Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, June 2009, p. 859-865, Vol. 16, No. 6
1071-412X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00033-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Microbiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1-W17, Chuou-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8556, Japan,1 Department of Pediatrics, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1-W16, Chuou-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8543, Japan2
Received 22 January 2009/ Returned for modification 20 March 2009/ Accepted 9 April 2009
|
|
|---|
B-binding motifs had a critical role in RSV-induced RANTES promoter activity. A luciferase reporter gene assay and a DNA-binding assay indicated that FOF suppressed the NF-
B activity induced by RSV infection. These results demonstrate that FOF treatment suppresses the RSV-induced transcription of the chemokines RANTES and IL-8 in airway epithelial cells. |
|
|---|
Several antimicrobial agents, such as the 14-membered-ring macrolides and fluoroquinolones, affect the immunological response of the host. The abilities of these antibiotics to inhibit the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines are thought to be mediated by inhibition of NF-
B (3, 13). Furthermore, pretreatment with erythromycin or clarithromycin has been reported to inhibit rhinovirus infection by suppressing the expression of virus receptors and reducing the rhinovirus-induced inflammatory cytokine response (14, 31). Fosfomycin (FOF) is a structurally unique antibiotic that is chemically unrelated to any other known antimicrobial agent (16). Apart from these antibacterial activities, FOF also possesses a novel immunomodulatory activity, which has been observed both in vitro and in vivo (10, 21, 22). FOF suppressed IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) secretion in vitro from human monocytes and/or lipopolyssacharide (LPS)-stimulated T lymphocytes. Yoneshima et al. demonstrated that FOF suppresses NF-
B activation induced by TNF-
in monocyte and T-lymphocyte cell lines (36). FOF also strongly suppressed the mixed lymphocyte reaction and IL-2 production in vivo. However, the effect of FOF on the immunomodulation during virus infection has not been studied. FOF is approved as a treatment for various bacterial infectious diseases, including respiratory infectious diseases, in Japan. Therefore, we investigated the effect and the mechanism of action of FOF on RSV-induced inflammatory cytokine upregulation in respiratory epithelial cells, which are the primary and main targets of RSV infection.
|
|
|---|
80% confluence were adsorbed at an RSV multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 for 60 min at 37°C. After adsorption, the viral solutions were removed and the cells were rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with growth medium. The virus titers in the supernatant were determined by a plaque-forming assay with HEp-2 cells. Expression of RSV mRNA was confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). FOF treatment. Cells were treated with medium containing FOF (0, 10, 100, and 1,000 µg/ml) at 37°C. FOF was provided by Meiji Seika Kaisha, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).
Cell viability. After 24 h of FOF treatment, cell viability was assessed with Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cell Counting Kit-8 solution, which contains the tetrazolium salt WST-8 [2-(2-methyl-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt], was added to the culture medium, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The absorbance at 450 nm was determined with a multiwell plate reader.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR. Total cellular RNA was prepared from cells with an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's protocol. RT-PCR was performed with a One-Step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen). The quantitative nature of the PCR was validated by the linearity of the determination curve obtained with various concentrations of RNA. The sequences of the primers (Sigma-Genosys, Ishikari, Japan) were described previously (24). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA was used as a control.
Measurement of cytokine production. A549 cells were infected with RSV in the presence or absence of FOF for 24 h. The culture supernatants were stored at –80°C until they were assayed. The RANTES, IL-8, and IL-6 levels were measured with a DuoSet enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) development kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Luciferase reporter gene assay.
