Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
IMMUNE MECHANISMS

A Novel Monoclonal Antibody against FbaA Can Inhibit the Binding of the Complement Regulatory Protein Factor H to Group A Streptococcus

Cuiqing Ma, Yiyang Guo, Haiyan Gu, Ling Zhang, Hainan Liu, Huidong Feng, Lin Wei
Cuiqing Ma
Department of Immunology, Basic Medical College, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiyang Guo
Department of Immunology, Basic Medical College, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haiyan Gu
Department of Immunology, Basic Medical College, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ling Zhang
Department of Immunology, Basic Medical College, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hainan Liu
Department of Immunology, Basic Medical College, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huidong Feng
Department of Immunology, Basic Medical College, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lin Wei
Department of Immunology, Basic Medical College, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: weilin_212603@yahoo.com
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00438-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Some microbial pathogens utilize human complement regulatory proteins, such as factor H (FH) and factor H-like protein 1 (FHL-1), for immune evasion. FbaA is an FHL-1 and FH binding protein expressed on the surface of group A streptococcus (GAS), a common agent of pharyngeal, skin, and soft tissue infections. In this study, we prepared monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against FbaA, assayed them for specificity, and located their binding domains in FbaA. We found an MAb called FbaA MAb2, which demonstrated the highest affinity to GAS among all of the MAbs. Based on the binding with component peptides, the detected epitope, which was specific for FbaA MAb2, was the amino acid residues 95 to 118 of FbaA; on the other hand, it did not bind with the truncated protein of the internally deleted residues of the segment from 95 to 118 of FbaA. Furthermore, the predominant amino acids specific for FbaA MAb2 screened by phage display epitope library were I, T, P, D, and L, corresponding to the amino acid residues 101, 103, 105, 106, and 110 of FbaA, respectively. The binding location of FbaA with FH and FHL-1 was a 16-amino-acid region corresponding to amino acid residues 97 to 112 of FbaA, which overlapped the FbaA MAb2 binding domain, as confirmed by competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence microscopy. Based on the results of the invasion assay, FbaA MAb2 can inhibit the binding of FH to GAS.

INTRODUCTION

Group A streptococcus (GAS), a major human pathogen, can persist within the human nasopharynx and intestinal tract, causing a variety of purulent inflammations, scarlet fever, erysipelas, neonatal sepsis, meningitis, puerperal fever, and allergic diseases, such as streptococcus allergic disease (6). Up to now, although antibiotics, e.g., penicillin, have been the major choice against streptococcus, some GAS infections still cannot be completely cured, and people may be infected by the pathogen repeatedly because of the increase in drug-resistant bacterial strains and the immunity escape. The common pathway for the development of pathogen immunity is to evade complement attack and opsonophagocytosis, which is often influenced or dictated by a pathogen's ability to bind complement regulatory proteins (1, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 17, 28). Cleary et al. (2) first proposed that GAS invades cells, shielding the bacterium from antibiotics and the immune system. In addition, Horstmann et al. (11) also confirmed that the acquisition of complement regulatory protein factor H (FH) by GAS contributes to the bacterium's capacity to evade phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs).

Pandiripally et al. (26) have identified FbaA, which is expressed by a serotype M1 GAS isolate, 90-226, as the protein that mediates the binding of both human complement regulatory proteins FH and factor H-like protein (FHL-1) (25). Fba is the first non-M-like protein of GAS that has been shown to bind these complement regulatory factors. Terao et al. have reported that the fba gene is present in GAS, such as the M1, 2, 4, 9, 13, 22, 28, 44, 49, 60, 67, 75, 77, 79, 80, 82, 87, and 89 serotypes; among different serotypes, FbaA protein has high homology (25). Pandiripally et al. (26) also confirmed the functions of FbaA in promoting the entry of GAS into the cytoplasm of human epithelial cells through the binding of FH and FHL-1, suggesting that the protein contributes to GAS survival in its host (27, 32). We have recently observed that FbaA has a strong immunogenicity and can induce protective immunization against GAS challenge in mice (5). Therefore, FbaA potentially plays an essential role in streptococci survival, virulence, and pathogenicity in vivo.

To explore further the pathogenesis and therapy of GAS infections, we focused on preparing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against FbaA, characterizing the local sites of FbaA to which the MAbs are specific, and evaluating the biological functions of MAbs. We successfully isolated a hybridoma clone, hereafter referred to as FbaA MAb2, which showed a high affinity in binding FbaA+ GAS. We also found that the epitope specific for FbaA MAb2 overlapped the FH binding site in FbaA. The antibody, FbaA MAb2, could be a novel tool in the study of pathogenesis and could be a new target in the diagnosis and immunotherapy of GAS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture media.The bacterial strains used in the present study were FbaA+ Streptococcus pyogenes strain, 90∼226 emm1::km (4), and an isogenic FbaA− strain, DC276 (25), hereafter referred to as FbaA+ and FbaA− GAS, respectively. Streptococci were grown in Todd-Hewitt broth containing 1% yeast extract (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI). The solid media used for streptococci contained sheep blood agar. Escherichia coli DH5α (Takara) was used for cloning the fbaA fragments and the maintenance of plasmids. E. coli strain BL21 (Stratagene) was used for protein expression; these samples were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or on LB agar (29) containing 100 μg of ampicillin per ml, as appropriate.

pGEX-2T (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) was used for the expression of proteins, which were expressed as fusions to glutathione S-transferase (GST) and purified by chromatography on glutathione-Sepharose in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer (GE Healthscience). SP2/0 BALB/c myeloma cells were prepared for cell fusion.

Cloning and expression of recombinant FbaA proteins.Plasmids encoding truncated or internally deleted FbaA proteins were constructed. Regions of fbaA (accession number AB040536) were amplified by PCR using pGEX-2T-fbaA as the template (5). The oligonucleotide primers used in the present study are listed in Table 1. Forward primers for cloning of truncated FbaA proteins contained BamHI restriction sites, and the reverse primers contained EcoRI restriction sites. The internally deleted amino acid residues 95 to 118 of FbaA68-161, hereafter referred to as FbaAΔ95-118, were also constructed. The forward primer of FbaA68-161 and primer 1 were used to amplify the coding region for FbaA68-95. The FbaA119-161 coding region was amplified with primer 2 and the reverse primers of FbaA68-161. DNA fragments of both FbaA68-95 and FbaA119-161 were used as templates to amplify FbaAΔ95-118 with the forward and reverse primers of FbaA68-161. PCR products were digested with BamHI and EcoRI, gel purified, and ligated with BamHI- and EcoRI-restricted pGEX-2T. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. The recombinant proteins were expressed as fusions to GST, which was removed by thrombin cleavage. Thrombin was removed by chromatography on benzamidine-Sepharose (GE Healthscience) (5). The proteins were dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Protein concentrations were determined by using the bicinchoninic acid method (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Sequences of the oligonucleotides used in this study

Immunization of mice.In all, five adult female BALB/c mice, 8 to 10 weeks old, were subcutaneously injected with purified FbaA (approximately 50 μg per mouse), which was emulsified in a 1:1 ratio with complete Freund adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich). The mice were screened for immune responsiveness by purified FbaA through indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) 10 days after the third immunization.

Indirect ELISA.Briefly, 96-well microtiter plates were coated with purified FbaA (10 μg/ml) in carbonate buffer at 4°C overnight and then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS overnight. Serial dilutions of sera from immunized mice were added to each microtiter well with 100 μl and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. After incubation, the wells were washed thrice with PBS and 0.05% Tween (PBST). Upon removing the unbound antibody, wash buffer containing a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled second antibody was added, and the incubation was repeated. Finally, the wells were washed, after which o-phenylenediamine (OPD; 10 mg of OPD in 10 ml of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer [pH 6] with 10 ml of 30% H2O2) was added. The reaction was stopped with 1 M H2SO4 (50 μl/well), and the plate was read at 490 nm. Positives were indicated by a fold increase in absorbance at 490 nm between the sample and negative control. Afterward, the IgG titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the last sample dilution, giving an absorbance at least 2-fold higher than that of the preimmune sample with an optical density of ≥0.15

Cell fusion and hybridoma preparation.Prior to cell fusion, mice with the highest antibody titer were boosted with 50 μg of FbaA proteins without adjuvant for 3 successive days; these animals were then sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Spleens were removed from the mice, and single-cell suspensions were prepared. Splenocytes and SP2/0 myeloma cells were mixed at a 10:1 ratio and centrifuged to form a cell pellet for cell fusion as described in a previous study (9). Upon reaching 75% cell confluence, the culture supernatants were isolated and tested for the presence of FbaA immune responsiveness by indirect ELISA (see above for a description).

Screening hybridoma supernatants.FbaA immune responsive cell cultures of interest were cloned in limiting dilution cultures at one cell per microtiter well (9). After cell expansion, the supernatants were screened by indirect ELISA. Of the nearly 2,000 supernatants that were screened, 4 positive clones were identified. The positive clones were subcloned on 96-well microtiter plates at 0.3 cells per microtiter well. Supernatants from the subclones were also screened for verification. Positive subclones were expanded and cryopreserved. BALB/c spleen cells served as a feeder (9) layer for fusions (5 × 104 per well), as well as for cloning and subcloning (3 × 106 cells/well).

Isotype of MAbs.The four positive FbaA MAbs were isotyped using IsoStrip, a mouse MAb isotyping kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). Briefly, 150 ml of supernatant from each of the four FbaA MAbs was added to the bottom of individual test tubes containing latex beads coated with anti-mouse kappa or lambda antibodies. An IsoStrip containing bands of goat anti-mouse antibodies representing the various mouse antibody isotypes was lowered into the supernatant-latex bead mix, followed by incubation for 10 min at room temperature. The presence of a blue band on the IsoStrip at a specific subclass and light chain indicated the antibody isotype.

