This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saville, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saville, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Ribot, J. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, March 2009, p. 430-432, Vol. 16, No. 3
1071-412X/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00480-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Efficacy of a Genetically Engineered Candida albicans tet-NRG1 Strain as an Experimental Live Attenuated Vaccine against Hematogenously Disseminated Candidiasis{triangledown}

Stephen P. Saville,1 Anna L. Lazzell,1 Ashok K. Chaturvedi,1 Carlos Monteagudo,2 and Jose L. Lopez-Ribot1*

Department of Biology and South Texas Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas,1 Departamento de Patología, Facultad de Medicina y Odontología, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain2

Received 19 December 2008/ Accepted 30 December 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We report on the efficacy of the genetically engineered Candida albicans tet-NRG1 strain as an experimental live, attenuated vaccine against disseminated candidiasis in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice mostly dependent on T-cell immunity. This experimental vaccination model may represent an important tool to unravel the mechanisms of protective immunity during candidiasis.


arrow
TEXT
 
Candida albicans remains the most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream-derived fungal infections (3, 4). Morbidity and mortality associated with hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, a major problem for an expanding population of immunosuppressed patients, most notably neutropenic patients, remain unacceptably high due mainly to the lack of early and accurate diagnostic tools, the limited arsenal of antifungal drugs, their toxicity, and the emergence of resistance (9, 13, 16, 21, 22). Thus, many studies over the years have investigated the mechanisms of protective host immunity against this organism to try to develop alternative immune-based strategies to combat candidiasis. Vaccine development is a major priority (6, 7, 11). Experimental vaccination strategies used by different groups of investigators vary and range from using heat-killed or attenuated organisms to cell wall extracts and recombinant proteins, also with different levels of efficacy (for a review, see reference 11). However, despite these efforts, currently there are no licensed vaccines against any human mycoses, including candidiasis.

In previous studies, we have described the construction of a genetically engineered C. albicans strain (SSY50-B) in which NRG1 (a negative regulator of filamentation) was placed under the control of a tetracycline-regulatable promoter so that morphology and virulence could be manipulated in vivo by adding or omitting doxycycline (DOX) from the animal's drinking water (19). Using a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, we demonstrated that infection with this strain when kept in the yeast form (in the absence of DOX) led to 100% survival, even at very high infectivity levels, both for immunocompetent mice and for mice with specific immune defects (18, 19). This high level of survival was observed despite the fact that yeast cells reached and proliferated in target organs and were able to maintain significant levels of fungal burden during relatively long periods of time (17-19). These results encouraged us to examine whether prior exposure to this strain when maintained in the yeast form, thus somewhat recreating a "carrier" or "commensal" state, would confer resistance to reinfection by a fully virulent wild-type strain of C. albicans. If so, this genetically engineered strain would represent a candidate for an experimental live, attenuated vaccine against systemic candidiasis that could possibly be used as a tool to further decipher mechanisms of protective immunity during candidiasis. This could be particularly helpful in improving the validity of the mouse as an experimental model of candidiasis, since humans are normally exposed to this fungus as a commensal but laboratory mice are not.

For these experiments, we utilized a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis that is routinely used in our laboratory, with some modifications (17-19). Briefly, cultures of the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain (SSY50-B) for injection were grown overnight at 25°C in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose without DOX. Yeast cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed three times in sterile pyrogen-free saline. After cells were counted using a hemocytometer, dilutions were made to allow the appropriate number of yeast cells (in this case, 1.7 x 106 CFU) to be injected in a final volume of 200 µl into the lateral tail veins of 6- to 8-week-old female mice (five mice per group). Unvaccinated control (naïve) mice received a 200-µl injection of saline only. Fourteen days later, all mice received a secondary infection with a lethal dose of 5.2 x 105 CFU of the fully virulent C. albicans CAF-2 strain (8). Mortality was monitored for 16 days after secondary challenge. For statistical analyses, survival data and differences between groups were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with institutional regulations, and mice were allowed a 1-week acclimatization period before the start of the experiments.

