Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
Clinical Immunology

Strain-Specific Neutralizing Antibody Responses against Human Cytomegalovirus Envelope Glycoprotein N

Sunil K. Pati, Zdenek Novak, Misty Purser, Nitin Arora, Michael Mach, William J. Britt, Suresh B. Boppana
Sunil K. Pati
aDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zdenek Novak
aDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Misty Purser
aDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nitin Arora
aDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Mach
cInstitute for Clinical and Molecular Virology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William J. Britt
aDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
bDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
dDepartment of Neurobiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suresh B. Boppana
aDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
bDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00092-12
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) gM-gN complex is a major target of virus-neutralizing activity, and gN subtypes induce strain-specific antibodies. However, the biological significance of HCMV gN polymorphisms is not known. Neutralizing antibody responses against HCMV gN recombinant viruses were investigated at study entry in 80 healthy HCMV-seropositive women who were monitored for the appearance of new antibody specificities against linear strain-specific epitopes on glycoproteins gH and gB as evidence of HCMV reinfection. Neutralizing activity against all four gN recombinant viruses was seen in 74% of subjects, and 61% of subjects had strain-specific responses. Significantly fewer women (9/39 subjects [23%]) with serological evidence of reinfection had strain-specific neutralizing responses than the women without reinfection (21/41 subjects [51%]). Women with antibodies against at least one of the four linear gB and gH antigens at study entry had higher neutralizing titers against gN-1 (P = 0.006) and gN-2 (P = 0.007). Neutralizing titers of ≥400 against gN-3 (P = 0.043) and gN-4 (P = 0.049) at study entry were associated with longer times to serological evidence of reinfection. The findings demonstrate that HCMV gN elicits strain-specific neutralizing antibody responses and that broader anti-gN neutralizing activity may provide some protection from reinfection with a different virus strain.

INTRODUCTION

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a frequent cause of congenital infection and an important pathogen in immunocompromised individuals, including allograft recipients and patients with AIDS. HCMV clinical strains have been shown to be highly diverse, and the implications of this diversity among circulating viral strains with respect to pathogenicity and effective immune responses have not been defined (6–8, 14, 15, 17–19, 22). Although there is no consensus definition for distinguishing different HCMV strains, polymorphisms in some or all of the glycoproteins, including gB, gH, gL, gO, and gN, have been used to identify genomic variants or genotypes of HCMV (6–8, 15, 17, 19). Studies have documented the presence of multiple HCMV strains or genotypes in a variety of clinical settings, including immunocompetent hosts, transplant recipients, HIV/AIDS patients, and congenitally infected infants (12, 15, 18, 22). Infection with multiple HCMV strains could be due to simultaneous infection with multiple virus strains or to acquisition of virus strains over time. In allograft recipients, reinfection with a genetically distinct donor virus was associated with a higher risk of developing severe HCMV disease than that with reactivation of the endogenous virus (9). In renal transplant recipients, reinfection with a different HCMV strain was associated with adverse outcomes, including transplant rejection and CMV disease (10). In HCMV-seropositive women, reinfection with a different virus strain can lead to intrauterine transmission and symptomatic congenital infection (2, 27).

HCMV envelope glycoproteins, including gB, the gH-gL-gO complex, and the gM-gN complex, have been shown to be important targets of neutralizing antibodies and can induce strain-specific antibodies (4, 11, 23, 25). A recent report demonstrated strain-specific antibody responses, including virus-neutralizing activity, against gN (5). However, the role of strain-specific immune responses in providing protection from HCMV disease and resolution of HCMV infection has not been understood. The definition of strain-specific immune responses is important in the development of an effective HCMV vaccine. The objective of our study was to determine the occurrence and frequency of strain-specific antibody responses against gN in healthy seropositive individuals and to examine the association between strain-specific anti-gN responses and HCMV reinfection.

(This research was presented in part at the 36th Annual International Herpesvirus Workshop, Gdansk, Poland, 24 to 28 July 2011 [16a].)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects and specimens.The study subjects were derived from a previously described cohort of HCMV-seropositive women that included predominantly young, unmarried black women enrolled in the postpartum period in an HCMV reinfection study (21). The study participants enrolled in the reinfection study between February 2000 and January 2002 constituted the study population for the current study. There were no differences in demographic and exposure characteristics between the 80 study women and the entire cohort of 205 participants of the HCMV reinfection study (data not shown).

