Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY

Profiling Antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Multiplex Microbead Suspension Arrays for Serodiagnosis of Tuberculosis

Imran H. Khan, Resmi Ravindran, JoAnn Yee, Melanie Ziman, David M. Lewinsohn, Marila L. Gennaro, JoAnne L. Flynn, Celia W. Goulding, Kathryn DeRiemer, Nickolas W. Lerche, Paul A. Luciw
Imran H. Khan
1Center for Comparative Medicine
2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ihkhan@ucdavis.edu
Resmi Ravindran
1Center for Comparative Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JoAnn Yee
3California National Primate Research Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Ziman
1Center for Comparative Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Lewinsohn
5Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marila L. Gennaro
6Public Health Research Institute, Newark, New Jersey 07103
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JoAnne L. Flynn
7Department of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Celia W. Goulding
8University of California, Irvine, California 91679
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn DeRiemer
4School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nickolas W. Lerche
3California National Primate Research Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul A. Luciw
1Center for Comparative Medicine
2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
3California National Primate Research Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00354-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious global disease. The fatality rate attributed to TB is among the highest of infectious diseases, with approximately 2 million deaths occurring per year worldwide. Identification of individuals infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and screening of their immediate contacts is crucial for controlling the spread of TB. Current methods for detection of M. tuberculosis infection are not efficient, in particular, for testing large numbers of samples. We report a novel and efficient multiplex microbead immunoassay (MMIA), based on Luminex technology, for profiling antibodies to M. tuberculosis. Microbead sets identifiable by unique fluorescence were individually coated with each of several M. tuberculosis antigens and tested in multiplex format for antibody detection in the experimental nonhuman primate model of TB. Certain M. tuberculosis antigens, e.g., ESAT-6, CFP-10, and HspX, were included to enhance the specificity of the MMIA, because these antigens are absent in nontuberculous mycobacteria and the vaccine strain Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin. The MMIA enabled simultaneous detection of multiple M. tuberculosis plasma antibodies in several cohorts of macaques representing different stages of infection and/or disease. Antibody profiles were defined in early and latent/chronic infection. These proof-of-concept findings demonstrate the potential clinical use of the MMIA. In addition, the MMIA serodetection system has a potential for mining M. tuberculosis open reading frames (about 4,000) to discover novel target proteins for the development of more-comprehensive TB serodiagnostic tests.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a global disease, with about one-third of the world's population infected with the etiological agent, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (6). New infections appear at the rate of about 8 million cases per year, and the annual death toll due to TB is placed at about 2 million (6). For effective control of TB, it is critical to identify infected individuals and screen their immediate contacts so that drug treatment can be administered quickly. For diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection, more than one diagnostic test is generally applied (8, 21). The tuberculin skin test (TST) is used extensively in both humans as well as nonhuman primates. Results are variable and subject to interpretation and are thus not consistent (8, 21). The sputum smear test allows direct identification of M. tuberculosis and is, therefore, highly specific, but results can be variable (8, 10). Bacterial culture for identification of M. tuberculosis infection requires a dedicated microbiology laboratory and is time-consuming (several weeks) (10).

More-specific and -sensitive TB diagnostic tests have been developed by using M. tuberculosis-specific antigens and by taking advantage of recent advances in sequencing and annotation of the M. tuberculosis genome, which have revealed approximately 4,000 open reading frames (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/TubercuList/ ). These tests include PCR amplification of an M. tuberculosis gene(s) and assays for cell-mediated immunity based on gamma interferon (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs) (20). The IGRAs, including QuantiFERON-TB Gold (Cellestis, Victoria, Australia) and the enzyme-linked immunospot-formatted T-SPOT.TB (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, United Kingdom), measure IFN-γ produced by T cells in whole blood upon stimulation by M. tuberculosis antigens. Both PCR and IGRA tests require a sophisticated laboratory and depend on personnel with significant expertise in patient sample handling and processing.

