Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pisani, P. Articles by Forman, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pisani, P. Articles by Forman, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, September 2008, p. 1363-1368, Vol. 15, No. 9
1071-412X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00132-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cross-Reactivity between Immune Responses to Helicobacter bilis and Helicobacter pylori in a Population in Thailand at High Risk of Developing Cholangiocarcinoma

Paola Pisani,^1,7* Mark T. Whary,² Ingrid Nilsson,³ Supannee Sriamporn,⁴ Torkel Wadström,³ James G. Fox,^2,5, Åsa Ljungh,^3, and David Forman^6,

Descriptive Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cours Albert-Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 03, France,¹ Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,² Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Medical Microbiology, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden,³ Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand,⁴ Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,⁵ Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health and Therapeutics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom,⁶ Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom⁷

Received 16 April 2008/ Returned for modification 15 May 2008/ Accepted 24 June 2008

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Helicobacter bilis DNA has been detected in human tissue and is a candidate for etiologic investigations on the causes of hepatic and biliary tract diseases, but reliable serologic tests need to be developed in order to pursue such investigations. The scope of this study was to assess the specificity of two assays for H. bilis immune response allowing for H. pylori, and their cross-reactivity in a population in Thailand at high risk for cholangiocarcinoma. Plasma samples from 92 Thai volunteers were independently tested in two laboratories (Massachusetts Institute of Technology [MIT] and Lund). MIT performed three analyses of H. pylori and H. bilis based either on (i) outer membrane protein (OMP) with no preabsorption or on antigens derived from whole-cell sonicate before (ii) or after (iii) preabsorption with H. pylori sonicate protein. Lund used cell surface proteins from H. pylori and H. bilis as antigens. Testing for H. bilis was preabsorbed with a whole-cell lysate of H. pylori. More than 80% of the samples were positive for H. pylori in both laboratories. As tested by MIT, 58.7% (95% confidence interval, 47.9 to 68.9%) were positive for H. bilis by OMP and 44.5% (34.1 to 55.3%) were positive for H. bilis sonicate protein, but only 15.2% (8.6 to 24.2%) remained positive after preabsorption with H. pylori sonicate protein. Lund found 34.5% of the samples positive for H. bilis (22.0 to 41.0%), which was statistically compatible with all three MIT results. Serologic responses to OMPs of the two bacteria coincided in 66 and 45% of the samples in the MIT and Lund assays, respectively. We found high cross-reactivity between the immune responses to H. pylori and H. bilis antigens. More-specific H. bilis antigens need to be isolated to develop serologic tests suitable for epidemiological studies.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
An increasing number of Helicobacter species (other than Helicobacter pylori) that colonize the enterohepatic tract of animals and humans have been identified in recent years (8). Some cause hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma in animal models (10) and bacteremia in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent hosts (19, 24). The documented role of H. pylori in developing duodenal and gastric ulcer disease and stomach cancer in humans (22) justifies the hypothesis that some of these bacteria may have a role in human enterohepatic diseases.

The presence of H. bilis DNA, one of the eight species identified in humans, was first described in the bile and gallbladder tissue of Chilean patients affected by cholecystitis in a region where the incidence of gallbladder cancer was high (9). The DNA of enteric species, including H. bilis, H. hepaticus, and H. pullorum, has been identified by PCR in neoplastic and normal tissues of cancer patients (29), in pediatric liver tissue (45), and in various chronic hepatic disorders, including malignancy and intra- and extrahepatic biliary diseases (2, 6, 20, 23, 37). In particular, H. bilis DNA was more common in Thai and Japanese patients affected by malignancies of the biliary tract than in patients affected by nonmalignant disorders (23). Because H. bilis has been associated with chronic hepatitis (11, 12), inflammatory bowel disease (3, 13, 40), and cholecystitis (25) in mouse models, potential H. bilis infection in humans appears to be suitable for epidemiological investigations.

Epidemiological studies require, however, the availability of noninvasive tests to compare large numbers of cases and suitable controls.

In the context of a long-term prospective investigation on cholangiocarcinoma in rural Thailand (42), we assessed whether individuals from the resident population expressed detectable plasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) to H. bilis antigens that can be discriminated from antibody responses to H. pylori infection. To establish reliable biomarkers based on minimally invasive tests is a necessary prerequisite to the development of epidemiological studies on the etiological relevance of different Helicobacter species.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Plasma samples of 92 subjects from a cohort of 24,000 volunteers recruited in northeastern Thailand between 1990 and 2001 were retrieved from the cohort biobank. At recruitment, each volunteer signed informed consent and donated a blood sample that was divided into several aliquots and stored at –20°C (42). The 92 subjects were selected to represent the cohort: 32 were men, the mean age of the group was 55.0 ± 10.0 years (range, 20 to 70 years), and 19.6% were positive for Opistorchis viverrini, a liver fluke endemic in this population. Infection with hepatitis B and C viruses was not assessed in this set of subjects. However, the prevalences of participants positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and core and surface antigens to hepatitis C in a random sample tested at baseline were 10 and 4%, respectively (unpublished data).