A first series of vaccination experiments was performed using immunocompetent BALB/c mice, obtained from the National Cancer Institute (NCI; Bethesda, MD). As shown in Fig. 1, prior exposure to the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain kept in the yeast form led to high levels of protection against a secondary infection with a lethal dose of the fully virulent CAF-2 strain, as assessed by survival proportions, with 100% of vaccinated mice versus 0% of naïve (unvaccinated) mice surviving the infection. Of note, the challenge with the C. albicans CAF-2 strain caused 100% mortality after only 3 days postinfection in the unvaccinated control group, thus demonstrating the very aggressive nature of the infection caused by this infecting dose, which vaccinated animals survived.


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Survival curves for C. albicans tet-NRG1-vaccinated (open circles) and nonvaccinated control (open squares) groups of BALB/c mice after subsequent challenge with a lethal dose of the fully virulent C. albicans CAF-2 strain. Results are displayed as percent survival from the time of the secondary challenge. P = 0.0031.

The above-described results using mice with the BALB/c background clearly demonstrate the protective effect of this experimental vaccination strategy using the tet-NRG1 strain. A caveat for these experiments is that, unlike humans, experimental mice do not normally contain C. albicans as part of their normal microbiota, and we reasoned that the establishment of a "carrier" or "commensal" state in mice with the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain (since we have previously demonstrated that a significant organ fungal burden remains with the tet-NRG1 strain, even a few weeks after infection) could exert a nonspecific protective effect against a secondary infection due to simple competition for binding sites for fungal cells in deep tissues. However, it is also possible that the protection observed using this vaccination strategy is mediated by specific immune mechanisms. We have previously shown that mice with specific immune deficiencies are able to survive a primary infection with the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain in the absence of DOX when kept as a yeast (18), thus also allowing the evaluation of the efficacy of this vaccination strategy in different types of immunocompromised mice and thereby providing insights into the mechanisms responsible for protective immunity in this model. To this end, we repeated the above-mentioned vaccination/challenge protocol with B-cell-deficient (bearing a homozygous deletion of the igh locus; C.129B6-IgH-Jhdtm1Dhu), nude (T-cell-deficient mice; CANn.Cg-Foxn1nu/Crl), and DBA/2N mice, which are C5 deficient (a component of the complement pathway) and are considered to have impaired neutrophil activity. Nude and DBA/2N mice were obtained from the NCI, while B-cell-deficient mice were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). Both the nude and B-cell-deficient mice used in these experiments are in the BALB/c background. As seen in Fig. 2, as for BALB/c mice, vaccination with the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain fully protected B-cell-deficient and DBA/2N mouse strains against a secondary infection with CAF-2 (100% survival in vaccinated animals versus 100% mortality in naïve mice). However, the same vaccination strategy completely failed to protect T-cell-deficient, nude mice, in which we observed 100% mortality for both naïve and vaccinated animals, although nude mice preexposed to the tet-NRG1 strain survived slightly longer than their naïve counterparts (Fig. 2C).


Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Survival curves for different groups of immunodeficient mice vaccinated or not vaccinated with the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain SSY50-B after subsequent challenge with a lethal dose of the fully virulent C. albicans CAF-2 strain. (A) Survival of vaccinated (closed triangles) and unvaccinated (closed circles) B-cell-deficient mice. P = 0.0031. (B) Survival of vaccinated (closed triangles) and unvaccinated (closed circles) DBA/2N mice. P = 0.0027. (C) Survival of vaccinated (closed triangles) and unvaccinated (closed circles) nude mice. P = 0.0522. The experimental details are the same as for the experiments using the BALB/c mice depicted in Fig. 1. The results are again displayed as percent survival from the time of the secondary challenge. Results from experiments with immunocompetent BALB/c mice (vaccinated, open circles; nonvaccinated, open squares) are overlaid in each panel for comparison.