Cells and viruses.Recombinant HCMV strains containing different genomic variants of UL73 (gN) coding sequences (gN genotypes 2, 3, and 4) were constructed using the AD169 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) as described previously (5). The four gN recombinant viruses differed only with respect to the gN genotype. The gN congenic viruses were propagated in human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells cultured in minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. To obtain recombinant gN infectious virus stocks, infected cells were harvested, sonicated, and pelleted by centrifugation at 1,600 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. Supernatant containing the cell-free virus was collected and stored at −80°C.

Neutralization analysis.The assay for the determination of virus-neutralizing antibody titers was adapted from a previously described technique (11). Briefly, individual gN recombinant viral titers were adjusted to give 100 to 150 infectious foci per well in a 96-well microtiter plate. Serial serum dilutions (in the range of 1:100 to 1:6,400) in MEM with 2% guinea pig complement were incubated with individual gN recombinant virus preparations for 1.5 h at 37°C and plated in 96-well microtiter plates with confluent HFF cells. Infected HFF cells were stained with a monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against the immediate-early protein 1 of HCMV (3). Neutralizing titer was expressed as the highest dilution of serum resulting in a 50% reduction in infectivity compared to that in wells without sera.

Strain-specific antibodies against linear epitopes within gH and gB.HCMV strain-specific antibody responses were determined on the basis of polymorphisms in antibody binding sites within envelope glycoproteins gH and gB between the two prototypical laboratory strains of HCMV, i.e., AD169 and Towne (13, 16, 24). The detection of new antibody specificities to either epitope (AD169 or Towne) on gH or gB in follow-up serum samples was considered evidence of infection with a new virus strain (reinfection) during the study.

Data analyses.Statistical significance was determined using the χ2, Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum test where appropriate. All data analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Study population.Most of the study participants were black (88%) and unmarried (90%). The mean age of the subjects was 18.35 ± 1.54 years. There were no differences in demographic and exposure characteristics between the 39 women with serologic evidence of HCMV reinfection during the study and the remaining 41 women without evidence of reinfection (data not shown).

Virus-neutralizing activity.Overall, neutralizing antibodies against all four recombinant viruses containing individual gN coding sequences were observed at study entry in 59/80 (74%) seropositive individuals. The neutralizing titers against the recombinant viruses ranged from 100 to 6,400. The proportions of individuals with detectable neutralizing responses against gN-1, gN-2, gN-3, and gN-4 recombinant viruses were 75%, 87.5%, 91.2%, and 81.2%, respectively. Forty-nine study individuals had strain-specific anti-gM/gN neutralizing antibodies at study entry, and of those, 27 had serological evidence of reinfection as defined by the appearance of new antibody specificities against the strain-specific gB or gH antigen during follow-up. No significant differences in the median neutralizing antibody titers at study entry were observed between women with evidence of HCMV reinfection and those without reinfection during follow-up.

Strain-specific neutralizing antibody responses.A strain-specific neutralizing antibody response was defined as a >3-fold difference in neutralizing titers against at least two different gN recombinant viruses in a serum specimen (5). Overall, sera from 61% (49/80 women) of the study women showed evidence of strain-specific virus neutralization activity against recombinant viruses. When the responses against individual recombinant viruses were analyzed, more subjects had strain-specific neutralizing antibodies against the gN-2 virus (45%), followed by the gN-3 virus (40%). Only 16% and 11% of samples showed strain-specific responses against the gN-1 and gN-4 viruses, respectively. Strain-specific responses against more than one gN recombinant virus were seen in about a third (30/80 women) of the study women. When strain-specific neutralizing activity against any of the four gN recombinant viruses was examined at study entry in women with and without serologic evidence of HCMV reinfection during follow-up, significantly fewer women with reinfection (9/39 women [23%]) had strain-specific responses against recombinant gN viruses than women without reinfection (21/41 women [51%]; P = 0.009). In addition, 56% (23/41 women) of women without serologic evidence of reinfection had strain-specific neutralizing antibodies against gN-3, compared to 23% (9/39 women) of those with reinfection (P = 0.003).