Preparation of mouse ascites fluids containing MAbs.We pretreated mice by intraperitoneal injection of Pristane (2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane; Sigma-Aldrich). A week later, we transplanted the positive FbaA monoclonal hybridoma cell line cells, at 106 cells per mouse, into the peritoneal cavities of mice. After 2 weeks, the ascites fluid was drawn from the mouse peritoneal cavities, centrifuged (1,500 × g, 10 min), and stored at −80°C.

Purification of MAb.Chromatography was performed on a Biologic DuoFlow FPLC system (Bio-Rad) (9). Briefly, Hybridoma supernatants and ascites were filtered and loaded onto 5 ml of protein G- and 5 ml of protein A-Sepharose FF HiTrap columns (GE Healthscience) connected in series and equilibrated in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0; loading buffer). The flowthrough media were saved, and the columns were washed with loading buffer until the absorbance at 280 nm reached baseline. IgG was eluted with 100 mM glycine (pH 2.7) into tubes containing 1 M Tris (pH 9) for pH neutralization. The IgG fractions were buffer exchanged into PBS on a HiPrep desalting column 26/10 (GE Healthscience).

Western blot.The FbaA truncated proteins—FbaA37-110, FbaA68-161, FbaA104-277, and FbaA160-324—were constructed based on the structural and functional domains of FbaA (Fig. 1); these were then expressed and transferred to the polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad) at 10 μg. The filter was blocked overnight with 5% albumin (Sigma Chemical Co.) in PBS. The filter was incubated successively with purified MAbs and HRP-labeled second antibody after a washing step. The reaction was developed with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Amersham Biosciences) and exposed to X-ray film.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Schematic representations of FbaA and FbaA derivative constructs used in the present study. (A) Structural and functional domains of FbaA: SS, signal sequence; CC, coiled-coil region; PRR, proline-rich repeats; anchor, cell wall and membrane anchoring region. The bar below the figure indicates the major binding site of FH in FbaA. (B to E) FbaA derivatives expressed as recombinant proteins. The numbers within the figures indicate FbaA amino acid residues present in each derivative. (F) FbaAΔ95-118 has an internal deletion of amino acid residues 95 to 118.

To analyze the MAb specificity further, three segments containing FbaA84-101 protein, FbaA95-112 protein, and FbaA101-118 protein and the mutant protein of FbaAΔ95-118 were expressed by pGEX-2T as fusions to GST. Afterward, these proteins were transferred to a PVDF filter for Western blot analysis as described above.

Bacteria solution ELISA.FbaA− or FbaA+ GAS strains were grown in an optical density at 560 nm (OD560) of 0.5. Bacteria were isolated by centrifugation, washed twice with PBST, and then suspended in carbonate buffer to ∼109 CFU/ml. Each well of the 96-well plates was coated with 0.1 ml of bacteria solution in carbonate buffer at 4°C overnight. Upon removal of unbound cells, the wells were blocked with PBST for 60 min at 37°C. To detect the binding of MAbs, the plates were incubated successively with MAbs and HRP-labeled second antibody to perform indirect ELISA as described above. The data were gathered from three independent experiments, where each strain was assayed thrice.

Screening epitope of MAb with phage display library.To define the MAb epitopes, we screened a library of circularized 7-mer peptides for high-affinity binding to random peptides that were specific for individual MAbs. The displayed heptapeptides were expressed at the N terminus of the pIII minor coat protein of M13 Phage (New England Biolabs, Inc.). Screening of the phage library was performed according to the method described in the manufacturer's instruction manual. Candidate peptides were selected by three rounds of iterative affinity selection, after which the specificity of phage for individual MAb was assessed by competitive ELISA. Briefly, the ELISA plate wall was coated with 10 μg of purified FbaA, blocked with 1% BSA in PBS, and then washed with PBST. Serial dilutions of phages, including 2 × 106, 2 × 107, and 2 × 108 PFU, were respectively mixed with 0.0025 μg of MAb. Subsequently, mixed solutions were added to the plates, and control wells were included that contained the antibody solution. After a washing step, the plates were incubated with a HRP-conjugated second antibody as described above in the indirect ELISA. Phages that specifically bound individual MAbs were identified. The random inserts were then sequenced.

Competitive ELISA.Competitive inhibition of FH binding to immobilized GAS by FbaA MAb2 was assayed as previously described in the bacteria ELISA with some modification. Bacteria were harvested from log-phase cultures, collected by centrifugation, and suspended to an OD560 of 0.05 in carbonate buffer. Wells of the microtiter plates were coated with suspensions of bacterial cells after a blocking step with gelatin. Afterward, 100 μl of wash buffer containing 3 μg of purified MAb was added to each well. For a control, only the wash buffer was added to wells coated with bacterial cells. After a washing step, 100 μl of wash buffer containing 1 μg of FH was added to all of the wells, except for the blank control, and the plates were incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After the wells were washed, HRP-labeled anti-FH antibody was added to the wells, and the absorbance values were determined. The data were collected from three independent experiments, in which each strain was assayed thrice.

