Stokes, Christopher R. Helps, Regina Hofmann-Lehmann, Séverine Tasker
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Dec 2014, 22 (1) 108-118; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00581-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X