The 92 vials of plasma were thawed, split into two aliquots (0.2 to 0.4 ml), and shipped in dry ice to the two laboratories at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, MA, and the University of Lund (Lund) in Sweden. The laboratories conducted the analyses independently and were blinded with respect to any characteristics of the participants.

Laboratory assays at MIT: bacterial strains and culture conditions. The MIT laboratory performed two analyses for antibody titers to H. pylori and H. bilis, one based on outer membrane proteins (OMPs) with no preabsorption and the second based on antigens derived by whole-cell sonication (51). In the second assay, comparisons were made between IgG levels before and after preabsorption with H. pylori sonicate protein. To prepare OMPs, H. pylori and H. bilis were cultured in brucella broth containing 5% fetal bovine serum for 24 h under microaerobic conditions. After 3 washes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and examination for bacterial contaminants using Gram staining and phase microscopy, the pellet was resuspended in 4 ml of 1% N-octyl-β-glucopyranoside (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min at room temperature. Insoluble material was removed by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 x g for 1 h. After dialysis against PBS for 24 h at 4°C, supernatant protein concentration was measured by the Lowry technique (Sigma). For sonication, bacterial pellets from broth cultures were resuspended in sterile PBS and sonicated on ice (Artek Sonic Dismembranator; Artek Systems, Framingdale, NY). Sonication was for four cycles of 30 s on and 30 s off at a duty cycle of 50% and with power applied slowly to 60 W. After sonication, the mixture was examined by phase-contrast microscopy to confirm the absence of intact bacteria, followed by determination of the protein concentration as described above. OMP antigens for the first analysis consisted of OMP extracts harvested from five clinical isolates of H. pylori (Hp1018, Hp1010, NQ366, NQ1725, and NQ1708) mixed in equal amounts based on protein concentration. The ATCC type strain of H. bilis (ATCC 51630) was used. Sonicate antigens for the second analysis were prepared from four of the five previously listed clinical isolates of H. pylori (Hp1018, Hp1010, NQ366, and NQ1708), also mixed in equal amounts based on protein analysis. H. bilis sonicate was prepared using the same ATCC type strain as described above.

For all assays, a checkerboard titration of reagents was performed to identify the optimal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) conditions. Sera from eight confirmed H. pylori-positive (four from Louisiana and four from Colombia) and five confirmed negative patients (two from Louisiana and three from Colombia) were used as controls (based on PCR, culture, and histology). Seroconversion to H. pylori was defined as ELISA values that exceeded the mean plus three standard deviations of the ELISA optical densities obtained for the five confirmed negative H. pylori sera. Seroconversion to H. bilis could not be proven and was based on ELISA values generated from the samples from the five confirmed H. pylori-negative patients.

MIT laboratory, first analysis. For plasma IgG measurement, 96-well Immulon II plates (ThermoLab Systems, Franklin, MA) were coated with 100 µl per well of 1-µg/ml concentrations of H. pylori or H. bilis OMP in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C. Sera were diluted 1:1,000 and incubated on wells for 1 h at 37°C. The biotinylated secondary antibody was goat anti-human IgG (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL), which was used at a 1:10,000 dilution for 1 h at 37°C. Incubation with extravidin peroxidase for 30 min at 37°C (Sigma) was followed by a 30-min incubation with ABTS [2,2'azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)] diammonium salt substrate (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) for color development at room temperature. Absorbance (optical density) at 405/562 was recorded by an ELISA plate reader (Dynatech MR7000; Dynatech Laboratories, Inc., Chantilly, VA).

MIT laboratory, second and third analyses. The ELISA conditions were identical to the first analysis except that sonicate proteins were used as coating antigen. To preabsorb plasma with H. pylori antigens to minimize cross-reactive IgG to H. bilis, the amount of sonicate protein used was standardized by adjusting the concentration to achieve and optical density of 0.15 at a wavelength of 540 nm when mixed with 1 ml of plasma diluted to 1:1,000. Tubes were placed on a mixing platform for 1 h at room temperature and then overnight at 4°C. A paired sample was incubated with PBS instead of protein and subjected to the same incubation conditions. Nonabsorbed and preabsorbed samples were then plated against H. pylori or H. bilis sonicate antigens for the ELISA. The data generated on serial days of assay were normalized by including a set of the same three samples on every plate and adjusting the values for interday variability.

