Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
CLINICAL LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY

Identification of Anti-Alpha Toxin Monoclonal Antibodies That Reduce the Severity of Staphylococcus aureus Dermonecrosis and Exhibit a Correlation between Affinity and Potency

C. Tkaczyk, L. Hua, R. Varkey, Y. Shi, L. Dettinger, R. Woods, A. Barnes, R. S. MacGill, S. Wilson, P. Chowdhury, C. K. Stover, B. R. Sellman
C. Tkaczyk
aDepartment of Infectious Disease, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Hua
aDepartment of Infectious Disease, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Varkey
bAntibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Shi
aDepartment of Infectious Disease, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Dettinger
bAntibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Woods
bAntibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Barnes
bAntibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. S. MacGill
aDepartment of Infectious Disease, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Wilson
bAntibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Chowdhury
bAntibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. K. Stover
aDepartment of Infectious Disease, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. R. Sellman
aDepartment of Infectious Disease, MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.05589-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus alpha toxin (AT) is an important virulence determinant and may be a valid target for immunoprophylaxis against staphylococcal disease. Here we report the identification of potent inhibitory anti-AT monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) derived using B-cell hybridoma technology from VelocImmune mice engineered to produce IgG with a human variable domain. A small panel of inhibitory MAbs blocked AT-mediated lysis of rabbit red blood cells, A549 human lung epithelial cells, and THP-1 human monocytic cells, in a dose-dependent manner. Binding studies indicated that these MAbs recognize a similar epitope on AT and exhibit dissociation constants (KD) ranging from 0.50 to 15 nM. In an S. aureus dermonecrosis model, mice passively immunized with anti-AT inhibitory MAbs exhibited significant reductions of lesion size relative to mice treated with an irrelevant IgG control. Interestingly, there was a correlation between MAb affinity for a single epitope, the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) in the AT hemolytic assay, and lesion size reduction in the dermonecrosis model. A representative high-affinity MAb, 2A3.1, was demonstrated to significantly reduce lesion size following infection with three different clinical isolates (USA300, CC30, and CC5). Taken together, these results indicate that in vitro potency of anti-AT MAbs predicts in vivo potency in this model, supporting their continued preclinical evaluation as molecules for immunoprophylaxis against staphylococcal skin and soft tissue infections caused by diverse clinical isolates.

INTRODUCTION

Regardless of origin (the community or hospital), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are often difficult to treat, due in part to the limited availability of safe and effective antibiotics. Treatment is further complicated by an increase in the level of vancomycin tolerance in S. aureus strains following vancomycin therapy (10). The difficulty of treatment and the slowed progress in the identification of new antibiotics necessitate the development of new approaches to antibacterial prophylaxis and therapy (29, 32). One alternate strategy being explored is the use of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against a surface determinant on the pathogen and/or virulence factors produced by the invading pathogen to be used in prophylaxis or as adjunctive therapy with antibiotics (13, 14, 22, 30, 36). Antigens for which there are promising preclinical data on the use of MAbs against S. aureus include IsaA, IsdB, ClfA, and alpha toxin (AT). Antibodies against IsaA, IsdB, and ClfA bind to the surface of bacteria and can limit disease by either promoting opsonophagocytic killing (OPK) or inhibiting the function of the targeted protein (e.g., fibrinogen binding or heme acquisition). In contrast, passive immunization with MAbs against a soluble protein toxin such as AT does not target the bacteria directly but acts by inhibiting a virulence mechanism important for staphylococcal disease (30). Toxins as targets for immunoprophylaxis have been successful for decades as part of vaccines or passive immunotherapy against bacterial diseases such as diphtheria, tetanus, and botulism (1, 8, 34). Such an approach targeting AT may be possible for S. aureus as well.

AT is a cytolytic pore-forming toxin that is conserved among S. aureus clinical isolates and has been shown to play a role in pneumonia, dermonecrosis, endocarditis, and sepsis (3, 5, 17, 18). AT is secreted as a 33-kDa soluble monomeric protein that binds to ADAM10 on cell membranes (38). After binding, AT undergoes a conformational change resulting in the formation of a heptameric transmembrane β-barrel leading to cell lysis, inflammation, and tissue damage (2, 9, 28, 38). At sublytic concentrations, AT activates ADAM10 metalloprotease activity on epithelial cells, leading to cleavage of E-cadherin and disruption of the epithelial barrier (16). Inhibition of AT function could therefore limit S. aureus-associated pathology and disease. Targeting of AT for prophylaxis of S. aureus infections was reported as early as the mid-1900s, with limited success (11, 27, 35). More recently, passive and active immunization against AT has been shown to afford protection in murine models of pneumonia, dermonecrosis, and sepsis, validating its potential as a target for immunoprophylaxis against these infections (6, 17, 24, 30). Herein we describe the identification of anti-AT MAbs that are potent inhibitors of AT function and provide protection against diverse S. aureus isolates in a murine dermonecrosis model. Their in vitro 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) and binding affinities correlate with their potency in the murine dermonecrosis model, suggesting that potency is linked to affinity for these MAbs. Taken together, these results support the continued investigation of potent, high-affinity AT MAbs for the prevention of staphylococcal skin and soft tissue infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.Strains NRS382 (USA100, clonal complex 5 [CC5]) and NRS261 (CC30) were obtained from the Network on Antibiotic Resistance (NARSA). Strains Wood (ATCC 10832) and FPR3757 (BAA-1556; USA300) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). SF8300 (USA300) was generously provided by Binh Diep (University of California at San Francisco).