The luciferase reporter gene assay was carried out as described previously (35). Plasmids containing fragments of the RANTES promoter (–884 bp to +1 bp) and its mutants were kindly provided by S. Matsukura, Showa University School of Medicine (Tokyo, Japan) (12). The reporter plasmids, pISRE and pNF-
B, were purchased from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). pISRE and pNF-
B harbor the enhancer elements of the interferon-stimulated response element [ISRE; (TAGTTTCACTTTCCC)5] and NF-
B [(TGGGGACTTTCCGC)5], respectively. These plasmids contain a firefly luciferase reporter gene and were cotransfected into cells with a reference plasmid, pRL-TK (Promega, Madison WI), by using the SuperFect transfect reagent (Qiagen). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were either infected or not infected with RSV in the presence or absence of FOF. After the cells were lysed, the luciferase activity was measured with the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) and a Fluoroskan Ascent FL apparatus (Labsystem, San Diego, CA).
ELDIA.
The DNA-binding activities of transcription factors in cells were determined by an enzyme-linked DNA-protein interaction assay (ELDIA), essentially by a previously described method (35). Nuclear extracts were prepared with the NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The DNA binding of NF-
B p50 was determined with a Mercury TransFactor NF-
B p50 kit (BD Bioscience, Palo Alto, CA). The specificities of binding to a DNA motif were confirmed by inhibition experiments with unlabeled double-stranded competitor oligonucleotides at a concentration of 200 ng/well. The following oligonucleotides were used as competitors: NF-
B p50 wild type (WT; GCCATGGGGGGATCCCGGGC) and its mutant (GCCATGGGCCGATCCCGGGC, where the underlining indicates the mutated nucleotides).
Statistical analysis. Determination of statistical significance was carried out by Student's t test. Data groups were considered significantly different when the P value was <0.05.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. FOF is not cytotoxic to A549 cells and does not influence RSV replication. (A) A549 cells were incubated with FOF (10 to 1,000 µg/ml) for 24 h, and their viabilities were measured by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Cell viability under cultivation without FOF was used as a control (100%; white bar). Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation for three samples. (B) Microscopic observation of A549 cells infected or not infected with RSV (Long strain at an MOI of 1) for 24 h in the presence of FOF (0 to 1,000 µg/ml). (C) Effects of FOF on viral titers in culture supernatants and expression of RSV glycoprotein mRNA (RSV/G) in RSV-infected A549 cells. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation for three samples.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effects of FOF treatment schedule on RANTES production by RSV-infected A549 cells. A549 cells were infected with the RSV Long strain at an MOI of 1 in either the presence of FOF (1,000 µg/ml) or the absence of FOF before infection (1 h), at the RSV adsorption step (1 h), and after infection (23 h). (Left panel) The gray regions of each bar indicate the period of FOF treatment; (right panel) the concentration of RANTES in the culture supernatant was determined by ELISA. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation for three samples. **, P < 0.01 compared with the results of incubation without FOF (bar 1, open bar).
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. FOF suppresses RANTES and IL-8 production but not IL-6 production in RSV-infected A549 cells. RSV-infected A549 cells were treated with FOF (1,000 µg/ml) for 23 h postinfection. (A) The levels of expression of RANTES, IL-8, and IL-6 mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. Analysis of GAPDH mRNA was performed as a control. (B) The concentrations of RANTES, IL-8, and IL-6 in the culture supernatant were determined by ELISA. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of three samples. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
|
B, the cis-acting replication element (CRE), and NF-IL-6, which bind to the interferon regulatory factors, NF-
B, jun/CREB/ATF, and C/EBP, respectively (5). We examined the role of the binding sites for NF-
B and ISRE during induction of the RANTES promoter in response to RSV infection, because NF-
B and ISRE were previously found to be critical for RSV-induced RANTES production (5, 32). We performed a luciferase reporter assay with plasmids containing the WT RANTES promoter or mutant forms of the RANTES promoter which were either mutated at two binding sites for NF-
