This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chutkowski, C.
Right arrow Articles by McSharry, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chutkowski, C.
Right arrow Articles by McSharry, J. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2002, p. 1379-1381, Vol. 9, No. 6
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.6.1379-1381.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Use of a Single Monoclonal Antibody To Determine the Susceptibilities of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 Clinical Isolates to Acyclovir

Christine Chutkowski,1 Betty Olson,1 Ann McDonough,1 James Mahoney,2 and James J. McSharry1*

Center for Immunology and Microbial Disease, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York 12208,1 Regional Virology Laboratory, St. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada2

Received 17 June 2002/ Returned for modification 30 July 2002/ Accepted 13 August 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
This report describes a flow cytometry drug susceptibility assay that uses a single fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibody to determine the acyclovir susceptibilities of herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 or type 2 clinical isolates. This assay yields 50% effective doses (drug concentrations that reduce the number of antigen-positive cells by 50%) for HSV clinical isolates that are equivalent to those obtained with the plaque reduction assay.


arrow
TEXT
 
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are ubiquitous, with approximately 80% of the adult population infected with HSV type 1 and approximately 20% of the adult population also infected with HSV type 2 (1, 22, 25). Current therapy for primary and recurrent HSV infections involves the use of acyclovir or one of its more bioavailable prodrugs, valacyclovir or famciclovir (2). Long-term use of these antiviral drugs in HSV-infected neonates and immunocompromised patients can lead to the selection of viral mutants that are resistant to these drugs (7, 8, 17). Less than 1% of the clinical isolates obtained from immunocompetent patients treated with acyclovir are resistant to acyclovir (3). However, 5 to 10% of the clinical isolates obtained from immunocompromised patients subjected to long-term treatment or multiple treatments with acyclovir are resistant to the drug due to mutations in the thymidine kinase (TK) gene and/or DNA polymerase genes (5, 7). Patients with acyclovir-resistant HSV clinical isolates caused by mutations in the TK gene, but not those infected with viruses with mutations in the DNA polymerase gene, can be successfully treated with the HSV DNA polymerase inhibitors foscarnet and cidofovir (9, 10).

There are no universally accepted methods for determining the drug susceptibilities of HSV clinical isolates. The most accurate assay for HSV is the plaque reduction assay (PRA) (19-21). The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) has established a standardized drug susceptibility assay for HSV based on the PRA, but it has not been validated and is seldom used because it is time-consuming, expensive to perform, and subjective. Other drug susceptibility assays are faster than the PRA, and some of the endpoints can be read automatically, but these assays are less sensitive than the PRA (6, 12, 23, 24). With the increased use of acyclovir and its derivatives among HSV-infected neonates and immunocompromised patients leading to the increased selection of drug-resistant HSV clinical isolates, there is a urgent need for a standardized drug susceptibility assay for HSV clinical isolates.

HSV-specific fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry have been used to detect and quantify HSV-infected cells and to perform drug susceptibility testing of HSV clinical isolates (13, 18). These studies used a high multiplicity of infection and monitored the effect of antiviral drugs on HSV replication by measuring the effects of drugs on the synthesis of late antigens. In this report, we show that a single monoclonal antibody to an HSV antigen that is shared by both HSV type 1 and HSV type 2 and flow cytometry can be used to determine the drug susceptibilities of HSV type 1 and type 2 clinical isolates to acyclovir.

The flow cytometry drug susceptibility assay is essentially that described previously for human cytomegalovirus (14-16). Briefly, confluent BSC-1 cell monolayers were infected with HSV clinical isolates at a multiplicity of infection of 0.001 in the presence of various concentrations of acyclovir. After overnight incubation, the cells were harvested, permeabilized, and treated with the appropriate fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibody to HSV antigens, and the number of antigen-positive cells was determined by flow cytometry. The EC50s (the drug concentration that reduces the number of antigen-positive cells by 50%) were determined by plotting the percent reduction in the number of antigen-positive cells versus the drug concentration using SlideWrite Plus software. Reagent 5090 is a fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibody that detects an unknown HSV-specific antigen expressed in cells infected with either HSV type 1 or HSV type 2. The HSV 1 Typing Reagent contains two fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibodies to HSV type 1 late antigens, glycoprotein C and ICP35. The HSV 2 Typing Reagent contains two fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibodies that react with HSV type 2-specific glycoproteins of 78 to 82 and 110 to 120 kDa. All monoclonal antibodies were obtained from Chemicon International, Temecula, Calif. The PRA followed standard procedures (20, 21).

