Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, March 2009, p. 430-432, Vol. 16, No. 3
1071-412X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00480-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Efficacy of a Genetically Engineered Candida albicans tet-NRG1 Strain as an Experimental Live Attenuated Vaccine against Hematogenously Disseminated Candidiasis
Stephen P. Saville,1
Anna L. Lazzell,1
Ashok K. Chaturvedi,1
Carlos Monteagudo,2 and
Jose L. Lopez-Ribot1*
Department of Biology and South Texas Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas,1
Departamento de Patología, Facultad de Medicina y Odontología, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain2
Received 19 December 2008/
Accepted 30 December 2008

ABSTRACT
We report on the efficacy of the genetically engineered
Candida albicans tet-NRG1 strain as an experimental live, attenuated
vaccine against disseminated candidiasis in both immunocompetent
and immunodeficient mice mostly dependent on T-cell immunity.
This experimental vaccination model may represent an important
tool to unravel the mechanisms of protective immunity during
candidiasis.

TEXT
Candida albicans remains the most common cause of nosocomial
bloodstream-derived fungal infections (
3,
4). Morbidity and
mortality associated with hematogenously disseminated candidiasis,
a major problem for an expanding population of immunosuppressed
patients, most notably neutropenic patients, remain unacceptably
high due mainly to the lack of early and accurate diagnostic
tools, the limited arsenal of antifungal drugs, their toxicity,
and the emergence of resistance (
9,
13,
16,
21,
22). Thus, many
studies over the years have investigated the mechanisms of protective
host immunity against this organism to try to develop alternative
immune-based strategies to combat candidiasis. Vaccine development
is a major priority (
6,
7,
11). Experimental vaccination strategies
used by different groups of investigators vary and range from
using heat-killed or attenuated organisms to cell wall extracts
and recombinant proteins, also with different levels of efficacy
(for a review, see reference
11). However, despite these efforts,
currently there are no licensed vaccines against any human mycoses,
including candidiasis.
In previous studies, we have described the construction of a genetically engineered C. albicans strain (SSY50-B) in which NRG1 (a negative regulator of filamentation) was placed under the control of a tetracycline-regulatable promoter so that morphology and virulence could be manipulated in vivo by adding or omitting doxycycline (DOX) from the animal's drinking water (19). Using a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, we demonstrated that infection with this strain when kept in the yeast form (in the absence of DOX) led to 100% survival, even at very high infectivity levels, both for immunocompetent mice and for mice with specific immune defects (18, 19). This high level of survival was observed despite the fact that yeast cells reached and proliferated in target organs and were able to maintain significant levels of fungal burden during relatively long periods of time (17-19). These results encouraged us to examine whether prior exposure to this strain when maintained in the yeast form, thus somewhat recreating a "carrier" or "commensal" state, would confer resistance to reinfection by a fully virulent wild-type strain of C. albicans. If so, this genetically engineered strain would represent a candidate for an experimental live, attenuated vaccine against systemic candidiasis that could possibly be used as a tool to further decipher mechanisms of protective immunity during candidiasis. This could be particularly helpful in improving the validity of the mouse as an experimental model of candidiasis, since humans are normally exposed to this fungus as a commensal but laboratory mice are not.
For these experiments, we utilized a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis that is routinely used in our laboratory, with some modifications (17-19). Briefly, cultures of the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain (SSY50-B) for injection were grown overnight at 25°C in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose without DOX. Yeast cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed three times in sterile pyrogen-free saline. After cells were counted using a hemocytometer, dilutions were made to allow the appropriate number of yeast cells (in this case, 1.7 x 106 CFU) to be injected in a final volume of 200 µl into the lateral tail veins of 6- to 8-week-old female mice (five mice per group). Unvaccinated control (naïve) mice received a 200-µl injection of saline only. Fourteen days later, all mice received a secondary infection with a lethal dose of 5.2 x 105 CFU of the fully virulent C. albicans CAF-2 strain (8). Mortality was monitored for 16 days after secondary challenge. For statistical analyses, survival data and differences between groups were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with institutional regulations, and mice were allowed a 1-week acclimatization period before the start of the experiments.
