Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
VACCINE RESEARCH

Selection and Characterization of Murine Monoclonal Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus Iron-Regulated Surface Determinant B with Functional Activity In Vitro and In Vivo

Martha Brown, Rose Kowalski, Julie Zorman, Xin-min Wang, Victoria Towne, Qinjian Zhao, Susan Secore, Adam C. Finnefrock, Tim Ebert, Greg Pancari, Kevin Isett, Yuhua Zhang, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Donna Montgomery, Leslie Cope, Tessie McNeely
Martha Brown
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rose Kowalski
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Zorman
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xin-min Wang
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria Towne
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qinjian Zhao
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Secore
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam C. Finnefrock
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Ebert
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg Pancari
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Isett
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuhua Zhang
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annaliesa S. Anderson
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donna Montgomery
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leslie Cope
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tessie McNeely
Merck Research Labs, Merck and Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tessie_mcneely@merck.com
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00085-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Potential MAb binding sites on IsdB. IsdB-specific MAbs were reacted with IsdB muteins using Western blotting. MAb binding was disrupted by the accumulation of amino acid mutations in the muteins (Table 2). Amino acids required for binding, as defined by the amino acid mutations which lead to MAb loss of binding, are indicated above the bars. The potential binding site for each MAb is lined up below the corresponding segment of the wild-type IsdB. Vertical lines in the MAb binding site represent amino acid mutations (see Table 2).

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Survival of BALB/c mice passively immunized to IsdB and then challenged with S. aureus. Mice were injected i.p. with 0.3 to 0.5 mg of IsdB-specific MAb (solid line), irrelevant isotype control MAb (dashed line), or PBS (dotted line) 20 to 24 h prior to i.v. injection of S. aureus Becker bacteria, as described in Materials and Methods. Data shown are the mean at each time point (error bars show 95% confidence intervals). (A) Mice (five independent experiments, a combined total of 50 per group) were injected i.p. with test MAb 2H2.B8, control MAb, or PBS. In the comparison of test MAb 2H2.B8 and the control MAb, survival was enhanced by the test MAb (P < 0.03; log rank Mantel Cox test). (B) Mice (four independent experiments, a combined total of 40 per group) were injected i.p. with test MAb 2H2.BE11, control MAb, or PBS. In the comparison of test MAb 2H2.BE11 and the control MAb, survival was enhanced by the test MAb (P < 0.01; log rank Mantel Cox test). (C) Mice (four independent experiments, a combined total of 40 per group) were injected i.p. with test MAb 13C7.BC1, control MAb, or PBS. In the comparison of test MAb 13C7.BC1 and the control MAb, survival was enhanced by the test MAb (P < 0.01; log rank Mantel Cox test).

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    MAb concentrations in blood after S. aureus challenge. Mice (22 per group) were injected i.p. with 0.5 mg of either IsdB-specific MAb 13C7.BC1 (•) or isotype control MAb 6G5.A8 (▪) 20 h prior to an i.v. sublethal challenge with S. aureus Becker. At time zero of the challenge, two mice were sacrificed and blood collected to measure the amount of MAb in the sera at the time of challenge. At each time point indicated, four mice per group were sacrificed and the titer of 13C7.BC1 or 6G6.A8 in sera determined. Titers were calculated based on a standard curve, and concentrations were normalized to those at time zero as described in Materials and Methods. The amount of 13C7.BC1 remaining in the mouse serum after 4 days was statistically less than the amount of control MAb 6G5.A8 remaining in the mouse serum (P < 0.01).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1.

    Murine MAbs to IsdB obtained after two separate immunization/selection protocols

    MAb IgG1 isotypeIsolation protocolaELISA resultbIgG2b isotype MAbc
    2H2.B81++2H2.BE11
    8H6.E11d1++
    7H2.C111++
    2E12.A82++
    8A8.B42+
    3G11.D52+
    13G11.C112+13G11.BF3
    13C7.D122++13C7.BC1
    1G3.B32++1G3.BD4
    9H3.E42++
    3B7.G82++
    3G12.A42++
    • ↵ a MAbs were obtained from mice immunized using one of the two methods described in Materials and Methods.

