Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, December 2008, p. 1764-1770, Vol. 15, No. 12
1071-412X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00270-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California,1 AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, California,2 Department of Microbiology/Immunology, Rosalind Franklin University/Chicago Medical School, Chicago, Illinois,3 Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California,4 Infectious Diseases Research Institute, Seattle, Washington,5 Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil6
Received 28 July 2008/ Accepted 13 October 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Murine models of leishmaniasis have been extensively used to study the pathogenesis of the disease and to test novel therapeutic and immunoprophylactic agents (18). Leishmania infection of BALB/c mice often results in uncontrolled growth of the parasite at the primary site of the infection followed by progressive dissemination through the lymph nodes into the reticuloendothelial system (22). These mice are susceptible to infection by various Leishmania species, including L. major and L. amazonensis as presented here (7, 17). The standard method for following infection in this in vivo model is based on estimation of parasite loads by labor-intensive microscopic enumeration of sacrificed animals or caliper-based measurements of the size or thickness of lesions that have developed at the site of infection, such as the footpad, ear dermis, or tail base (7, 22).
Optical techniques are now available for whole-body imaging of small animals using luciferase and green fluorescent protein (GFP) (10, 11, 25, 26). Bioluminescent Leishmania expressing luciferase has recently been used for monitoring infection in mouse macrophages, as well as in living mice (15). Several of us have pioneered in vivo imaging with GFP to visualize tumors and infectious agents such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in live mice (10, 26, 27). Recently, in an experimental model of malaria, imaging of Plasmodium berghei transfected with GFP demonstrated the dynamics of infection directly in live mice (1). GFP-transfected Leishmania parasites have been used to screen for antileishmanial activity in cell cultures by flow cytometry and microtiter plate assays (5, 8, 12, 23). Herein we describe the use of episomally GFP-transfected Leishmania in a whole-body imaging system to follow the dynamics of infection.
|
|
|---|
Transfected parasites. Enhanced GFP gene (egfp) transfectants of L. amazonensis (LV78, clone 12-1) were prepared as described. Briefly, egfp was cloned into the BamHI site of p6.5, a Leishmania-specific vector, for expansion in Escherichia coli. The constructs obtained were used to transfect stationary-phase promastigotes by electroporation (9, 13). Electroporated cells were then selected for resistance to tunicamycin at 10 µg/ml. Stable transfectants were passaged continuously under these selective conditions in vitro in medium M199 buffered to pH 7.4 with 50 mM HEPES and fortified with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum.
In vitro culture system. egfp-transfected Leishmania amazonensis parasites harvested from mouse footpads were expanded in standard nonventilated tissue culture flasks in M199 medium supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 1 mg hemin (Sigma H-1652), 0.25 ml of 0.1% biotin in 95% ethanol (Sigma B-4639), 50 mM HEPES (Sigma H-1552), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Gibco BRL 25030-081). Cultures were maintained at 25°C, and the parasites were passaged by 1:9 dilution weekly. The transfectants were grown for one cycle without selective pressure before inoculation to avoid the introduction of cytotoxic tunicamycin into the recipient mice.
In vivo (murine) model of infection. The right hind footpads of female BALB/c mice aged 8 to 12 weeks were subcutaneously injected each with 107 egfp-transfected late-stationary-phase L. amazonensis promastigotes suspended in 100 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), using a 26-gauge needle. GFP fluorescence was demonstrated within mouse footpads up to 3 months after inoculation (unpublished observations).
Imaging. The footpads of the mice were imaged weekly, beginning at day 0, with the Olympus OV-100 small-animal imaging system as described below (25). Mice were treated with a depilatory substance (Nair) to remove hair from their legs and feet to reduce background autofluorescence. They were then temporarily anesthetized with xylazine-ketamine-acepromazine solution given intraperitoneally and then imaged on days 0, 7, 14, 24, 28, and 35 after inoculation. Photographs were taken after exposure for 1.5 s with a focal length of 40.7 mm. Pixel counting and measurement of the lesions were performed using Olympus software. Measurements were reported as "sum green," a quantitative measurement defined as the number of green pixels in a given area multiplied by the average intensity of each pixel.
Presence of Leishmania within tissue. Mice were sacrificed for collection of samples from infected footpads, from which frozen sections 5 µm in thickness were prepared. Fluorescence pictures were taken using a Nikon E600 microscope prior to fixation. Additional sections were cut and fixed with cold acetone and stained with F4 80 (rat anti-mouse macrophage antibody subsequently biotinylated and labeled with phycoerythrin) and DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), to demonstrate colocalization.
Immunotherapy with Leish 111f + MPL-SE vaccine. BALB/c mice divided into groups of five were inoculated in the right footpad with 107 egfp-transfected L. amazonensis promastigotes. On days 7, 14, and 24, the mice in the control arm received subcutaneous injections of 25 µl of PBS into the footpad. The mice in the vaccine group received 100 µl of the Leish 111f + MPL-SE vaccine on days 7, 14, and 24, of which 30 µl was injected subcutaneously into the inoculated footpad and 70 µl was injected subcutaneously into the right flank of the mouse. Imaging was performed weekly as described above, and the mice were euthanized on day 41 of the experiment.
Statistical analysis. Prism 4.0 (Graphpad Software, Carlsbad, CA) was used to create charts and best curve fits using a nonlinear regression exponential growth model. Intergroup comparisons were analyzed by the unpaired Students t test using the same statistical package.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Photographs of a mouse footpad over time after inoculation with 107 egfp-transfected L. amazonensis promastigotes. (A to F) On each pair of photographs, the left image was taken using the fluorescence imaging system, while the right image was taken using normal bright-field imaging. The images were taken at 7-day intervals, as indicated in the figure, with the day 0 photograph taken just prior to inoculation. Photographs were taken using the OV-100 imaging system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Five mice were used in this experiment, and one representative mouse was chosen for all of the photographs. (G) Graph of the mean footpad measurement in mm (right axis) with standard error over the course of the Leishmania infection (solid triangles). On the same graph, the mean of the sum green pixel count (open circles) with standard error from images taken at serial time points is plotted as well (left axis). GFP fluorescence, indicating infection, was visualized when the first set of images was taken at day 7. A significant difference in the mean measurements between day 0 and each time point was not reached until day 24 (P = 0.011).
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Mouse footpads were inoculated with increasing numbers of egfp-transfected Leishmania amazonensis parasites from 102 to 106 promastigotes. Mice were followed over time, and footpad measurements and fluorescence imaging were done at regular intervals. The times of first detection of fluorescence for each inoculation were as follows: 106, 4 days; 105, 18 days; 104, 32 days; 103, 42 days; and 102, 42 days. (A) Graph of sum green pixel count in the fluorescence image at each time point for each inoculation dose. (B) Graph of footpad thickness at each time point for each inoculation dose. Data from two mice were averaged for each data point.
|
![]() View larger version (80K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. (a) Fluorescence micrograph of a tissue section taken 42 days after inoculation with a Nikon E600 at x1,000. The GFP-containing amastigote bodies are seen as the scattered green dots in the tissue section. (b) Fluorescence micrograph taken at x400 of a touch preparation of a mouse footpad infected for 5 weeks after inoculation with GFP-transfected L. amazonensis. Panel c shows the same touch preparation at the corresponding area of the slide taken at x400 stained with Hema 3. (d) Magnification at x1,000 of inset 3d, which demonstrates the presence of an L. amazonensis amastigote stained with Hema 3 that also corresponds to the fluorescent parasite in the bottom left corner of Fig. 3b. (e) Magnification at x1,000 of inset 3e, which demonstrates the presence of an L. amazonensis amastigote stained with Diff-Quick that is again expressing GFP based on the fluorescence micrograph shown in panel b.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. (A) Images taken 2 h after inoculation with increasing numbers of egfp-transfected L. amazonensis parasites. (B) Graph of pixel counts of green fluorescence against the number of Leishmania parasites inoculated, showing the relationship between infecting dose and pixel count (r = 0.9798 by the Pearson method). The solid line represents the best-fit curve using linear regression.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Immunotherapeutic suppression of Leishmania growth with Leish 111f + MPL-SE. (A) Graph of the sum green pixel count from mice inoculated with 107 egfp-transfected L. amazonensis promastigotes versus time. Five mice in each group were imaged weekly. The mice in the control group received 25 µl of PBS injected into the inoculated footpad at days 7, 14, and 24. The mice in the vaccine group received 100 µl of the Leish 111f + MPL-SE vaccine divided between the right flank and the inoculated footpad at days 7, 14, and 24. Solid lines represent best-fit curves using a nonlinear regression exponential growth equation. (B) Graph of the footpad measurements of the mice from the same experiment. The measurements of footpad thickness and GFP at each time point were compared between the control group and the treatment group and analyzed using the unpaired Student's t test. The difference in footpad measurements between groups did not reach statistical significance (P < 0.05) until day 35, while the difference in GFP signals between groups was statistically significant at day 14. (C) Representative photographs of a footpad from the control group, a, and the vaccinated group, b, at 24 days.
|
|
|
|---|
Luciferase has also been used as a reporter for in vivo imaging of Leishmania and Leishmania parasites stably tranfected with luciferase have been detected in vivo using an ear model 1 day after 105 organisms were inoculated (15). However, there are several limitations to this approach. Luciferase requires the substrate luciferin, which must be administered intravenously or intraperitoneally each time imaging is performed. The luminescence produced is unstable and dependent upon the metabolic activity of cells transfected with luciferase, which can vary depending upon where in the lesion parasites are located, time of day, and other factors. Finally, fluorescence imaging allows for actual imaging, while quantification with luminescence requires photon counting, and can only generate a pseudoimage. This is important when studying tissue harvested from an infected animal, as parasites can be visualized individually.
Fluorescent imaging offers several advantages. In vitro systems have demonstrated that fluorescence measurements are proportional to the number of Leishmania amastigotes present (20). Episomal transfection was chosen because it provided significantly higher levels of fluorescence. Roy et al. demonstrated successful chromosomal integration of the luciferase gene into the ribosomal promoter region of L. major and L. donovani. In their work, they noted that these parasites were almost 2 log10 less luminescent than the episomal transfectants (21). Recent work has shown that Leishmania parasites constitutively express their entire genome and that gene expression modification occurs posttranscriptionally (16). Because of this, the expression of a gene integrated into the Leishmania chromosome will be dependent on many factors. Leishmania transfectants retain episomal plasmids in the absence of selective pressure for prolonged periods (23). GFP expression stability in vivo has been well demonstrated previously in tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis models (10). In hamster ovary cells, episomal expression of GFP has been shown to remain stable even after 24 days in the absence of selective pressure (19). Furthermore, in our system we followed mice infected with 100 GFP-transfected Leishmania parasites for greater than 8 weeks and despite the lack of selective pressure in vivo, fluorescence was visualized after 70 days.
Previous studies have classically described footpad measurements using calipers to estimate the severity of infection by measuring the thickness of the footpad, observing for signs of ulceration, and monitoring other clinical parameters that do not necessarily represent the burden of infection but may reflect inflammation (3, 6). In our model, we directly measure parasite burden using the GFP fluorescence expressed by the parasites. Our fluorescence imaging system gives a precise two-dimensional image of the extent of infection, independent of the inflammatory response. This measurement method has been well established in the measurement of fluorescing tumor lesions in vivo, and we now describe its use in murine cutaneous leishmaniasis (26). The tissue penetration of the GFP fluorescence and our imaging software allow us to make an approximation of the integration of total fluorescence through multiple planes. Therefore, although we are using single-plane imaging, we can determine an approximation of the total volume of infection. The future may yield improvements in small-animal imaging resolution through tomography or volumetric imaging using Z-series, a method of imaging that allows a more three-dimensional view of the image by taking images in serial depths similar to tomography.
The sensitivity of this technique makes it extremely useful for monitoring Leishmania in vivo. The intensity of GFP fluorescence and the sensitivity of our detection system gave us a limit of detection of
106 organisms per footpad by real-time in vivo imaging. From our experiments using an inoculum of 106 promastigotes, we have found that detection of infection by whole-body imaging precedes that demonstrated by Vernier calipers by nearly 2 weeks. These advantages outweigh some of the inherent problems with the system: i.e., variability in the GFP fluorescence among individual parasites and diminishing plasmid copy number and fluorescence with the duration of time in vivo in the absence of selective pressure.
In conclusion, the application of GFP fluorescence for in vivo imaging provides a novel murine model of cutaneous leishmaniasis that allows for the evaluation of the dynamics of ongoing infection in the same mice. In comparison with the classical footpad caliper measurements, we avoid the disadvantages of (i) substantial variability associated with the current and routine caliper-based methods that require the use of large numbers of animals to obtain statistically reliable data; (ii) measurement in a single vector to quantify a three-dimensional infection; and (iii) difficulty in differentiating the extent of infection from local immune response. Our model is qualitative and semiquantitative, markedly more sensitive and precise than the standard caliper-based method of following infection, and reduces experimental variation by allowing investigators to follow the same mouse through the course of an experiment, rather than sacrificing multiple groups of mice at serial time points. This powerful noninvasive whole-body imaging tool creates new opportunities for studying immunopathogenesis in murine leishmaniasis and for the evaluation of new prophylactic and therapeutic agents and represents a significant refinement over previous animal models.
We thank Steven Baird for assistance with frozen tissue sections; Keith Jenne for assistance with photography and animal care; and finally Jim Feramisco, Kersi Pestonjamasp, and the UCSD Cancer Center Histology Core for assistance with immunofluorescence imaging.
R.M.H. is president of AntiCancer, Inc. Y.G. is an employee of the Infectious Disease Research Institute. All other authors report no financial conflicts of interest.
Published ahead of print on 22 October 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»