Cloning and expression of wild-type S. aureus AT and nonhemolytic H35L mutant.The wild-type AT gene (hla) was amplified from S. aureus USA300 FPR3757 (BAA-1556; ATCC) genomic DNA by PCR using the primers ATATATGAGCTCGCAGATTCTGATATTAATATTAAAACC and ATATATAAGCTTAATTTGTCATTTCTTCTTTTTCCC and Herculase II polymerase (Agilent Technologies). The resultant fragment was digested with SacI and HindIII and ligated into the pCold II DNA vector (TaKaRa Bio USA) in frame with an N-terminal 6×His tag. The H35L mutant (ATH35L) was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis of the wild-type gene, using a QuikChange II XL site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies) and the following mutagenic primers: GATAAAGAAAATGGCATGCTCAAAAAAGTATTTTATAGTTTTATC and GATAAAACTATAAAATACTTTTTTGAGCATGCCATTTTCTTTATC. The sequences of wild-type AT and the ATH35L mutant were confirmed by automated DNA sequencing. Expression of the wild type and the H35L mutant was accomplished with the BL21 strain of Escherichia coli as the host. A 50-ml overnight culture grown in LB plus carbenicillin was diluted 1:10 in a 500-ml culture and grown at 37°C to an A600 of 0.5. The culture was shifted to 15°C for 30 min, and IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside; Invitrogen) was added to achieve a final concentration of 100 mM. The culture was incubated for an additional 24 h at 15°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and stored at −20°C.

Purification of rAT-His.Bacterial cell pellets were thawed on ice and resuspended in Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) buffer A (20 mM sodium phosphate [Sigma], pH 7.2, 300 mM NaCl [Sigma]). Cells were lysed in a microfluidizer (Microfluidics model M-110P) at 20,000 lb/in2, and the crude lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 27,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Following 0.2-μm filtration, the supernatant was loaded onto a 5-ml Ni-NTA Superflow column (Qiagen) equilibrated with Ni-NTA buffer A. Recombinant, His-tagged alpha toxin (rAT-His) was eluted with a 300 mM and 500 mM imidazole step gradient (into tubes containing EDTA at a final concentration of 1 mM) and dialyzed into SP buffer A1 (50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 25 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA [Sigma]). Dialysates were loaded onto a 5-ml HiTrap SP Sepharose FF column (GE Healthcare) in SP buffer A1, and rAT-His was eluted with a step gradient to 1 M NaCl. Fractions containing rAT-His were dialyzed into 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2, with 1 mM EDTA, and aliquots were frozen at −80°C. The same methods were employed to purify rATH35L-His.

Purification of nAT from S. aureus.S. aureus Wood was grown overnight with shaking (250 rpm) at 37°C in tryptic soy broth (TSB). Culture supernatant was harvested by centrifugation and then brought to 75% saturation with solid ammonium sulfate. After stirring for 3 h at 4°C, the precipitate was captured by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 45 min, resuspended in SP buffer A2 (25 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.2, 20 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), and dialyzed against SP buffer A2 overnight at 4°C, with one exchange. The soluble dialysate was filtered (0.2 μm) and loaded onto a 10-ml SP Sepharose FF column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with SP buffer A2. Bound native alpha toxin (nAT) was eluted with a linear gradient to 0.3 M NaCl, followed by steps to 0.5 and 1 M NaCl. Fractions containing nAT were pooled and dialyzed overnight into PBS, pH 7.2, containing 1 mM EDTA. For final polishing, the dialysate was loaded onto a HiPrep Sephacryl S-200 high-resolution column (GE Healthcare) at a flow rate of 1.3 ml/min in 1× PBS, pH 7.2, with 1 mM EDTA. Fractions containing nAT were pooled and stored at −80°C.

Immunization and hybridoma generation.All in vivo work was reviewed and approved by our Institutional Animal Care and use committee. Eight-week-old VelocImmune mice received 5 rounds of subcutaneous injections of rATH35L-His at multiple sites, following the RIMMS immunization protocol (19). Mice were immunized over a course of 13 days at intervals of 2 to 3 days. For each round of immunization, rATH35L-His was emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant or incomplete Freund's adjuvant plus TiterMax Gold (Sigma) adjuvant and injected bilaterally at the nape of the neck, axilla, calf, and groin. Test bleeds were collected on day 13 and assayed in an antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). On day 17, mice were given a prefusion boost intraperitoneally. Lymph node lymphocytes and splenocytes were fused with a myeloma partner (P3x63) to generate stable hybridomas (20).

Expression and purification of chimeric anti-AT MAbs.Clarified murine hybridoma supernatants (∼5 liters at 30 to 50 mg/liter) were concentrated by tangential-flow filtration. The concentrated supernatants were then passed over five 5-ml protein G HiTrap HP columns (GE Healthcare) in sequence, and the bound IgG was eluted with 50 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 11.0, and neutralized to ∼pH 7.0 with 1 M phosphoric acid. The neutralized material was loaded onto two 1-ml HiTrap Q FF (GE Healthcare) columns in sequence. The IgG-containing flowthrough was collected and dialyzed into PBS, pH 7.2.

Neutralization of hemolytic activity.Anti-AT MAbs were added to a 96-well plate at 80 μg/ml in PBS and the samples serially diluted (2-fold) in PBS to a final volume of 50 μl. A nonspecific human IgG1, R347 (anti-HIV gp120), was included as a control throughout these studies. Twenty-five microliters of each MAb dilution was mixed with 25 μl of rAT-His in a 96-well round-bottom plate, followed by the addition of 50 μl 5% rabbit red blood cells (RBC; PelFreeze Biological) in PBS, for a final rAT-His concentration of 0.1 μg/ml. Control wells contained RBC with or without AT. Plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C, the intact cells were pelleted by centrifugation, 50-μl supernatants were transferred to a new 96-well plate, and the A450 was measured in a spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices). Neutralizing activity was calculated relative to lysis with RBC plus rAT-His alone, as follows: % inhibition = 100 − {100 × [(A450 nAT+MAb)/(A450 nAT, no MAb)]}.

