Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Archive
  • About the Journal
    • About CVI
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • FAQ
MICROBIAL IMMUNOLOGY

Construction and Expression of Recombinant Streptolysin-O and Preevaluation of Its Use in Immunoassays

Blanca Velázquez, Hugo Massaldi, Julio Battistoni, José A. Chabalgoity
Blanca Velázquez
1Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Hygiene, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Uruguay, Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hugo Massaldi
1Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Hygiene, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Uruguay, Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julio Battistoni
2Laboratory of Immunotechnology, Department of Immunology, School of Chemistry-School of Science, Universidad de la República, Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José A. Chabalgoity
1Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Hygiene, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Uruguay, Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jachabal@higiene.edu.uy
DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.12.5.683-684.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Commercially available immunoassays for assessment of anti-streptolysin-O antibodies use native streptolysin-O obtained by a complex process. We prepared a biologically active recombinant streptolysin-O with higher yield and a simpler purification process. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay developed with this recombinant showed good correlation with a commercial test, suggesting that it could be suitable for immunoassays.

Streptolysin-O (SLO) is a pore-forming cytolysin secreted by most strains of Streptococcus pyogenes (4). Patients infected with S. pyogenes develop antibodies to SLO, and strong antibody responses to SLO have been shown to correlate with the onset of acute rheumatic fever and acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis. Titration of anti-SLO antibodies in sera of patients with recurrent infection with group A streptococci is then important for risk factor assessment (16). Most commercially available immunoassays for assessment of anti-SLO antibodies in sera use native SLO purified from S. pyogenes cultures (2, 3). However, purification of native SLO has several drawbacks: it has very low yield and considerable batch-to-batch variation, the industrial process carries biological risks, and wasting is a problem. The use of recombinant SLO (rSLO) is an alternative that could solve most of those problems.

A DNA fragment coding for SLO amino acid sequence 78 to 571 of the whole protein (5) was amplified by PCR, using appropriate primers and purified chromosomal DNA from S. pyogenes as template (10). Forward primer (5′-AATGGATCCCTTGCTCCCAAAGAAATGCC-3′) corresponded to nucleotides 430 to 450 of the slo complete gene and was designed with addition of a BamHI (underlined) site at the 5′ end. Reverse primer (5′-CCGGAATTCCTACTTATAAGTAATCGAACC-3′) corresponded to nucleotides 1894 to 1914 and had an EcoRI site (underlined) added at the 5′ end. PCRs were performed using a polymerase with proofreading activity (Vent Polymerase; New England Biolabs Inc., Hertfordshire, United Kingdom). The amplified fragment was ligated into plasmid pGEX-2T (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) previously digested with the same enzymes and transformed into Escherichia coli TG2 cells. Selected transformants were grown in Luria-Bertani broth, and expression of the glutathione S-transferase fusion protein was induced with isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). Cells were recovered by centrifugation and disrupted by sonication, and the soluble GST-rSLO fusion protein was affinity purified with a glutathione-Sepharose column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (13). Purified protein yield was 1.5 mg/liter. Analysis of the purified product by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed two bands of similar intensity corresponding to approximately 77 kDa and 27 kDa and a third band of minor intensity of approximately 70 kDa (data not shown). The two major bands (77 kDa and 27 kDa) were consistent with the predicted sizes for GST-rSLO and GST, respectively. Immunoblot analysis demonstrated that human anti-SLO sera recognize the bands of 77 kDa and 70 kDa, whereas a mouse anti-GST serum recognizes all bands; preincubation of anti-GST mouse serum with soluble GST resulted in a marked reduction of all bands in the immunoblot (Fig. 1). These results confirm that all three bands contain GST and that the two bigger bands were different forms of GST-rSLO fusion, while the 27-kDa band seems to correspond to GST alone. The shorter fusion may be a degradation product or a modified form of the fusion protein due to alternative translation termination sites within the slo gene, resulting in the expression of shorter fragments of SLO (11, 14). The appearance of a product with a molecular weight corresponding to GST that is only recognized by anti-GST serum could be the result of sensitivity of the hybrid protein to host's proteases or early stop in the transcription/translation process. Similar results have been reported with other proteins fused to GST (12, 13). Early stop in the transcription/translation process could arise from the presence in the fused gene of codons of low usage in E. coli, generating a pause in the ribosome traffic when these codons are reached (8). Changes in the codon usage to fit with the codon bias of the host organism could be an appropriate strategy to improve the expression of a heterologous gene (6, 15), presumably by securing to a straightforward ribosome traffic.

Titration of the hemolytic activity of the purified material was assayed side by side with native SLO (Wiener Lab, Rosario, Argentina) in reduced conditions, nonreducing conditions (without cysteine), and in oxidizing conditions using FeCl3 (0.012%) as previously described (1). The hemolytic activity of native and recombinant SLO were similar, showing biological activity in reducing conditions (1,600 and 25,600, respectively) that was abrogated in nonreducing or oxidizing conditions as expected (4). Specific hemolytic activity of purified native SLO has been reported as 8 × 105 IU/mg of protein (1), and for a different rSLO a value of 1 × 105 IU/mg has been reported (9). Our preparation had a specific hemolytic activity of 1 × 108 IU/mg. This finding was surprising, since GST does not have hemolytic activity and it represents approximately one third of the total molecular weights of the fusion.

Thirty-four human sera obtained from patients with recent S. pyogenes infection (collected at the University Hospital, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Uruguay) were assessed using either a specially designed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that uses the GST-rSLO and a latex agglutination test (Rheumagen ASO, Biokit Inc., Barcelona, Spain) that uses native SLO (3). Titers obtained by latex agglutination technique have discontinuous distribution, and those obtained by ELISA are continuously distributed; thus, the ELISA results were made discrete for comparison. Compared in this way, anti-SLO titers obtained by both methods showed good correlation (r = 0.9646; Fig. 2). However, when we applied the Wilcoxon rank sign test for a paired experiment (7), we did not find significance to the null hypothesis that proposes that results were the same by either method. This lack of correlation could be attributed to the intrinsic error of the latex technique (+/− one dilution) and to differences in the dilution schemes employed by the two assays.

In summary, our results suggest that the GST-rSLO obtained is a suitable antigen for the specific detection of anti-SLO antibodies in human serum samples without any further processing, which could replace the native molecule in diagnostic assays. Also, these results suggest that the ELISA method could be an acceptable alternative for quantification of anti-SLO antibodies. Work aimed at scaling up the production as well as at improving the purity of the protein is currently under way in our laboratory.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Analysis of the purified extract by immunoblotting. The material eluted from the glutathione-Sepharose column was separated according to molecular weight on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immediately transferred to nitrocellulose for analysis by antigenic recognition. Nitrocellulose strips were assessed with the following: lane 1, anti-SLO human serum 1/500 and developed with an anti-human IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase 1/1,000; lane 2, mouse anti-GST serum 1/200 and developed with an anti-mouse IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase 1/1,000; lane 3, mouse anti-GST serum previously incubated with GST (0.0075 mg/ml) and developed with anti-mouse IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase 1/1,000; lane 4, negative control.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Correlation between anti-SLO antibody titers measured by ELISA and by latex agglutination. ELISA and latex results were plotted, and their statistical relationships were assessed using log-transformed values.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Blanca Velázquez was supported by a scholarship from “The National Council for Science and Technology” (CONICYT), Uruguay.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 22 November 2004.
    • Returned for modification 3 January 2005.
    • Accepted 14 March 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bhakdi, S., M. Roth, A. Sziegoleit, and J. Tranun-Jensen. 1984. Isolation and identification of two hemolytic forms of streptolysin-O. Infect. Immun.46:394-400.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Boreland, P. C., E. A. Thompson, and G. Fenning. 1987. Evaluation of a latex agglutination screening test for the determination of anti-streptolysin O (ASO) antibodies. Serodiagn. Immunother.1:113-116.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Gerber, M., L. Caparas, and F. Randolph. 1990. Evaluation of a new agglutination test for detection of streptolysin O antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol.28:413-415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Halbert, S. P. 1970. Streptolysin O, p. 69-98. In T. C. Montie, S. Dakis, and S. J. Ajl (ed.), Microbial toxins, vol. 3. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
  5. 5.↵
    Kehoe, M. A., and K. N. Timmis. 1984. Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of the streptolysin O determinant from Streptococcus pyogenes: characterization of the cloned streptolysin O determinant and demonstration of the absence of substantial homology with determinants of other thiol-activated toxins. Infect. Immun.43:804-810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Makoff, A. J., M. D. Oxer, M. A. Romanos, N. F. Fairweather, and S. Ballantine. 1989. Expression of tetanus toxin fragment C in E. coli: high level expression by removing rare codons. Nucleic Acids Res.17:10191-10202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Mendelhall, W., R. Scheaffer, and D. Wackerly. 1996. Mathematical statistic with application, 5th ed. Duxbury Press, Florence, Ky.
  8. 8.↵
    Peterson, C. 1992. Control of functional mRNA stability in bacteria: multiple mechanism of nucleolytic and non-nucleolytic inactivation. Mol. Microb.6:277-282.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Pinkney, M., V. Kapur, J. Smith, U. Weller, M. Palmer, M. Glanville, M. McBner, J. M. Musser, S. Bhakdi, and M. A. Kehoe. 1995. Different forms of streptolysin O produced by Streptococcus pyogenes and by Escherichia coli expressing recombinant toxin cleavage by streptococcal cysteine protease. Infect. Immun.63:2776-2779.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd. ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  11. 11.↵
    Savic, D. J., and J. J. Ferretti. 2003. Novel genomic rearrangement that affects expression of Streptococcus pyogenes streptolysin O (slo) gene. J. Bacteriol.185:1857-1869.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Smith, D. B. 1993. Purification of glutathione-S-transferase fusion proteins. Methods Mol. Cell. Biol.4:220-229.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Smith, D. B., and K. S. Johnson. 1988. Single step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusion with glutathione S-transferase. Gene67:31-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Smith, R. A., and J. S. Parkinson. 1980. Overlapping genes at the cheA locus of Escherichia coli.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA77:5370-5374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Spanjaard, R. A., and J. Van Duin. 1988. Translation of the sequence AGG-AGG yields 50% ribosomal frameshift. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA85:7967-7971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    World Health Organization. 1998. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Report of a W.H.O. study group. Tech. Rep. Ser.764:3-11.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Construction and Expression of Recombinant Streptolysin-O and Preevaluation of Its Use in Immunoassays
Blanca Velázquez, Hugo Massaldi, Julio Battistoni, José A. Chabalgoity
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology May 2005, 12 (5) 683-684; DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.12.5.683-684.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical and Vaccine Immunology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Construction and Expression of Recombinant Streptolysin-O and Preevaluation of Its Use in Immunoassays
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Construction and Expression of Recombinant Streptolysin-O and Preevaluation of Its Use in Immunoassays
Blanca Velázquez, Hugo Massaldi, Julio Battistoni, José A. Chabalgoity
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology May 2005, 12 (5) 683-684; DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.12.5.683-684.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CVI
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript to mSphere

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1556-6811; Online ISSN: 1556-679X