Lund laboratory. (i) Bacterial strains and culture conditions. A reference strain of H. pylori (17874 obtained from the Cell Culture Collection, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden [CCUG]) and an H. bilis strain (CCUG 38995) were cultured on brucella blood agar (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) supplemented with 5% horse blood, 10% inactivated horse serum, 1% IsoVitalex (Becton Dickinson), and 1% hemin (ICN, Aurora, OH) for 3 to 4 days at 37°C in a microaerobic atmosphere (Anoxomat; MART Microbiology, Lichtenvoorde, The Netherlands). Cells of the two species were harvested, washed twice in PBS (pH 7.2; 0.02 M sodium phosphate, 0.15 M NaCl) and used for subsequent protein extraction.

(ii) Extraction of CSPs. An acid glycine extraction of cell surface proteins (CSPs) of the two Helicobacter species was performed as follows. Washed cells were resuspended in 0.2 M glycine hydrochloride (pH 2.2; 4 g of cells/100 ml) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and stirred magnetically for 15 min at 20°C. Cells were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 8°C, and the supernatants were neutralized with NaOH and dialyzed for 18 h at 8°C against PBS. Protein was quantified by the Bradford method using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) and bovine serum albumin as a standard. Protein extracts were divided into aliquots and kept frozen at –22°C until use.

(iii) Serology. To remove potentially cross-reacting antibodies between H. pylori and the enteric H. bilis, a preabsorption step was performed. Plasma samples to be tested for antibodies to antigens of H. bilis by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and immunoblotting were absorbed with a whole-cell lysate of H. pylori (CCUG 17874). Then, 10 µl of serum was added to 1 ml of cell lysate (with the density adjusted at A₅₄₀ to 1.5), followed by incubation for 2.5 h at 22°C under constant shaking. Cells were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 15 min, and the supernatants were used for the serology (21, 49).

CSPs of the Helicobacter species were used as the coating antigens, diluted to a concentration of 5 µg/ml in carbonate buffer (pH 9.8), and 100 µl/well was added in duplicate to the microtiter plates (Maxisorp Immunoplates; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). Plates were incubated for 16 h at 8°C, washed with PBS-T (PBS plus 0.05% Tween [pH 7.2]), and blocked for 1.5 h at 22°C with 2% bovine serum albumin in PBS-T. Samples, diluted 1/800, were applied and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. As a reference standard, human gamma globulin (Pharmacia & UpJohn, Stockholm, Sweden) was used. A pool of 10 sera, determined to be negative by EIA for H. pylori and H. bilis, was included as a negative control, and a polyclonal rabbit antiserum to the two Helicobacter species was applied as a positive control. After a washing step, an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human IgG (diluted 1/30,000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or an anti-rabbit IgG antibody (diluted 1/500; DacoCytomation AS, Glostrup, Denmark) was used as a secondary antibody, and the plates were again incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Bound antibodies were visualized by adding a substrate buffer containing 1 mg of p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma) per ml in a diethanolamine buffer (pH 9.8). The absorbance was measured in a spectrophotometer at 405 nm after 35 min of incubation. The results are expressed as the corrected mean absorbance values in percentages of the reference standard and are presented as the relative antibody activity (RAA). The cutoff value for seropositivity to H. pylori is based on sera from patients with culture-positive and -negative biopsy specimens, sera from children, and blood donors. An RAA value of >35 was regarded as positive, and an RAA value between 25 and 35 regarded as a low-positive (borderline) result. For H. bilis (RAA > 35), the cutoff values were established based on comparisons of the EIA results of 90 blood donors (Swedish) corresponding to the upper limit for the 95th percentile level.

(iv) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Extracted CSPs of H. pylori and H. bilis were separated under reducing conditions using Criterion cell electrophoresis equipment (Bio-Rad) in 8 to 16% gradient gels with a 4% stacking gel (Criterion precast gel; Bio-Rad). Proteins were diluted in a standard sample buffer (Bio-Rad), loaded onto the gels (120 µg/gel), and separated at 200 V for 90 min. The M_rs of the separated proteins were established using marker proteins (Bio-Rad) (32, 47).