In contrast to the above assays, diagnostic tests for infection based on antibody detection are relatively straightforward. A key drawback is that antibodies to any single M. tuberculosis antigen may not be detected in most M. tuberculosis-infected individuals (2). Therefore, detection of multiple M. tuberculosis antibodies may be more useful. A multiantigen print immunoassay (MAPIA), in which several antigens are printed on a nitrocellulose membrane by microaerosolization, has been used for profiling multiple M. tuberculosis antibodies (18, 19). A recent report described the use of a mixture of multiple antigens, selected by the use of a MAPIA (18, 19), for serodetection of M. tuberculosis infection in a membrane-based, lateral flow antibody detection method (19). We have used a multiplex microbead immunoassay (MMIA) to profile anti-M. tuberculosis antibodies in nonhuman primates. Profiles of antibodies against multiple antigens are valuable in TB serodiagnosis and may also be useful in differentiating between disease states (7). Because conventional immunoassays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and Western blotting, detect one antibody at a time, their use in antibody profiling has limits for widespread diagnostic use.

We reasoned that a method allowing determination of profiles of antibodies against multiple M. tuberculosis antigens simultaneously would be highly efficient for serodiagnosis of infection. Accordingly, our report describes the development of a novel MMIA for serodiagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection based on the Luminex technology (Austin, TX). This robust diagnostic system is based on 100 microbead sets, and each set is identifiable by a unique fluorescence (11, 22). For our study, six individual microbead sets were coated with six M. tuberculosis antigens. We report that the MMIA enabled simultaneous detection of antibodies against these antigens in nonhuman primates experimentally infected with M. tuberculosis. Because nonhuman primates are vulnerable to TB, an efficient immunoassay with potentially high-throughput testing for TB in thousands of animals in nonhuman primate colonies is highly desirable. In addition, nonhuman primates are a relevant model of TB in humans. Lung pathology, disease progression, and immune correlates of infection are more accurately modeled in nonhuman primates than in the mouse, rabbit, or guinea pig (9). Our report describes proof-of-concept studies that support the use of the multiplex microbead suspension array for defining antibody profiles in M. tuberculosis infection and disease in the macaque model. The highly manipulatable macaque model of TB enables rigorous control over experimental infection conditions. Importantly, this work has implications for profiling antibodies against multiple antigens for use in TB serodiagnosis in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

M. tuberculosis antigens.Early secretory antigenic target 6 (ESAT-6; Rv3875), culture filtrate protein (CFP-10; Rv3874), HspX (Rv2031C), MPT53 (Rv2878C), and MPT63 (Rv1926C) were expressed in Escherichia coli as recombinant histidine-tagged products and purified to near-homogeneity as previously described (5). These recombinant antigens were characterized for purity by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not shown). Peptides representing Ag85B protein were obtained from Genemed Synthesis Inc. (San Antonio, TX). These Ag85B peptides have been previously used as antigens in measuring frequencies of anti-M. tuberculosis CD8+ T cells in TB patients (16).

Antigen coupling to microbeads.Microbead sets, individually identifiable by unique fluorescence (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX), were coupled through carbodiimide linkages with each of the five M. tuberculosis recombinant antigens and Ag85B synthetic peptides as previously described (12, 13).

Nonhuman primates and plasma samples.Four specific-pathogen-free (SPF) rhesus monkeys (numbers 21200, 21300, 21222, and 21229), housed at the Oregon National Primate Research Center (Beaverton, OR), were experimentally inoculated as previously described (17). Briefly, M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv was inoculated by instillation of 1,000 CFU into the right lower lobe of each subject. Disease progression was monitored, and animals were characterized for infection and disease by computer tomography (CT) scanning, chest X-rays, and M. tuberculosis culture in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (17). In these animals, disease progression varied. CT scans revealed early signs of small focal lung lesions in three of four animals at week 4 (21229, 21222, and 21200); lesions became progressively more pronounced at 8 and 12 weeks postinoculation in all four animals. Results from chest X-rays and M. tuberculosis cultures from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid followed a similar pattern as for the CT scans with the exception that animal 21203 did not become culture positive during the 12 weeks of monitoring (17). Necropsies were done on these animals, and the specimens were subjected to histopathological examination (17). Plasma samples were obtained from these animals at preinoculation and postinoculation time points as follows: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks.