Neutralization of A549 and THP-1 cell lysis.THP-1 and A549 cells were maintained in RPMI medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with nonessential amino acids, 2 mM glutamine, and 10% fetal bovine serum in a 5% CO2 37°C incubator. Anti-AT MAbs were added to a 96-well plate at 80 μg/ml in RPMI medium, and the samples were serially diluted (2-fold) in RPMI medium. A nonspecific IgG, R347, was included as a negative control. Twenty-five microliters of each MAb dilution was mixed with 25 μl nAT (final concentrations for THP-1 and A549 cells, 1.5 and 20 μg/ml, respectively), followed by the addition of 50 μl RPMI medium-washed cells (106 cells/ml in RPMI medium with 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS]) in a 96-well plate, for a final volume of 100 μl. Control wells of cells with and without nAT were included. Plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 3 h and then centrifuged, and 50 μl of supernatant was transferred to a new 96-well plate. Cell lysis was measured as the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), using a Cytotox 96 nonradioactive assay kit (Promega) following the manufacturer's protocol. Background LDH was subtracted from each well, and the inhibition of LDH release was calculated as follows: % inhibition = 100 − {100 × [(A590 nAT+MAb)/(A590 nAT, no MAb)]}.

Erythrocyte ghost receptor binding and oligomerization.Erythrocyte ghosts were prepared by incubating 5 ml of washed and packed RBC in 500 ml of lysis buffer (5 mM phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) overnight at 4°C, with constant stirring (31). The ghosts were removed by centrifugation at 15,000 × g, washed three times with lysis buffer, washed in PBS, and resuspended in a final volume of 3 ml PBS.

To assess binding of nAT to cell membranes, RBC ghosts were diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of approximately 0.2 in PBS, and 50 μl was used to coat 1/2-well 96-well flat-bottom plates (Costar) and incubated overnight at 4°C. The liquid was removed from the plates, and the wells were blocked with 100 μl of 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, pH 7.4, for 2 h at 4°C and then washed three times with PBS. A 10-fold molar excess of IgG was mixed with nAT at 3 μg/ml, and 50 μl was added to the blocked plates. The plates were incubated at 4°C for 2 h and then washed three times with PBS. Biotinylated rabbit anti-AT IgG was added to the wells at 1 μg/ml, incubated at 4°C for 1 h, washed three times, and incubated for 1 h at 4°C with streptavidin peroxidase conjugate (1:30,000; Jackson ImmunoResearch). The wells were washed three times and developed with Sure Blue Reserve (KPL, Inc.). The A450 was read using a plate reader (Molecular Devices), and the % AT bound was calculated as follows: % AT bound = 100 × (A450 AT+IgG/A450 AT alone).

Inhibition of AT heptamer formation was measured by mixing purified IgG with purified nAT (0.5 μg) at a 5:1 molar ratio, along with 5 μl RBC ghosts and PBS to a final volume of 22 μl, and incubating the reaction mix at 37°C for 45 min. The samples were then solubilized in 5 μl SDS-PAGE sample buffer (Invitrogen) for 5 min at 37°C, and 10 μl was subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 4 to 12% precast polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen). The separated proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose, blocked for 10 min with casein blocker in PBS (Thermo Scientific), and probed with rabbit anti-AT IgG (2 μg/ml) for 2 h at room temperature with constant shaking. The AT bands were detected following a 1-h incubation with an alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Caltag Laboratories) and developed using a 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate–nitroblue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT) membrane phosphatase substrate system (KPL, Inc.).

Measurement of kinetic rate and binding constants.Kinetic rate constants (kon and koff) for binding of the anti-AT IgGs to purified nAT were measured by employing an IgG capture assay on a BIAcore 3000 instrument. Rat anti-mouse IgG was immobilized on a CM5 sensor chip with a final surface density of ∼2,500 resonance units (RUs). A reference flow cell surface was also prepared on this sensor chip by use of the identical immobilization protocol, but without nAT. Anti-AT IgGs were prepared at 20 nM in instrument buffer (HBS-EP buffer; 0.01 M HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, and 0.005% P-20), along with 2-fold serial dilutions of nAT (0.78 nM to 50 nM) in instrument buffer. A sequential approach was utilized for kinetic measurements. Each anti-AT IgG was first injected over the capture and reference surfaces, at a flow rate of 50 μl/min. Once the binding of the captured IgG stabilized, a single concentration of the nAT protein was injected over both surfaces, at a flow rate of 50 μl/min. The resulting binding response curves yielded the association phase data. Following the injection of nAT, the flow was then switched back to instrument buffer for 10 min to permit the collection of dissociation phase data, followed by a 1-min pulse of 10 mM glycine, pH 1.5, to regenerate the IgG capture surface on the chip. Binding responses from duplicate injections of each concentration of nAT were recorded against all anti-AT IgGs. In addition, several buffer injections were interspersed throughout the injection series. Select buffer injections were used along with the reference cell responses to correct the raw data sets for injection artifacts and/or nonspecific binding interactions, commonly referred to as “double referencing” (26). Fully corrected binding data were then globally fit to a 1:1 binding model (BIAevaluation 4.1 software; BIAcore, Inc.) that included a term to correct for mass transport-limited binding, should it be detected. These analyses determined the kinetic rate constants kon and koff, from which the apparent dissociation constant (KD) was calculated as koff/kon.