After electrophoresis, the gels were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Micron Separations, Westborough, MA) for antibody detection, using semidry electroblotter equipment (Ancos, Vig, Denmark). The transfer time was 90 min at a constant current of 0.8 mA/cm². The membranes were blocked for two periods of 15 min each in a blocking buffer containing hydrolyzed gelatin, polyvinylpyrrolidone, Tween 20, ethanolamine, and glycine; cut into strips; probed with serum samples diluted 1/100 in a Tris buffer containing gelatin hydrolysate, sodium chloride, and Tween 20 (pH 8.7) (24); and then incubated for 16 h at 8°C with gentle shaking. After repeated washings, horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-human IgG antibodies (DakoCytomation) diluted 1/600 were added, and the strips were incubated for 2 h at 8°C. Bound antibodies were detected by adding a 50 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 0.04% 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (Sigma) and 0.015% H₂O₂. For each of the immunoblot assays, a polyclonal rabbit antiserum to the Helicobacter species was included as a reference (50). All sera giving positive or borderline EIA results were analyzed by immunoblotting. Stained protein patterns were documented by visual inspection, and very weakly stained bands were ignored and considered nonspecific binding. For H. pylori, a serum was deemed blot positive if found to contain antibodies reacting with the CagA protein (120 kDa) and/or at least two of the low-M_r proteins (26, 29, 30, and 33 kDa) considered H. pylori specific (32, 47). Antibody responses to the 20- to 22-kDa proteins of H. bilis are considered H. bilis specific (21) and were used as criteria for positively.

Statistical analyses. Subjects were classified as positive or negative for infection. Comparisons were carried out by means of contingency tables. Associations were tested by the kappa statistics, which test deviations from the expected joint distribution given the marginal distribution of the two variables, corrected for chance (7). Statistically significant kappa values indicate nonchance associations. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CI) of proportions were calculated based on the binomial distribution. Statistical computing was carried out by using STATA software, version 9 (43).

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The prevalence of H. pylori-positive individuals was high in both laboratories: 75 of 92 samples analyzed by MIT (Table 1), yielding a prevalence of 81.5% (95% CI = 72.1 to 88.9%), and 77 of 88 analyzed by Lund (Table 2; four vials did not contain enough material for all assays), yielding a prevalence of 87.5% (CI = 78.7 to 93.6%). The difference was not statistically significant.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. MIT laboratory: within-subject association between H. pylori and H. bilis immune response

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Lund laboratory: within-subject association between H. pylori and H. bilis immune responsea

According to MIT (Table 1), 54 of the 92 samples were positive for H. bilis using OMP (58.7%; CI = 47.9 to 68.9%), 41 were positive using the sonicate protein (44.5%; CI = 34.1 to 55.3%), but only 14 remained so after preabsorption of the samples with H. pylori sonicate, reducing the prevalence to 15.2% (CI = 8.6 to 24.2%). The proportion of H. bilis-positive samples, confirmed as positive after preabsorption with H. pylori, was 34.0% (CI = 20.1 to 50.6%).

The proportion of H. bilis-positive reported by the Lund laboratory (Table 2) was intermediate between the MIT assays: 29 of 92 samples, corresponding to a prevalence of 31.5% (CI = 22.0 to 41.0%), which was statistically compatible with all three MIT results. Correlation of data from MIT indicated that antibody responses to OMPs of the two bacteria coincided for 66% of the subjects (Table 1), while the concordance was 45% by the Lund laboratory (Table 2).

Table 3 shows the agreement between the Lund and the three MIT assessments of the immune responses to H. bilis. Concordance between the two laboratories was statistically significant only between the Lund and the two MIT sonicate assays; however, this was due to a greater proportion of concordant negatives rather than positives. The proportion of concordant positive samples was the same by Lund (CSPs, preabsorbed plasma samples) and either MIT OMP or sonicate without preabsorption (20/92 [21.7%]; CI = 13.8 to 31.6). The MIT assay that was most comparable with the Lund method (sonicate with preabsorption) detected 7 positives (7.6%) and 56 negatives (60.9%). The remaining are considered undetermined.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. H. bilis immune response: joint distributions according to the two laboratories

Four of the twenty-nine H. bilis EIA-positive sera were confirmed by immunoblotting in the Lund laboratory. The sera reacted strongly to the 20- and 22-kDa proteins, previously shown to have high specificity (31). Three were EIA positive by the MIT laboratory using OMPs as antigen, but none remained positive after preabsorption with H. pylori.

Altogether, the proportion of discordant outcomes was high for H. bilis, ranging from 31.5% (sonicate preabsorbed) to 46.7% (OMP). In epidemiological studies, such a level of misclassification can reduce a true odds ratio of 10 (magnitude of the association between H. pylori and gastric cancer as an example) to an observed value of 2.4 to 4.3 (46).

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
This study confirmed high cross-reactivity between the immune responses to antigens obtained from H. pylori and H. bilis to an extent that infection with the two species cannot be distinguished serologically in most subjects given the high prevalence of H. pylori in the population studied. Cross-reactivity between bile-tolerant species and H. pylori has been documented previously (1). Several aspects of the study design limit the interpretation of the results: the two laboratories used different strains of H. pylori, with none originating from the Thai population investigated. Further, cutoff points for positivity were based on different reference distributions. Despite these methodological differences, the two laboratories showed nonrandom agreement in the characterization of the immune response to the H. bilis strain used, suggesting that the detected antibodies were not entirely explained by infection with H. pylori. Moreover, concordance between the two laboratories after preabsorption with H. pylori remained high (68%) and statistically greater than would be expected by chance. A further indication of a genuine presence of the enteric H. bilis in this population comes from the confirmation by immunoblotting of H. bilis-specific antibodies in four subjects. Our preliminary results justify further investigations designed to better control the confounding effect of H. pylori infection and improve the specificity of the assays. These studies would be particularly relevant in this population due to the very high incidence of liver-fluke related cholangiocarcinoma, the low risk of gastric cancer, and the high prevalence of H. pylori infection. Ideally, the outcome of ELISAs should be compared to a gold standard such as an immunoblotting. ELISA OMP antigens were prepared by different techniques but were optimized for each laboratory. The OMP preparations used for H. pylori EIA-based assays were found to be superior in sensitivity and specificity compared to antigen preparations based on acid glycine extracts, crude cell lysates, high-molecular-weight urease preparations, and flagellum extracts (35). Similar banding patterns derived from OMP preparations of four H. bilis strains isolated from different species were shown to be distinct from those of H. pylori (14). Immunoblotting demonstrated that OMPs from H. bilis and H. pylori have little cross-reactivity, except for their flagellins, and that at least two of the immunogenic polypeptides identified in H. bilis OMP had no N-terminal sequence homology with protein sequences available in public databases. Although the significance of H. bilis OMPs in terms of virulence is not known, these unique H. bilis antigens may be useful as targets in serologic assays.

The ability to characterize the infection status of individuals with enterohepatic helicobacters described in the last 20 years would open entirely new perspectives for investigations into the causes of chronic and malignant diseases of the biliary tract in human beings. Cancers of the gallbladder and biliary tract show 10-fold variation worldwide (36), being generally rare but with areas of an exceptionally high incidence in the Andean region in South America, Thailand, Japan, central Europe (36), and northeastern India (28). Established risk factors for the disease such as cholelithiasis, obesity, and parity seem to account for only a small degree of variation, with endemic liver fluke infection in Thailand being the only exception (17). The risk attributed to the parasite, however, could be confounded by enterohepatic Helicobacter infection as a cofactor contributing to biliary carcinogenesis, similar to the role of H. pylori infection in the development of gastric cancer.

Based on molecular evidence that enterohepatic Helicobacter species infect humans (8, 9, 19, 24), it remains unknown how commonly these infections develop and which human populations are at greatest risk. The geographical distribution of H. bilis or other enteric Helicobacter species in humans is unknown but suggests that their prevalence may be low in populations at low risk for nonviral hepatitis and biliary duct malignancies (4, 5, 30, 37, 38, 48) but could contribute to the unexplained increase of extra- and intrahepatic cancer incidence in North America and Europe (18, 39, 44) and the wide geographical variation in the incidence of gallbladder and extrahepatic bile duct cancers observed in other regions (36). Enterohepatic Helicobacter infection could also be a factor in the development of cholesterol gallstones and intrahepatic cholelithiasis, as suggested by recent studies in animal models (25-27).

In order to increase the probability of detecting positive subjects, investigators have analyzed patients affected by a variety of disorders of the liver and biliary tract. When serological markers of infection were assessed, more patients were generally found positive compared to blood donors, depending on the specific disease (31). The hepatic disease may, however, modify responses to infection as is well documented for H. pylori and atrophy of the gastric mucosa (15, 33, 41). The nature of a putative association between the enterohepatic helicobacters and hepatic diseases in humans will therefore eventually clarified by epidemiological studies that can discriminate subjects harboring active infection from negative subjects, hopefully preceding the diagnosis of clinical disease. It is therefore important to develop inexpensive but accurate serological markers of infection for use in large-scale epidemiological studies. The design of future descriptive investigations of the kind we have presented here will require improved control of the confounding effect of H. pylori infection (16, 34) and the adoption of a highly reproducible diagnostic standard. Assays based on antigens derived from the population in which the study is performed are more sensitive and specific. A significant limitation to date is that gastric, liver, and lower-bowel samples suitable for PCR and culture have not been commonly available, particularly in high-risk populations. Thus, the interpretation of epidemiological studies such as those presented here must acknowledge the inability to definitively demonstrate H. pylori or H. bilis infection.

 
The recruitment and the follow-up of the cohort were in part supported by grants from the Buddhist Aid Center of Japan, the Association for International Cancer Research, Scotland, United Kingdom (grant 98-55), and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. The analyses in the MIT laboratory were supported by NIH grants R01-CA067529 and P30-ES02109. The analyses in the Lund laboratory were supported by an ALF grant from the Lund University Hospital.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington OX4 7LF, United Kingdom. Phone: (44)1865 289660. Fax: (44)1865 289610. E-mail: paola.pisani{at}ceu.ox.ac.uk

Published ahead of print on 2 July 2008.