For latent and active-chronic infection studies, cynomolgus macaques, housed at the Primate Facility at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA), were inoculated with M. tuberculosis strain Erdman (4). Animals were inoculated with 25 CFU per animal in 2 ml of sterile saline via bronchoscopic instillation into the right caudal or middle lung lobe. Latent infection was characterized as the presence of granulomas and low bacterial loads (compared to active disease) in the lung at necropsy but no radiographic involvement for 4 weeks postinfection or clinical signs of TB for at least 6 months postinfection (4). Samples at several time points, spanning a period over 2 years postinoculation, from two animals representing latent disease were analyzed by MMIA (see Fig. 2B, below). Active-chronic disease was characterized as previously described (4) and was based on evidence of persistent disease, radiographic involvement, persistent culture positivity, or other clinical signs of active disease. Samples at several time points spanning about 8 months to 1 year postinoculation from four active-chronic disease animals were analyzed by MMIA (see Fig. 2B, below). In addition, samples drawn at 1 year postinoculation from five active-chronic infected animals were analyzed (see Fig. 2A, below). Preinoculation plasma samples from four of these animals were used as controls (see Fig. 2A, below). Animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Utilization committees at the University of California, Davis.

TST and Primagam.TST and Primagam assays were performed as previously described (23). For TST, animals were skin tested using mammalian old tuberculin as follows: (i) SPF animals (n = 20), Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) inoculated (n = 9), and Mycobacterium avium-positive monkeys (n = 10) were tested once a year; (ii) rhesus macaques (see Fig. 1, below) were tested prior to and 1 month after inoculation with H37Rv; (iii) cynomolgus macaques (see Fig. 2, below), infected with the Erdman strain, were tested by skin test and Primagam assay prior to infection and at various time points during the infection.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Analysis of M. tuberculosis antibodies in early stages after experimental inoculation of four rhesus macaques. (A) Detection of antibodies to M. tuberculosis antigens by MMIA. All bead sets with positive results are shown. Results are shown as the MFI for each microbead set coated with an antigen. The assay background for each microbead set is shown in red (average MFI ± standard deviation), representing the reactivity of each to plasma samples from uninfected rhesus macaques (n = 20). (B) Detection of antibodies by Western blotting to ESAT-6, CFP-10, and HspX. Animal numbers are indicated, and samples A, B, C, and D represent 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postinoculation. In addition, two negative and two positive control plasma samples (from rhesus macaques naturally infected in a TB outbreak at Tulane National Primate Research Center, LA) were included in the analysis (-Ve Cntrl and +Ve Cntrl, respectively). Positive control animals used for ESAT-6 and CFP-10 are numbers BC64 and EV64 (lanes 1 and 2, respectively), and those for HspX are BH33 and EV64 (lanes 1 and 2, respectively). Antibodies are indicated by arrows. HspX antibodies were only detected in one of two positive control samples and in none of the experimentally infected animals.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Detection of antibodies to M. tuberculosis antigens by MMIA from latent and active-chronic infection samples (cynomolgus macaques). (A) All bead sets with positive results are shown. Plasma samples from five animals experimentally infected with M. tuberculosis for 1 year and samples from four of the same animals before inoculation (control group I) are shown as red closed circles. Samples from uninfected animals collected at six time points over more than 2 years are shown as green closed circles (n = 10 animals; control group II). Animals infected with M. avium (n = 10 animals; control group III) and those inoculated with BCG vaccine (n = 9 animals; control group IV) are shown in blue and purple closed circles, respectively. (B) Time course analysis of M. tuberculosis antibody profiles by multiplex microbead immunoassay. Results for all six bead sets are shown; two samples (110 and 111) were an exception, where the Ag85 bead set was not included in the experiments. Animals 110 and 111 were latently infected for about 2 years. Animals 15704 and 15204 and animals 10105 and 10605 were infected for about 1 year and about one-half year, respectively. Immune responses measured by Primagam assay are shown as the optical density at 450 nm for comparison. The Primagam assay cutoff was an optical density of 0.025.

Multiplex detection of anti-M. tuberculosis antibodies.The MMIA, containing a mixture of six microbead sets, one for each of six coated antigens described above, was used in the analysis of plasma samples, which were diluted 1:200 in Prionex (bio-WORLD, Dublin, OH), as previously described (12). Plasma samples from 20 SPF rhesus macaques provided the baseline (background) median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for the MMIA (see Fig. 1A, below). Positive control plasma samples for MMIA and Western blot analysis (see Fig. 1B, below) were obtained from three naturally infected rhesus macaques (from a TB outbreak at the Tulane National Primate Research Center, Corington, LA; P. J. Didier, personal communication). All three of these animals (EV64, BH33, and BC64) were skin test positive and Primagam positive. In addition, these animals were found positive for TB pneumonia (EV64) and TB lymphadenitis (BH33 and BC64) at necropsy. Additional negative control plasma samples, obtained at the California National Primate Research Center (Davis, CA), were as follows: six serial samples taken over 2 years from 10 SPF animals (control group II) (see Fig. 2A, below), 10 animals infected with a nontuberculous mycobacterium (M. avium) (control group III), and 9 animals vaccinated with BCG (control group IV) (see Fig. 2A, below).

