This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shivananda
Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shivananda,
Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, P. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, June 2006, p. 661-664, Vol. 13, No. 6
1071-412X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00087-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Two Hepatitis B Vaccines (GeneVac-B and Engerix-B) in Healthy Infants in India

Shivananda,1 Virbhadra Somani,1 B. S. Srikanth,1 M. Mohan,1 and P. S. Kulkarni2*

Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore,1 Serum Institute of India Ltd., Pune, India2

Received 7 March 2006/ Returned for modification 3 April 2006/ Accepted 17 April 2006

Hepatitis B is a major problem in many parts of the world. The WHO has recommended the inclusion of hepatitis B vaccines in routine immunization schedules. We wanted to compare two recombinant hepatitis B vaccines in an infant population for immunogenicity and reactogenicity when given at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. One hundred seventy-three infants meeting eligibility criteria were given either GeneVac-B (Serum Institute of India Ltd.) or Engerix-B (GlaxoSmithKline Beecham) in a random fashion. Three 0.5-ml (10-µg) doses of the vaccines were given at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age along with diphtheria-pertussis (whole cell)-tetanus (DTPw) vaccine. Blood samples were collected at baseline and 1 month after administration of the third dose of the vaccines to measure anti-HBs antibody levels. Seroconversion was defined as a titer of more than 1 x 10–3 IU/ml, while seroprotection was defined as a titer of more than 10 x 10–3 IU/ml. Of the GeneVac-B recipients, 98% seroconverted versus 99% of the Engerix-B group. The anti-HBs geometric mean titer was slightly greater for GeneVac-B (229 x 10–3 IU/ml) than for Engerix-B (167 x 10–3 IU/ml), but the difference was not significant. The seroprotection rates were similar for both vaccines (96% and 95%, respectively). The most common systemic reaction events were mild to moderate fever, excessive crying, local swelling, rash, and irritability, and the local reactions were redness, induration, and edema, which most probably were caused by the simultaneously administered DTPw vaccine. All events were transient and resolved without sequelae. Reactogenicity was similar for the two vaccines. The present study shows that GeneVac-B is as immunogenic and as well tolerated as Engerix-B when administered with DTPw vaccine at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Serum Institute of India Ltd., 212/2, Hadapsar, Pune, India. Phone: 91-20-26602384. Fax: 91-20-26993945. E-mail: drpsk{at}seruminstitute.com.


Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, June 2006, p. 661-664, Vol. 13, No. 6
1071-412X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00087-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hutton, D. W., Tan, D., So, S. K., Brandeau, M. L. (2007). Cost-Effectiveness of Screening and Vaccinating Asian and Pacific Islander Adults for Hepatitis B. ANN INTERN MED 147: 460-469 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sapru, A., Kulkarni, P. S., Bhave, S., Bavdekar, A., Naik, S. S., Pandit, A. N. (2007). Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Two Recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccines in Small Infants: A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparative Study. J Trop Pediatr 53: 303-307 [Abstract] [Full Text]