J.G.F., A.L., and D.F. contributed equally to this study.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Ananieva, O., I. Nilsson, T. Vorobjova, R. Uibo, and T. Wadström. 2002. Immune responses to bile-tolerant Helicobacter species in patients with chronic liver diseases, a randomized population group, and healthy blood donors. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 9:1160-1164.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Apostolov, E., W. Abu Al Soud, I. Nilsson, I. Kornilovs'ka, V. Usenko, V. Lyzogubov, Y. Gaydar, T. Wadström, and Å. Ljungh. 2005. Helicobacter pylori and other Helicobacter species in gallbladder and liver of patients with chronic cholecystitis detected by immunological and molecular methods. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 40:96-102.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Burich, A., R. Hershberg, K. Waggie, W. Zeng, T. Brabb, G. Westrich, J. L. Viney, and L. Maggio-Price. 2001. Helicobacter-induced inflammatory bowel disease in IL-10- and T cell-deficient mice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 281:G764-G778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Castera, L., A. Pedeboscq, M. Rocha, B. Le Bail, C. Asencio, V. de Ledinghen, P. H. Bernard, C. Laurent, M. E. Lafon, M. Capdepont, P. Couzigou, P. Bioulac-Sage, C. Balabaud, F. Megraud, and A. Menard. 2006. Relationship between the severity of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease and the presence of Helicobacter species in the liver: a prospective study. World J. Gastroenterol. 12:7278-7284.[Medline]
5
5. Chen, W., D. Li, R. J. Cannan, and R. S. Stubbs. 2003. Common presence of Helicobacter DNA in the gallbladder of patients with gallstone diseases and controls. Dig. Liver Dis. 35:237-243.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Dore, M. P., G. Realdi, D. Mura, D. Y. Graham, and A. R. Sepulveda. 2002. Helicobacter infection in patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig. Dis. Sci. 47:1638-1643.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Fleiss, J. L. 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
8
8. Fox, J. G. 2002. The non-Helicobacter pylori helicobacters: their expanding role in gastrointestinal and systemic diseases. Gut 50:273-283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Fox, J. G., F. E. Dewhirst, Z. Shen, Y. Feng, N. S. Taylor, B. J. Paster, R. L. Ericson, C. N. Lau, P. Correa, J. C. Araya, and I. Roa. 1998. Hepatic Helicobacter species identified in bile and gallbladder tissue from Chileans with chronic cholecystitis. Gastroenterology 114:755-763.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Fox, J. G., X. Li, L. Yan, R. J. Cahill, R. Hurley, R. Lewis, and J. C. Murphy. 1996. Chronic proliferative hepatitis in A/JCr mice associated with persistent Helicobacter hepaticus infection: a model of Helicobacter-induced carcinogenesis. Infect. Immun. 64:1548-1558.[Abstract]
11
11. Fox, J. G., A. B. Rogers, M. T. Whary, N. S. Taylor, Y. Xu Feng, and S. Keys. 2004. Helicobacter bilis-associated hepatitis in outbred mice. Comp. Med. 54:571-577.[Medline]
12
12. Fox, J. G., L. L. Yan, F. E. Dewhirst, B. J. Paster, B. Shames, J. C. Murphy, A. Hayward, J. C. Belcher, and E. N. Mendes. 1995. Helicobacter bilis sp. nov., a novel Helicobacter species isolated from bile, livers, and intestines of aged, inbred mice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:445-454.[Abstract]
13
13. Franklin, C. L., L. K. Riley, R. S. Livingston, C. S. Beckwith, C. L. Besch-Williford, and R. R. Hook. 1998. Enterohepatic lesions in SCID mice infected with Helicobacter bilis. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48:334-339.[Medline]
14
14. Ge, Z., P. Doig, and J. G. Fox. 2001. Characterization of proteins in the outer membrane preparation of a murine pathogen, Helicobacter bilis. Infect. Immun. 69:3502-3506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Genta, R. M., and D. Y. Graham. 1993. Intestinal metaplasia, not atrophy or achlorhydria, creates a hostile environment for Helicobacter pylori. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 28:924-928.[Medline]
16
