Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, March 2000, p. 312-313, Vol. 7, No. 2
Instituto Columbiano de Medicina Tropical, AA
52162 Medellín, Colombia,1 and
Hospital Cayetano Heredia
Received 27 September 1999/Returned for modification 5 November
1999/Accepted 21 December 1999
Clinical application of a dot blot test to detect immunoglobulin G
(IgG) (88% sensitivity and specificity) and IgM (12.1% sensitivity
and 97% specificity) against flagellar antigen from Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhi was performed in Peruvian and Colombian
patients with typhoid fever. This test can be used as a good predictor
of serovar Typhi infection in regions lacking laboratory facilities and
in field studies.
One hundred and two volunteers older
than 15 years with typhoid fever confirmed by bacteriological isolation
of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi from blood culture were
included in this study. They were treated at the Instituto Colombiano
de Medicina Tropical (ICMT) (Medellín and Apartadó,
Colombia) or Hospital Cayetano Heredia (Lima, Perú) in 1997 and
1998. When typhoid fever was suspected, blood samples were collected
for triplicate cultures (7, 8, 11, 17), and one serum sample
was collected for dot blot analysis. Once diagnosis of typhoid fever
was confirmed by bacteriological isolation, patients were included in
the study and were dot blot tested on days 1, 7, and 15.
Serovar Typhi 1991-ICMT (isolated from the blood of a patient at the
ICMT) was used to obtain the flagellar antigen. Antigen isolation and
purification was carried out following procedures previously described
(10). Briefly, a colony obtained from a 37°C overnight
culture in nutritive agar was subcultured into 400 ml of brain heart
infusion broth (Becton Dickinson BBL) at 37°C for 16 h. Bacteria
were centrifuged at 500 × g for 30 min, the pellet was
resuspended in 150 ml of saline, and pH was adjusted to 2. The
suspension was centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 30 min, the
supernatant was recovered, and the insoluble material was isolated by
centrifugation at 40,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C.
Two volumes of ammonium sulfate (2.67 M) were added to the recovered
supernatant (pH 7.2), and the solution was stored at 4°C overnight.
Polymerized flagellar protein was then recovered from the pellet after
15 min of centrifugation at 15,000 × g at 4°C, was
dissolved in 5 ml of distilled water, and was dialyzed with a
50,000-pm-pore-size filter into distilled water for 2 h at room
temperature and then for 18 h at 4°C into 500 ml of distilled
water containing 20 g of activated carbon. Purified antigen was
stored at Each membrane had six serum blank wells in order to detect any
unspecific color and positive and negative controls in 1:50, 1:100, and
1:200 dilutions (1, 14). After Tween-TBS washing, 100 µl
of goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (IgG) or IgM (Jackson Immuno
Research Laboratories) was added and gravity filtered. Finally,
4-chloronaphthol (Sigma Chemicals Co.) was added for 20 min to develop
the reaction. The membrane was washed with distilled water to stop the
reaction. The membrane was allowed to dry prior to the final color
visualization reading (1, 14; Bio Dot instruction manual,
Bio-Rad).
A total of 102 patients with typhoid fever were studied: 48 Colombians
and 54 Peruvians. Difficulties arose in monitoring outpatients who had
been released 7 days before the second control was scheduled. Table
1 summarizes the number of patient
samples studied.
1071-412X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Clinical Application of a Dot Blot Test for
Diagnosis of Enteric Fever Due to Salmonella enterica
Serovar Typhi in Patients with Typhoid Fever from Colombia and
Peru
Instituto de Medicina Tropical
Alexander von Humbolt, Lima 100, Perú2
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
70°C. Antigen protein concentration was 0.7 mg/ml as
determined by the Lowry method (14). Antigen purity was
checked in a 10% polyacrylamide gel, and the purified flagellar
protein mass was determined to be 45 to 66 kDa (10). Dot
blot analysis was carried out by using nitrocellulose paper
(1, 5; Bio Dot microfiltration apparatus instruction
manual, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.). The paper
was first soaked with Tris- buffered saline (TBS), then the membrane
was placed into a Bio Dot microfiltration apparatus (Bio-Rad
Laboratories). The membrane was rehydrated by using 100 µl of
phosphate-buffered saline per well, which was later vacuum extracted.
This was followed by the fixation of 100 µl (5 µg/ml) of flagellar
antigen to each well (14; Bio Dot instruction manual, Bio-Rad). Blocking solution, fetal calf serum, and 1% TBS
were added (200 µl per well) and left to gravity filter. The membrane was vacuum washed with a solution of Tween and TBS. Serum samples were
added in 1:50, 1:100, and 1:200 dilutions and were left to filter by gravity.
TABLE 1.
Number of samples tested from typhoid fever patients
Percentages of patients with typhoid fever positive for IgG and IgM
against the flagellar antigen of serovar Typhi on the day of evaluation
are shown in Table 2.
|
On the first day of evaluation, 69 patients were tested: all of them were IgM positive and 66 had titers for IgG. Twelve patients had three serum controls (days 1, 7, and 15): 11 patients were IgM positive at the three time points tested and one patient was positive only in one. Seven patients were positive for IgG in all the periods, and three were positive in at least one. Fourteen patients were evaluated on the 1st and 7th days, and all of them were positive for IgM at both time points and 10 were IgG positive at both time points. Eight patients were evaluated on the 15th day only: seven were IgM positive and six were IgG positive.