Immunofluorescence microscopy.To estimate further the relationship between FH and FbaA MAb2 binding sites on the surfaces of streptococci, bacteria were harvested from log-phase cultures, washed twice with PBS, and diluted to ∼108 CFU/ml. The suspensions were applied to the empty wells of the chamber slides (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL), and unbound bacteria were removed by washing with PBS. Slides were incubated with 10 μg of FH/ml, whereas the control was incubated only with PBS. Upon removal of the unbound FH, all of the slides were incubated successively with 5 μg of FbaA MAb2 and goat anti-mouse IgG labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/ml. The specimens were examined by fluorescence microscopy for FbaA MAb2 binding on GAS.

Invasion assay.A 24-well plate was inoculated with A549 cells at approximately 5 × 104 cells/well, followed by incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 2 days. FbaA+ GAS diluted to approximately 5 × 106 CFU were incubated with 6 μg of FbaA MAb2 overnight at 4°C and then with 10 μg of FH per ml for 1 h at room temperature and then centrifuged to remove the supernatant. FbaA+ GAS were incubated with FH or PBS in the same conditions as the FH or the no-FH control. The pellets were suspended in appropriate RPMI 1640, transferred to one well of the plate, and then incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Some of the no-FH control cells were harvested after being washed twice with PBS; the trypsinized cells were transferred to sterile water as an attached bacteria control, and other cells were further incubated with RPMI 1640 containing 1,000 U of penicillin and 500 U of gentamicin/ml for 2 h at 37°C and subsequently harvested and transferred to sterile water as described above. The lysates were diluted and plated onto blood plate overnight at 37°C. The number of bacteria CFU was determined the next day. Indeed, the attached bacteria control was expressed as the number of bacteria CFU from the cells harvested prior to incubation with antibiotics minus the CFU number from the no-FH control.

RESULTS

Production and screening of MAbs.Full-length FbaA fused to an N-terminal GST tag was purified by chromatography on glutathione-Sepharose, followed by GST reduction with thrombin and was used to immunize BALB/c mice. After fusing the splenocytes of the mice and SP2/0 myeloma cells and screening more than 2,000 single-cell supernatants, four positive hybridomas were selected, cloned, and purified based on the secreted antibody recognition of FbaA, which was performed by indirect ELISA. The four MAbs (i.e., FbaA MAb1, FbaA MAb2, FbaA MAb3, and FbaA MAb4) were isotyped as IgG1κ. The IgG titers of the supernatants from the four hybridomas were 1:426 (FbaA MAb1), 1:586 (FbaA MAb2), 1:533 (FbaA MAb3), and 1:533 (FbaA MAb4). The IgG titers of the ascites were 1:128,000, 1:341,000, 1:426,000, and 1:213,000, respectively.

Detection of MAbs binding to FbaA+ GAS or FbaA− GAS.The ability of the four MAbs to bind with FbaA+ GAS or FbaA− GAS was determined by bacteria ELISA. FbaA MAb2 bound with FbaA+ GAS with the highest specificity, whereas FbaA MAb2 did not bind with FbaA− GAS specifically.

Characterization of antibody binding sites.To identify the binding sites of the monoclonal antibodies, FbaA proteins divided into four overlapping peptides based on the structural domains, were expressed. The four truncated peptides were amino acids 37 to 110, 68 to 161, 104 to 277, and 160 to 324, respectively (Fig. 2 A). Western blot analysis showed that two antibodies (i.e., FbaA MAb2 and FbaA MAb3) only recognized the truncated FbaA68-161 and not FbaA37-110 or FbaA104-277 (Fig. 2B). Thus, the epitopes for FbaA MAb2 and FbaA MAb3 were both located in a narrow region and encompassed FbaA residues 104 to 110. Antibodies FbaA MAb1 and FbaA MAb4 recognized truncated FbaA104-277 and FbaA161-324 (Fig. 2C), suggesting that the binding location might overlap the common regions of FbaA104-277 and FbaA161-324.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Localization of the four MAb binding sites in FbaA. (A) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel of the recombinant FbaA proteins used for the present study. The name of each FbaA derivative is listed above the gel. MW, molecular mass standards. Numbers to the left of the figure indicate the sizes of each protein standard in kilodaltons. (B) FbaA MAb2 binding by FbaA derivatives. The same proteins shown in panel A were transferred to nitrocellulose, blocked, and incubated successively with FbaA MAb2 and an HRP-labeled anti-mouse antibody. The reaction was developed with ECL reagents and exposed to X-ray film. The same bands were detectable on a duplicate blot incubated with FbaA MAb3 (not shown). At least two independent experiments were performed with each FbaA derivative. (C) FbaA MAb1 binding by FbaA derivatives. Binding was performed as described for panel B except that the membrane was incubated with FbaA MAb1. The same bands were detectable on a duplicate blot incubated with FbaA MAb4 (data not shown).