B (mkB) or at an ISRE (mISRE) (12). Cells were transfected with each plasmid and infected with RSV, and the luciferase activity was measured. As shown in Fig. 4A, RSV infection upregulated the luciferase activity of the WT RANTES promoter. FOF treatments reduced the level of RSV-induced luciferase activity in a dose-dependent manner. The mkB RANTES promoter showed reduced levels of RSV-induced luciferase activity in the absence of FOF, with the mkB RANTES promoter being expressed at a level similar to that of the WT RANTES promoter upon FOF (100 µg/ml) treatment. The luciferase activity of the mkB RANTES promoter was not further reduced by FOF treatment. The mISRE RANTES promoter almost abolished both basal and RSV-inducible luciferase activity.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Luciferase reporter gene analyses of promoter and transcription factors contributing to the suppression of RANTES production in RSV-infected cells treated with FOF. (A) Mutations in the NF- B-binding sites of the RANTES promoter reduce the level of RSV-induced RANTES transcription at a level similar reduced by FOF treatment. The luciferase (Luc.) activities of WT and mutant (mkB and mISRE) RANTES promoters were determined with or without RSV infection and with or without FOF treatment. Twenty-four hours after the transfection of each plasmid to A549 cells, FOF (0 to 100 µg/ml) was added to the A549 cell culture before infection (1 h) and after infection (24 h) with RSV. (B) NF- B activation by RSV is suppressed by FOF treatment. The luciferase activities of the plasmids containing tandem repeats of the NF- B-binding site (pNF- B-Luc) and ISRE (pISRE-Luc) were determined with or without RSV infection and with or without FOF treatment. White bars, no RSV infection; gray bars, infection with RSV. The results are expressed as the level of fold induction (± standard deviation) relative to the value obtained from uninfected cells transfected with the WT RANTES promoter without FOF treatment (A) and from uninfected cells transfected with each reporter plasmid (B). Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation for three samples. **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant.
|
B or ISRE (Fig. 4B). The luciferase activities of both plasmids were upregulated by RSV infection (Fig. 4B, FOF at 0 µg/ml). FOF suppressed RSV-induced NF-
B activity in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4B, left panel). In contrast, ISRE activities were not affected by FOF treatment (Fig. 4B, right panel).
To confirm that FOF alters the NF-
B activity induced by RSV infection, the ability of NF-
B to bind to DNA was determined by ELDIA with nuclear extracts prepared from RSV-infected cells with or without FOF treatment. As shown in Fig. 5, RSV infection markedly increased the level of binding of NF-
B p50 to its specific binding consensus motif (Fig. 5A). NF-
B p50 binding was inhibited by the addition of an NF-
B-binding motif-containing oligonucleotide (data not shown). The nuclear extract prepared from FOF-treated, RSV-infected cells contained less activated NF-
B than that prepared from nontreated RSV-infected cells. This effect of FOF occurred in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5B). The data from the luciferase assay and ELDIA indicate that the RANTES promoter activity is suppressed by FOF in RSV-infected cells due to the suppression of NF-
B activity and is not mediated by an ISRE-dependent mechanism.
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. FOF suppresses the ability of NF- B to bind to an oligonucleotide in A549 cells infected with RSV. The ability of NF- B to bind to its binding consensus motif was determined by an ELDIA. (A) A549 cells infected with RSV for 3, 6, or 9 h. (B) A549 cells either infected or not infected with RSV for 24 h were treated with FOF (0 to 100 µg/ml). FOF was added before infection (1 h), during the RSV adsorption step (1 h), and after infection (5 h). The cells were harvested at the indicated times, and the nuclear fractions were prepared. The nuclear extracts were assessed by ELDIA, which used the authentic NF- B p50-binding motif as a coated oligonucleotide. The specificity of binding of NF- B was confirmed by the inhibition of NF- B binding to a mutated oligonucleotide DNA in the presence of a soluble oligonucleotide DNA as a competitor (data not shown). Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation for three samples. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
|
|
|
|---|
B activity. Our results are the first to indicate the suppression of a virus-induced chemokine by FOF in epithelial cells, which are the primary target of viral infection.