16. Hoang, T. T., T. U. Wheeldon, C. Bengtsson, D. C. Phung, M. Sorberg, and M. Granstrom. 2004. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Helicobacter pylori needs adjustment for the population investigated. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:627-630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Jongsuksuntigul, P., and T. Imsomboon. 2003. Opisthorchiasis control in Thailand. Acta Trop. 88:229-232.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Khan, S. A., S. D. Taylor-Robinson, M. B. Toledano, A. Beck, P. Elliott, and H. C. Thomas. 2002. Changing international trends in mortality rates for liver, biliary and pancreatic tumours. J. Hepatol. 37:806-813.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Kitamura, T., Y. Kawamura, K. Ohkusu, T. Masaki, H. Iwashita, T. Sawa, S. Fujii, T. Okamoto, and T. Akaike. 2007. Helicobacter cinaedi cellulitis and bacteremia in immunocompetent hosts after orthopedic surgery. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:31-38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Kobayashi, T., K. Harada, K. Miwa, and Y. Nakanuma. 2005. Helicobacter genus DNA fragments are commonly detectable in bile from patients with extrahepatic biliary diseases and associated with their pathogenesis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 50:862-867.[CrossRef][Medline]
21
21. Kornilovs'ka, I., I. Nilsson, M. Utt, A. Ljungh, and T. Wadström. 2002. Immunogenic proteins of Helicobacter pullorum, Helicobacter bilis, and Helicobacter hepaticus identified by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Proteomics 2:775-783.[CrossRef][Medline]
22
22. Makola, D., D. A. Peura, and S. E. Crowe. 2007. Helicobacter pylori infection and related gastrointestinal diseases. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 41:548-558.[CrossRef][Medline]
23
23. Matsukura, N., S. Yokomuro, S. Yamada, T. Tajiri, T. Sundo, T. Hadama, S. Kamiya, Z. Naito, and J. G. Fox. 2002. Association between Helicobacter bilis in bile and biliary tract malignancies: H. bilis in bile from Japanese and Thai patients with benign and malignant diseases in the biliary tract. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 93:842-847.[CrossRef]
24
24. Matsumoto, T., M. Goto, H. Murakami, T. Tanaka, H. Nishiyama, E. Ono, C. Okada, E. Sawabe, M. Yagoshi, A. Yoneyama, K. Okuzumi, K. Tateda, N. Misawa, and K. Yamaguchi. 2007. Multicenter study to evaluate bloodstream infection by Helicobacter cinaedi in Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2853-2857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Maurer, K. J., M. M. Ihrig, A. B. Rogers, V. Ng, G. Bouchard, M. R. Leonard, M. C. Carey, and J. G. Fox. 2005. Identification of cholelithogenic enterohepatic Helicobacter species and their role in murine cholesterol gallstone formation. Gastroenterology 128:1023-1033.[CrossRef][Medline]
26
26. Maurer, K. J., V. P. Rao, Z. Ge, A. B. Rogers, T. J. Oura, M. C. Carey, and J. G. Fox. 2007. T-cell function is critical for murine cholesterol gallstone formation. Gastroenterology 133:1304-1315.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
27. Maurer, K. J., A. B. Rogers, Z. Ge, A. J. Wiese, M. C. Carey, and J. G. Fox. 2006. Helicobacter pylori and cholesterol gallstone formation in C57L/J. mice: a prospective study. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 290:G175-G182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28
28. Nandakumar, A., P. C. Gupta, P. Gangadharan, R. N. Visweswara, and D. M. Parkin. 2005. Geographic pathology revisited: development of an atlas of cancer in India. Int. J. Cancer 116:740-754.[CrossRef][Medline]
29
29. Nilsson, H. O., U. Stenram, I. Ihse, and T. Wadstrom. 2006. Helicobacter species ribosomal DNA in the pancreas, stomach and duodenum of pancreatic cancer patients. World J. Gastroenterol. 12:3038-3043.[Medline]
30
30. Nilsson, H. O., J. Taneera, M. Castedal, E. Glatz, R. Olsson, and T. Wadström. 2000. Identification of Helicobacter pylori and other Helicobacter species by PCR, hybridization, and partial DNA sequencing in human liver samples from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or primary biliary cirrhosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1072-1076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Nilsson, I., I. Kornilovs'ka, S. Lindgren, A. Ljungh, and T. Wadström. 2003. Increased prevalence of seropositivity for non-gastric Helicobacter species in patients with autoimmune liver disease. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:949-953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32
32. Nilsson, I., Å. Ljungh, P. Aleljungh, and T. Wadström. 1997. Immunoblot assay for serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:427-432.[Abstract]
33
33. Osawa, H., F. Inoue, and Y. Yoshida. 1996. Inverse relation of serum Helicobacter pylori antibody titres and extent of intestinal metaplasia. J. Clin. Pathol. 49:112-115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34