A first series of vaccination experiments was performed using immunocompetent BALB/c mice, obtained from the National Cancer Institute (NCI; Bethesda, MD). As shown in Fig. 1, prior exposure to the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain kept in the yeast form led to high levels of protection against a secondary infection with a lethal dose of the fully virulent CAF-2 strain, as assessed by survival proportions, with 100% of vaccinated mice versus 0% of naïve (unvaccinated) mice surviving the infection. Of note, the challenge with the C. albicans CAF-2 strain caused 100% mortality after only 3 days postinfection in the unvaccinated control group, thus demonstrating the very aggressive nature of the infection caused by this infecting dose, which vaccinated animals survived.
The above-described results using mice with the BALB/c background
clearly demonstrate the protective effect of this experimental
vaccination strategy using the
tet-NRG1 strain. A caveat for
these experiments is that, unlike humans, experimental mice
do not normally contain
C. albicans as part of their normal
microbiota, and we reasoned that the establishment of a "carrier"
or "commensal" state in mice with the
C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain
(since we have previously demonstrated that a significant organ
fungal burden remains with the
tet-NRG1 strain, even a few weeks
after infection) could exert a nonspecific protective effect
against a secondary infection due to simple competition for
binding sites for fungal cells in deep tissues. However, it
is also possible that the protection observed using this vaccination
strategy is mediated by specific immune mechanisms. We have
previously shown that mice with specific immune deficiencies
are able to survive a primary infection with the
C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain in the absence of DOX when kept as a yeast (
18),
thus also allowing the evaluation of the efficacy of this vaccination
strategy in different types of immunocompromised mice and thereby
providing insights into the mechanisms responsible for protective
immunity in this model. To this end, we repeated the above-mentioned
vaccination/challenge protocol with B-cell-deficient (bearing
a homozygous deletion of the
igh locus; C.129B6-IgH-Jhd
tm1Dhu),
nude (T-cell-deficient mice; CANn.Cg-
Foxn1nu/Crl), and DBA/2N
mice, which are C5 deficient (a component of the complement
pathway) and are considered to have impaired neutrophil activity.
Nude and DBA/2N mice were obtained from the NCI, while B-cell-deficient
mice were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). Both
the nude and B-cell-deficient mice used in these experiments
are in the BALB/c background. As seen in Fig.
2, as for BALB/c
mice, vaccination with the
C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain fully
protected B-cell-deficient and DBA/2N mouse strains against
a secondary infection with CAF-2 (100% survival in vaccinated
animals versus 100% mortality in naïve mice). However,
the same vaccination strategy completely failed to protect T-cell-deficient,
nude mice, in which we observed 100% mortality for both naïve
and vaccinated animals, although nude mice preexposed to the
tet-NRG1 strain survived slightly longer than their naïve
counterparts (Fig.
2C).
Results from this series of experiments using different mouse
strains with defects in specific components of the immune system
allow us to gain some insight into the mechanisms responsible
for protection. Thus, from these data, it is clear that the
nature of the protective response in this model is mostly immune
based and not due merely to a nonspecific steric hindrance caused
by the nonpathogenic
tet-NRG1 cells occupying and possibly saturating
binding sites in tissues. (However, it is possible that the
slight increase in survival observed with vaccinated versus
that of naïve nude mice may be attributable to this "nonspecific"
effect.) The results also suggest that neither B cells nor functional
neutrophils have any role to play in the protective effect exerted
by vaccination with the
C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain. In addition,
the high levels of protection achieved in B-cell-deficient mice
seem to rule out the contribution of antibodies to protection,
at least in this specific experimental model. In contrast, the
lack of protection observed in the case of T-cell-deficient
nude mice strongly indicates a likely role for a cell-mediated
adaptive immune response in protection against reinfection,
even when the time between primary and secondary infection is
relatively short. These observations are similar to those previously
reported for the recombinant Als vaccine (
10,
20). Perhaps the
most significant observation, however, with potentially important
clinical implications for vaccine development, is the fact that
by using this vaccination strategy we were able to effectively
protect DBA/2N mice, which are normally exquisitely sensitive
to systemic candidiasis because of their impaired neutrophil
activity due to complement C5 deficiency (
1,
2). This indicates
that vaccine approaches may be feasible for use in patients
with neutrophil deficiencies, a major patient population at
risk for candidiasis. Our results are also in stark contrast
to previous reports by Romani et al., in which their live, attenuated
vaccine strain killed DBA/2 mice even at very low doses, highlighting
the advantages of using genetically engineered and well-characterized
strains rather than attenuated strains with ill-defined genetic
mutations (
14,
15).