Bacteria ELISA for FbaA MAb1 to FbaA MAb4 binding FbaA+ or FbaA− GAS showed that FbaA MAb2 had the highest affinity to bind with FbaA+ GAS. Thus, we hypothesize that the epitope FbaA MAb2 is a nature domain on the surface of GAS. Based on the results of the experiments and the epitopes predicted through bioinformatics, three prokaryotic expression plasmids enclosing gene segments 104 to 110—pGEX-4T-2/fbaA84-101, pGEX-4T-2/fbaA95-112, and pGEX-4T-2/fbaA101-118—were constructed and expressed successfully (Fig. 3 A) to identify further the FbaA MAb2 binding regions. The results of the Western blot analysis showed that FbaA95-112 and FbaA 101-118 significantly bound FbaA MAb2, while FbaA84-101 was hardly able to bind FbaA MAb2 (Fig. 3B), suggesting that the FbaA MAb2 binding site might be located in the region of FbaA from amino acids 95 to 118.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Determination of FbaA MAb2 binding sites in FbaA. (A) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel of the recombinant FbaA proteins used for the present study. The name of each FbaA derivative is listed above the gel. MW, molecular mass standards. Numbers to the left of the figure indicate the sizes of each protein standard in kilodaltons. (B) FbaA MAb2 binding by FbaA derivatives. The same proteins shown in panel A were transferred to nitrocellulose, blocked, and incubated successively with FbaA MAb2, an HRP-labeled anti-mouse antibody. The blots were visualized with ECL reagents and exposed to X-ray film. FbaA68-161 was used as a positive control.

To verify the presumption that the FbaA MAb2 binding site is located in the amino acid residues 95 to 118 of FbaA, a fragment of the fbaA gene that deleted the amino acid residues 95 to 118 of FbaA68-161 (FbaAΔ95-118) was amplified by PCR and expressed in E. coli (Fig. 1F and Fig. 3A). As expected, FbaA MAb2 was unable to recognize the recombinant FbaAΔ95-118 protein by Western blot analysis (Fig. 3B), whereas the FbaA MAb2 showed an insignificant blot with the positive control FbaA68-161.

To define further the predominant amino acids specific for FbaA MAb2, phage 7 peptide library was used to screen the random peptides that showed a high-affinity binding to FbaA MAb2. The predominant amino acids specific for FbaA MAb2 were I, T, P, D, and L, which were located in the region from amino acid residues 100 to 110 of FbaA. Residues 101, 103, 105, 106, and 110 were predicted as essential for FbaA MAb2 recognition.

Overlapping of the epitope specific for FbaA MAb2 and the FH binding site in FbaA.The major binding site of FH in FbaA is a linear 16-amino-acid region encompassing FbaA residues 97 to 112 (26), indicating that the FH binding site overlaps the FbaA MAb2 binding site (positions 95 to 118) in FbaA. Therefore, to verify whether FbaA MAb2 affects the binding of FH to FbaA+ GAS, competitive-inhibition ELISA was performed. The results revealed that FbaA MAb2 could block the binding of FH with GAS (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Inhibition of FH binding to GAS by FbaA MAb2. ELISA analysis of FbaA MAb2 inhibiting FH to bind GAS. Wells of microtiter plates were coated with GAS grown to mid-exponential phase. The immobilized cells were incubated successively with FbaA MAb2, FH, goat anti-human FH antibody, and an HRP-labeled anti-goat antibody. The data are from two independent experiments, in which each assay was performed three times. FbaA− GAS, incubated successively with FbaA MAb2, FH, goat anti-human FH antibody, and a labeled anti-goat antibody, was used as a negative control; FbaA+ GAS, not incubated with FbaA MAb2 but only with FH, goat anti-human FH antibody, and a labeled anti-goat antibody, was used as a positive control.

Furthermore, FH also affected FbaA MAb2 interaction with streptococci. Thus, immunofluorescence microscopy was performed to detect whether the FH could interfere the binding of FbaA MAb2 to GAS. As anticipated, FbaA MAb2 reacted with the FbaA+ strain (Fig. 5 C) but not with the FbaA− strain (Fig. 5B). However, when FH was added to the slides prior to FbaA MAb2, the binding of FbaA MAb2 with FbaA+ GAS was not detected (Fig. 5D), suggesting that the epitope for FbaA MAb2 and the FH binding site in FbaA overlapped each other.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

(A) Surface labeling of GAS with FbaA MAb2 and/or FH by indirect fluorescence. FbaA− and FbaA+ GAS were incubated with FbaA MAb2 (B and C), followed by FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG. (D) FbaA+ GAS were incubated successfully with FH, FbaA MAb2, and goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to FITC. The bacteria for panel A are FbaA+ GAS as determined by Gram staining (magnification, ×200).