34. Pineros, D. M., S. C. Riveros, J. D. Marin, O. Ricardo, and O. Diaz. 2001. Helicobacter pylori in gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease in a Colombian population. Strain heterogeneity and antibody profiles. Helicobacter 6:199-206.[CrossRef][Medline]
35
35. Pronovost, A. D., S. L. Rose, J. W. Pawlak, H. Robin, and R. Schneider. 1994. Evaluation of a new immunodiagnostic assay for Helicobacter pylori antibody detection: correlation with histopathological and microbiological results. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:46-50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36
36. Randi, G., S. Franceschi, and C. La Vecchia. 2006. Gallbladder cancer worldwide: geographical distribution and risk factors. Int. J. Cancer 118:1591-1602.[CrossRef][Medline]
37
37. Rocha, M., P. Avenaud, A. Ménard, B. Le Bail, C. Balabaud, P. Bioulac-Sage, D. M. de Magalhãesq Ueiroz, and F. Mégraud. 2005. Association of Helicobacter species with hepatitis C cirrhosis with or without hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 54:396-401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38
38. Rudi, J., A. Rudy, M. Maiwald, and W. Stremmel. 1999. Helicobacter sp. are not detectable in bile from German patients with biliary disease. Gastroenterology 116:1016-1017.[CrossRef][Medline]
39
39. Shaib, Y. H., J. A. Davila, K. McGlynn, and H. B. El-Serag. 2004. Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase? J. Hepatol. 40:472-477.[CrossRef][Medline]
40
40. Shomer, N. H., C. A. Dangler, M. D. Schrenzel, and J. G. Fox. 1997. Helicobacter bilis-induced inflammatory bowel disease in SCID mice with defined flora. Infect. Immun. 65:4858-4864.[Abstract]
41
41. Sitas, F., R. Smallwood, D. Jewell, P. R. Millard, D. G. Newell, S. G. Meuwissen, S. Moses, A. Zwiers, and D. Forman. 1993. Serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies and pepsinogens A and C as serological markers of chronic atrophic gastritis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2:119-123.[Abstract]
42
42. Sriamporn, S., D. M. Parkin, P. Pisani, V. Vatanasapt, K. Suwanrungruang, P. Kamsa-ard, P. Pengsaa, O. Kritpetcharat, V. Pipitgool, and P. Vatanasapt. 2005. A prospective study of diet, lifestyle, and genetic factors and the risk of cancer in Khon Kaen Province, northeast Thailand: description of the cohort. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 6:295-303.[Medline]
43
43. StataCorp. 2005. Stata statistical software: release 9. StataCorp. LP, College Station, TX.
44
44. Taylor-Robinson, S. D., M. B. Toledano, S. Arora, T. J. Keegan, S. Hargreaves, A. Beck, S. A. Khan, P. Elliott, and H. C. Thomas. 2001. Increase in mortality rates from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in England and Wales 1968-1998. Gut 48:816-820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45
45. Tolia, V., H. O. Nilsson, K. Boyer, A. Wuerth, W. A. Al-Soud, R. Rabah, and T. Wadström. 2004. Detection of Helicobacter ganmani-like 16S rDNA in pediatric liver tissue. Helicobacter 9:460-468.[CrossRef][Medline]
46
46. Tzonou, A., J. Kaldor, P. G. Smith, N. E. Day, and D. Trichopoulos. 1986. Misclassification in case-control studies with two dichotomous risk factors. Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publique 34:10-17.[Medline]
47
47. Utt, M., I. Nilsson, Å. Ljungh, and T. Wadström. 2002. Identification of novel immunogenic proteins of Helicobacter pylori by proteome technology. J. Immunol. Methods 259:1-10.[CrossRef][Medline]
48
48. Veijola, L., I. Nilsson, L. Halme, W. A. Al-Soud, J. Mäkinen, A. Ljungh, and H. Rautelin. 2007. Detection of Helicobacter species in chronic liver disease and chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Ann. Med. 39:554-560.[CrossRef][Medline]
49
49. Vorobjova, T., I. Nilsson, S. Terjajev, M. Granholm, M. Lyyra, T. Porkka, T. Prükk, R. Salupere, H.-I. Maaroos, T. Wadström, and R. Uibo. 2006. Serum antibodies to enterohepatic Helicobacter spp. in patients with chronic liver diseases and in a population with high prevalence of H. pylori infection. Dig. Liver Dis. 38:171-176.[CrossRef][Medline]
50
50. Whary, M. T., N. Sundina, L. E. Bravo, P. Correa, F. Quinones, F. Caro, and J. G. Fox. 2005. Intestinal helminthiasis in Colombian children promotes a Th2 response to Helicobacter pylori: possible implications for gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14:1464-1469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, September 2008, p. 1363-1368, Vol. 15, No. 9
1071-412X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00132-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pisani, P. Articles by Forman, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pisani, P. Articles by Forman, D.