Previous studies have demonstrated that fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies to a type-specific HSV late antigen and flow cytometry can be used for drug susceptibility assays of HSV type 1 (18). We tested the ability of reagent 5095 and flow cytometry to determine the drug susceptibilities of HSV type 1 and HSV type 2 clinical isolates. Six phenotypically and genotypically characterized HSV clinical isolates (4, 11, 21) were tested by the drug susceptibility assay using either reagent 5095 or a type-specific monoclonal antibody for HSV type 1 or HSV type 2 late antigens. The data are presented in Table 1. Using any of these monoclonal antibodies, the assay correctly identified the drug-susceptible and -resistant HSV isolates. The EC50s for the drug-susceptible clinical isolates for acyclovir were very similar. The EC50s for the acyclovir-resistant isolates were 10 to 100 times greater than the EC50s for the acyclovir-susceptible isolates.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Flow cytometric analysis of BSC-1 cells infected with drug-susceptible or resistant HSV clinical isolatesa

The most accurate method for determining drug susceptibilities of HSV clinical isolates is the PRA. To determine how well the flow cytometry drug susceptibility assay compares with the PRA, the EC50s of a large number of drug-susceptible and -resistant HSV clinical isolates were determined by these assays. The results are presented in Table 2. The average EC50s for acyclovir for 42 drug-susceptible HSV clinical isolates by all three assays were similar. The average EC50s for acyclovir for 25 drug-resistant HSV clinical isolates by all three assays were similar and approximately 50 times higher than the EC50s of the drug-susceptible isolates.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Comparison of flow cytometric drug susceptibility assay (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) and PRA

The data presented show that reagent 5095 in conjunction with flow cytometry can be used to determine the drug susceptibilities of acyclovir-susceptible and -resistant HSV type 1 and type 2 clinical isolates. The assay can be completed in less than 24 h, is easy to perform, is not subjective, and yields EC50s that are equivalent to values obtained with the more-labor-intensive PRA. The rapid quantitative nature of the flow cytometry drug susceptibility assay makes it more useful than the PRA for the appropriate treatment of patients. If a cell line that metabolizes the prodrugs valacyclovir and famciclovir to acyclovir is used, the assay should also be useful for determining the drug susceptibilities of these drugs for HSV clinical isolates. This assay could replace the currently used assays for determining the drug susceptibilities of HSV clinical isolates.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Karen Biron of GlaxoSmithKline, Nell Lurain of Rush Medical School, and the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of the Albany Medical Center Hospital for providing HSV clinical samples.