Western blotting.Western blot analysis to confirm the detection of antibodies by MMIA against ESAT-6, CFP-10, and HspX was performed as previously detailed (14).

RESULTS

Detection of M. tuberculosis antibodies in early stages of infection.Profiles of antibodies against M. tuberculosis antigens in four rhesus macaques, at multiple time points postinfection, are shown in Fig. 1A. The MMIA included a mixture of six microbead sets, each coated with one of six antigens: ESAT-6, CFP-10, HspX, MPT53, MPT63, and Ag85B. In each sample, the MMIA was able to simultaneously detect antibodies to all but MPT63. Anti-M. tuberculosis antibody profiles produced by the MMIA allowed serodetection of infection in two animals as early as 4 weeks (21222 and 21229), in three animals by 8 weeks (21203, 21222, and 21229), and in all four by 12 weeks (Fig. 1A). Each of the four monkeys contained antibodies against at least two antigens during the 12-week period. One monkey (21203) contained antibodies to four antigens (ESAT-6, CFP-10, MPT53, and Ag85B), while another (21229) contained antibodies to three antigens (ESAT-6, CFP-10, and HspX) over the experimental period. Western blot analysis was performed to confirm detection of ESAT-6, CFP10, and HspX antibodies (Fig. 1B). Results obtained by the MMIA correlated with those obtained by Western blotting. However, the multiplex assay detected HspX antibodies that were undetectable by Western blotting (Fig. 1A and B). Antibodies against MPT63 were not detected in experimentally infected animals; the MPT63-coated microbead set detected antibodies in naturally infected rhesus macaques (data not shown).

Antibody profiles to M. tuberculosis in latent and active-chronic infection.To test the utility of antibody profiling in latent and active-chronic M. tuberculosis infection, cynomolgus macaques infected with M. tuberculosis for various lengths of time (4) were studied. In a group of five macaques at 1 year postinoculation, antibodies against M. tuberculosis antigens that were clearly detected were as follows: five of five animals were positive for ESAT-6, three of five animals were positive for HspX, and one of five animals was positive for CFP-10 antibodies (Fig. 2A). In preinoculation plasma samples (control group I), anti-M. tuberculosis antibodies were not detected (Fig. 2A). In addition, three other control groups (control groups II, III, and IV) were included in the analysis, all of which were negative for anti-M. tuberculosis antibodies (Fig. 2A), demonstrating specificity of the MMIA for serodetection of M. tuberculosis infection.

To investigate the kinetics and dynamics of anti-M. tuberculosis antibody profiles in latent and active-chronic infection, serial plasma samples from six cynomolgus macaques, experimentally infected with M. tuberculosis, were analyzed. Plasma samples from two monkeys were collected from each of three groups at several time points (Fig. 2B): (i) those latently infected for 2 years (numbers 110 and 111), (ii) those chronically infected for 1 year (15204 and 15704), and (iii) those infected for 0.5 year (10105 and 10605). In comparison to controls (control groups I, II, III, and IV) (Fig. 2A), all infected animals contained antibodies to multiple M. tuberculosis antigens (except animal 110, in which only ESAT-6 antibody was detected) (Fig. 2B). The Primagam test for cell-mediated immune responses, in contrast, displayed negative or barely detectable results at a number of time points (Fig. 2B). TST results were similarly inconsistent (data not shown). The following observations were made: (i) antibodies against ESAT-6 appeared early (6 to 7 weeks) and in most of the infected animals, (ii) antibodies against CFP-10 (animals 111, 15704, and 10105) and HspX (15204, 10105, and 10605) appeared in fewer animals, and (iii) antibodies against Ag85 and MPT53 were detected in only one animal (15204, at 41 weeks). Antibodies against MPT63 were not detected in any of the above samples.

