Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, March 2009, p. 376-381, Vol. 16, No. 3
1071-412X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00344-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea,1 Center for Vaccine Evaluation and Study, Ewha Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea,2 Departments of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 352943
Received 19 September 2008/ Returned for modification 26 November 2008/ Accepted 6 January 2009
|
|
|---|
0.35 µg/ml for all serotypes, including serotype 19A. In contrast, the opsonic index was detectable (i.e., opsonic index
8) in all children for the seven vaccine serotypes, 81% for serotype 6A, and merely 19% for serotype 19A. PCV7 shows good immunogenicity for vaccine serotypes in infants after a primary series. PCV7 does not elicit opsonic antibodies to serotype 19A. ELISA may thus be an inadequate surrogate assay for evaluating the response for cross-reactive serotypes in infants. |
|
|---|
Serotypes 6A and 19A have been labeled vaccine-related serotypes (VRTs) since they differ from serotypes 6B and 19F only slightly in capsular structures and can cross-react with antibodies to 6B and 19F. Consequently, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines had been assumed to elicit antibodies cross-reacting with and to be cross-protective against the two VRTs. However, cross-protection against serotype 6A was not universally reported (5, 20). Also, herd immunity to serotype 6A has not been evident among adults despite the significant reduction of IPDs among vaccinated children (9, 13). Further, the incidence of 19A IPD has significantly increased since 2000 in the U.S. adults and children (7, 29). Although the increased prevalence of serotype 19A IPDs suggests the ineffectiveness of PCV7 against 19A, some have noted that, before the introduction of PCV7, 19A isolates began to become antibiotic resistant and its prevalence began to increase (15). Thus, it is unclear whether PCV7 induces protective immunity against these two VRTs.
Vaccine-induced protective immunity is generally estimated by measuring antibody concentrations (i.e., as in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]). However, the protective immunity can be estimated better by directly measuring opsonic capacity of vaccine-induced antibodies because the antibodies provide protection by opsonizing pneumococci for phagocytes. Nevertheless, opsonization assay (OPA) was seldom used for estimating protective immunity in young children because OPA was technically difficult to perform and required a large amount of sera. OPA technology has been greatly improved in the last several years (2, 17). For instance, multiplexed OPA permits one to measure opsonic capacities to many different serotypes with small amounts of sera from young children. To investigate the immune response to PCV7 in VRTs, we directly measured opsonic responses to all VTs and the two VRTs in young children following administration of PCV7 and compared the OPA results to antibody levels determined by ELISA. (This study was presented in part at the 6th International Symposium on Pneumococci and Pneumococcal Diseases, Reykjavik, Iceland, in 2008 [abstr. P3-057].)
|
|
|---|
ELISA. Antipneumococcal antibodies against VTs 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F and VRT 19A were measured by ELISA using both cell wall PS (CW-PS) and 22F serotype C-PS absorption, as previously described (4, 38). The ELISA was performed at the Center for Vaccine Evaluation and Study, Ewha Medical Research Institute at Ewha Womans University. Briefly, each well of a 96-well medium binding microtiter plate (Corning, Inc., Corning, NY) was coated with 100 µl of a serotype-specific pneumococcal PS antigen (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) diluted to a predetermined concentration, and plates were incubated at 37°C for 5 h in a humidified chamber. The coated plates were washed with 1x Tris-buffered saline with 0.01% Brij 35 solution. Test sera were preabsorbed with CW-PS (Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark) and 22F C-PS (American Type Culture Collection), and the reference standard 89-SF (provided by Carl Frasch, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD) was preabsorbed with CW-PS. Sera were serially diluted 2.5-fold in absorption solution and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. After incubation, the sera (50 µl) were transferred to the coated microtiter plates, and the plates were incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed five times, and 100 µl of diluted alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (IgG; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL) was added to each well. After a 2-h incubation, the plates were washed five times, and 100 µl of substrate solution (diethanolamine [Sigma, St. Louis, MO] with 1 mg of p-nitrophenyl phosphate powder [Sigma]/ml) was added to each well. After a 2-h incubation at room temperature, 50 µl of 3 M NaOH was added to all wells to stop the enzyme reaction. The optical density was measured at 405 nm, and the optical density at 690 nm was subtracted. Optical densities were converted to antibody concentrations using CDC software for pneumococcal ELISA (written by Brian Plikaytis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; this software can be downloaded free of charge from www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/bimb/elisa.htm). A detailed protocol can be found online (www.vaccine.uab.edu).