Epitope competition experiments.Epitope competition assays were performed with a ForteBio Octet 384 instrument using streptavidin sensors and 384-well slanted-bottom plates (ForteBio, Menlo Park, CA). All reagents were diluted in ForteBio kinetics buffer (PBS plus 0.002% Tween 20 plus 0.1 mg/ml BSA). Native AT, biotinylated with a FluoReporter mini-biotin-XX protein labeling kit (Invitrogen) and retaining full hemolytic activity, was captured at 1 μg/ml, and then MAb 1 (500 nM) was allowed to bind. Finally, binding was measured with MAb 2 (500 nM) in combination with MAb 1, also at 500 nM, so as to maintain MAb 1 equilibrium. All steps were performed for 400 s at 1,000 rpm, with a 3-mm sensor offset and a 0.6-Hz sensitivity.

The final MAb 2-plus-MAb 1 binding step was analyzed using ForteBio's analysis software to determine R equilibrium (change in nanometers [nm] at equilibrium). Percent relative binding was calculated using the following formula: % binding = [(MAb 2 + MAb 1 binding − 0% control binding)/(100% MAb 1 control binding − 0% control binding)] × 100. The 100% and 0% controls were the binding of the R347 negative-control MAb and MAb 1, respectively, followed by R347 plus MAb 1, both at 500 nM. For the five MAbs (four anti-AT MAbs plus R347 negative control), all possible combinations of MAb 1 and MAb 2 were tested, and the assay was repeated three times.

Murine dermonecrosis model.Groups of five 6- to 8-week-old female BALB/c mice (Harlan) were shaved on the back and administered 0.5 ml IgG by intraperitoneal injection at the concentrations indicated. Twenty-four hours later, the mice were infected with 50 μl of a bacterial suspension (1 × 108 CFU S. aureus Wood, NRS382, NRS261, or SF8300 in PBS) by intradermal injection. The animals were monitored twice daily for signs of infection, and abscess size was measured once daily. The areas of the lesions were calculated using the following formula: area = length × width. Statistical significance was determined using analysis of variance and Dunnett's posttest.

RESULTS

Monoclonal antibody generation.Anti-AT MAbs were generated in VelocImmune mice immunized with His-tagged, recombinant, nonhemolytic ATH35L (rATH35L-His). Hybridomas produced from VelocImmune mice express human-mouse chimeric antibodies with fully human variable regions and murine constant domains. These chimeric antibodies are easily converted to fully human IgG by genetic replacement of the murine sequences with human constant domains (4). Initially, >1,800 hybridoma supernatants were found to contain IgGs that bound rAT-His by antigen ELISA. The hybridoma supernatants which exhibited binding to rAT-His were screened for inhibition of rAT-His-mediated lysis of rabbit RBC, whereby the pool of hybridomas expressing functional IgGs was reduced to ∼250. The hybridoma supernatants were then normalized for IgG levels and their inhibitory activities compared. The 12 most potent rAT-His inhibitors were selected for limited dilution cloning and small-scale IgG expression and purification.

Inhibition of cytolytic activity.The inhibitory activities of the 12 purified anti-AT IgG MAbs were compared in a hemolytic assay. The MAbs were each titrated from 80 to 0.07 μg/ml in the presence of constant amounts of nAT and RBC. Surprisingly, only 6 (2A3.1, 10A7.5, 11D12.1, 12B8.19, 15B6.3, and 28F6.1) of the 12 purified MAbs inhibited nAT-mediated RBC lysis (Fig. 1). All 6 inhibitory MAbs were determined by ELISA to be IgG1, with the exception of 15B6.3, which was IgG3 (data not shown). The 6 MAbs that did not inhibit nAT lysis were confirmed by ELISA to retain binding to rAT-His but not to nAT or another 6×His-tagged protein (data not shown). These results suggest that the IgGs that were inactive on nAT bound an epitope unique to rAT-His. Of the antibodies capable of binding nAT, three (2A3.1, 10A7.5, and 12B8.19) were found to be potent inhibitors and exhibited ∼80% inhibition of nAT-mediated RBC lysis at a 1:1 (IgG:AT) molar ratio, indicating that these MAbs inhibit pore formation in rabbit RBC and that the interaction is nearly stoichiometric.

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

Anti-AT MAbs inhibit nAT-mediated lysis of rabbit red blood cells. Purified anti-AT MAbs were titrated in a hemolytic assay in the presence of constant quantities of nAT and rabbit RBC. Hemolysis was measured by the amount of hemoglobin release into the supernatant. % hemolysis inhibition was calculated as follows: % inhibition = 100 − {100 × [(A450 nAT+Ab)/(A450 nAT, no Ab)]}. These results are representative of 3 independent experiments.

AT has been reported to lyse a variety of mammalian cell types in addition to RBC (e.g., platelets, monocytes, and epithelial and endothelial cells). In fact, it has been proposed that one or more of these cell types, not RBC, may be the primary target for AT lysis in human S. aureus infections (7, 15, 38). Therefore, we tested the purified MAbs for the ability to prevent nAT-mediated lysis of the human cell lines A549 (alveolar epithelial cell line) and THP-1 (monocytic cell line). Again, the MAbs were titrated against a constant level of nAT, giving ∼90% lysis of A549 or THP-1 cells, and cell lysis was quantified by LDH release. The MAbs which inhibited rabbit RBC lysis also inhibited nAT-mediated lysis of both human A549 and THP-1 cells (Fig. 2A and B), with the exception of 11D12.1, which had no effect on nAT-mediated lysis of THP-1 cells.