DISCUSSION

These proof-of-concept studies explored the feasibility of the novel detection system MMIA to test for antibody profiles in M. tuberculosis infection. Antibodies against any single TB antigen are expected to be detectable in only some infected individuals (2). A recent report described the use of a mixture of four antigens of M. tuberculosis (ESAT-6, CFP-10, MPB83, and TBF-10), selected on the basis of a MAPIA (18, 19), in a membrane-based TB antibody detection test by a lateral flow method (19). We report the use of a MMIA, on the Luminex platform, for potentially studying a large number of samples to profile antibodies against each individual antigen in nonhuman primates infected with M. tuberculosis. Conventional immunoassays, e.g., ELISAs, generally detect one analyte per test and are therefore inefficient in generating profiles of antibodies. The MMIA was evaluated for profiling antibodies to six M. tuberculosis antigens in plasma samples from four experimentally infected rhesus monkeys that were TST positive at 4 weeks postinoculation (17). CT scanning revealed TB lesions in lungs of these animals (17). Anti-M. tuberculosis antibody profiles by MMIA enabled serodetection of infection in two animals (21229 and 21222) as early as 4 weeks and in all four animals by 12 weeks (Fig. 1A). Confirmation by Western blotting, and the fact that MMIA antibodies against different antigens were not detected in preinoculation samples, indicated that antibody profiles generated by MMIA are specific (Fig. 1A). For animal 21203, ESAT-6 antibodies were readily detected at weeks 8 and 12 by MMIA. However, by Western blotting, ESAT-6 antibodies in this animal were only weakly detected at week 12 (Fig. 1B). In addition, the MMIA was able to detect HspX antibodies in one animal (21229), while HspX antibodies were undetectable by Western blotting in any of the four animals (Fig. 1).

The MMIA did not detect antibodies in animals vaccinated with BCG (n = 9) or those infected with M. avium (n = 10) (Fig. 2A). Animals vaccinated with BCG were assumed to have anti-BCG immune responses as previously shown (15). Animals infected with M. avium were tested by Primagam assay and were found to contain strong anti-M. avium immune responses (reference 15 and data not shown). Experiments with these samples and those from SPF animals further suggest that the MMIA is specific for the detection of anti-M. tuberculosis antibodies (against ESAT-6, CFP10, and HspX). These results indicate that anti-M. tuberculosis antibody profiles are of value as a diagnostic modality for the detection of M. tuberculosis infection.

In about 90% of human cases with exposure to M. tuberculosis, either active-chronic or latent infection ensues (1). To obtain antibody profiles representative of these clinical groups, we studied cynomolgus macaques infected with M. tuberculosis over a period of about 2 years. In latently infected animals with no overt TB symptoms, the MMIA detected antibody responses at all the time points tested, after the first 2 weeks, to ESAT-6 or CFP-10 or both (animals 110 and 111) (Fig. 2B). In another group, plasma samples from a cohort of five infected animals were collected at 1 year postinoculation (Fig. 2A). These animals had antibodies against ESAT-6, HspX, and CFP-10 (Fig. 2A). Similarly, in a time course analysis, anti-M. tuberculosis antibodies could be readily detected in four macaques with active-chronic infection at all time points tested (animals 15704, 15204, 10105, and 10605) (Fig. 2B). In most of the infected animals, ESAT-6 antibodies were the earliest to appear, either alone or in combination with other antibodies. This finding is consistent with previously reported antibody detection by ELISA and the lateral flow method with M. tuberculosis-infected nonhuman primates (3, 19). Generally, anti-M. tuberculosis antibodies, once generated, remained detectable throughout the period of investigation. In contrast, detection of IFN-γ as detected by the Primagam assay was sporadic (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that the MMIA is a useful modality to study profiles of M. tuberculosis antibodies. In this study, correlation of antibody profiles by MMIA with severity of disease in rhesus macaques (Fig. 1) and cynomolgus macaques (Fig. 2) was not observed.

