Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology

Evaluation of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1 and -2 Assay as a Confirmatory Assay for Detection of HIV-1 and -2 Antibodies

Anne Hawthorne Hallen, Agneta Samuelson, Margareta Nordin, Jan Albert, Gordana Bogdanovic
R. L. Hodinka, Editor
Anne Hawthorne Hallen
aDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Vastmanland Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agneta Samuelson
bDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margareta Nordin
bDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Albert
bDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden
cDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gordana Bogdanovic
bDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. L. Hodinka
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00153-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The performance of the new Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1/2 confirmatory assay was compared with that of the Chiron RIBA HIV-1/HIV-2 strip immunoblot assay using 166 samples from HIV-1-, HIV-2-, or HIV-1/2-positive and HIV-negative individuals and two quality control panels. Our results indicate that the Geenius assay is a suitable alternative for confirmatory HIV testing.

TEXT

International guidelines for the diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 recommend the use of multistep algorithms for identifying early HIV infections and for confirming and differentiating between established HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections (1, 2). The current diagnostic algorithm in our laboratory requires screening with a fourth-generation HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay followed by testing of reactive samples with the Chiron RIBA HIV-1/HIV-2 strip immunoblot assay (RIBA) and with the INNOTEST HIV antigen MAb test (Innogenetics) (HIV antigen test) (3). RIBA is a labor-intensive strip assay that relies on visual interpretation of reactivity to viral antigens and synthetic peptides (4). Bio-Rad Laboratories developed the Geenius HIV-1/2 confirmatory assay (Geenius assay) as a new single-use immunochromatographic assay designed for the confirmation and differentiation of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in whole blood, venous blood, serum, or plasma samples (5). The CE-marked Geenius assay has automatic reading and interpretation and can be completed within 30 min.

This study evaluated the Geenius assay as an alternative to RIBA using multiple sets of clinical samples and external quality control panels.

The Geenius assay was evaluated by testing 75 serum samples from patients known to be HIV positive or HIV negative, 79 consecutive routine samples with reactive Combo assay results, and 12 samples from external quality control panels and by comparing the results with RIBA results.

Seventy-five samples were retrospectively selected based on the HIV infection status of the patients, defined as positive (confirmed HIV-positive follow-up samples) or negative (one or more HIV-negative follow-up samples). This group included 55 single samples from 25 patients with established HIV infection (23 with HIV-1, 1 with HIV-2, and 1 with HIV-1/HIV-2 double infection), 25 HIV-negative individuals, and 5 patients in the acute phase of infection with ongoing HIV-1 seroconversion (based on a confirmed HIV antigen test). Paired serum samples (n = 20) from 10 patients with confirmed primary HIV infection (positive HIV antigen test and negative RIBA in the first sample and a confirmed HIV-positive follow-up sample using RIBA, the HIV antigen test, or HIV RNA) were tested with the Geenius assay.

Furthermore, 79 consecutive routine clinical samples, admitted to the laboratory from June to August 2013, were analyzed in parallel with RIBA and the Geenius assay. The results from follow-up testing were not available at the time of data compilation; therefore, the confirmed HIV status of most of these patients was unknown.

Finally, two external quality control panels obtained from Equalis in 2011 and 2013, consisting of 12 samples (4 HIV-1 positive, 2 HIV-2 positive, 6 HIV negative), were retested with the Geenius assay.

All selected serum samples were tested with the Geenius assay according to Bio-Rad's three-step protocol (6).

For the 75 retrospectively selected clinical samples, the Geenius assay and RIBA produced concordant results in 25 samples from patients with established HIV infection and in 24 of 25 samples from HIV-negative patients (Table 1). The only discordant result was obtained from a patient for whom the Geenius assay was indeterminate while RIBA was negative and supplemental and follow-up testing was negative. RIBA and the Geenius assay gave concordant results for 76 of 79 routine clinical samples concurrently tested by both assays (Table 1). Three samples were indeterminate in RIBA but positive (n = 1) or negative (n = 2) in the Geenius assay. The two samples with negative Geenius results tested negative for HIV antigen, and the sample with a positive Geenius result was not tested for HIV antigen. Follow-up testing was not completed by the time the data were collected for this study. Twelve samples from quality control panels were tested with the Geenius assay and gave results matching the anticipated results (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Comparison of results from the RIBA and Geenius HIV assays

We analyzed 25 samples from 15 patients in the acute phase of HIV-1 infection (Tables 1 and 2). Discordances between the Geenius and RIBA results were observed in nearly half of these samples (12 of 25). In these samples, RIBA was often indeterminate, whereas the Geenius assay was either negative or positive. No obvious difference in the sensitivities of the two assays was discovered. Thus, for 10 samples that were indeterminate in RIBA, the Geenius assay was positive for 5 samples and negative for 5 samples. Furthermore, one sample was negative in RIBA and positive in the Geenius assay, while a second sample was positive in RIBA and negative in the Geenius assay (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Results for seroconversion sample panel

