Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
MICROBIAL IMMUNOLOGY

Evaluation of Two Types of Sponges Used To Collect Cervical Secretions and Assessment of Antibody Extraction Protocols for Recovery of Neutralizing Anti-Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Antibodies

Troy J. Kemp, Allan Hildesheim, Roni T. Falk, John T. Schiller, Douglas R. Lowy, Ana Cecilia Rodriguez, Ligia A. Pinto
Troy J. Kemp
1HPV Immunology Laboratory, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan Hildesheim
2Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roni T. Falk
2Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John T. Schiller
3Laboratory of Cellular Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas R. Lowy
3Laboratory of Cellular Oncology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Cecilia Rodriguez
4Proyecto Epidemiológico Guanacaste, San José, Costa Rica
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ligia A. Pinto
1HPV Immunology Laboratory, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lpinto@ncifcrf.gov
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00118-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Strategies implemented to improve antibody extraction from Ultracell sponges. (A) Detergents influence the SEAPNA in a concentration-dependent manner. Each condition was set up in triplicate, and the error bars were calculated from the standard deviations of the results of five separate experiments. (B) Recovery of mouse IgG1-TNP from Ultracell sponges incubated with BSA is dependent upon BSA concentration. BSA (0.5% to 0.00005%) was incubated with Ultracell sponges before they were spiked with mouse IgG1-TNP. The extracts were analyzed in a mouse IgG1 ELISA to determine recovery. (C) The addition of BSA to the EB slightly improved the recovery of mouse IgG1-TNP from Ultracell sponges. Mouse IgG1-TNP was spiked onto the sponges at 1,000 ng/ml. The extracts were analyzed in a mouse IgG1 ELISA to determine recovery. The results are representative of two separate experiments.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Cumulative recoveries of V5 (anti-HPV16) spiked at 1/1,000 and 1/2,000 onto Merocel and Ultracell spongesa

    Sponge typeNo. of sponges% V5 recovery
    MeanSD95% CI
    Merocel
        Sterile3210211.498.1-106
        Participant2093.515.286.4-101
    Ultracell
        Sterile162.55.8−0.64-5.6
        Participant3561.249.344.3-78.2
    • ↵ a Mean, SD, and 95% CI values were calculated by combining the results obtained from sponges spiked with V5 at dilutions of 1/1,000 and 1/2,000.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Two Types of Sponges Used To Collect Cervical Secretions and Assessment of Antibody Extraction Protocols for Recovery of Neutralizing Anti-Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Antibodies
Troy J. Kemp, Allan Hildesheim, Roni T. Falk, John T. Schiller, Douglas R. Lowy, Ana Cecilia Rodriguez, Ligia A. Pinto
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Jan 2008, 15 (1) 60-64; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00118-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Two Types of Sponges Used To Collect Cervical Secretions and Assessment of Antibody Extraction Protocols for Recovery of Neutralizing Anti-Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Antibodies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of Two Types of Sponges Used To Collect Cervical Secretions and Assessment of Antibody Extraction Protocols for Recovery of Neutralizing Anti-Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Antibodies
Troy J. Kemp, Allan Hildesheim, Roni T. Falk, John T. Schiller, Douglas R. Lowy, Ana Cecilia Rodriguez, Ligia A. Pinto
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology Jan 2008, 15 (1) 60-64; DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00118-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Viral
Cervix Uteri
Contraceptive Devices, Female
Human papillomavirus 16
Papillomavirus Infections
Uterine Cervical Diseases

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X