    • ↵ b Binding of MAb to recombinant IsdB in ELISA. ++, higher level of specific binding; +, lower level of specific binding.

    • ↵ c MAbs were class switched from IgG1 to IgG2b by using limiting dilution as described in Materials and Methods.

    • ↵ d 8H6.E11 was the only isotype IgG2a MAb; all other MAbs were of the IgG1 isotype.

  • TABLE 2.

    Western blot analysis of MAb binding to IsdB muteins

    MAbGroupaSpecific amino acid point mutations which cumulatively disrupted binding of MAb to the mutein
    2H2.B8I130, 139, 180, 182, 217, 226, 454
    8A8.B4I130, 157-159, 184, 454
    13G11.C11I157-159, 184, 267, 400, 425
    1G3.B3 9H3.E4II130, 157-159, 184, 454
    3G11.D5III157-159, 184
    13C7.D12 2E12.A8IV130, 296, 454
    • ↵ a Grouping for each MAb was determined by Western blot analysis of IsdB mutein binding.

  • TABLE 3.

    Summary of IsdB-specific MAb grouping, based on evaluation of IsdB binding sites

    Grouping methodGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IV
    Mutein binding by Western blot2H2.B81G3.B33G11.D513C7.D12
    8A8. B49H3.E42E12.A8
    13G11.C11
    SPR analysis (exp. 1)2H2.B81G3.B313C7.D12
    8A8.B49H3.E42E12.A8
    3G11.D5
    13G11.C11
    SPR analysis (exp. 2)2H2.B81G3.B313C7.D12
    13G11.C11
    Native IsdB binding by flow cytometry2H2.B81G3.B313G11.D513C7.D12
    8A8.B49H3.E42E12.A8
    3G11.D5
  • TABLE 4.

    Summary of functional activities of IsdB-specific MAbs

    IsotypeMAbGroupaOPK resultbMAb-conferred protection in the indicated murine challenge modelc
    Ex vivo modelLethal challenge modelCatheter colonization
    IgG12H2.B8I+++nt
    IgG2b2H2.BE11I++++
    1G3.BD4II−−−nt
    13G11.BF3III−−ntnt
    13C7.BC1IV−−+nt
    • ↵ a Grouping based on pairwise flow cytometry analysis; each MAb group represents a nonoverlapping epitope based on this method.

    • ↵ b OPK is defined as ≥50% killing activity.

    • ↵ c nt, not tested.

  • TABLE 5.

    OPK activities of IsdB-specific MAbsa

    Irrelevant MAb isotype controlbMAbGroupNo. of CFU (% survival)c after 2 h of incubation with indicated amount (μg/ml)of MAb
    10050200d
    10B4.H4 (IgG1)161, 163110, 161113, 111189, 200
    2H2.B8I74, 60 (41)58, 64 (45)65, 126 (85)
    6G6.A8 (IgG2b)153, 139145, 17094, 89
    2H2.BE11I107, 70 (61)88, 79 (53)101, 111 (116)
    1G3.BD4II139, 178 (109)121, 128 (79)98, 107 (112)
    13G11.BF3III130, 155 (98)114, 125 (76)92, 83 (96)
    13C7.BC1IV98, 147 (84)111, 117 (72)68, 90 (86)
    • ↵ a The OPK reaction mixture was MAb, complement, HL60 cells, and S. aureus Becker bacteria.

    • ↵ b 10B4H4 and 6G6.A8 murine MAbs were used as non-S. aureus binding isotype controls.

    • ↵ c Data are replicates from two identical reaction mixtures. Percent survival is the mean number of CFU from tubes with test MAb divided by the mean number of CFU from tubes with control MAb, times 100, at 2 h. A percent survival value of >100 indicates bacterial growth during the 2-h assay incubation period. Representative data from one of two experiments with equivalent results are shown.