In this evaluation, the Geenius assay proved to be a reliable alternative to RIBA and should perform satisfactorily when applied to our HIV diagnostic algorithm. Our results showed a high concordance between RIBA and Geenius assay results in terms of sensitivity and specificity for HIV-negative individuals and patients with established HIV infection. However, for patients with ongoing primary HIV infection, discordant results were more common, with the Geenius assay giving fewer indeterminate results than RIBA in this limited material. Similar results were reported by Malloch et al. (7), who compared the performance of the Geenius assay with that of the Bio-Rad multispot HIV-1/2 rapid test. The sensitivities of antibody-confirmatory tests in early infection are limited by the natural delay of antibody production, so early HIV infections still need to be diagnosed with Combo screening combined with HIV antigen and/or HIV RNA testing.

The Geenius assay has a simple protocol, bar-coded single-use test cassettes (which minimize the risk for sample-patient mix-ups), and an automated reader that allows for the objective evaluation of results, eliminating subjective laboratory personnel interpretations. Furthermore, the ease of use and short analysis time allow for daily implementation, which is more difficult to achieve with RIBA.

The following limitations of our study should be taken into consideration. The manufacturer of the Geenius assay recommends using samples that have not gone through five or more freeze-thaw cycles (6). Many of the samples in our seroconversion panel had gone through multiple freeze-thaw cycles for other studies, which may have influenced the results. We could not fully evaluate the ability of the Geenius assay to detect HIV-2 and double HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections, because such infections are very rare in Sweden. However, for the few clinical and external quality panel samples with HIV-2, the results matched the expected outcomes. The Geenius assay was developed to be flexible and allow for use with different sample types (e.g., whole blood, plasma), but we investigated the performance with serum samples only. However, Minard et al. (5) showed that the assay has a high specificity in alternative sample types (plasma, venous blood, capillary blood) as well.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank laboratory technician Lena Persson Ahlander for her excellent technical assistance.

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 7 March 2014.
    • Returned for modification 12 April 2014.
    • Accepted 9 June 2014.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 18 June 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Branson BM,
    2. Handsfield HH,
    3. Lampe MA,
    4. Janssen RS,
    5. Taylor AW,
    6. Lyss SB,
    7. Clark JE,
    8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    . 2006. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 55(RR-14):1–17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Styer LM,
    2. Sullivan TJ,
    3. Parker MM
    . 2011. Evaluation of an alternative supplemental testing strategy for HIV diagnosis by retrospective analysis of clinical HIV testing data. J. Clin. Virol. 52(Suppl 1):S35–S40. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2011.09.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Socialstyrelsen: Falldefinitioner. 2012. Publiceringsår: 2012 art nr 2012-5-11 s23. www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2012/2012-5-11.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kline RL,
    2. McNairn D,
    3. Holodniy M,
    4. Mole L,
    5. Margolis D,
    6. Blattner W,
    7. Quinn TC
    . 1996. Evaluation of Chiron HIV-1/HIV-2 recombinant immunoblot assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2650–2653.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Minard F,
    2. Guerrier L,
    3. Gadelle S,
    4. Chaumat P,
    5. Ferret M,
    6. Jego JM,
    7. Cardona M
    . 2013. Geenius HIV1/2 confirmatory assay performance evaluation, poster. 23rd Reg. Congr. Int. Soc. Blood Transfus. International Society for Blood Transfusion, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  6. 6.↵
    Bio-Rad Laboratories. 2013. Geenius HIV-1/-2 confirmatory assay kit insert. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Solna, Sweden.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Malloch L,
    2. Kadivar K,
    3. Putz J,
    4. Levett PN,
    5. Tang J,
    6. Hatchette TF,
    7. Kadkhoda K,
    8. Ng D,
    9. Ho J,
    10. Kim J
    . 2013. Comparative evaluation of the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1/2 confirmatory assay and the Bio-Rad Multispot HIV-1/2 rapid test as an alternative differentiation assay for CLSI M53 algorithm-I. J. Clin. Virol. 58:e85–e91. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2013.08.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1 and -2 Assay as a Confirmatory Assay for Detection of HIV-1 and -2 Antibodies
Anne Hawthorne Hallen, Agneta Samuelson, Margareta Nordin, Jan Albert, Gordana Bogdanovic
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Jul 2014, 21 (8) 1192-1194; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00153-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1 and -2 Assay as a Confirmatory Assay for Detection of HIV-1 and -2 Antibodies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1 and -2 Assay as a Confirmatory Assay for Detection of HIV-1 and -2 Antibodies
Anne Hawthorne Hallen, Agneta Samuelson, Margareta Nordin, Jan Albert, Gordana Bogdanovic
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Jul 2014, 21 (8) 1192-1194; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00153-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X