To the best of our knowledge, these are the highest levels of protection described for an anti-C. albicans vaccine, particularly in the case of immunodeficient mice and, more specifically, in mice with neutrophil deficiencies, which reinforces the efficacy of our C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain as an experimental live, attenuated vaccine against disseminated candidiasis in mice. However, we are fully cognizant of some limitations of our study, particularly in regard to the development of live, attenuated vaccines for human use (5, 12). Certainly, the use of live, attenuated vaccines carries important risks, particularly if used in immunosuppressed patients, and the majority of at-risk patients for candidiasis fall into this category (12). For example, we have previously demonstrated that the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain, even in the absence of DOX when kept as a yeast, leads to 100% mortality in mice that have been severely immunosuppressed by pharmacological treatment with cyclophosphamide and cortisone acetate (18). Under similar conditions, we have also observed occasional deaths in DBA/2N mice, particularly if very high levels of infecting inocula of the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain are used (S. P. Saville and J. L. Lopez-Ribot, unpublished results). Despite these caveats, we feel that the C. albicans tet-NRG1 strain and its use in this infection model represent an important tool in our aim to further understand protective immunity during candidiasis, particularly in light of the fact that C. albicans is a normal commensal of humans but not mice, with the ultimate goal of developing safe, effective, and most likely subunit vaccines against candidiasis. Current experiments in our laboratory are aimed at elucidating the specific immunological mechanisms responsible for the induction of the protective immunity seen in this model.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded in part by grants RO1AI064562 and RO1AI063256
from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
to J.L.L.-R. and S.P.S., respectively.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of Biology, the University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249. Phone: (210) 458-7022. Fax: (210) 458-7023. E-mail:
jose.lopezribot{at}utsa.edu 
Published ahead of print on 14 January 2009. 

REFERENCES
1 - Ashman, R. B., E. M. Bolitho, and J. M. Papadimitriou. 1993. Patterns of resistance to Candida albicans in inbred mouse strains. Immunol. Cell Biol. 71:221-225.
2 - Ashman, R. B., J. M. Papadimitriou, A. Fulurija, K. E. Drysdale, C. S. Farah, O. Naidoo, and T. Gotjamanos. 2003. Role of complement C5 and T lymphocytes in pathogenesis of disseminated and mucosal candidiasis in susceptible DBA/2 mice. Microb. Pathog. 34:103-113.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Banerjee, S. N., T. G. Emori, D. H. Culver, R. P. Gaynes, W. R. Jarvis, T. Horan, J. R. Edwards, J. Tolson, T. Henderson, and W. J. Martone. 1991. Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am. J. Med. 91:86S-89S.
4 - Beck-Sague, C., and W. R. Jarvis. 1993. Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, 1980-1990. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. J. Infect. Dis. 167:1247-1251.