This report utilized the well-controlled macaque model to demonstrate that profiles of antibodies against M. tuberculosis can be studied by MMIA. Infection in macaques was detected as early as 4 weeks postinoculation by this method. These results suggest that antibody profiling in the multiplex format, using multiple M. tuberculosis target antigens (the six reported here, plus others selected from 4,000 open reading frames), will afford a useful and efficient serodiagnostic modality for the detection and survey of M. tuberculosis infection in nonhuman primates as well as humans. A key advantage of the MMIA is flexibility of the Luminex platform and the potential for testing additional antigens defined by the deciphering of the M. tuberculosis genome for TB diagnosis. Because the Luminex platform is adaptable, flexible, and user-friendly, those additional antigens against which antibodies are more consistently detected in M. tuberculosis-infected subjects could be easily incorporated into the MMIA. Additionally, the MMIA will be very useful for monitoring antibody responses in TB vaccine studies because of the flexibility of antibody targets and high-throughput capabilities of this technology.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Saverio V. Capuano (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) for providing Primagam data on M. tuberculosis-infected cynomolgus macaques. Peter J. Didier is gratefully acknowledged for providing plasma samples from several infected macaques at the Tulane National Primate Research Center.

The research in this report was supported by NIH RRO22907 (P.A.L.), RR15104 (D.M.L.), HL075845 (J.L.F.), and RR00169 (base grant to the California National Primate Research Center).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 29 August 2007.
    • Returned for modification 20 September 2007.
    • Accepted 26 November 2007.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Andersen, P., T. M. Doherty, M. Pai, and K. Weldingh. 2007. The prognosis of latent tuberculosis: can disease be predicted? Trends Mol. Med.13:175-182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bothamley, G. H. 1995. Serological diagnosis of tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. Suppl.20:676s-688s.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Brusasca, P. N., R. L. Peters, S. L. Motzel, H. J. Klein, and M. L. Gennaro. 2003. Antigen recognition by serum antibodies in non-human primates experimentally infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Comp. Med.53:165-172.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Capuano, S. V., D. A. Croix, S. Pawar, A. Zinovik, A. Myers, P. L. Lin, S. Bissel, C. Fuhrman, E. Klein, and J. L. Flynn. 2003. Experimental Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of cynomolgus macaques closely resembles the various manifestations of human M. tuberculosis infection. Infect. Immun.71:5831-5844.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Colangeli, R., A. Heijbel, A. M. Williams, C. Manca, J. Chan, K. Lyashchenko, and M. L. Gennaro. 1998. Three-step purification of lipopolysaccharide-free, polyhistidine-tagged recombinant antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Chromatogr. B714:223-235.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    Corbett, E. L., C. J. Watt, N. Walker, D. Maher, B. G. Williams, M. C. Raviglione, and C. Dye. 2003. The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Arch. Intern. Med.163:1009-1021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Davidow, A., G. V. Kanaujia, L. Shi, J. Kaviar, X. Guo, N. Sung, G. Kaplan, D. Menzies, and M. L. Gennaro. 2005. Antibody profiles characteristic of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection state. Infect. Immun.73:6846-6851.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Dinnes, J., J. Deeks, H. Kunst, A. Gibson, E. Cummins, N. Waugh, F. Drobniewski, and A. Lalvani. 2007. A systematic review of diagnostic tests for the detection of tuberculosis infection. Health Technol. Assess.11:1-196.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Flynn, J. L., S. V. Capuano, D. Croix, S. Pawar, A. Myers, A. Zinovik, and E. Klein. 2003. Nonhuman primates: a model for tuberculosis research. Tuberculosis83:116-118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Getahun, H., M. Harrington, R. O'Brian, and P. Nunn. 2007. Diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in people with HIV infection or AIDS in source-constrained settings: informing urgent policy changes. Lancet369:2042-2049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Kettman, J. R., T. Davies, D. Chandler, K. G. Oliver, and R. J. Fulton. 1998. Classification and properties of 64 multiplexed microsphere sets. Cytometry33:234-243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Khan, I. H., L. V. Kendall, M. Ziman, S. Wong, S. Mendoza, J. Fahey, S. M. Griffey, S. W. Barthold, and P. A. Luciw. 2005. Simultaneous serodetection of 10 highly prevalent mouse infectious pathogens in a single reaction by multiplex analysis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.12:513-519.