Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 1999, p. 291-292, Vol. 6, No. 3
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
GUEST COMMENTARY
Clinical Laboratory Immunology: the
Future
John L.
Fahey*
Department of Microbiology & Immunology, UCLA
School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Preparation for the future has two
elements. One is to look at the dynamics operating at the present time
to estimate where these are heading. The second is to have an open but
prepared mind to discern important new elements that will arise
to impact on the practice of clinical laboratory immunology.
The future is going to be a foreign land, as has been pointed out by
Herbert Hooijkaas (1). The language will be different from
that which we are used to. The terms of reference will be different.
The areas of importance will be different and the assumptions of
professional knowledge and responsibility may be different. Clearly,
meeting the conditions required for successful performance and
communication in a foreign land or era will require continual attention. Readiness to learn as well as preparation in the basics will
be needed for effective participation in the future world.
 |
SCOPE |
In recent decades, there have been striking changes in the
practice of clinical laboratory immunology. Diagnostic testing for
infection is no longer the major activity. Advances have come from many
areas of science and medicine and from new technologies. Autoimmune
diseases, allergy and asthma, organ and bone marrow transplantation,
lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies, and primary and secondary immune
deficiencies, have all provided challenges and opportunities to advance
clinical laboratory immunology. Each has unresolved issues that will
continue into the future.
Technological advances have come on many fronts. Protein
chemistry contributed electrophoresis. Immunologists contributed immunoelectrophoresis and monoclonal antibodies. Immunogeneticists and
collaborating engineers brought forth flow cytometry. Many contributed to the huge advances in quantitative immunochemical methodologies. Now cytokines, receptors, and soluble immune activation markers can be measured in plasma and within stimulated lymphocyte subsets to assess the capacity of the immune system to respond to
specific stimuli.
Immune-based therapies are being introduced at an accelerating rate and
assessments of complex immune-based therapies are having an increasing
impact on the responsibilities of the clinical immunology laboratory.
The result has been a shift from diagnostic immunology to the
increasing emphasis on functional status and responsiveness of the
immune system. Are therapies having the intended effects of increasing
or toning down selected immune functions? Accurate, quantitative
measures of clinical effectiveness are required. Demands of the
clinical immunology laboratory are increasing from new diseases and
from new information about well-established disorders.
 |
PROCEDURES |
Future findings about immune mechanisms and disease pathogenesis
as well as new technologies are likely to result in more precise
assays on smaller samples obtained from restricted sites and
requiring more precision in sample handling. These trends are
likely to continue with more new tests and more sensitive assays which will require better control of reagent consistency and
laboratory procedures. Close cooperation between clinical immunology
laboratories and manufacturers of reagents and equipment is to be
commended and fostered. Everyone will benefit as costs continue to escalate.
T-cell subsets, B and NK cells, Th1 and Th2 categories of lymphoid
cells, lymphokines and cytokines, as well as immunoglobulins, autoantibodies, and therapeutics are the common parlance of clinical laboratory immunology. While diagnostic and clinical laboratory immunology long ago outgrew the confines of microbiology, AIDS may be a
form of microbiological revenge where HIV infects and lethally damages
the immune system. The overall point is that diagnostic and clinical
laboratory immunology contributions and responsibilities have grown by
input from many fields of science and medicine. Similarly, clinical
laboratory immunology now provides intellectual and clinical services
to medicine very broadly.
 |
PROJECTIONS |
One message from the recent past is that there will be new
diseases. AIDS emphasizes that. Another message is that there will be
new therapies. Other signals come from current work on the human
genome. Many genetic factors that relate to occurrence or course of
disease will be identified. New interventions will be devised for use
in otherwise healthy individuals for the purpose of heading off disease
or modulating its course. Some of these are likely to affect functions
of the immune system and will require new measurements. There is
every reason to believe that medicine and science in the future will
benefit from broadly knowledgeable immunologists who incorporate
advances from many different disciplines into the field of diagnostic
and clinical immunology.
The assemblage of information into computers and the automation of
testing have facilitated standardization and easy exchange of
information. Clarity of communication between people is important before and after computers have done their thing. There will always be
a need for well-trained and articulate persons to solve problems and
provide corrective measures. Good training programs in
fundamentals of immunology and clinical relevance and analytic
interpretation will be important. Continuing educational programs will
be needed for ensuring professional competence in a changing world.
These will have to be modified to meet new developments.
In the past century, innovations and advancements were based on the
development and adaptation of new principles and new technologies to
meet identified needs. While it is hard to be specific about the
future, we are in a situation similar to that of 100 or 50 years ago.
Only the challenges and opportunities are different now. Imaginative
and innovative resolutions to current problems and new questions will
be the substance of commentaries on accomplishments in the next
century. The future is a land of opportunity. Adventure, rewards, and
indeed, pleasure will be there for those who are prepared and
are fortunate enough to have the resources to participate in
the clinical laboratory immunology of the future.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Mailing address: Department of Microbiology & Immunology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1747. Phone:
(310) 825-6568. Fax: (310) 206-1318. E-mail:
jlfahey{at}ucla.edu.
The views expressed in this Commentary do not necessarily reflect
the views of the journal or of ASM.
 |
REFERENCE |
| 1.
|
Hooijkaas, H.
1998.
The role of the clinical immunology laboratory in disease evaluation beyond the year 2000.
In
Presented at the Xth International Congress of Immunology, New Delhi, India, 1 to 6 November 1998.
|
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 1999, p. 291-292, Vol. 6, No. 3
1071-412X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.