5 - Belshe, R. B. 2007. Translational research on vaccines: influenza as an example. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 82:745-749.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Deepe, G. S., Jr. 1997. Prospects for the development of fungal vaccines. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:585-596.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Dixon, D. M., A. Casadevall, B. Klein, L. Mendoza, L. Travassos, and G. S. Deepe, Jr. 1998. Development of vaccines and their use in the prevention of fungal infections. Med. Mycol. 36(Suppl. 1):57-67.[Medline]
8 - Fonzi, W. A., and M. Y. Irwin. 1993. Isogenic strain construction and gene mapping in Candida albicans. Genetics 134:717-728.[Abstract]
9 - Gudlaugsson, O., S. Gillespie, K. Lee, J. Vande Berg, J. Hu, S. Messer, L. Herwaldt, M. Pfaller, and D. Diekema. 2003. Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia, revisited. Clin. Infect. Dis. 37:1172-1177.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Ibrahim, A. S., B. J. Spellberg, V. Avenissian, Y. Fu, S. G. Filler, and J. E. Edwards, Jr. 2005. Vaccination with recombinant N-terminal domain of Als1p improves survival during murine disseminated candidiasis by enhancing cell-mediated, not humoral, immunity. Infect. Immun. 73:999-1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Mochon, A. B., and J. E. Cutler. 2005. Is a vaccine needed against Candida albicans? Med. Mycol. 43:97-115.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Pirofski, L. A., and A. Casadevall. 1998. Use of licensed vaccines for active immunization of the immunocompromised host. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:1-26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Rentz, A. M., M. T. Halpern, and R. Bowden. 1998. The impact of candidemia on length of hospital stay, outcome, and overall cost of illness. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:781-788.[Medline]
14 - Romani, L., A. Mencacci, E. Cenci, P. Mosci, G. Vitellozzi, U. Grohmann, P. Puccetti, and F. Bistoni. 1992. Course of primary candidiasis in T cell-depleted mice infected with attenuated variant cells. J. Infect. Dis. 166:1384-1392.[Medline]
15 - Romani, L., A. Mencacci, E. Cenci, R. Spaccapelo, P. Mosci, P. Puccetti, and F. Bistoni. 1993. CD4+ subset expression in murine candidiasis. Th responses correlate directly with genetically determined susceptibility or vaccine-induced resistance. J. Immunol. 150:925-931.[Abstract]
16 - Sanglard, D., and F. C. Odds. 2002. Resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents: molecular mechanisms and clinical consequences. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2:73-85.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Saville, S. P., A. L. Lazzell, A. P. Bryant, A. Fretzen, A. Monreal, E. O. Solberg, C. Monteagudo, J. L. Lopez-Ribot, and G. T. Milne. 2006. Inhibition of filamentation can be used to treat disseminated candidiasis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3312-3316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Saville, S. P., A. L. Lazzell, A. K. Chaturvedi, C. Monteagudo, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2008. Use of a genetically engineered strain to evaluate the pathogenic potential of yeast cell and filamentous forms during Candida albicans systemic infection in immunodeficient mice. Infect. Immun. 76:97-102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Saville, S. P., A. L. Lazzell, C. Monteagudo, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot. 2003. Engineered control of cell morphology in vivo reveals distinct roles for yeast and filamentous forms of Candida albicans during infection. Eukaryot. Cell 2:1053-1060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Spellberg, B. J., A. S. Ibrahim, V. Avenissian, S. G. Filler, C. L. Myers, Y. Fu, and J. E. Edwards, Jr. 2005. The anti-Candida albicans vaccine composed of the recombinant N terminus of Als1p reduces fungal burden and improves survival in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised mice. Infect. Immun. 73:6191-6193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Viudes, A., J. Peman, E. Canton, P. Ubeda, J. L. Lopez-Ribot, and M. Gobernado. 2002. Candidemia at a tertiary-care hospital: epidemiology, treatment, clinical outcome and risk factors for death. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:767-774.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Wey, S. B., M. Mori, M. A. Pfaller, R. F. Woolson, and R. P. Wenzel. 1988. Hospital-acquired candidemia. The attributable mortality and excess length of stay. Arch. Intern. Med. 148:2642-2645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, March 2009, p. 430-432, Vol. 16, No. 3
1071-412X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00480-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Xue, J., Chen, X., Selby, D., Hung, C.-Y., Yu, J.-J., Cole, G. T.
(2009). A Genetically Engineered Live Attenuated Vaccine of Coccidioides posadasii Protects BALB/c Mice against Coccidioidomycosis. Infect. Immun.
77: 3196-3208
[Abstract]
[Full Text]