The role of FbaA MAb2 inhibition in FbaA+ GAS epithelia cell invasion was also evaluated. FbaA+ GAS were incubated successively with FbaA MAb2 and FH and then centrifuged to remove the supernatant. FbaA+ GAS were only incubated with FH or PBS at the same condition as the FH or no-FH control. After these pellets were incubated with A549 cells for 2 h, some cells of no-FH control were harvested prior to incubation with 10-fold antibiotics as an attached bacterial control. The bacteria CFU showed that the number of GAS attached A549 cells was more than that of GAS-invaded A549 cells. More importantly, FbaA MAb2 inhibited FH binding to GAS, which resulted in the number of GAS-invaded A549 cells decreasing more significantly than in the controls. (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Epithelial cell invasion assay. (A) FbaA+ GAS, diluted to approximately 5 × 106 bacterial CFU, were incubated with Fba MAb2 (plate d) overnight at 4°C, subsequently with FH for 1 h at room temperature, and then centrifuged to remove the supernatant. The pellets were suspended, transferred to 24-well plates inoculated with A549 cells, and then incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Fba+ GAS were incubated with FH or PBS under the same conditions as the FH control (plate c) or the no-FH control (plate a). Some cells of no-FH control were harvested after washed twice with PBS as an attached bacterial control (plate b), and other cells were further incubated with RPMI 1640 containing 1,000 U of penicillin and 500 U of gentamicin/ml for 2 h at 37°C and then harvested. After the harvest, the cells were transferred to sterile water, and the lysates were diluted and plated onto a blood plate overnight at 37°C. The numbers of bacterial CFU were determined the next day. (B) Numbers of bacterial CFU-invaded or -attached A549 cells.

DISCUSSION

The Gram-positive bacterium S. pyogenes, or GAS, is an important and highly versatile human pathogen. Infection with the human bacterial pathogen GAS is estimated to cause over 500,000 deaths per year, the majority of which are related to rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease (23).

GAS is capable of intracellular invasion, i.e., entry into and persistence within mammalian cells (4, 18, 21, 24, 25). There is evidence that intracellular invasion contributes to the frequency and severity of GAS disease by affording partial protection of GAS from immune factors and antibiotics (3, 22, 31) and is a factor in GAS dissemination in an infected host (20). Therefore, a major virulence trait of GAS is the capacity of the organism to evade ingestion and/or killing by host phagocytes through intracellular invasion (6). Particularly, streptococcal resistance to phagocytosis is due, in part, to the binding of human complement regulatory proteins, such as FH, FHL-1, and C4b binding protein (11, 14, 16), to its surface proteins; among these, FbaA protein and M protein play potential roles that mediate binding both FH and FHL-1 (25).

To further investigate the biological function of FbaA and to explore the pathogenesis of GAS, we prepared the MAbs against FbaA protein and detected their binding domains afterward. Based on the structural and functional domains (Fig. 1), FbaA proteins were divided into four overlapping peptides, expressed and blotted with the four selected antibodies respectively by Western blotting, and the results suggested that two of the antibodies recognized the N terminus (amino acids 68 to 161) and two others identified the C-terminal region between amino acids 161 and 277 (Fig. 2). These antibodies are useful in clarifying FbaA protein localization and in future experimentation in determining the biological function of the FbaA protein itself. FbaA MAb2 showed the highest affinity with FbaA+ GAS, leading us to locate precisely the epitope for FbaA MAb2. Thus, the segments of FbaA (amino acid residues 95 to 114 and 101 to 118), control peptides (amino acids 84 to 101), and FbaAΔ95-118 (Fig. 1F) with deleted corresponding epitopes for FbaA MAb2 were constructed, expressed according to the Western blot results (Fig. 2B) and bioinformatics prediction, and blotted with FbaA MAb2 using Western blotting again. The result showed that FbaA MAb2 recognized the amino acid residues 95 to 114 and 101 to 118 but could hardly bind amino acid residues 84 to 101 and could not recognize FbaAΔ95-118 at all. Thus, the epitope specific for FbaA MAb2 was found to be located in the region from amino acids 95 to 118 of FbaA.

The Ph.D-7 phage display peptide library (10, 30) was used to determine the predominant amino acids of the epitope for FbaA MAb2, which were I, T, P, D, and L, corresponding to residues 101, 103, 105, 106, and 110 of the segment from 100 to 110 of FbaA, respectively. This suggests that these amino acid residues may be extremely essential for FbaA MAb2 recognition. Thus, the epitope should be a discontinuous immunodominant epitope.

The major FH binding site in FbaA is the sequence YKQKIKTAPDKDKLLF (amino acids 97 to 112), a putative coiled-coil domain in the N-terminal half of the protein (26). Here, we determined the epitope specific for FbaA MAb2 located in the amino acid region from residues 95 to 118 of FbaA, which overlapped the FH binding sites. Activation of the complement system in response to infectious agents is a key component of the innate immune response, resulting in opsonization and/or lysis of invading pathogens. The intermediate product of the complement activation, C3b, is the critical component in the three-complement pathway. Particularly, C3b deposited on the surface of a pathogen serves as a nucleus for the formation of the alternative complement pathway C3 convertase C3bBb, which can activate additional complement components and form a membrane attack complex to lyse the invading pathogens. On the other hand, C3b can bind the complement receptors on the surfaces of PMNs to mediate opsonization and/or complement-dependent cytotoxin of invading pathogens. Recruitment of FH or FHL-1 by microbes facilitates factor I-mediated cleavage of cell surface-bound C3b to iC3b, thereby decreasing the deposition of C3 fragments on bacterial cells. In addition, this limited amount of C3 deposited on cells can lessen the probability that a pathogen becomes phagocytosed or lysed (11, 33). The FbaA binding site in FH and FHL-1 has been localized to SCR7, which is a domain common to both proteins (19, 33). In the present study, the epitope of FbaA MAb2 was located in the amino acid region from residues 95 to 118 of FbaA, which overlapped with the binding sites of FH and FHL-1, suggesting that FbaA MAb2 and SCR7 possibly have a similar, if not the same, domain to bind FbaA (Fig. 7). We speculate that FbaA MAb2 may competitively inhibit FH and FHL-1 to bind FbaA protein. The results of the invasion assay and competitive inhibition ELISA verified that FbaA MAb2 could inhibit drastically FH binding to GAS.

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Schematic representation of the relationship between Fba MAb2 and FH on binding FbaA.