We and other researchers showed that NF-
B activity is important in RSV-induced RANTES promoter regulation (Fig. 4 and 5) (5, 32). The production of IL-8 that was induced by RSV infection was suppressed by FOF treatment (Fig. 3). The IL-8 promoter also has an NF-
B-binding site, and the production of IL-8 that is induced by RSV infection involves the activation of NF-
B (6). We inferred from these results that FOF treatment suppresses IL-8 production by inhibiting NF-
B activation. Although the IL-6 promoter also has an NF-
B-binding site (20), the production of IL-6 was not affected by the FOF treatment (Fig. 3). It was reported that FOF treatment enhances IL-6 production in LPS-stimulated human monocytes (22). The production of IL-6 may thus mainly be controlled by transcription factors other than NF-
B.
Some researchers reported on the modulatory effect of FOF on cytokine production by examining LPS-stimulated monocytes and/or T cells (10, 21, 22). They demonstrated that FOF suppressed IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-8 but not IL-6 or IL-10. Yoneshima et al. reported that FOF suppressed NF-
B activation in TNF-
-stimulated human monocyte and T-cell lines (36). We found no reports on the effect of FOF on virus-induced cytokine production or on epithelial cells, which are the main targets of RSV infection. Because airway epithelial cells are the primary targets of RSV replication, the immune response that develops within the lungs of infected individuals dictates the subsequent immune response. Among the chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines, RANTES and IL-8 are strongly expressed in RSV-infected epithelial cells (25, 27) and are key factors in the pathophysiology of RSV infection (8). The RANTES expressed in airway epithelial cells serves as a chemotactic and activation factor for eosinophils, basophils, monocytes, and neutrophils (17); promotes the adhesion and infiltration of these leukocytes, especially the eosinophils; and induces allergic reactions in individuals with asthma who have been exposed to an allergen (15). The examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with RSV bronchiolitis showed markedly elevated levels of IL-8, which significantly correlated with the neutrophil numbers (18). IL-8 primarily targets the neutrophil and promotes neutrophil migration to the site of inflammation. It is suggested that neutrophils induced by IL-8 inflammation play an important role during airway RSV infection (37). RANTES and IL-8 induced by RSV infection activate the release of leukotrienes and histamine in primed mast cells and basophils (2, 4). The release of these chemical mediators in the respiratory tract induces RSV-related bronchiolitis and asthma (19). John et al. demonstrated that the RSV-induced release of leukotrienes is suppressed by the reduction of RANTES activity (15). Furthermore, FOF has the capacity to suppress histamine release from anti-immunoglobulin E-stimulated basophils and leukotriene release from neutrophils (10, 11). The suppression of RANTES and IL-8 in RSV-infected respiratory epithelial cells by FOF treatment may result in relief from the RSV-related symptoms. We also found that FOF suppressed the production of RANTES and IL-8, even if it was added postinfection (Fig. 2). These results suggest that FOF suppresses the RSV-induced allergic property that is triggered by the inflammatory immune reaction of both epithelial and leukocyte cells.
Fourteen-membered-ring macrolides, such as erythromycin and clarithromycin, have been reported to reduce the titers of rhinovirus and influenza virus and the cytokine response induced by these viruses (14, 31, 33). Our results indicate that FOF modulates chemokine production via the suppression of NF-
B activation independently of the replication of RSV (Fig. 1B). Thus, FOF has the ability to suppress cytokine production via the NF-
B induced not only by RSV infection but also by other infectious agents.
The inflammation mediated by chemokines promotes the pathogenesis of RSV-induced infectious diseases. Our results have shown that the levels of RANTES and IL-8 induced by RSV in epithelial cells are decreased by FOF via the suppression of NF-
B activation. FOF should improve the clinical symptoms induced by RSV not only by preventing secondary bacterial infections but also by imparting an immunomodulatory effect.
Published ahead of print on 15 April 2009. ![]()
|
|
|---|
by lower airway epithelial cells and eosinophils infected with respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. 72:4756-4764.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»