CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
CVI.00414-07v1
15/2/385    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadziyannis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Archimandritis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadziyannis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Archimandritis, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, February 2008, p. 385-387, Vol. 15, No. 2
1071-412X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00414-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Performance Characteristics of Microparticle Enzyme and Chemiluminescence Immunoassays for Measurement of Anti-HBc Immunoglobulin M in Sera of Patients with HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection{triangledown}

Emilia Hadziyannis,* Emanuel Manesis, Dimitrios Vassilopoulos, Anastasia Georgiou, and Athanasios Archimandritis

Academic Department of Medicine, Athens University School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, 114 Vas. Sophias Ave., Athens 11527, Greece

Received 15 October 2007/ Returned for modification 29 October 2007/ Accepted 28 November 2007


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
TEXT
 REFERENCES
 
The IMx, AxSym, and Architect immunoglobulin M anti-HBc assay systems for detecting hepatitis B virus e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection were compared. Despite good intra- and interassay coefficients of variation, significantly different values and low correlation (overestimation by AxSym and underestimation by Architect) were observed. Association and cutoff values for distinguishing patients with viral replication should be established for all methods.


   TEXT
Top
 ABSTRACT
 TEXT
REFERENCES
 
In patients with hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, absolute levels and changing titers of immunoglobulin M antibodies against the HBV core protein (anti-HBc IgM) are considered markers of viral replication (11, 13, 17). The measurement of anti-HBc IgM is an easily performed and inexpensive alternative to frequent serum HBV DNA measurements for monitoring untreated patients, as well as patients treated with alpha interferon or antiviral agents (1, 5, 11-13, 15-18, 20).

Most experience in the detection of anti-HBc IgM in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is based on microparticle enzyme immunoassays (MEIA) using the IMx analyzer. Most anti-HBc IgM values for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection are below the cutoff limit for a diagnosis of acute hepatitis B, either in the negative or in the "gray" zone. When determined by a classic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, they range from 20 to 600 U/ml (10), and when tested with a MEIA (the IMx system), the results range from index values of 0.2 to 2.0, approximately 10 to 300 U/ml (1, 7).

In most laboratories, the IMx analyzer has been replaced by the AxSym analyzer (MEIA), and newer analyzers with chemiluminescent assays (CMIA) are gradually being instituted (4, 6, 21). We compared the anti-HBc IgM measurements by the three analyzers for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection.

The IMx (MEIA), AxSym (MEIA), and Architect (CMIA) analyzers (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) were used for anti-HBc IgM quantification. The results of the MEIA are expressed as index values (ratio of sample to calibrator) (9), and the results of the CMIA are in relative light units divided by the cutoff value determined in the preceding calibration (21).

For the evaluation of the inter- and intra-assay variation (coefficient of variation [CV]), we used multiple aliquots of sera from three patients with HBeAg-negative CHB (patients P1 to P3). Each serum sample was tested five times in the same assay and five times over five days with each of the three analyzers. Anti-HBc IgM measurements for 53 consecutive patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection were compared. The influence of rheumatoid factor (RF) measured by nephelometry (Immage immunochemistry systems; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA) was assessed.

For data entry, frequencies, and comparisons, SPSS version 14.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used. The t test and the Mann-Whitney test were applied for parametric and nonparametric data comparisons, respectively. For paired comparisons, the Friedman test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used, as appropriate. A two-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The inter- and intra-assay variations were expressed as the mean ± 1 standard deviation, and the %CV was calculated. All other measurements were reported as medians (interquartile range) and compared by nonparametric procedures.

The intra-assay %CV was 1.7 to 11.7% (mean, 5.2%) for IMx, 0.8 to 3.6% (mean, 2.4%) for AxSym, and 2.4 to 4.2% (mean, 3.5%) for Architect. The interassay %CV was 7.2 to 8.8% (mean, 8.1%) for IMx, 3.6 to 8.6% (mean, 5.3%) for AxSym, and 3.9 to 9.7% (mean, 7.6%) for Architect. The mean anti-HBc IgM values in the replicate measurements were significantly different (P < 0.001). With IMx as the reference, AxSym overestimated by 2.8%, and Architect underestimated by 34.2% (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Anti-HBc IgM assay characteristics of the IMx, AxSYM (MEIA), and Architect (CMIA) analyzersa

 
The median anti-HBc IgM values for the 53 patients were 0.224 (0.107 to 0.574) by IMx, 0.25 (0.07 to 0.7) by AxSym, and 0.135 (0.04 to 0.69) by Architect, the differences being highly significant (P < 0.001). Compared to IMx, AxSym overestimated the anti-HBc IgM by 21%, and Architect underestimated it by 26%. Among the 20 patients with IMx values below the 0.2 cutoff for quantification, 2 (10%) and 5 (25%) had values higher than 0.2 by AxSym and Architect, respectively. Of the 33 patients with anti-HBc IgM values of >0.2 by IMx, 16 (52%) and 3 (10%) had values of <0.2 by Architect and AxSym, respectively. The correlation coefficient (r) between IMx and AxSym was 0.78, and that between IMx and Architect was 0.71 (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Anti-HBc IgM measurements for 53 HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative patients by AxSym and Architect in reference to measurements by the IMx analyzer. There is low positive correlation between the assays, and the paired differences are significantly different. r, correlation coefficient.

 
Among 28 samples with anti-HBc IgM values of >0.2 by IMx, 14 were positive for RF at >20 IU/ml (range, 20 to 566 IU/ml; mean, 65.65 IU/ml). No positive correlation was observed between RF and anti-HBc IgM measurements.

Although commercially available anti-HBc IgM assays have been developed and marketed for the diagnosis of acute HBV infection (9, 19), anti-HBc IgM titers are used for the differentiation between "inactive HBsAg carriers" and patients with HBeAg-negative CHB. In this study, we showed that two MEIA methods and one CMIA method for the quantification of serum anti-HBc IgM have good performance characteristics with low variation and no positive interference with RF but that individual results deviate significantly. In addition, measurements by CMIA appear clinically irrelevant in distinguishing patients with HBeAg-negative CHB when a cutoff of 0.2 set by MEIA is used (7).

Current guidelines do not justify a liver biopsy when the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level is normal and the HBV DNA level is <20 x 103 copies/ml, and it is common practice to monitor patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection by serum ALT and anti-HBc IgM measurements and at longer intervals by HBV DNA determinations (2, 23). Raw values provided by commercial anti-HBc IgM methods have been widely used for monitoring such patients (5, 8, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 20, 24). The observed differences between the three analyzers advocate the use of not only the same method but also the same analyzer in the follow-up of these patients.

The intermittent elevation of serum ALT (ALT flares) preceded by an increase in HBV DNA is common in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB. ALT flares are followed by an elevation in anti-HBc IgM lasting for several months of biochemical and viral quiescence. In this phase, the only marker of a previous flare is an elevation in anti-HBc IgM (3, 20), usually a moderate score index of >0.2 and rarely a score index of >1.2 by MEIA (diagnostic of acute hepatitis B) (22). Based on our results, the 0.2 cutoff index for viral activity does not apply to methods other than MEIA, and 52% of patients with an anti-HBc IgM index of >0.2 by IMx would be missed by Architect.

CMIA analyzers are most likely going to replace MEIA, especially in large settings, since they are sensitive, fast, and reliable and can combine immunology with biochemical tests. The underestimation of the level of anti-HBc IgM by CMIA was anticipated, since the cutoff for acute infection is set lower and the gray zone is set wider than for the MEIA. A 1.4 conversion factor could decrease the discordance between results above and below the 0.2 limit, but the values would still be significantly different. Moreover, in contrast to MEIA, no association between Architect anti-HBc IgM and HBV DNA (20 patients; data not shown) or ALT measurements was observed, which is in agreement with results of previous studies (21).

We propose that for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection, anti-HBc IgM should be quantified by MEIA until an association with viral activity and cutoff values for active disease are established with CMIA.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Academic Department of Medicine, Athens University School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, 114 Vas. Sophias Ave., Athens 11527, Greece. Phone: 302107718645. Fax: 302107481771. E-mail: emhadzi{at}med.uoa.gr Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 12 December 2007. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 TEXT
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Brunetto, M. R., M. T. Cerenzia, F. Oliveri, P. Piantino, A. Randone, P. L. Calvo, P. Manzini, G. Rocca, C. Galli, and F. Bonino. 1993. Monitoring the natural course and response to therapy of chronic hepatitis B with an automated semi-quantitative assay for IgM anti-HBc. J. Hepatol. 19:431-436.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Brunetto, M. R., F. Oliveri, P. Colombatto, M. Capalbo, C. Barbera, and F. Bonino. 1995. Treatment of chronic anti-HBe-positive hepatitis B with interferon-alpha. J. Hepatol. 22:42-44.[Medline]
  3. Cacciola, I., G. Spatari, T. Pollicino, L. Costantino, G. Zimbaro, S. Brancatelli, C. Fenga, G. Caccamo, G. Squadrito, and G. Raimondo. 2005. Virological profiles in hepatitis B virus inactive carriers: monthly evaluation in 1-year follow-up study. Liver Int. 25:555-563.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Chen, D., L. Kaplan, and Q. Liu. 2005. Evaluation of two chemiluminescent immunoassays of ADVIA Centaur for hepatitis B serology markers. Clin. Chim. Acta 355:41-45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Chen, J. J., C. Y. Lin, M. J. Sheu, H. T. Kuo, C. S. Sun, L. Y. Tang, S. L. Wang, and S. L. Tsai. 2006. Poor response to 18-month lamivudine monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with IgM anti-HBc and acute exacerbation. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 23:85-90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Cheng, Y., N. Dubovoy, M. E. Hayes-Rogers, J. Stewart, and D. Shah. 1999. Detection of IgM to hepatitis B core antigen in a reductant containing, chemiluminescence assay. J. Immunol. Methods 230:29-35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Colloredo, G., G. Bellati, G. Leandro, P. Colombatto, A. Rho, F. Bissoli, M. R. Brunetto, G. Angeli, G. Ideo, and F. Bonino. 1996. Quantitative analysis of IgM anti-HBc in chronic hepatitis B patients using a new "gray-zone" for the evaluation of "borderline" values. J. Hepatol. 25:644-648.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Colloredo, G., G. Bellati, A. Sonzogni, C. Zavaglia, O. Fracassetti, G. Leandro, R. Ghislandi, E. Minola, and G. Ideo. 1999. Semiquantitative assessment of IgM antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and prediction of the severity of chronic hepatitis B. J. Viral Hepat. 6:429-434.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Eble, K., J. Clemens, C. Krenc, M. Rynning, J. Stojak, J. Stuckmann, P. Hutten, L. Nelson, L. DuCharme, S. Hojvat, et al. 1991. Differential diagnosis of acute viral hepatitis using rapid, fully automated immunoassays. J. Med. Virol. 33:139-150.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Gerlich, W. H., A. Uy, F. Lambrecht, and R. Thomssen. 1986. Cutoff levels of immunoglobulin M antibody against viral core antigen for differentiation of acute, chronic, and past hepatitis B virus infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:288-293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hadziyannis, S. J., A. S. Hadziyannis, S. Dourakis, A. Alexopoulou, A. Horsch, and G. Hess. 1993. Clinical significance of quantitative anti-HBc IgM assay in acute and chronic HBV infection. Hepatogastroenterology 40:588-592.[Medline]
  12. Kiyosawa, K., T. Sodeyama, S. T. Franca, H. Yoda, Y. Ohike, H. Imai, Y. Imai, and S. Furuta. 1988. Serial assay for IGM anti-HBc in patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis and its significance for long-term prognosis. J. Med. Virol. 24:241-250.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kiyosawa, K., S. Wada, Y. Imai, T. Sodeyama, E. Tanaka, H. Yoda, S. Furuta, M. Kameko, and M. Kanai. 1986. Significance of IgM antibody to hepatitis B core antigen for the differential diagnosis of acute and chronic hepatitis B virus infection and for the evaluation of the inflammatory activity of type B chronic liver diseases. Gastroenterol. Jpn. 21:601-607.[Medline]
  14. Koike, K., S. Iino, K. Kurai, K. Mitamura, Y. Endo, and H. Oka. 1987. IgM anti-HBc in anti-HBe positive chronic type B hepatitis with acute exacerbations. Hepatology 7:573-576.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Manesis, E. K., G. V. Papatheodoridis, V. Sevastianos, E. Cholongitas, C. Papaioannou, and S. J. Hadziyannis. 2003. Significance of hepatitis B viremia levels determined by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 98:2261-2267.[Medline]
  16. Marinos, G., H. M. Smith, N. V. Naoumov, and R. Williams. 1994. Quantitative assessment of serum IgM anti-HBc in the natural course and during interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology 19:303-311.[Medline]
  17. Mels, G. C., G. Bellati, G. Leandro, M. R. Brunetto, O. Vicari, M. Borzio, P. Piantino, G. Fornaciari, G. Scudeller, G. Angeli, et al. 1994. Fluctuations in viremia, aminotransferases and IgM antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in chronic hepatitis B patients with disease exacerbations. Liver 14:175-181.[Medline]
  18. Nakajima, E., T. Tsuji, K. Kachi, K. Kagawa, T. Okanoue, T. Takino, A. Yamada, and J. Imanishi. 1987. Immunoglobulin M antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (IgM anti-HBc) as a marker of interferon therapy in patients with persistent hepatitis B virus infection. Biken J. 30:17-23.[Medline]
  19. Papaevangelou, G., A. Roumeliotou-Karayannis, N. Tassopoulos, and P. Stathopoulou. 1984. Diagnostic value of anti-HBc IgM in high HBV prevalence areas. J. Med. Virol. 13:393-399.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Papatheodoridis, G. V., and S. J. Hadziyannis. 2001. Diagnosis and management of precore mutant chronic hepatitis B. J. Viral Hepat. 8:311-321.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Rodella, A., C. Galli, L. Terlenghi, F. Perandin, C. Bonfanti, and N. Manca. 2006. Quantitative analysis of HBsAg, IgM anti-HBc and anti-HBc avidity in acute and chronic hepatitis B. J. Clin. Virol. 37:206-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Tassopoulos, N. C., G. V. Papatheodoridis, Y. Kalantzakis, E. Tzala, J. K. Delladetsima, M. G. Koutelou, P. Angelopoulou, and A. Hatzakis. 1997. Differential diagnosis of acute HBsAg positive hepatitis using IgM anti-HBc by a rapid, fully automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay. J. Hepatol. 26:14-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Zavaglia, C., L. Mondazzi, G. Maggi, G. Iamoni, F. Gelosa, G. Bellati, G. Colloredo, R. Bottelli, and G. Ideo. 1997. Are alanine aminotransferase, hepatitis B virus DNA or IgM antibody to hepatitis B core antigen serum levels predictors of histological grading in chronic hepatitis B? Liver 17:83-87.[Medline]
  24. Zoulim, F., L. Mimms, M. Floreani, C. Pichoud, I. Chemin, A. Kay, L. Vitvitski, and C. Trepo. 1992. New assays for quantitative determination of viral markers in management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1111-1119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, February 2008, p. 385-387, Vol. 15, No. 2
1071-412X/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00414-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
CVI.00414-07v1
15/2/385    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadziyannis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Archimandritis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadziyannis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Archimandritis, A.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS