Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, January 2009, p. 122-126, Vol. 16, No. 1
1071-412X/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00359-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Laboratory of Mycobacterial Diseases and Cellular Immunology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland,1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York,2 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Genetics, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York3
Received 30 September 2008/ Returned for modification 26 October 2008/ Accepted 14 November 2008
|
|
|---|
secA2 mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, or a DNA vaccine expressing an ESAT6-antigen 85B fusion protein and then aerogenically challenged with a low dose of M. tuberculosis were evaluated by PCR array. The cellular immune responses at day 10 postchallenge were essentially equivalent in the lungs of mice immunized with either the highly immunogenic BCG vaccine or the
secA2 M. tuberculosis mutant strain. Specifically, 12 immune biomolecules (including gamma interferon [IFN-
], interleukin-21 [IL-21], IL-27, IL-17f, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) were differentially regulated, relative to the levels for naïve controls, in the lungs of vaccinated mice at this time point. Although the vaccine-related immune responses evoked in mice immunized with the DNA vaccine were relatively limited at 10 days postinfection, upregulation of IFN-
RNA synthesis as well as increased expression levels of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokines were detected. |
|
|---|
To identify a pattern of biomarker expression which correlates with the induction of vaccine-induced anti-TB protective immunity, we evaluated early immune responses in the lungs of mice which had been vaccinated and then challenged by the aerosol route with a low dose of virulent M. tuberculosis. In mice, the immunologic events occurring soon after a tuberculous challenge seem to be critical for determining the extent of disease progression. Significant reductions of M. tuberculosis growth (relative to the levels for naïve controls) in the lungs of vaccinated mice during the first month after an aerosol infection often lead to substantially increased survival periods (3, 4). Since different types of TB vaccines will likely evoke various immune responses, we assessed the postchallenge cytokine and chemokine responses induced in the lungs of mice immunized with three different vaccines: BCG, a
secA2 M. tuberculosis attenuated strain, and the M. tuberculosis SD1 DNA vaccine. The
secA2 strain is a highly protective proapoptotic deletion mutant of M. tuberculosis (11). The SD1 DNA vaccine construct expresses a ESAT6-antigen 85B fusion protein which has been shown to boost BCG-induced immune responses and to protect against primary M. tuberculosis infection (5).
|
|
|---|
secA2 mutant. For the DNA vaccine studies, mice were immunized three times, 3 weeks apart, with 200 µg of the SD1 DNA vaccine or the pVax DNA vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA) preparation. The vaccinated mice were challenged about 3 months later by the aerosol route with 100 to 200 CFU of M. tuberculosis Erdman, using a Middlebrook-type inhalation chamber (5). To assess vaccine effectiveness, the growth of M. tuberculosis in relevant organs in naïve and BCG-vaccinated mice was assessed at 7, 10, 14, and 28 days postchallenge by plating organ homogenates on Middlebrook 7H11 plates as described earlier (4, 5). Mice immunized with the
secA2 mutant and the SD1 DNA vaccine were sacrificed at 28 days postchallenge. The level of protection was defined as the difference in organ bacterial burden between naïve and vaccinated animals at the various time points after the M. tuberculosis challenge. The data were analyzed for statistical significance by using the t test analysis in the Graph Pad Prism version 4 software program. Evaluation of pulmonary cytokine and chemokine responses. To evaluate postchallenge immune responses, which may contribute to anti-TB protective immunity, pulmonary transcriptional responses in vaccinated and naïve mice were assessed after a low-dose aerogenic infection with M. tuberculosis Erdman. Briefly, at 7 to 14 days postchallenge, five infected mice per group were sacrificed and lung cells were harvested by shredding the lung tissues with razor blades before treatment with 2 mg/ml dispase (Invitrogen) for 1 h at 37°C. A single cell suspension of lymphocytes was achieved by passing the homogenate through a 70-µm strainer, followed by treatment with ACK lysing buffer and washing with phosphate-buffered saline with fetal calf serum. Total RNA was isolated from the lung cell suspensions by using an RNeasy minikit protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Equal amounts of RNA from each sample were then reverse transcribed to cDNA by using a Superscript first-strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen). The quality of the cDNA conversion was confirmed by doing PCR on individual samples, using glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) primers. To quantitate lung transcriptional responses, the expression levels of 84 cytokines and 84 chemokine-like molecules were evaluated using the RT2 profiler PCR array system (SABiosciences, Frederick, MD) and an ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The specific genes evaluated are listed in Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material. The mRNA expression levels obtained for each gene were normalized to the expression of the GAPDH housekeeping gene by using the following equation: relative mRNA expression = 2–(Ct of cytokine –Ct of GAPDH) (where Ct is the threshold cycle). To determine whether the relative levels of gene expression in vaccinated animals were significantly different from the expression levels in naïve mice, the PCR array results were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pair test (GraphPad Prism 4 software). Finally, the normalized gene expression levels in experimental samples (relative to the levels for naïve controls) were determined by dividing the relative gene expression values in vaccinated animals by the expression levels of naïve controls. Each reported cytokine or chemokine value represents the mean increase (or decrease) of mRNA expression relative to the levels for naïve controls for four to six experiments.