In summary, FbaA MAb2 can competitively inhibit FH binding to the surface proteins of GAS. Thus, the inhibition decreases the amount of GAS invading epithelia, giving an opportunity to the host to eliminate GAS. Hence, both FbaA MAb2 and the corresponding epitope are promising starting points for pharmacologic targeting and further development of new therapeutic agents for GAS.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 30872399 and 30901350), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (C2009001091), and the Scientific Research Foundation of the Health Bureau of Hebei Province (grant 08054).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 October 2010.
    • Returned for modification 3 November 2010.
    • Accepted 29 December 2010.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 12 January 2011.
  • Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Areschoug T.,
    2. Stalhammar-Carlemalm M.,
    3. Karlsson I.,
    4. Lindahl G.
    . 2002. Streptococcal beta protein has separate binding sites for human factor H and IgA-Fc. J. Biol. Chem. 277:12642–12648.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cleary P. P.,
    2. LaPenta D.,
    3. Vessela R.,
    4. Lam H.,
    5. Cue D.
    . 1998. A globally disseminated M1 subclone of group A streptococci differs from other subclones by 70 kilobases of prophage DNA and capacity for high-frequency intracellular invasion. Infect. Immun. 66:5592–5597.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cue D.,
    2. Dombek P. E.,
    3. Cleary P. P.
    . 2000. Intracellular invasion by Streptococcus pyogenes: invasins, host receptors, and relevance to human disease, p. 27–33. In Fischetti V. A., et al. (ed.), Gram-positive pathogens. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cue D.,
    2. Dombek P. E.,
    3. Lam H.,
    4. Cleary P. P.
    . 1998. Streptococcus pyogenes serotype M1 encodes multiple pathways for entry into human epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 66:4593–4601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cuiqing M.,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Similar ability of FbaA with M protein to elicit protective immunity against group A streptococcus challenge in mice. Cell Mol. Immunol. 6:73–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cunningham M. W
    . 2000. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13:470–511.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dave S.,
    2. Brooks-Walter A.,
    3. Pangburn M. K.,
    4. McDaniel L. S.
    . 2001. PspC, a pneumococcal surface protein, binds human factor H. Infect. Immun. 69:3435–3437.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Duthy T. G.,
    2. et al
    . 2002. The human complement regulator factor H binds pneumococcal surface protein PspC via short consensus repeats 13 to 15. Infect. Immun. 70:5604–5611.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ezzat M.-K.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies against the glaucoma-associated protein myocilin. Exp. Eye Res. 87:376–384.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hong S. S.,
    2. Boulanger P.
    . 1995. Protein ligands of the human adenovirus type 2 outer capsid identified by biopanning of a phage-displayed peptide library on separate domains of wild-type and mutant penton capsomers. EMBO J. 14:4714–4727.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Horstmann R. D.,
    2. Sievertsen H. J.,
    3. Knobloch J.,
    4. Fischetti V. A.
    . 1988. Antiphagocytic activity of streptococcal M protein: selective binding of complement control protein factor H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85:1657–1661.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Janulczyk R.,
    2. Iannelli F.,
    3. Sjoholm A. G.,
    4. Pozzi G.,
    5. Bjorck L.
    . 2000. Hic, a novel surface protein of Streptococcus pneumoniae that interferes with complement function. J. Biol. Chem. 275:37257–37263.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Jarva H.,
    2. et al
    . 2002. Streptococcus pneumoniae evades complement attack and opsonophagocytosis by expressing the pspC locus-encoded Hic protein that binds to short consensus repeats 8-11 of factor H. J. Immunol. 168:1886–1894.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Johnsson E.,
    2. et al
    . 1996. A highly variable region in members of the streptococcal M protein family binds the human complement regulator C4BP. J. Immunol. 157:3021–3029.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. 15.↵
    1. Johnsson E.,
    2. et al
    . 1998. Role of the hypervariable region in streptococcal M proteins: binding of a human complement inhibitor. J. Immunol. 161:4894–4901.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kotarsky H.,
    2. et al
    . 1998. Identification of a domain in human factor H and factor H-like protein-1 required for the interaction with streptococcal M proteins. J. Immunol. 160:3349–3354.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kraiczy P.,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Immune evasion of Borrelia burgdorferi: mapping of a complement-inhibitor factor H-binding site of BbCRASP-3, a novel member of the Erp protein family. Eur. J. Immunol. 33:697–707.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. LaPenta D.,
    2. Rubens C.,
    3. Chi E.,
    4. Cleary P. P.
    . 1994. Group A streptococci efficiently invade human respiratory epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:12115–12119.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lin W.,
    2. Pandiripally V.,
    3. Gregory E.,
    4. Clymer M.,
    5. Cue D.
    . 2005. Impact of the SpeB protease on binding of the complement regulatory proteins factor H and Factor H-Like protein 1 by Streptococcus pyogenes Infect. Immun. 73:2040–2050.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Medina E.,
    2. Goldmann O.,
    3. Toppel A. W.,
    4. Chhatwal G. S.
    . 2003. Survival of Streptococcus pyogenes within host phagocytic cells: a pathogenic mechanism for persistence and systemic invasion. J. Infect. Dis. 187:597–603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Molinari G.,
    2. Chhatwal G. S.
    . 1999. Role played by the fibronectin-binding protein SfbI (protein F1) of Streptococcus pyogenes in bacterial internalization by epithelial cells. J. Infect. Dis. 179:1049–1050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Neeman R.,
    2. Keller N.,
    3. Barzilai A.,
    4. Korenman Z.,
    5. Sela S.
    . 1998. Prevalence of internalisation-associated gene, prtF1, among persisting group A streptococcus strains isolated from asymptomatic carriers. Lancet 352:1974–1977.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Olive C
    . 2007. Progress in M-protein-based subunit vaccines to prevent rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 9:25–34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ozeri V.,
    2. et al
    . 2001. De novo formation of focal complex-like structures in host cells by invading streptococci. Mol. Microbiol. 41:561–573.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Pandiripally V.,
    2. Gregory E.,
    3. Cue D.
    . 2002. Acquisition of regulators of complement activation by Streptococcus pyogenes serotype M1. Infect. Immun. 70:6206–6214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Pandiripally V.,
    2. Wei L.,
    3. Skerka C.,
    4. Zipfel P. F.,
    5. Cue D.
    . 2003. Recruitment of complement factor H-like protein 1 promotes intracellular invasion by group a streptococci. Infect. Immun. 71:7119–7128.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Podbielski A.,
    2. Woischnik M.,
    3. Pohl B.,
    4. Schmidt K. H.
    . 1996. What is the size of the group A streptococcal vir regulon? The Mga regulator affects expression of secreted and surface virulence factors. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 185:171–181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ram S.,
    2. et al
    . 1998. Binding of complement factor H to loop 5 of porin protein 1A: a molecular mechanism of serum resistance of nonsialylated Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Exp. Med. 188:671–680.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    . 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Scott J. K.,
    2. Loganathan D.,
    3. Easley R. B.,
    4. Gong X.,
    5. Goldstein I. J.
    . 1992. A family of concanavalin A-binding peptides from a hexapeptide epitope library. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:5398–5402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sela S.,
    2. Neeman R.,
    3. Keller N.,
    4. Barzilai A.
    . 2000. Relationship between asymptomatic carriage of Streptococcus pyogenes and the ability of the strains to adhere to and be internalized by cultured epithelial cells. J. Med. Microbiol. 49:499–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Terao Y.,
    2. et al
    . 2001. Fba, a novel fibronectin-binding protein from Streptococcus pyogenes, promotes bacterial entry into epithelial cells, and the fba gene is positively transcribed under the Mga regulator. Mol. Microbiol. 42:75–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Zipfel P. F.,
    2. Skerka C.
    . 1999. FHL-1/reconectin: a human complement and immune regulator with cell-adhesive activity. Immunol. Today 20:135–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Novel Monoclonal Antibody against FbaA Can Inhibit the Binding of the Complement Regulatory Protein Factor H to Group A Streptococcus
Cuiqing Ma, Yiyang Guo, Haiyan Gu, Ling Zhang, Hainan Liu, Huidong Feng, Lin Wei
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Apr 2011, 18 (4) 552-558; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00438-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Novel Monoclonal Antibody against FbaA Can Inhibit the Binding of the Complement Regulatory Protein Factor H to Group A Streptococcus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Novel Monoclonal Antibody against FbaA Can Inhibit the Binding of the Complement Regulatory Protein Factor H to Group A Streptococcus
Cuiqing Ma, Yiyang Guo, Haiyan Gu, Ling Zhang, Hainan Liu, Huidong Feng, Lin Wei
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Apr 2011, 18 (4) 552-558; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00438-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X