MOPA.
The opsonic activities of the samples were evaluated at the University of Alabama at Birmingham using the fourfold multiplexed OPA (MOPA4), as previously described (2, 33, 34, 37). Briefly, frozen aliquots of target pneumococci were thawed, washed twice with opsonization buffer B (Hanks balanced salt solution with Mg/Ca, 0.1% gelatin, and 10% fetal bovine serum) by centrifugation (12,000 x g, 2 min) and diluted to the proper bacterial density (
2 x 105 CFU/ml of each serotype). Target strains expressing capsule types 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, and 23F were reported (2, 37). Equal volumes of four bacterial suspensions that were chosen to be analyzed together were pooled. All serum samples were incubated at 56°C for 30 min before serial dilutions in opsonization buffer B. Serially diluted serum (20 µl/well) was mixed with 10 µl of bacterial suspension in each well of round-bottom 96-well plates (Corning, Inc.). After a 30-min incubation at room temperature with shaking (Mini Orbital Shaker; Bellco Biotechnolgy, Vineland, NJ) at 700 rpm, 10 µl of 3- to 4-week-old rabbit complement (PelFreeze Biologicals, Rogers, AK) and 40 µl of HL60 cells (4 x 105 cells) were added to each well. HL60 cells were differentiated to granulocytes by culture in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% L-glutamine, and 0.8% dimethyl formamide at a starting density of 4 x 105 cells/ml for 5 to 6 days. Plates were incubated in a tissue culture incubator (37°C, 5% CO2) with shaking at 700 rpm. After a 45-min incubation, plates were placed on ice for 10 to 15 min, and an aliquot of the final reaction mixture (10 µl) was spotted onto four different THY agar plates (Todd-Hewitt broth with 0.5% yeast extract and 1.5% agar). When the fluid was absorbed into the agar, an equal volume of overlay agar (THY with 0.75% agar and 25 mg of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride/liter) containing one of the four antibiotics (optochin, spectinomycin, streptomycin, or trimethoprim) was applied to each THY agar plate (17). After an overnight incubation at 37°C, the number of bacterial colonies in the agar plates was enumerated. Opsonic indices were defined as the serum dilution that kills 50% of bacteria and were determined by linear interpolation. (A detailed protocol may be found at www.vaccine.uab.edu.)
Statistical analyses.
The analyses of serum antibody concentrations were based on logarithms of the antibody concentrations of all subjects. Geometric mean concentrations of antipneumococcal IgG antibodies and opsonic indices were evaluated, and two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for each pneumococcal serotype. Serum samples with opsonization indices of <8 were assigned a value of 4 for analysis purposes. The proportions of subjects achieving antipneumococcal antibody titers of
0.35 µg/ml and opsonic indices of
8 were determined, respectively. Reverse cumulative distribution curves were used to display the percentages of children that achieved different antibody concentrations to each of the seven vaccine type pneumococcal serotypes and VRTs 19A and 6A.