|
|
|---|
secA2 M. tuberculosis mutant, and the SD1 DNA vaccine was confirmed in vaccination/challenge studies. In these experiments, vaccine-induced protection was defined as the relative reduction in organ bacterial burdens in vaccinated compared to naïve mice. Figure 1 shows the mean protective responses in the murine lungs and spleens at 28 days after the aerosol M. tuberculosis challenge. In these studies, the growth of the TB infection strain was reduced significantly in all vaccinated animals compared to the levels for naïve controls (P < 0.05). In contrast, injection of the DNA vector did not evoke significant protective responses (data not shown). It should be emphasized that BCG and
secA2 immunization evoked stronger protective responses than vaccination with the SD1 DNA vaccine at this early time point (P < 0.05). Also, although the anti-TB protection evoked by vaccination with the
secA2 mutant was frequently increased relative to the BCG-induced protective responses, these differences were not statistically significant at 4 weeks after an aerogenic challenge with M. tuberculosis Erdman. Importantly, for all three vaccines, the protection detected at 28 days postchallenge is consistent with the significantly enhanced survival periods (relative to the levels for naïve controls) seen in previous studies (5, 11).
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Protective responses in vaccinated mice at 28 days postchallenge. Mice were vaccinated with either BCG, the secA2 mutant of M. tuberculosis, or the SD1 DNA vaccine expressing an ESAT6-antigen 85B fusion protein, as described in Materials and Methods; challenged by the aerosol route with a low dose of M. tuberculosis Erdman; and then sacrificed at 28 days postchallenge. Vaccine-induced protection was calculated as follows: number of organ bacterial CFU in naïve mice – number of CFU in vaccinated mice. These results represent the mean protective results for three or four experiments. The mean lung and spleen CFU values at day 28 postinfection for all vaccinated mice were significantly lower than the CFU values for naïve controls (P < 0.05; t tests). The protective responses in the BCG- and the secA2-vaccinated mice were significantly increased relative to the levels for SD1 DNA-vaccinated mice (*, P < 0.05).
|
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Protective responses in the lungs of BCG-vaccinated mice during the first 2 weeks after the aerogenic infection. The mean numbers of CFU in the lungs of the BCG-vaccinated mice were significantly lower than the mean numbers of lung CFU for the naïve controls at day 14 postchallenge (*, P < 0.05).
|
), interleukin-7 (IL-7), and IL-21 expression levels were upregulated at this early time point, while Gdf10 expression was consistently downregulated. At day 10 postinfection, the expression levels of five cytokine-related genes (the Gdf3, IFN-
, IL-17f, IL-21, and IL-27 genes) had increased 7- to 24-fold relative to the levels for naïve controls. Surprisingly, IL-4 expression was also significantly increased (a modest threefold increase) in vaccinated animals at day 10. In contrast, the expression levels of three immune response genes (the Gdf10, Bmp3, and IL-11 genes) were decreased about threefold at this time point. By day 14 after the challenge, mRNA levels of eight cytokine-related genes were increased in the lungs of BCG-vaccinated mice, including the IFN-
, IFN-β, IL-17f, IL-27, and tumor necrosis factor alpha genes. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Normalized values for early pulmonary cytokine responses in vaccinated mice following an aerosol infection with M. tuberculosis
|
inducible T-cell chemoattractant molecules CXCL9 (41.7-fold increase), CXCL10 (10.1-fold), and CXCL11 (17.6-fold) were highly increased in BCG-vaccinated mice. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Normalized values for pulmonary chemokine responses in vaccinated mice 10 days after an aerosol infection with M. tuberculosis
|
secA2 mutant or the SD1 DNA vaccine, and then pulmonary cytokine and chemokine expression levels were evaluated 10 days after a low-dose aerosol M. tuberculosis infection. Interestingly, the early cytokine and chemokine responses in the lungs of infected mice immunized with the
secA2 mutant strain were nearly identical to the BCG results, with no significant differences detected in the levels of expression of upregulated and downregulated genes (Tables 1 and 2). In particular, the expression levels of the Gdf3, IFN-
, IL-17f, IL-21, and IL-27 cytokine genes as well as the CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokine genes were highly upregulated in mice vaccinated with the
secA2 mutant 10 days after the aerosol M. tuberculosis infection. In contrast, the overall cytokine expression responses at day 10 postinfection in animals immunized with the SD1 DNA vaccine were substantially lower than the responses detected in mice vaccinated with live, attenuated vaccines. Among the 84 cytokines evaluated by PCR array, only the expression levels of IFN-
and IL-4 were upregulated in the lungs of the SD1 DNA-vaccinated mice at this early time point. Furthermore, the level of IFN-
expression was reduced about threefold relative to levels seen in mice immunized with BCG or the
secA2 mutant strain. Surprisingly, despite the modest IFN-
responses in SD1 DNA-vaccinated mice, the postinfection pulmonary IFN-
-inducible CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokine responses in these mice were not significantly different from those in the other vaccinated animals. At 10 days postinfection, the average increases in lung mRNA expression for these chemokines were 37.6-fold for CXCL9, 5.5-fold for CXCL10, and 6.9-fold for CXCL11 in mice vaccinated with the SD1 DNA vaccine. |
|
|---|