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

Anti-AT MAbs inhibit nAT-mediated lysis of human A549 and THP-1 cells. Purified anti-AT MAbs were titrated in a cytolytic assay in the presence of constant quantities of nAT and A549 cells (alveolar epithelial cell line) (A) or THP-1 cells (monocytic cell line) (B). Lysis was measured by determining the amount of release of LDH into the supernatant. % lysis inhibition was calculated as follows: % inhibition = 100 − {100 × [(A590 nAT+MAb)/(A590 nAT, no MAb)]}. These results are representative of 3 independent experiments.

Inhibitory MAbs block formation of SDS-resistant heptamer.AT lyses cells in a multistep process whereby a soluble monomeric AT molecule binds to a cell surface receptor, oligomerizes into a heptameric prepore on the cell surface, and undergoes a conformational change leading to formation of a 14-stranded transmembrane β-barrel (33). Experiments were conducted to determine at which step in this mechanism the inhibitory MAbs block AT function. First, the ability of the most potent inhibitors to prevent binding of AT to rabbit RBC ghosts was examined. At a 10-fold molar IgG excess, there was little or no inhibition of nAT binding to rabbit RBC membranes (Fig. 3), indicating that these inhibitory MAbs were not acting at the step of receptor binding.

Fig 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3

Anti-AT MAbs do not inhibit nAT binding to its receptor on rabbit erythrocyte ghosts. Ninety-six-well ELISA plates were coated with RBC ghosts and blocked with 1% BSA. The ghosts were then incubated with nAT, with or without a 10-fold molar excess of anti-AT IgG. Binding of nAT was then detected with rabbit anti-AT IgG, and % binding was calculated as follows: % binding = 100 × [(A450 nAT+MAb)/(A450 nAT,no MAb)]. The results are reported as means ± standard deviations (SD) for 3 independent experiments.

The effect of anti-AT IgG on AT heptamer formation on erythrocyte membranes was tested next. Following incubation of nAT with erythrocyte ghosts in the presence of a 5-fold molar excess of IgG, heptamer formation was examined by Western blot analysis. The SDS-resistant high-molecular-weight heptamer was readily apparent in the presence of the control MAb (Fig. 4). However, SDS-resistant heptamers were not observed following incubation with any of the four AT MAbs, providing evidence that these inhibitory MAbs prevent AT-mediated cell lysis through a blockade of SDS-resistant heptamer formation.

Fig 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4

AT heptamer formation is inhibited by MAbs. AT was incubated with erythrocyte ghosts at 37°C in the presence or absence of anti-AT IgG. The samples were then solubilized in SDS-PAGE, and heptamer formation was detected by Western blot analysis.

Binding kinetics and competition.As a means to further characterize and possibly differentiate the nAT-inhibitory MAbs, affinity measurements were carried out using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). In these studies, different concentrations of nAT were allowed to bind purified IgGs that were immobilized on sensor chips. The association and dissociation rate constants were measured and used to determine the apparent binding constants. MAbs 2A3.1, 10A7.5, and 12B8.19 had similar affinities, with KD values of 601, 504, and 485 pM, respectively, whereas 28F6.1 exhibited a KD value of 13 nM, due largely to a lower kon rate (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Association and dissociation rate constants and apparent binding constants for MAbs in this studya

Epitope competition assays were performed using Octet 384 biolayer interferometry to determine if the inhibitory MAbs compete for binding to biotinylated nAT. In this experiment, biotinylated nAT was immobilized on a streptavidin-coated sensor. A single AT MAb was then bound to the sensor, followed by an equimolar quantity of a second AT MAb, and the % binding of the second MAb was calculated. In Fig. 5, data from a representative epitope competition assay with MAb 2A3.1 are shown. Epitope competition assay results for the four MAbs with the most potent in vitro nAT-inhibitory activities (2A3.1, 10A7.5, 12B8.19, and 28F6.1) are provided in Table 2. Antibodies 2A3.1, 10A7.5, and 12B8.19 prevented each other, and 28F6.1, from binding nAT. The failure of 28F6.1 to inhibit binding of 2A3.1, 10A7.5, or 12B8.19 was most likely the result of the ∼20-fold difference in KD between 28F6.1 and the other three MAbs. At equilibrium, when 28F6.1 vacates an AT binding site, the other three higher-affinity MAbs are able to occupy the vacated site. Overall, the data suggest that the four potent AT MAbs bind similar, overlapping epitopes on AT.

Fig 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5

Epitope competition assays. Biotinylated AT was captured on streptavidin sensors (step not shown), MAb 2A3.1 (500 nM) was allowed to bind and come to equilibrium, and then a second MAb (500 nM) was introduced while maintaining 2A3.1 at 500 nM. 100% control = R347 followed by 2A3.1 plus R347; 0% control = 2A3.1 followed by 2A3.1 plus R347. R equilibrium was fit with Octet analysis software, and percent binding was calculated as follows: % binding = [(MAb 2 + MAb 1 binding − 0% control binding)/(100% MAb 1 control binding − 0% control binding)] × 100. Results are representative of 3 independent experiments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Percent relative binding in epitope competition assays

Passive immunization with anti-AT MAbs reduces dermonecrotic lesions.AT has been shown to play a role in skin and soft tissue infections in mice, and active immunization with AT or passive delivery of AT-specific immune serum limits the severity of staphylococcal disease (17). To determine if our potent AT inhibitors could also limit the severity of a staphylococcal skin infection, anti-AT or the irrelevant R347 IgG control was administered by intraperitoneal injection to groups of 5 mice, at a dose of 5 mg/kg of body weight, 24 h prior to intradermal challenge with a high-AT-producing strain, S. aureus Wood. The sizes of the dermonecrotic lesions were measured daily and documented photographically. The four most potent in vitro inhibitors of nAT function, 2A3.1, 10A7.5, 12B8.19, and 28F6.1, significantly reduced lesion size relative to that with the R347 control, whereas the least potent MAbs in vitro (11D12.1 and 15B6.3) did not (Fig. 6A and B).

