Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, September 2007, p. 1084-1093, Vol. 14, No. 9
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00115-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Giorgio Cosentino,3
Heather P. Masri,4
Valerie Mock,5
Rebecca Oesterle,6
Robert S. Lanciotti,1
Denise A. Martin,1
Amanda J. Panella,1
Olga Kosoy,1 and
Brad J. Biggerstaff1
Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vector-Borne and Enteric Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Fort Collins, Colorado,1 Bureau of State Laboratory Services, Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, Arizona,2 Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory, California Department of Health Services, Richmond, California,3 Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services, Richmond, Virginia,4 Florida Department of Health Laboratory, Jacksonville, Florida,5 Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan6
Received 9 March 2007/ Returned for modification 12 April 2007/ Accepted 13 June 2007
A microsphere-based immunoassay (MIA) was previously developed that is capable of determining the presence of anti-West Nile (WN) virus or anti-St. Louis encephalitis (SLE) virus immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in human serum or cerebrospinal fluid. The original data set on which the classification rules were based comprised 491 serum specimens obtained from the serum bank at the Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (DVBID). The classification rules were used to provide a result and to determine whether confirmatory testing was necessary for a given sample. A validation study was coordinated between the DVBID and five state health laboratories to determine (i) the reproducibility of the test between different laboratories, (ii) the correlation between the IgM-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MAC-ELISA) and the MIA, and (iii) whether the initial nonspecific parameters could be refined to reduce the volume of confirmatory testing. Laboratorians were trained in the method, and reagents and data analysis software developed at the DVBID were shipped to each validating laboratory. Validating laboratories performed tests on approximately 200 samples obtained from their individual states, the collections of which comprised approximately equal numbers of WN virus-positive and -negative samples, as determined by MAC-ELISA. In addition, 377 samples submitted to the DVBID for arbovirus testing were analyzed using the MIA and MAC-ELISA at the DVBID only. For the specimens tested at both the state and the DVBID laboratories, a correlation of results indicated that the technology is readily transferable between laboratories. The detection of IgM antibodies to WN virus was more consistent than detection of IgM antibodies to SLE virus. Some changes were made to the analysis software that resulted in an improved accuracy of diagnosis.
Published ahead of print on 3 July 2007.
Present address: City of Phoenix Water Services Department, Phoenix, AZ.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»