This work was supported in part by grant number RO3-AI45350 from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Immunology and Microbial Disease, Mail Code 151, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Ave., Albany, NY 12208. Phone: (518) 262-5174. Fax: (518) 262-5748. E-mail: mchsarj{at}mail.amc.edu. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Armstrong, G. L., J. Schillinger, L. Markowitz, A. J. Nahmias, R. E. Johnson, G. M. McQuillan, and M. E. St. Louis. 2001. Incidence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in the United States. Am. J. Epidemiol. 153:912-920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Cassidy, K. A., and R. J. Whitley. 1997. New therapeutic approaches to the alphaherpesvirus infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39:119-128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Christophers, J., J. Clayton, J. Craske, R. Ward, P. Collins, M. Trowbridge, and G. Darby. 1998. Survey of resistance of herpes simplex virus to acyclovir in Northwest England. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:868-872.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Darby, G., H. J. Field, and S. A. Salisbury. 1981. Altered substrate specificity of herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase confers acyclovir-resistance. Nature 289:81-83.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Darville, J. M., B. E. Ley, A. F. Roome, and A. B. Foot. 1998. Acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus infections in a bone marrow transplant population. Bone Marrow Transplant. 22:587-589.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. De La Iglesia, P., S. Melon, B. Lopez, M. Rodriguez, M. I. Blanco, P. Mellado, and M. de Ona. 1998. Rapid screening tests for determining in vitro susceptibility of herpes simplex virus clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2389-2391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Field, A. K., and K. K. Biron. 1994. "The end of innocence" revisited: resistance of herpesviruses to antiviral drugs. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:1-13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Gaudreau, A., E. Hill, H. H. Balfour, Jr., A. Erice, and G. Boivin. 1998. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex viruses from immunocompromised patients. J. Infect. Dis. 178:297-303.[Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Javaly, K., M. Wohlfeiler, K. R. Klein, Y. Bryson, K. Grafford, S. Martin-Munely, and W. D. Hardy. 1999. Treatment of mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infections unresponsive to acyclovir with topical foscarnet cream in AIDS patients: a phase I/II study. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 21:301-306.
    10. 10
  10. Jofre, J. T., P. A. Schaffer, and D. A. Parris. 1977. Genetics of resistance to phosphonoacetic acid in strain KOS of herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Virol. 23:833-836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Kost, R., E. L. Hill, M. Tigges, and S. E. Straus. 1993. Recurrent acyclovir resistant genital herpes in an immunocompetent patient. N. Engl. J. Med. 329:1777-1782.[Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. McLaren, C., M. N. Ellis, and G. A. Hunter. 1983. A colorimetric assay for measurement of the sensitivity of herpes simplex virus to antiviral agents. Antivir. Res. 3:223-234.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. McSharry, J. J., R. Costantino, M. B. McSharry, R. A. Venezia, and J. M. Lehman. 1990. Rapid detection of herpes simplex virus in clinical samples by flow cytometry after amplification in tissue culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1864-1866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. McSharry, J. J., N. S. Lurain, G. L. Drusano, A. Landay, J. Manischewitz, M. Nokta, M. O'Gorman, H. M. Shapiro, A. Weinberg, P. S. Reichelderfer, and C. S. Crumpacker. 1998. Flow cytometric determination of ganciclovir susceptibility of human cytomegalovirus clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:958-964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. McSharry, J. J., N. S. Lurain, G. L. Drusano, A. Landay, M. Nokta, M. O'Gorman, A. Weinberg, H. M. Shapiro, P. S. Reichelderfer, and C. S. Crumpacker. 1998. Rapid ganciclovir susceptibility assay using flow cytometry for human cytomegalovirus clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2326-2331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. McSharry, J. J. 1999. Antiviral drug susceptibility assays: going with the flow. Antivir. Res. 43:1-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Oram, R. J., D. Marcellino, D. Strauss, E. Gustafson, C. L. Talarico, A. K. Root, P. L. Sharma, K. Thompson, J. D. Fingeroth, C. Crumpacker, and B. C. Harold. 2000. Characterization of an acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus type 2 strain isolated from a premature neonate. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1458-1461.[CrossRef][Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Pavic, I., A. Hartmann, A. Zimmermann, D. Michel, W. Hampl, I. Schleher, and T. Mertens. 1997. Flow cytometric analysis of herpes simplex virus type 1 susceptibility to acyclovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2686-2692.[Abstract]
    19. 19
  19. Safrin, S., T. Elbeik, L. Phan, D. Robinson, J. Rush, A. Elbaggari, and J. Mills. 1994. Correlation between response to acyclovir and foscarnet therapy and in vitro susceptibility result for isolates of herpes simplex virus from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1246-1250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Safrin, S., T. Elbeik, and J. Mills. 1994. A rapid screen test for in vitro susceptibility of clinical herpes simplex virus isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 169:879-882.[Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Sibrach, C. D., L. T. Gutman, C. M. Wilfert, C. McLaren, M. H. St. Clair, P. M. Keller, and D. W. Barry. 1982. Pathogenicity of acyclovir resistant herpes simplex virus type 1 from an immunodeficient child. J. Infect. Dis. 146:673-682.[Medline]
    22. 22
  22. Stanberry, L., A. Cunningham, G. Mertz, A. Mindel, B. Peters, M. Reitano, S. Sacks, A. Wald, S. Wassilew, and P. Woolley. 1999. New developments in the epidemiology, natural history, and management of genital herpes. Antivir. Res. 42:1-14.[CrossRef][Medline]
    23. 23
  23. Swierkosz, E. M., D. R. Scholl, J. L. Brown, J. D. Jollick, and C. A. Gleaves. 1987. Improved DNA hybridization method for detection of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:1465-1469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Tebas, P., E. C. Stabell, and P. Olivo. 1995. Antiviral susceptibility testing with a cell line which expresses ß-galactosidase after infection with herpes simplex virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1287-1291.[Abstract]
    25. 25
  25. Whitley, R. J., D. W. Kimberlin, and B. Roizman. 1998. Herpes simplex viruses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:541-555.[Medline]

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, November 2002, p. 1379-1381, Vol. 9, No. 6
1071-412X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.9.6.1379-1381.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • McSharry, J. J., McDonough, A. C., Olson, B. A., Drusano, G. L. (2004). Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Assay for Influenza Virus Neuraminidase Inhibitors. CVI 11: 21-28 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chutkowski, C.
Right arrow Articles by McSharry, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chutkowski, C.
Right arrow Articles by McSharry, J. J.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»