Fig 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6

Passive immunization with the most potent inhibitory MAbs reduces severity of dermonecrosis. Groups of 5 BALB/c mice were passively immunized with 5 mg/kg of the inhibitory MAbs and infected with S. aureus Wood, and lesion size was monitored for 6 days. (A) Photographs of lesion sizes at 6 days postinfection. (B) Lesion sizes over the time course of infection (lesion size area = length × width). Statistical significance was determined using analysis of variance and Dunnett's posttest.

To further differentiate these MAbs, 2A3.1, 10A7.5, 12B8.19, and 28F6.1 were titrated in the dermonecrosis model (5 mg/kg to 0.05 mg/kg) (Fig. 7), and the concentration required for 50% efficacy (EC50) 1 day after S. aureus challenge was determined (Table 3). The EC50s for 2A3.1, 10A7.5, and 12B8.19 were calculated to be 9- to 11-fold lower than that for 28F6.1. Table 3 shows a comparison of the in vivo EC50s for these MAbs, their IC50s determined in the RBC lysis assay, and their calculated binding affinities for nAT. Interestingly, 2A3.1, 10A7.5, and 12B8.19 exhibited 9- to 14-fold differences in both in vivo and in vitro potencies relative to 28F6.1, correlating with their relative binding affinities. Thus, for this group of AT-specific MAbs, binding affinity for AT is predictive of both in vitro and in vivo anti-AT activity.

Fig 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 7

Lesion size comparison for the most potent MAbs. Groups of 5 BALB/c mice were passively immunized with anti-AT MAbs (0.05 to 5 mg/kg) and infected with S. aureus Wood, and the lesion size was measured 24 h after infection. The means ± SD for three experiments were plotted, and the EC50s were determined using GraphPad Prism.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Comparison of relative affinity with in vitro and in vivo activities of anti-AT MAbsa

The in vivo studies described above were all carried out using a single strain of S. aureus (Wood). To test whether the anti-AT MAbs could limit disease caused by more clinically relevant isolates, groups of 5 mice were treated with 5 mg/kg 2A3.1 or control MAb (R347) 24 h prior to intradermal infection with 1e8 CFU of NRS382 (USA100; CC5), SF8300 (USA300), or NRS261 (CC30). Prophylaxis with 2A3.1 resulted in a significant reduction (P < 0.0001) in lesion size over the course of the 6-day experiment for each infecting strain, indicating that the potency of this MAb, and likely others with similar epitope specificities, is not limited to S. aureus Wood and this MAb could potentially provide protection against disease caused by diverse clinical isolates (Fig. 8).

Fig 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 8

Anti-AT MAb reduces disease severity caused by diverse clinical isolates. Groups of 5 BALB/c mice were passively immunized with 5 mg/kg of 2A3.1 or R347 and infected with either S. aureus NRS261, NRS382, or SF8300, and lesion size was monitored for 6 days. (Top) Lesion sizes over the time course of infection (lesion size area = length × width). Lesion sizes in the 2A3.1-treated animals were significantly reduced at all time points compared to those in R347-treated animals, with P values of <0.0001. Statistical significance was determined using analysis of variance and Dunnett's posttest. (Bottom) Photographs of lesion sizes at 6 days postinfection.

DISCUSSION

This report describes the characterization of anti-AT MAbs generated from VelocImmune mice that inhibit AT-mediated lysis, reduce lesion size in a murine model of staphylococcal dermonecrosis, and exhibit a correlation between affinity and in vitro and in vivo potency. Following immunization with rATH35L-His, anti-AT IgGs from B-cell hybridoma supernatants were screened and triaged based on the ability to inhibit rAT-His-mediated rabbit RBC lysis. Surprisingly, six of the selected MAbs exhibited no AT-neutralizing activity when nAT instead of rAT-His was used in the RBC lysis assay. This was unexpected, since His-tag-specific antibodies were screened out by removing those that bound to an unrelated His-tagged protein. The fact that some of the antibodies bound to rAT-His and not to nAT illustrates the importance of using either native or untagged recombinant proteins, when possible, to generate a functional antibody response. Six MAbs were identified as exhibiting a 100-fold range of potencies in vitro, inhibiting AT-mediated lysis of rabbit RBC, human alveolar epithelial cells (A549), and human monocytic cells (THP-1). The three most potent MAbs exhibited similar activities, resulting in ∼80% reductions in nAT-mediated RBC lysis at a 1:1 MAb:toxin molar ratio, indicating that the mode of action is likely stoichiometric in nature. The four MAbs with the greatest in vitro anti-AT activities were shown to bind with high affinity to overlapping/shared epitopes on nAT. Thus, it is not surprising that all of these MAbs act through a similar mechanism, namely, inhibition of SDS-resistant AT heptamer formation. Potent in vitro activity was mirrored by in vivo prophylactic potency, as indicated by reduced skin lesion size in an S. aureus murine dermonecrosis model using various clinical isolates, including USA300 (SF8300), an S. aureus strain for which there is some debate about the virulence determinants involved in disease. Our observations further substantiate AT's role in staphylococcal skin and soft tissue infections and exemplify its potential as a therapeutic target. In a recent publication, Kennedy et al. reported that active and passive immunization (using AT-specific immune sera) against AT reduces lesion size in a dermonecrosis model (17). Our findings support these results and demonstrate that reductions in disease severity for infections with diverse clinical isolates can be accomplished with a single high-affinity MAb in a murine dermonecrosis model.

