This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Iqbal, H. S. Articles by Balakrishnan, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Iqbal, H. S. Articles by Balakrishnan, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, December 2005, p. 1425-1428, Vol. 12, No. 12
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.12.1425-1428.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation and Diagnostic Usefulness of Domestic and Imported Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Antibody in India

VHS-YRG CARE Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Centre for AIDS Research and Education, Voluntary Health Services Hospital Campus, Taramani, Chennai, India

Received 28 July 2005/ Returned for modification 12 August 2005/ Accepted 3 October 2005

Diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is important for patient management and prevention of new infections. The number of test kits available for the detection of HIV antibodies is unprecedented. In order to identify appropriate test kits, we evaluated a variety of commercial kits manufactured abroad as well as in India. The plasma and serum specimens (n = 264) were collected from individuals attending the Voluntary Counseling and Testing Centre at the YRG Centre for AIDS and Education. The specimens were used to evaluate six commercially available HIV test kits: Enzaids HIV 1+2, HIV-CheX, Murex HIV-1.2.0, Genscreen HIV 1/2 version 2, Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II Ag/Ab, and CombAids RS Advantage. High sensitivities and specificities (99%) were observed for the Enzaids, Murex, Vironostika, and CombAids assays. HIV-CheX showed the highest number of false-positive and false-negative results. The Genscreen test also gave many false positives. The study indicated that the Enzaids, Murex, and Vironostika enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits and the CombAids RS Advantage rapid assay could be used to achieve acceptable results for the detection of HIV antibodies. A combination of two tests is recommended to optimize the efficiency of HIV antibody testing algorithms, especially when evaluation with an HIV Western blot confirmatory test is not possible.