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Khan, I. H., S. Mendoza, J. Yee, M. Deane, K. Vankateswaran, S. S. Zhou, P. A. Barry, N. W. Lerche, and P. A. Luciw. 2006. Simultaneous detection of antibodies to six nonhuman-primate viruses by multiplex microbead immunoassay. Clin. Vaccine Immunol.13:45-52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Khan, I. H., S. Mendoza, P. Rhyne, M. Ziman, J. Tuscano, D. Eisinger, H. J. Kung, and P. A. Luciw. 2006. Multiplex analysis of intracellular signaling pathways in lymphoid cells by microbead suspension arrays. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5:758-768.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Langermans, J. A., P. Andersen, D. van Soolingen, R. A. Vervenne, P. A. Frost, T. van der Laan, L. A. van Pinxteren, J. van den Hombergh, S. Kroon, I. Peekel, S. Florquin, and A. W. Thomas. 2001. Divergent effect of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination on Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in highly related macaque species: implications for primate models in tuberculosis vaccine research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:11497-11502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Lewinsohn, D. A., E. Winata, G. M. Swarbrick, K. E., Tanner, M. S. Cook, M. D. Null, M. E. Cansler, A. Sette, J. Sidney, and D. M. Lewinsohn. 2007. Immunodominant tuberculosis CD8 antigens preferentially restricted by HLA-B. PloS Pathog.3:1240-1249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Lewinsohn, D. M., I. S. Tydeman, M. Freider, J. E. Grotzke, R. A. Lines, S. Ahmed, K. D. Prongay, S. L. Primack, L. M. Colgin, A. D. Lewis, and D. A. Lewinsohn. 2006. High resolution radiographic and fine immunologic definition of TB disease progression in rhesus macaque. Microbes Infect.8:2587-2598.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Lyashchenko, K. P., M. Singh, R. Colengeli, and M. L. Gennaro. 2000. A multi-antigen print immunoassay for the development of serological diagnosis of infectious diseases. J. Immunol. Methods242:91-100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Lyashchenko, K. P., R. Greenwald, J. Esfandiari, D. Greenwald, C. A. Nacy, S. Gibson, P. J. Didier, M. Washington, P. Szczerba, S. Motzel, L. Handt, J. M. Pollock, J. McNair, P. Andersen, J. A. Langermans, F. Verreck, S. Ervin, F. Ervin, and C. McCombs. 2007. PrimaTB STAT-PAK assay, a novel, rapid lateral-flow test for tuberculosis in nonhuman primates. Clin. Vaccine Immunol.14:1158-1164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Menzies, D., M. Pai, and G. Comstock. 2007. Meta-analysis: new tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: areas of uncertainty and recommendations for research. Ann. Intern. Med.146:340-354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Perkins, M. D., G. Roscigno, and A. Zumla. 2006. Progress towards improved tuberculosis diagnostics for developing countries. Lancet367:942-943.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Prabhakar, U., E. Eirikis, and H. M. Davis. 2002. Simultaneous quantification of proinflamatory cytokines in human plasma using the LabMap assay. J. Immunol. Methods1:207-218.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    Vervenne, R. A., S. L. Jones, D. van Soolingen, T. van der Laan, P. Andersen, P. J. Heidt, A. W. Thomas, and J. A. Langermans. 2004. TB diagnosis in non-human primates: comparison of two interferon-gamma assays and the skin test for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.100:61-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Profiling Antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Multiplex Microbead Suspension Arrays for Serodiagnosis of Tuberculosis
Imran H. Khan, Resmi Ravindran, JoAnn Yee, Melanie Ziman, David M. Lewinsohn, Marila L. Gennaro, JoAnne L. Flynn, Celia W. Goulding, Kathryn DeRiemer, Nickolas W. Lerche, Paul A. Luciw
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Mar 2008, 15 (3) 433-438; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00354-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Profiling Antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Multiplex Microbead Suspension Arrays for Serodiagnosis of Tuberculosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Profiling Antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Multiplex Microbead Suspension Arrays for Serodiagnosis of Tuberculosis
Imran H. Khan, Resmi Ravindran, JoAnn Yee, Melanie Ziman, David M. Lewinsohn, Marila L. Gennaro, JoAnne L. Flynn, Celia W. Goulding, Kathryn DeRiemer, Nickolas W. Lerche, Paul A. Luciw
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Mar 2008, 15 (3) 433-438; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00354-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Viral
Antigens, Bacterial
Immunoassay
Microspheres
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
tuberculosis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X