responses are frequently being used as a correlate of vaccine-induced protective immunity in preclinical experiments and clinical studies, our results are consistent with previous data which indicate that TB vaccine-induced immunity involves the expression of many genes rather than just a few genes (8, 12, 20, 25, 27). In our studies, we showed that vaccination with the highly immunogenic attenuated strains followed by an aerosol tuberculous infection induced differential regulation of expression of at least 15 genes encoding immune mediators at 7 to 14 days postchallenge. While the precise biological significance of the up- or downregulation of cytokine expression in the lungs of immunized animals remains uncertain, these early changes do correspond with decreased mycobacterial organ burdens at 1 month postchallenge and increased survival periods for vaccinated mice relative to the levels for naïve controls (5, 11). Interestingly, the early cytokine and chemokine responses after vaccination with BCG or the
secA2 mutant of M. tuberculosis were essentially equivalent. These results are consistent with our 4-week postinfection bacterial burden data, which showed that the protection induced by these vaccines against M. tuberculosis Erdman was statistically indistinguishable in this mouse model. It should be noted that in an earlier study, we demonstrated that mice immunized with the
secA2 mutant survived significantly longer than BCG-vaccinated mice after an aerosol M. tuberculosis infection (11). This absence of a direct linear correlation between the day 28 protection data and the survival results is likely due to the enhanced capacity of the
secA2 mutant to induce CD8 T-cell responses. In this mouse model, early pulmonary anti-TB cellular immunity is dominated by CD4 T-cell responses, while antigen-specific CD8 T-cell responses are likely more important during the later phases of the infection (25). Clearly, this CD4 T-cell dominance is a limitation in assessing early immune responses in mice. To adequately evaluate protective responses evoked by vaccines designed to induce CD8 responses, new models which can assess vaccine-induced immunity at later phases of the infection are needed.
While the live, attenuated strains are clearly highly immunogenic, immunization with the SD1 DNA vaccine also induced anti-TB protection in the lung and modest pulmonary cytokine responses in this mouse model. Despite decreased relative IFN-
responses in the SD1 DNA-vaccinated mice (compared to the levels for the attenuated vaccine strains), the expression levels of the CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokines were still substantially upregulated. These results, coupled with previous data, suggest that to generate a modest protective response, early postinfection IFN-
expression (probably from memory T cells) is needed to activate macrophages and to induce early synthesis of the CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokines. Interestingly, these IFN-
-inducible chemokines possess biological activities associated with both innate and adaptive immune mechanisms. It is well known that CXC chemokines serve as adaptive immune response signals in the recruitment of lymphocytes to infected tissues (23, 24). Additionally, these peptides have innate defensin-like activities and can inactivate microbial pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Listeria monocytogenes (3, 19). Clearly, further studies are needed to determine whether the CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 chemokines possess antimycobacterial activity and whether these bactericidal properties may contribute to early control of M. tuberculosis infections.
The roles of the other up (or down)-regulated cytokines (including Gdf3, IL-17f, IL-21, and IL-27) in the generation of enhanced anti-TB protection are also uncertain. For example, IL-17 expression has been shown to be critical in the host pulmonary response to organisms such as Klebsiella pneumoniae and Bordetella pertussis as well as M. tuberculosis (1, 10, 14). Khader et al. proposed that vaccination against M. tuberculosis induces IL-17-producing CD4 T cells that evoke chemokine production, which ultimately leads to recruitment of IFN-
-producing CD4 cells to the lung (14). Although the induction of chemokine expression is directly relevant to the anti-TB protective response, it is unclear whether other well-known activities of IL-17, including neutrophil recruitment and maintenance of granulopoietic responses, are important for limiting M. tuberculosis growth in vaccinated mice (16). Moreover, the anti-TB protective roles of IL-21 and IL-27 need to be clarified. Although the upregulation of IL-21 and IL-27 responses have been shown to stimulate T-cell proliferation and promote Th1 responses, these molecules can also regulate pathogen-induced immune responses by suppressing effector T-cell cytokine production (13, 17, 22). Whether IL-21 and IL-27 amplify Th1-type responses or limit potentially dangerous inflammatory responses in vaccinated mice after infection is unclear. It has recently been shown that the synergistic combination of IL-21 and transforming growth factor β can initiate an alternative pathway for inducing the proinflammatory Th17 cells (15). It would be of interest to assess whether Gdf3, a transforming growth factor β family member that was shown to be upregulated in this study, has similar Th17-promoting activities when combined with IL-21 (18).
In sum, by characterizing the pulmonary cytokine and chemokine responses in the lungs of vaccinated mice after a M. tuberculosis aerosol infection, we have identified several immune mediators which may contribute to the anti-TB protective responses induced by TB vaccines. Clearly, these data suggest novel experiments for better understanding the cellular mechanisms of vaccine-induced protection against M. tuberculosis and for further identification of the potential correlates of anti-TB protective immunity.
Published ahead of print on 26 November 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://cvi.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»