Association between neutralizing titers and antibodies against linear strain-specific epitopes on gB and gH.In a previous study of HCMV reinfections in 205 healthy seropositive women, including the 80 women examined in the current study, responses against the strain-specific linear antibody binding sites within envelope glycoproteins gB and gH of the two prototypic laboratory strains of HCMV, AD169 and Towne, were determined (21). We compared neutralizing responses against the four gN recombinant viruses with the presence of antibodies against one or more (39/80 women) of these antigens or against none of the four strain-specific linear epitopes on gB and gH at study entry (Table 1). Those with antibodies against at least one of the four gB and gH antigens at study entry had higher median neutralizing titers against gN-1 (P = 0.006) and gN-2 (P = 0.007) viruses (Fig. 1). Significantly more women with antibodies against one or more strain-specific gB and gH antigens had neutralizing titers of ≥800 against gN-1 (17/39 women versus 6/41 women; P = 0.009) and gN-2 (17/39 women versus 8/41 women; P = 0.03) recombinant viruses than those with antibody responses against none of the gB or gH antigens. The mean duration to serologic evidence of reinfection (appearance of new antibody specificities) was significantly longer for women with neutralizing titers of ≥400 against ADgN-3 (P = 0.043) and ADgN-4 (P = 0.049) at study entry (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Comparison of neutralizing titers against gN and the presence or absence of antibodies against linear strain-specific epitopes within gH and gB

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

Neutralizing titers against gN recombinant viruses according to the presence of strain-specific antibodies against the four linear epitopes within gH and gB at study entry (baseline). 0, absence of antibodies against strain-specific linear epitopes; 1, presence of antibodies against at least one of the four antigens; >1, presence of antibodies against more than one antigen.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Neutralizing titers against gN recombinant viruses at study entry and time to appearance of new antibody specificities against linear epitopes within gH and gB

DISCUSSION

The importance of antiviral neutralizing antibodies in protective immune responses against infectious agents, including viruses, has been shown in experimental systems (28). Envelope glycoproteins of HCMV, including gB, gH, and gN, have been shown to be important targets of antiviral antibody responses, including virus neutralization activity (4, 23, 25). Both strain-common and strain-specific epitopes within gB and gH have been described (13, 24). In a more recent study, Burkhardt et al. used recombinant viruses that differed only in the gN genotype to demonstrate that sera from about 30% of seropositive individuals contained HCMV strain-specific neutralizing antibodies directed against gN (5). Our study, utilizing the same recombinant viruses, demonstrated that the majority of HCMV-seropositive individuals exhibited strain-specific neutralizing antibody responses against gN. The larger proportion of individuals with strain-specific neutralizing antibodies in our study could be due to differences in the study population. In a previous study from our laboratory, we demonstrated that the majority of study subjects were infected with multiple viruses (15). In addition, the current study included a larger number of HCMV-seropositive individuals than the 20 subjects in the study of Burkhardt et al. (5). We found that sera from some seropositive women neutralized all four recombinant viruses with comparable efficiencies, while clear differences in neutralizing capacity against individual gN recombinant viruses were seen in sera from others. This finding confirms that the gM-gN complex contains strain-common as well as strain-specific epitopes. Of the sera from the 80 women in this study, most (74%) showed evidence of neutralizing activity against all four gN recombinant viruses. However, responses against individual gN recombinant viruses varied, indicating strain-specific neutralizing activity.

A strain-specific neutralizing response was defined as a >3-fold difference in the titers of neutralizing activity against at least two different gN recombinant viruses in a serum sample. Overall, 61% (49/80 samples) of samples showed a strain-specific response to at least one of the four recombinant viruses. An examination of the responses against individual gN recombinant viruses showed that the highest neutralizing titers were seen against gN-2 (45%), followed by gN-3 (40%). It was also observed that women without serological evidence of acquisition of a different HCMV strain (reinfection) had higher strain-specific responses against multiple gN types than did women with evidence of reinfection. Since the recombinant viruses differed only with respect to gN, the findings of our study suggest that gN constitutes one of the major determinants for induction of a strain-specific neutralizing antibody response.

When the neutralizing antibody response was compared to the presence of antibodies against the linear strain-specific epitopes on gH and gB, we found that those with antibodies to at least one of the four antigens had significantly higher neutralizing titers against gN-1 and gN-2 recombinant viruses. In addition, individuals with antibodies against more than one of the gH and gB antigens had higher titers of neutralizing antibodies against gN-1, gN-2, and gN-3 recombinant viruses. Since the presence of antibodies against two or more strain-specific linear epitopes within gH and gB indicated infection with multiple HCMV strains, our finding suggests that infection with multiple HCMV strains results in higher titers of neutralizing antibodies.

It is known that variations in surface glycoproteins in influenza virus (1) and HIV (26) have profound effects on antibody binding and neutralization. Since HCMV is a DNA virus, the sequence variation is assumed to be lower than that observed in RNA viruses. However, a recent study by Renzette et al. demonstrated that the genomic variability in HCMV is comparable to that in many RNA viruses (20). Since gN is a surface glycoprotein, it is possible that immune pressure may result in genomic variation. It was suggested in the study by Burkhardt et al. that the difference in neutralization activity against gN genomic variants could be due to the amount of glycosylation in the gN protein (5). Although the appearance of new antibody specificities against strain-specific gB and gH epitopes has been considered serologic evidence of HCMV reinfection, it is possible that the evolution of new virus strains over time may lead to the generation of new antibodies (2, 21). Extensive virus diversity in infants with congenital infection and in allograft recipients has been demonstrated by utilizing deep-sequencing technology. Explanations for the extent of virus diversity could include coinfection with multiple virus strains, sequential reinfection with different viruses over time, and/or evolution of new virus strains from the original virus over time.

The mean time to serologic evidence of reinfection was significantly shorter for women with neutralizing titers of <400 against gN-3 and gN-4 recombinant viruses at study entry than for those with titers of ≥400, suggesting that a larger neutralizing antibody response against gN delays infection with a different virus strain in seropositive individuals. However, identification of reinfection with a different HCMV strain was based on the appearance of new antibody specificities against strain-specific epitopes within gH and gB. Therefore, it is possible that the frequency of reinfection could have been underestimated in the study population because of the use of a limited number of antigens. Although higher neutralizing titers against gN-2 and gN-3 were observed, the distribution of gN genotypes of the circulating virus strains in the population is not known. Since neutralizing antibody responses against gN recombinant viruses were examined only at study entry, it is unknown whether virus-neutralizing activity against gN changes with respect to the titer and specificity at the time of HCMV reinfection.

In summary, the findings of our study demonstrate the presence of strain-specific neutralizing antibodies in a majority of HCMV-seropositive individuals. In addition, higher titers of neutralizing activity against gN in women with broadly reactive antibody responses, as measured by the presence of antibodies against strain-specific linear epitopes within gH and gB, suggest that infection with multiple HCMV strains leads to higher neutralizing activity. Furthermore, the longer time to serological evidence of reinfection for women with higher neutralizing titers against gN-3 and gN-4 recombinant viruses at study entry suggests that neutralizing antibodies against gN may provide protection against infection with a different HCMV strain in seropositive individuals. Although the exact protective nature of the antibody response against gN needs to be defined, inclusion of gN as one of the antigens in HCMV subunit vaccines could enhance protection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC04163 to S.B.B.) and by the General Clinical Research Center (M01 R00032).

No authors have any conflict of interest to disclose.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 13 February 2012.
    • Returned for modification 13 March 2012.
    • Accepted 31 March 2012.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 4 April 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Abe Y,
    2. et al
    . 2004. Effect of the addition of oligosaccharides on the biological activities and antigenicity of influenza A/H3N2 virus hemagglutinin. J. Virol. 78:9605–9611.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Boppana SB,
    2. Rivera LB,
    3. Fowler KB,
    4. Mach M,
    5. Britt WJ
    . 2001. Intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus to infants of women with preconceptional immunity. N. Engl. J. Med. 344:1366–1371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Boppana SB,
    2. Smith RJ,
    3. Stagno S,
    4. Britt WJ
    . 1992. Evaluation of a microtiter plate fluorescent-antibody assay for rapid detection of human cytomegalovirus infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:721–723.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Britt WJ,
    2. Vugler L,
    3. Butfiloski EJ,
    4. Stephens EB
    . 1990. Cell surface expression of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) gp55-116 (gB): use of HCMV-recombinant vaccinia virus-infected cells in analysis of the human neutralizing antibody response. J. Virol. 64:1079–1085.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Burkhardt C,
    2. Himmelein S,
    3. Britt W,
    4. Winkler T,
    5. Mach M
    . 2009. Glycoprotein N subtypes of human cytomegalovirus induce a strain-specific antibody response during natural infection. J. Gen. Virol. 90:1951–1961.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chou SW
    . 1990. Differentiation of cytomegalovirus strains by restriction analysis of DNA sequences amplified from clinical specimens. J. Infect. Dis. 162:738–742.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Coaquette A,
    2. et al
    . 2004. Mixed cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B genotypes in immunocompromised patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:155–161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Fries BC,
    2. Chou S,
    3. Boeckh M,
    4. Torok-Storb B
    . 1994. Frequency distribution of cytomegalovirus envelope glycoprotein genotypes in bone marrow transplant recipients. J. Infect. Dis. 169:769–774.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Grundy JE,
    2. et al
    . 1988. Symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection in seropositive kidney recipients: reinfection with donor virus rather than reactivation of recipient virus. Lancet ii:132–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ishibashi K,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Association of the outcome of renal transplantation with antibody response to cytomegalovirus strain-specific glycoprotein H epitopes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45:60–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Klein M,
    2. Schoppel K,
    3. Amvrossiadis N,
    4. Mach M
    . 1999. Strain-specific neutralization of human cytomegalovirus isolates by human sera. J. Virol. 73:878–886.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Leach CT,
    2. et al
    . 1994. A longitudinal study of cytomegalovirus infection in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive homosexual men: molecular epidemiology and association with disease progression. J. Infect. Dis. 170:293–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Meyer H,
    2. Sundqvist VA,
    3. Pereira L,
    4. Mach M
    . 1992. Glycoprotein gp116 of human cytomegalovirus contains epitopes for strain-common and strain-specific antibodies. J. Gen. Virol. 73:2375–2383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Murphy E,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Coding potential of laboratory and clinical strains of human cytomegalovirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:14976–14981.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Novak Z,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Cytomegalovirus strain diversity in seropositive women. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:882–886.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Novak Z,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method for detection of cytomegalovirus strain-specific antibody responses. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16:288–290.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 16a.↵
    1. Pati SK,
    2. et al
    . 2011. Abstr. 36th Annu. Int. Herpesvirus Workshop, Gdansk, Poland, 24 to 28 July 2011, abstr 5.20.
  18. 17.↵
    1. Pignatelli S,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein N (gpUL73-gN) genomic variants: identification of a novel subgroup, geographical distribution and evidence of positive selective pressure. J. Gen. Virol. 84:647–655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 18.↵
    1. Puchhammer-Stockl E,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Emergence of multiple cytomegalovirus strains in blood and lung of lung transplant recipients. Transplantation 81:187–194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 19.↵
    1. Rasmussen L,
    2. Geissler A,
    3. Cowan C,
    4. Chase A,
    5. Winters M
    . 2002. The genes encoding the gCIII complex of human cytomegalovirus exist in highly diverse combinations in clinical isolates. J. Virol. 76:10841–10848.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 20.↵
    1. Renzette N,
    2. Bhattacharjee B,
    3. Jensen JD,
    4. Gibson L,
    5. Kowalik TF
    . 2011. Extensive genome-wide variability of human cytomegalovirus in congenitally infected infants. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001344. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 21.↵
    1. Ross SA,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Cytomegalovirus reinfections in healthy seroimmune women. J. Infect. Dis. 201:386–389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 22.↵
    1. Ross SA,
    2. et al
    . 2011. Mixed infection and strain diversity in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 204:1003–1007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 23.↵
    1. Shimamura M,
    2. Mach M,
    3. Britt WJ
    . 2006. Human cytomegalovirus infection elicits a glycoprotein M (gM)/gN-specific virus-neutralizing antibody response. J. Virol. 80:4591–4600.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 24.↵
    1. Urban M,
    2. Britt W,
    3. Mach M
    . 1992. The dominant linear neutralizing antibody-binding site of glycoprotein gp86 of human cytomegalovirus is strain specific. J. Virol. 66:1303–1311.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 25.↵
    1. Urban M,
    2. Klein M,
    3. Britt WJ,
    4. Hassfurther E,
    5. Mach M
    . 1996. Glycoprotein H of human cytomegalovirus is a major antigen for the neutralizing humoral immune response. J. Gen. Virol. 77:1537–1547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 26.↵
    1. Wei X,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Antibody neutralization and escape by HIV-1. Nature 422:307–312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 27.↵
    1. Yamamoto AY,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Human cytomegalovirus reinfection is associated with intrauterine transmission in a highly cytomegalovirus-immune maternal population. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 202:297.e1-297.e8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 28.↵
    1. Zinkernagel RM,
    2. Hengartner H
    . 2006. Protective ‘immunity' by pre-existent neutralizing antibody titers and preactivated T cells but not by so-called ‘immunological memory'.Immunol. Rev. 211:310–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Strain-Specific Neutralizing Antibody Responses against Human Cytomegalovirus Envelope Glycoprotein N
Sunil K. Pati, Zdenek Novak, Misty Purser, Nitin Arora, Michael Mach, William J. Britt, Suresh B. Boppana
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology May 2012, 19 (6) 909-913; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00092-12

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Strain-Specific Neutralizing Antibody Responses against Human Cytomegalovirus Envelope Glycoprotein N
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Strain-Specific Neutralizing Antibody Responses against Human Cytomegalovirus Envelope Glycoprotein N
Sunil K. Pati, Zdenek Novak, Misty Purser, Nitin Arora, Michael Mach, William J. Britt, Suresh B. Boppana
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology May 2012, 19 (6) 909-913; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00092-12
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X