Ethical considerations. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Ewha Womans University Hospital and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Informed written consent was obtained from all parents or legal guardians following a detailed explanation of the study.
|
|
|---|
0.35 µg/ml for all vaccine type serotypes (Fig. 1). The geometric mean of opsonic indices for the seven VTs ranged from 360 (95% CI = 237 to 547) for serotype 19F to 3,245 (95% CI = 2,087 to 5,045) for serotype 14. The opsonic index was also detectable (i.e.,
8) in all children for all seven VTs (Fig. 1). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Response to a primary series of the PCV7 of 31 infants for vaccine-type serotypes and VRTs 19A and 6A evaluated by antibody concentrations and opsonic activity
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Reverse cumulative distribution curves for vaccine type serotypes generated by PCV7 in infants. (A) Antibody concentration (µg/ml); (B) opsonic index.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Opsonic index (y axis) versus antibody concentration (x axis) for vaccine-type serotypes (4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, and 23F) and VRT 19A. The vertical and horizontal dotted lines represent the antibody titer of 0.35 µg/ml and opsonic detection limit of 8 for the OPA, respectively.
|
0.35 µg/ml for both serotypes. The antibody titers evaluated by the ELISA showed a good correlation between serotype 19F and 19A (r = 0.69) (data not shown). However, the opsonic indices for 19F and 19A showed a poor correlation (Fig. 3A). While opsonic activity was detectable in all children for serotype 19F, only 6 of 31 of the children (19.4%) had an opsonic index of
8 for serotype 19A (Fig. 3A and 4A). Among infants with detectable cross-opsonic activity, the geometric mean antibody concentrations were 5.41 µg/ml for 19F and 2.66 µg/ml for 19A and the opsonic indices ranged 315 to 1,491 and from 12 to 323 for serotypes 19F and 19A, respectively.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Cross-opsonic capacities for serogroup 19 (A) and serogroup 6 (B). The opsonic index for the VRTs (y axis) versus opsonic index for VTs (x axis) is shown.
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Reverse cumulative distribution curves of opsonic indices generated by PCV7. (A) Serotypes 19F and 19A; (B) serotypes 6B and 6A. The vertical dotted line represents the opsonic detection limit of 8 for the OPA.
|
Immune response to VRT 6A. After vaccination with PCV7, opsonic activity against 6A was elicited in response to serotype 6B (Fig. 3B). The PCV7 vaccine induced opsonic indices in all infants for the VT 6B, and opsonic indices were detectable for 81% of the infants for serotype 6A (Fig. 4B). Among infants with detectable cross-opsonic antibodies, there was a good correlation between the opsonic indices for serotypes 6B and 6A (r = 0.75) (Fig. 3B).
The six infants with no detectable opsonic antibodies for serotype 6A showed high opsonic indices for serotype 6B (range, 27 to 3,205).
Immune response to NVTs 5 and 7F. For NVTs 5 and 7F 3 and 23%, respectively, of the infants showed a detectable opsonic index (data not shown).
|
|
|---|
8) for all VTs. Also, we confirmed that there was a good correlation between the antibody concentration and opsonic activity for VT of PCV7. These results are consistent with those of other previous reports (19, 26, 32, 35, 41). Thus, PCV7 elicits strong protective immunity against the seven VTs in the children in this study as determined by both assay methods, and our study confirms usefulness of ELISA in estimating the immune protection induced for VT with PCV7.
For VRT, the results of serotype 6A OPA correlated with those of 6B OPA, suggesting that 6B PS in PCV7 induces antibodies that cross-opsonize the 6A serotype. According to our results, infants with opsonic activity for serotype 6A were noted at 81%, which is comparable with previously reported vaccine efficacy of 76% against IPDs by 6A (39). Interestingly, there were six infants with high opsonic titers for serotype 6B but no opsonic activity for 6A. However, the results for serotype 19A, the other VRT, are strikingly different. Only a small percentage of infants (19.4%) had detectable opsonic capacity (index
8), and the opsonic index of 19A is poorly correlated with that of 19F. Furthermore, all infants showed an antibody concentration of
0.35 µg/ml for serotype 19A; however, the 19A specific antibody concentrations poorly correlated with the opsonic indices (Fig. 2). However, this 19A-specific antibody appears to have been induced by PCV7 since anti-Pn IgG antibody concentrations show a strong correlation between serotypes 19F and 19A (r = 0.69) (data not shown). Thus, PCV7 elicits antibodies binding to 19A, though a majority of these are functionally ineffective (nonopsonic).