The ideal test for an early diagnosis of typhoid fever must be sensitive, specific, rapid, simple, and inexpensive. However, conventional laboratory tests based on cultures of serovar Typhi from blood, bone marrow, feces, and urine and the Widal test lack these characteristics (2, 9, 16).
The development of a diagnostic test, a dot blot to detect IgG and IgM against flagellar antigen of Serovar Typhi, with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% for IgG detection and a sensitivity of 12.1% and 97% of specificity to detect IgM (1) was obtained. The dot blot test can be a diagnostic alternative in detecting typhoid fever, is an easy-to-read visual test, does not require complex laboratory facilities or training, and would be useful in rural areas where microbiology laboratory resources are difficult to obtain or are unavailable (1, 6, 16). This test can be used for the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies against serovar Typhi flagellar antigen at any of the evaluated time points during the course of typhoid fever (days 1, 7, and 15).
Serology and longevity of antibody response to several antigens from serovar Typhi had been evaluated (3, 4, 12, 13, 15). Choo et al. (4) found that the average persistence was 2.6 months, and the IgG persisted, on average, for 5.4 months. These results indicated the presence of IgG and IgM from the 1st to the 15th day of the study.
The dot blot test to detect IgG and/or IgM against flagellar antigen of serovar Typhi can be used in laboratories in rural areas of developing countries where typhoid fever is endemic, as these regions lack the necessary facilities for isolation of bacteria. This test can also be used in field research.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by Colciencias grant 3256-04-304-98 from
Colombia, Instituto Colombiano de Medicina Tropical (Medellín, Colombia), and Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander Von
Humbolt
Hospital Cayetano Heredia (Lima, Perú).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Instituto Colombiano de Medicina Tropical, Cra 51a No. 62-42, AA 52162 Medellín, Columbia. Phone: (574) 211-7788. Fax: (574) 571-6960. E-mail: icmt{at}epm.net.co.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Cardona-Castro, N., and P. Agudelo-Flórez. 1998. Immunoenzymatic dot-blot test for the diagnosis of enteric fever caused by Salmonella typhi in an endemic area. Clin. Microb. Infect. 2:64-69. |
| 2. | Chaky, R. B., and M. J. Blaser. 1988. A review of human salmonellosis. III. Magnitude of Salmonella infection in the United States. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10:111-124[Medline]. |
| 3. | Chart, H., B. Rowe, and J. S. Cheesbrough. 1997. Serological response of patients infected with Salmonella typhi. J. Clin. Pathol. 11:944-946. |
| 4. | Choo, K. E., T. M. Davis, A. Ismail, and K. H. Ong. 1997. Longevity of antibody responses to a Salmonella typhi-specific outer membrane protein: interpretation of a dot enzyme immunosorbent assay in an area of high typhoid fever endemicity. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 6:656-659. |
| 5. | Choo, K. E., S. J. Oppenheimer, B. I. Asma, and K. H. Ong. 1994. Rapid serodiagnosis of typhoid fever by dot enzyme immunoassay in an endemic area. Clin. Infect. Dis. 19:172-176[Medline]. |
| 6. | Edelman, R., and M. M. Levine. 1986. Summary of an international workshop on typhoid fever. Rev. Infect. Dis. 8:329-349[Medline]. |
| 7. | Guerra-Cáceres, J. G., E. Gotuzzo-Heredia, and E. Crosby-Dagninol. 1979. Diagnostic value of bone marrow culture in typhoid fever. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 73:680-683[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Hoffman, S. L., N. H. Punjabi, and R. C. Rockhill. 1984. Duodenal string-capsule culture compared with bone marrow, blood and rectal swab cultures for diagnosing typhoid and paratyphoid fever. J. Infect. Dis. 149:157-161[Medline]. |
| 9. | Hook, E. W. 1990. Salmonella species (including typhoid fever), p. 1256-1269. In G. L. Mandel, R. G. Douglas, and J. E. Bennet (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious diseases. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. |
| 10. |
Ibrahim, G. F.,
G. H. Fleet,
M. L. Lyons, and R. A. Walker.
1985.
Method for the isolation of highly purified Salmonella flagellins.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
22:1040-1044 |
| 11. | Isenberg, H. D., J. A. Washington II, A. Balows, and A. C. Sonnenwirth. 1985. Collection, handling and processing of specimens, p. 73. In E. H. Lennette, A. Balows, W. J. Hausler, Jr., and H. J. Shadomy (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 4th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 12. | Isomaki, O., R. Vuento, and K. Granfors. 1989. Serological diagnosis of Salmonella infections by enzyme immunoassay. Lancet ii:1411-1414. |
| 13. | Jesudasun, M. V., G. Sridharan, R. Aruselvan, P. G. Babu, and T. J. John. 1998. Diagnosis of typhoid fever by the detection of anti LPS & anti-flagellin antibodies by ELISA. Indian J. Med. Res. 107:204-207[Medline]. |
| 14. | Lane, D. 1988. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 15. | Nardiello, S., T. Pizzela, M. Russo, and B. Galanti. 1983. ELISA determination of IgM anti-LPS in the early phase of typhoid fever. Boll. Ist. Sieroter. Milan. 62:372-375[Medline]. |
| 16. | Prada, G. 1990. Tifoidea, flagelo del Tercer Mundo. Acta Medica Colombiana 15:125-130. |
| 17. | Vallenas, C., H. Hernandez, B. Kay, R. Black, and E. Gotuzzo. 1985. Efficacy of bone marrow, blood, stool and duodenal contents culture for bacteriologic confirmation of typhoid fever in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 5:496-498. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. | Infect. Immun. |
|---|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | J. Virol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |