CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
CVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 March 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
CVI.00435-06v1
14/5/527    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Caulfield, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Caulfield, M. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clin. Vaccine Immunol. doi:10.1128/CVI.00435-06
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Establishing Acceptance Criteria for Cell-Mediated Immunity Assays Using Frozen Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Stored Under Optimal and Suboptimal Conditions

Jeffrey G. Smith*, Heather R. Joseph, Tina Green, Jodie A. Field, Melissa Wooters, Robin M. Kaufhold, Joseph Antonello, and Michael J. Caulfield

Vaccine & Biologics Research, Vaccine Biometrics, Merck Research Laboratories, 770 Sumneytown Pike, Merck and Co., Inc., West Point, PA 19486

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: jeffrey_smith2{at}merck.com.


   Abstract

The ELISPOT assay is a powerful tool for measuring antigen specific cellular immune responses. The ability to use frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) facilitates testing samples in multi-center clinical trials; however unreliable ELISPOT responses may result if samples are not handled properly. Exposure of frozen PBMCs to suboptimal storage temperature (-20°C) or repeated cycling between more optimal storage temperatures (<-130°C and -70°C) reduced the quality of frozen PBMCs as assessed by cell viability and functional ELISPOT response measures. Cell viability assessed by Trypan blue dye exclusion was reduced and the percentage of apoptotic cells, by the Guava NexinTM assay, was significantly increased following these events. The functional IFN-{gamma} ELISPOT responses to PHA mitogen, a CD4 T cell specific antigen (varicella zoster virus [VZV]), and a CD8 T cell specific antigen (pool containing known CMV, EBV, and influenza virus peptides) were all significantly reduced following suboptimal storage events. However, for a given suboptimal storage event, the magnitude of the reduction varied between individuals and even among aliquots within an individual bleed, indicating the need for sample specific acceptance criteria (AC). Percent viable or percent apoptotic cells after thaw as well as functional ELISPOT response to PHA were all effective when applied with limits as acceptance criteria for separating samples damaged during storage from valid control samples. While all three AC measures could be effectively applied, the apoptosis AC limit applied was best for separating samples that could respond to antigenic stimulation from samples that could not effectively respond.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.