Cross-protective immunity against 19A has been investigated previously. Yu et al. reported the immunologic response of vaccine-induced cross-opsonization for several conjugate vaccines (40). Antibodies induced by the experimental pentavalent CRM197 protein conjugate vaccine were found to bind the PS by an ELISA, but this was not demonstrable by OPA. However, the present study did not examine the seven-valent vaccine currently in use. Others reported cross-protection by showing that passive immunization with infant sera vaccinated with a tetanus toxoid protein conjugate vaccine in a murine pneumococcal pneumonia model showed a protective effect against serotype 19A pneumococci (16). Interestingly, the protective effect did not correlate with the anti-19A specific IgG antibody levels. These studies do suggest that the serotype 19A-specific antibody levels estimated by the ELISA do not seem to reflect the functional capacity of the antibodies for 19A serotypes.
We have shown here that PCV7 provide little immunoprotection against 19A if it was estimated with OPA and not with ELISA. Similar to the findings described here, it was recently reported that antibody responses by adults to protein conjugate vaccines for serotype 19F and 19A are highly specific and that cross-reactive IgG elicited by serogroup 19 conjugates do not seem to show opsonic response to other serotypes within serogroup 19 (8). These findings provide additional information that shuld be considered in explaining the rapid increase in prevalence of serotype 19A with the use of PCV7. Although the increase is partially due to spreading of the antibiotic resistance of 19A serotype strains (15), one should recognize that PCV7 does not induce strong cross-protective antibodies, and this weak cross-protective immunity may be partially responsible for the increased prevalence of 19A serotype. Interestingly, when the 14-valent PS vaccine was upgraded to the 23-valent vaccine, serotype 19A PS was added in addition to 19F PS because 19F was inadequate in inducing antibodies cross-reacting with serotype 19A (24).
We found that PCV7 elicits strong opsonic capacity against serotype 6A and that they are strongly correlated with opsonic capacity to serotype 6B. This finding would suggest that PCV7 should provide herd immunity against serotype 6A, unlike the published epidemiologic observations of poor herd immunity against serotype 6A (9, 13). However, the apparent absence of herd immunity to 6A can now be explained with the newly described serotype 6C, which was typed as "6A" by classical serotyping methods (28). When 6C serotype was distinguished from the 6A serotype with the use of a new serotyping method, PCV7 was found to reduce both the prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage among children (23) and that of IPDs among adults (27) by serotype 6A but not by serotype 6C. Thus, serological evaluation of PCV7 pneumococcal immunity in serotype 6A is consistent with the epidemiologic studies of serotype 6A.
Our findings show that only a functional assay, OPA, can be a surrogate of immune protection for the VRT serotype 19A, whereas an antibody concentration evaluated by the ELISA at best can only be a correlate of immune protection. There are additional examples showing OPA to be a surrogate of protection. Immunization of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with PCV7 may be assessed better with OPA than with ELISA. Correlations for antibody concentrations and OPA titers were poor, suggesting nonspecific antibodies in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients (36). Older adults generally have high levels of pneumococcal antibodies detected by ELISA, but these individuals are susceptible to pneumococcal infections. Thus, despite its usefulness among (healthy) infants, ELISA may not be a good surrogate of immune protection for the elderly or subjects with a suppressed immune status. With many technical improvements, OPA has become a practical tool for studying a large number of samples even from infants (1). It has been reported that ELISA results may overestimate or underestimate vaccine effectiveness against IPDs for several VTs and VRTs, whereas OPA results show a better correlation with actual vaccine effectiveness (11). Also, the results of functional assays are favored by the regulatory agencies. Thus, we believe that OPA can (and should) be used more often in future evaluations of pneumococcal vaccines, especially for VRTs.
The University of Alabama at Birmingham (M.H.N.) retains intellectual property rights on the target bacteria used for the MOPA. This may represent a potential conflict of interest.
Published ahead of print on 14 January 2009. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»