The fact that 2A3.1, 10A7.5, 12B8.19, and 28F6.1 bind overlapping epitopes provides an opportunity for comparison of the potencies of the individual MAbs relative to their binding affinities. This comparison could not be made if they bound different epitopes, since it would be difficult to differentiate the impacts of affinity and epitope on the MAb-mediated toxin inhibition. 28F6.1 exhibits a KD of 13 nM and was substantially less potent in the cell lysis assays and the murine dermonecrosis model than 2A3.1, 10A7.5, and 12B8.19, each with a KD of ∼500 pM. This lower affinity is primarily the result of an ∼10-fold lower kon rate for 28F6.1 than for 2A3.1, 10A7.5, and 12B8.19. Comparisons of apparent affinity to the IC50 for RBC lysis and the EC50 in the dermonecrosis model indicated a correlation between affinity and potency for these MAbs. Two anti-AT MAbs were previously identified and characterized by Ragle and Bubeck Wardenburg (30). These MAbs were murine IgGs and functioned as potent inhibitors of AT function in vitro and in a murine pneumonia model. They exhibited similar affinity constants for AT, thus precluding a similar comparison between affinity and potency. One example where affinity correlated with antitoxin potency was reported for MAbs against staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB); however, the potencies of the different MAbs were not examined in vivo (12). The number of MAbs compared in our study and the Drozdowski study (12) is small, yet the results provide support for the hypothesis that in some instances an increase in affinity will result in increased potency.

