CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
CVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 2 May 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
CVI.00432-06v1
14/7/839    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gao, X.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gao, X.-M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clin. Vaccine Immunol. doi:10.1128/CVI.00432-06
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of IgG responses against the spike and nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome

Jincun Zhao, Wei Wang, Wenling Wang, Zhendong Zhao, Yan Zhang, Ping Lv, Furong Ren, and Xiao-Ming Gao*

Department of Immunology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China; Beijing Red Cross Blood Center, Beijing, China

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: xmgao{at}bjmu.edu.cn.


   Abstract

Both the nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) proteins of SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) are able to induce strong humoral responses in humans following an infection. To compare IgG responses against the S and N proteins of SARS-CoV in SARS patients during the manifestation/convalescent versus post-infection periods, serum samples were collected from hospitalized SARS patients within 6 weeks after the onset of illness (Set 1, 57 sequential samples from 19 patients) or 2-3 months after their recovery (Set 2, 33 post-infection samples from 33 subjects). Serum samples from 100 healthy blood donors (Set 3), collected in 2002, were also included. Specific IgG against whole virus, fragment 450-650 of the S protein, and full length N protein of SARS-CoV were measured by ELISAs. Western-blot assays were carried out to confirm the ELISA results. Fifty one of the Set 1 sera (89%) bound N-protein, a similar proportion to that recognizing whole virus (79%) and S-fragment (77%). All 33 sera from Set 2 were strongly positive for N-specific IgG, while 27 (82%) were positive for anti-S450-650 IgG. Two of the Set 3 sera were strongly positive for anti-N, but not anti-S450-650, IgG. Similar levels of IgG responses against the S and N proteins were observed in SARS patients during the manifestation/convalescent stages. In the post-infection period, however, a number of patients had much lower serum IgG levels against S450-650 than against N protein.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.