Results from this series of experiments using different mouse strains with defects in specific components of the immune system allow us to gain some insight into the mechanisms responsible for protection. Thus, from these data, it is clear that the nature of the protective response in this model is mostly immune based and not due merely to a nonspecific steric hindrance caused by the nonpathogenic tet-NRG1 cells occupying and possibly saturating binding sites in tissues. (However, it is possible that the slight increase in survival observed with vaccinated versus that of naïve nude mice may be attributable to this "nonspecific" effect.) The results also suggest that neither B cells nor functional neutrophils have any role to play in the protective effect exerted by vaccination with the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain. In addition, the high levels of protection achieved in B-cell-deficient mice seem to rule out the contribution of antibodies to protection, at least in this specific experimental model. In contrast, the lack of protection observed in the case of T-cell-deficient nude mice strongly indicates a likely role for a cell-mediated adaptive immune response in protection against reinfection, even when the time between primary and secondary infection is relatively short. These observations are similar to those previously reported for the recombinant Als vaccine (10, 20). Perhaps the most significant observation, however, with potentially important clinical implications for vaccine development, is the fact that by using this vaccination strategy we were able to effectively protect DBA/2N mice, which are normally exquisitely sensitive to systemic candidiasis because of their impaired neutrophil activity due to complement C5 deficiency (1, 2). This indicates that vaccine approaches may be feasible for use in patients with neutrophil deficiencies, a major patient population at risk for candidiasis. Our results are also in stark contrast to previous reports by Romani et al., in which their live, attenuated vaccine strain killed DBA/2 mice even at very low doses, highlighting the advantages of using genetically engineered and well-characterized strains rather than attenuated strains with ill-defined genetic mutations (14, 15).