This study provides further evidence for the role of AT in S. aureus skin infections and a rationale for anti-AT IgG as an immunotherapeutic for staphylococcal disease. Although there is only one anti-infective MAb currently approved for use in humans, there are other MAbs targeting pathogens being tested in human clinical trials (21, 23, 25, 37). These anti-infective MAbs, which are specific for pathogen and not human antigens, are anticipated to have relatively few off-target toxicities. In addition, the long serum half-life of human IgG (∼20 days) offers an advantage over small-molecule antibacterials in a prophylactic setting. Passive administration of MAbs also offers certain advantages over active vaccination for protection against disease caused by S. aureus. Unlike active vaccination, passive immunoprophylaxis does not require an active immune response and thus could be utilized in a population of persons with an impaired immune system. In addition, unlike the case with vaccines, the protective qualities of passively administered MAbs are available immediately. MAbs also have a high specific activity, since every molecule in the preparation functions as a potent inhibitor. In contrast, not all antibodies in a polyclonal response elicited by a vaccine are active, which could have contributed in part to the somewhat limited success of earlier attempts at anti-AT active and passive (immune serum) immunization (11, 27, 35). This is exemplified by the fact that the initial pool of >1,800 AT-reactive hybridoma supernatants generated via vaccination of VelocImmune mice with rAT-His contained only 250 (14%) with any AT-inhibitory activity and that only 12 (0.6%) exhibited potent inhibition of AT-mediated lysis. This may have been due in part to low expression levels by some of the hybridomas; however, it is more likely because the majority of the IgGs elicited during vaccination target noninhibitory epitopes on AT or are of low affinity and do not function as potent inhibitors. Thus, the features embodied in a highly potent, fully human anti-AT IgG1 might provide an addition to the available antibacterial armamentarium for S. aureus disease prevention and therapy.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank J. Suzich and M. McCarthy for critical reviews of the manuscript and J. Hilliard for assistance with figures.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 3 November 2011.
    • Returned for modification 8 December 2011.
    • Accepted 27 December 2011.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 11 January 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Arnon SS,
    2. Schechter R,
    3. Maslanka SE,
    4. Jewell NP,
    5. Hatheway CL
    . 2006. Human botulism immune globulin for the treatment of infant botulism. N. Engl. J. Med. 354: 462–471. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051926.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bartlett AH,
    2. Foster TJ,
    3. Hayashida A,
    4. Park PW
    . 2008. Alpha-toxin facilitates the generation of CXC chemokine gradients and stimulates neutrophil homing in Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. J. Infect. Dis. 198: 1529–1535. doi: 10.1086/592758.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bayer AS,
    2. et al
    . 1997. Hyperproduction of alpha-toxin by Staphylococcus aureus results in paradoxically reduced virulence in experimental endocarditis: a host defense role for platelet microbicidal proteins. Infect. Immun. 65: 4652–4660.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Boulianne GL,
    2. Hozumi N,
    3. Shulman MJ
    . 1984. Production of functional chimaeric mouse/human antibody. Nature 312: 643–646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bubeck-Wardenburg J,
    2. Bae T,
    3. Otto M,
    4. Deleo FR,
    5. Schneewind O
    . 2007. Poring over pores: alpha-hemolysin and Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Nat. Med. 13: 1405–1406. doi: 10.1038/nm1207-1405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bubeck-Wardenburg J,
    2. Schneewind O
    . 2008. Vaccine protection against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. J. Exp. Med. 205: 287–294. doi: 10.1084/jem.20072208.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cassidy PS,
    2. Harshman S
    . 1973. The binding of staphylococcal 125I-alpha-toxin (B) to erythrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 248: 5545–5546.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2011. Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2010. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 60: 13–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Craven RR,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin activates the NLRP3-inflammasome in human and mouse monocytic cells. PLoS One 4: e7446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. David MZ,
    2. Daum RS
    . 2010. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23: 616–687.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dolman CE
    . 1934. Staphylococcus antitoxic serum in the treatment of acute staphylococcal infections and toxaemias. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 30: 601–610.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Drozdowski B,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Generation and characterization of high affinity human monoclonal antibodies that neutralize staphylococcal enterotoxin B. J. Immune Based Ther. Vaccines 8: 9. doi: 10.1186/1476-8518-8-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ebert T,
    2. et al
    . 2010. A fully human monoclonal antibody to Staphylococcus aureus iron regulated surface determinant B (IsdB) with functional activity in vitro and in vivo. Hum. Antibodies 19: 113–128. doi: 10.3233/HAB-2010-0235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hall AE,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Characterization of a protective monoclonal antibody recognizing Staphylococcus aureus MSCRAMM protein clumping factor A. Infect. Immun. 71: 6864–6870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hildebrand A,
    2. Pohl M,
    3. Bhakdi S
    . 1991. Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin. Dual mechanism of binding to target cells. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 17195–17200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Inoshima I,
    2. et al
    . 2011. A Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxin subverts the activity of ADAM10 to cause lethal infection in mice. Nat. Med. 17: 1310–1314. doi: 10.1038/nm.2451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kennedy AD,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Targeting of alpha-hemolysin by active or passive immunization decreases severity of USA300 skin infection in a mouse model. J. Infect. Dis. 202: 1050–1058. doi: 10.1086/656043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kernodle DS,
    2. Voladri RK,
    3. Menzies BE,
    4. Hager CC,
    5. Edwards KM
    . 1997. Expression of an antisense hla fragment in Staphylococcus aureus reduces alpha-toxin production in vitro and attenuates lethal activity in a murine model. Infect. Immun. 65: 179–184.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kilpatrick KE,
    2. et al
    . 1997. Rapid development of affinity matured monoclonal antibodies using RIMMS. Hybridoma. 16: 381–389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kohler G,
    2. Milstein C
    . 1975. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256: 495–497.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lopez EL,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Safety and pharmacokinetics of urtoxazumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, against Shiga-like toxin 2 in healthy adults and in pediatric patients infected with Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54: 239–243. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00343-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lorenz U,
    2. et al
    . 2011. Functional antibodies targeting IsaA of Staphylococcus aureus augment host immune response and open new perspectives for antibacterial therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55: 165–173. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01144-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lowy I,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difficile toxins. N. Engl. J. Med. 362: 197–205. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907635.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Menzies BE,
    2. Kernodle DS
    . 1996. Passive immunization with antiserum to a nontoxic alpha-toxin mutant from Staphylococcus aureus is protective in a murine model. Infect. Immun. 64: 1839–1841.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Migone TS,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Raxibacumab for the treatment of inhalational anthrax. N. Engl. J. Med. 361: 135–144. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Myszka DG
    . 1999. Improving biosensor analysis. J. Mol. Recognit. 12: 279–284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Parish HJ,
    2. Cannon DA
    . 1960. Staphylococcal infection: antitoxic immunity. Br. Med. J. 1: 743–747.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Peacock SJ,
    2. et al
    . 2002. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 70: 4987–4996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Projan SJ,
    2. Shlaes DM
    . 2004. Antibacterial drug discovery: is it all downhill from here? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10 (Suppl 4): 18–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-0691.2004.1006.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Ragle BE,
    2. Bubeck Wardenburg J
    . 2009. Anti-alpha-hemolysin monoclonal antibodies mediate protection against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Infect. Immun. 77: 2712–2718. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00115-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sellman BR,
    2. Kagan BL,
    3. Tweten RK
    . 1997. Generation of a membrane-bound, oligomerized pre-pore complex is necessary for pore formation by Clostridium septicum alpha toxin. Mol. Microbiol. 23: 551–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Shlaes DM
    . 2003. The abandonment of antibacterials: why and wherefore? Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 3: 470–473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Song L,
    2. et al
    . 1996. Structure of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore. Science 274: 1859–1866.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Wagner KS,
    2. et al
    . 2009. A review of the international issues surrounding the availability and demand for diphtheria antitoxin for therapeutic use. Vaccine 28: 14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.094.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Weise EC
    . 1930. Staphylococcus toxin in the treatment of furunculosis. JAMA 95: 743–747.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Weisman LE,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Safety and pharmacokinetics of a chimerized anti-lipoteichoic acid monoclonal antibody in healthy adults. Int. Immunopharmacol. 9: 639–644. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.02.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Weisman LE,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Phase 1/2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation, safety, and pharmacokinetic study of pagibaximab (BSYX-A110), an antistaphylococcal monoclonal antibody for the prevention of staphylococcal bloodstream infections, in very-low-birth-weight neonates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 2879–2886. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01565-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Wilke GA,
    2. Bubeck Wardenburg J
    . 2010. Role of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 in Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin-mediated cellular injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107: 13473–13478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001815107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification of Anti-Alpha Toxin Monoclonal Antibodies That Reduce the Severity of Staphylococcus aureus Dermonecrosis and Exhibit a Correlation between Affinity and Potency
C. Tkaczyk, L. Hua, R. Varkey, Y. Shi, L. Dettinger, R. Woods, A. Barnes, R. S. MacGill, S. Wilson, P. Chowdhury, C. K. Stover, B. R. Sellman
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Feb 2012, 19 (3) 377-385; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.05589-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of Anti-Alpha Toxin Monoclonal Antibodies That Reduce the Severity of Staphylococcus aureus Dermonecrosis and Exhibit a Correlation between Affinity and Potency
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification of Anti-Alpha Toxin Monoclonal Antibodies That Reduce the Severity of Staphylococcus aureus Dermonecrosis and Exhibit a Correlation between Affinity and Potency
C. Tkaczyk, L. Hua, R. Varkey, Y. Shi, L. Dettinger, R. Woods, A. Barnes, R. S. MacGill, S. Wilson, P. Chowdhury, C. K. Stover, B. R. Sellman
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Feb 2012, 19 (3) 377-385; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.05589-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X