    • ↵ d The numbers of CFU at time zero for the assay control (complement, HL60 cells, S. aureus Becker bacteria, and 0 μg MAb) replicates were 122 and 171.

  • TABLE 6.

    Ex vivo opsonization and protection by IsdB-specific MAbsa

    Irrelevant MAb isotype control or nonprotein controlMAbGroupNo. of testsTotal no. of mice surviving (n = 5/test)Total % of mice surviving
    10B4.H4, IgG184/4010
    2H2.B8I839/4098b
    6G6.A8, IgG2b52/258
    2H2.BE11I314/1593b
    1G3.BD4II11/520c
    13G11.BF3III12/540c
    13C7.BC1IV20/100c
    PBS33/1520
    • ↵ a The bacterial challenge strain was RN4220. The challenge dose was 2 × 109 to 4 × 109 CFU bacteria.

    • ↵ b Comparison of test MAb to control (P < 0.01).

    • ↵ c Comparison of test MAb to control (P > 0.09).

  • TABLE 7.

    Murine indwelling catheter model

    Irrelevant MAb isotype controlMAbGroupNo. (%) of culture-negative cathetersa
    Exp. 1Exp. 2Exp. 3Exp. 4Totalb
    6G6.A8, IgG2b1/4 (25)3/8 (38)4/10 (40)0/9 (0)8/31 (25)
    2H2.BE11I3/4 (75)6/8 (75)4/10 (40)4/9 (44)17/31 (54)
    • ↵ a Number of culture-negative catheters obtained in four independent passive transfer experiments in the murine indwelling catheter model.

    • ↵ b Comparison of experimental group to control group (P = 0.019).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 - Supplemental methods and results.
      Table S1. Matrix footprint evaluation of anti-IsdB MAbs.
      Table S2. Western blot data with IsdB muteins.
      Table S3. Mutein sequences.
      Legends for Fig. S1 through S4.
      MS Word document, 111K.
    • Supplemental file 2 - Fig. S1. Pairwise MAb binding to IsdB, by SPR sensorgram.
      MS PowerPoint file, 56K.
    • Supplemental file 3 - Fig. S2. SPR binding of IsdB-specific MAbs to sequestered IsdB.
      MS PowerPoint file, 61K.
    • Supplemental file 4 - Fig. S3. ELISA titration of murine IsdB MAb binding to recombinant IsdB.
      MS PowerPoint file, 113K.
    • Supplemental file 5 - Fig. S4. Pairwise binding of MAbs to S. aureus expressing IsdB.
      MS PowerPoint file, 60K.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Selection and Characterization of Murine Monoclonal Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus Iron-Regulated Surface Determinant B with Functional Activity In Vitro and In Vivo
Martha Brown, Rose Kowalski, Julie Zorman, Xin-min Wang, Victoria Towne, Qinjian Zhao, Susan Secore, Adam C. Finnefrock, Tim Ebert, Greg Pancari, Kevin Isett, Yuhua Zhang, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Donna Montgomery, Leslie Cope, Tessie McNeely
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Jul 2009, 16 (8) 1095-1104; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00085-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Selection and Characterization of Murine Monoclonal Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus Iron-Regulated Surface Determinant B with Functional Activity In Vitro and In Vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Selection and Characterization of Murine Monoclonal Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus Iron-Regulated Surface Determinant B with Functional Activity In Vitro and In Vivo
Martha Brown, Rose Kowalski, Julie Zorman, Xin-min Wang, Victoria Towne, Qinjian Zhao, Susan Secore, Adam C. Finnefrock, Tim Ebert, Greg Pancari, Kevin Isett, Yuhua Zhang, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Donna Montgomery, Leslie Cope, Tessie McNeely
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Jul 2009, 16 (8) 1095-1104; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00085-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Bacterial
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Cation Transport Proteins
Staphylococcal Infections
Staphylococcus aureus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X