To the best of our knowledge, these are the highest levels of protection described for an anti-C. albicans vaccine, particularly in the case of immunodeficient mice and, more specifically, in mice with neutrophil deficiencies, which reinforces the efficacy of our C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain as an experimental live, attenuated vaccine against disseminated candidiasis in mice. However, we are fully cognizant of some limitations of our study, particularly in regard to the development of live, attenuated vaccines for human use (5, 12). Certainly, the use of live, attenuated vaccines carries important risks, particularly if used in immunosuppressed patients, and the majority of at-risk patients for candidiasis fall into this category (12). For example, we have previously demonstrated that the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain, even in the absence of DOX when kept as a yeast, leads to 100% mortality in mice that have been severely immunosuppressed by pharmacological treatment with cyclophosphamide and cortisone acetate (18). Under similar conditions, we have also observed occasional deaths in DBA/2N mice, particularly if very high levels of infecting inocula of the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain are used (S. P. Saville and J. L. Lopez-Ribot, unpublished results). Despite these caveats, we feel that the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain and its use in this infection model represent an important tool in our aim to further understand protective immunity during candidiasis, particularly in light of the fact that C. albicans is a normal commensal of humans but not mice, with the ultimate goal of developing safe, effective, and most likely subunit vaccines against candidiasis. Current experiments in our laboratory are aimed at elucidating the specific immunological mechanisms responsible for the induction of the protective immunity seen in this model.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was funded in part by grants RO1AI064562 and RO1AI063256 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to J.L.L.-R. and S.P.S., respectively.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of Biology, the University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249. Phone: (210) 458-7022. Fax: (210) 458-7023. E-mail: jose.lopezribot{at}utsa.edu Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 14 January 2009. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Ashman, R. B., E. M. Bolitho, and J. M. Papadimitriou. 1993. Patterns of resistance to Candida albicans in inbred mouse strains. Immunol. Cell Biol. 71:221-225.
  2. 2
  3. Ashman, R. B., J. M. Papadimitriou, A. Fulurija, K. E. Drysdale, C. S. Farah, O. Naidoo, and T. Gotjamanos. 2003. Role of complement C5 and T lymphocytes in pathogenesis of disseminated and mucosal candidiasis in susceptible DBA/2 mice. Microb. Pathog. 34:103-113.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Banerjee, S. N., T. G. Emori, D. H. Culver, R. P. Gaynes, W. R. Jarvis, T. Horan, J. R. Edwards, J. Tolson, T. Henderson, and W. J. Martone. 1991. Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am. J. Med. 91:86S-89S.
  6. 4
  7. Beck-Sague, C., and W. R. Jarvis. 1993. Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, 1980-1990. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. J. Infect. Dis. 167:1247-1251.
  8. 5
  9. Belshe, R. B. 2007. Translational research on vaccines: influenza as an example. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 82:745-749.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Deepe, G. S., Jr. 1997. Prospects for the development of fungal vaccines. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:585-596.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. Dixon, D. M., A. Casadevall, B. Klein, L. Mendoza, L. Travassos, and G. S. Deepe, Jr. 1998. Development of vaccines and their use in the prevention of fungal infections. Med. Mycol. 36(Suppl. 1):57-67.[Medline]
  14. 8
  15. Fonzi, W. A., and M. Y. Irwin. 1993. Isogenic strain construction and gene mapping in Candida albicans. Genetics 134:717-728.[Abstract]
  16. 9
  17. Gudlaugsson, O., S. Gillespie, K. Lee, J. Vande Berg, J. Hu, S. Messer, L. Herwaldt, M. Pfaller, and D. Diekema. 2003. Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia, revisited. Clin. Infect. Dis. 37:1172-1177.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Ibrahim, A. S., B. J. Spellberg, V. Avenissian, Y. Fu, S. G. Filler, and J. E. Edwards, Jr. 2005. Vaccination with recombinant N-terminal domain of Als1p improves survival during murine disseminated candidiasis by enhancing cell-mediated, not humoral, immunity. Infect. Immun. 73:999-1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 11
  21. Mochon, A. B., and J. E. Cutler. 2005. Is a vaccine needed against Candida albicans? Med. Mycol. 43:97-115.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. 12
  23. Pirofski, L. A., and A. Casadevall. 1998. Use of licensed vaccines for active immunization of the immunocompromised host. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:1-26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Rentz, A. M., M. T. Halpern, and R. Bowden. 1998. The impact of candidemia on length of hospital stay, outcome, and overall cost of illness. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:781-788.[Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Romani, L., A. Mencacci, E. Cenci, P. Mosci, G. Vitellozzi, U. Grohmann, P. Puccetti, and F. Bistoni. 1992. Course of primary candidiasis in T cell-depleted mice infected with attenuated variant cells. J. Infect. Dis. 166:1384-1392.[Medline]
  28. 15
  29. Romani, L., A. Mencacci, E. Cenci, R. Spaccapelo, P. Mosci, P. Puccetti, and F. Bistoni. 1993. CD4+ subset expression in murine candidiasis. Th responses correlate directly with genetically determined susceptibility or vaccine-induced resistance. J. Immunol. 150:925-931.[Abstract]
  30. 16
  31. Sanglard, D., and F. C. Odds. 2002. Resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents: molecular mechanisms and clinical consequences. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2:73-85.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. 17
  33. Saville, S. P., A. L. Lazzell, A. P. Bryant, A. Fretzen, A. Monreal, E. O. Solberg, C. Monteagudo, J. L. Lopez-Ribot, and G. T. Milne. 2006. Inhibition of filamentation can be used to treat disseminated candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3312-3316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Saville, S. P., A. L. Lazzell, A. K. Chaturvedi, C. Monteagudo, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2008. Use of a genetically engineered strain to evaluate the pathogenic potential of yeast cell and filamentous forms during Candida albicans systemic infection in immunodeficient mice. Infect. Immun. 76:97-102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. 19
  37. Saville, S. P., A. L. Lazzell, C. Monteagudo, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2003. Engineered control of cell morphology in vivo reveals distinct roles for yeast and filamentous forms of Candida albicans during infection. Eukaryot. Cell 2:1053-1060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. 20
  39. Spellberg, B. J., A. S. Ibrahim, V. Avenissian, S. G. Filler, C. L. Myers, Y. Fu, and J. E. Edwards, Jr. 2005. The anti-Candida albicans vaccine composed of the recombinant N terminus of Als1p reduces fungal burden and improves survival in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised mice. Infect. Immun. 73:6191-6193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. 21
  41. Viudes, A., J. Peman, E. Canton, P. Ubeda, J. L. Lopez-Ribot, and M. Gobernado. 2002. Candidemia at a tertiary-care hospital: epidemiology, treatment, clinical outcome and risk factors for death. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:767-774.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. 22
  43. Wey, S. B., M. Mori, M. A. Pfaller, R. F. Woolson, and R. P. Wenzel. 1988. Hospital-acquired candidemia. The attributable mortality and excess length of stay. Arch. Intern. Med. 148:2642-2645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, March 2009, p. 430-432, Vol. 16, No. 3
1071-412X/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00480-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Xue, J., Chen, X., Selby, D., Hung, C.-Y., Yu, J.-J., Cole, G. T. (2009). A Genetically Engineered Live Attenuated Vaccine of Coccidioides posadasii Protects BALB/c Mice against Coccidioidomycosis. Infect. Immun. 77: 3196-3208 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saville, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saville, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Ribot, J. L.