Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, October 2008, p. 1529-1535, Vol. 15, No. 10
1071-412X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00181-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland,1 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama2
Received 15 May 2008/ Returned for modification 27 June 2008/ Accepted 13 August 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
PspA is highly variable at the level of DNA sequence, and few PspA molecules are exactly the same (12). Nevertheless, PspAs share many sequence similarities and serologically cross-reactive epitopes (12). The epitopes shown to elicit protective antibodies are located in the surface-exposed N-terminal part of PspA (19, 43). Based on sequence similarities, PspAs have been divided into three PspA families and further into six clades; family 1 (clades 1 and 2) and family 2 (clades 3, 4, and 5) collectively cover 98% of the PspAs (12), whereas to date, only a few pneumococcal strains have been classified into family 3 (clade 6) (11). Slight differences in the distributions of PspA families 1 and 2 have been reported in different parts of the world (11, 23, 29, 36, 40).
The data from animal models on cross-protection of immunity evoked by different PspAs are somewhat contradictory, speaking both for (19, 22, 38) and against (20, 28) cross-protection. With a DNA vaccine, the cross-reactivity of antibodies was restricted to the same PspA family, and protection was limited to the same clade that mice were immunized with (20). Mice immunized with a hybrid protein containing portions of family 1 and family 2 PspAs were protected against strains with either PspA family, but protection against family 2 appeared to be clade specific (6).
Few studies have addressed the cross-reactivity of human antibodies. Adults immunized with a single family 1 PspA had antibodies cross-reacting with different PspAs from families 1 and 2 (21) that were competent for protecting mice after passive immunization from challenge strains expressing PspAs of either family (2). The extent of the cross-reactivity of PspA clades followed roughly the amount of amino acid sequence homology of the heterologous antigens (21). Depending on the cross-reactive properties of each individual PspA molecule, one or more PspAs may be recognized by antiserum raised to a single PspA (11). In a human colonization model, serum IgG antibodies raised to the PspA of the colonizing strain cross-reacted with some other PspA molecules as well, but recognition was strongest with the most similar PspA (17, 18).
We have previously assessed the development of natural immunity to pneumococci in relation to pneumococcal carriage and disease (14, 24, 31-35) in the children of the Finnish Otitis Media (FinOM) Cohort Study (15, 37). Studies suggested that infants and children develop only low or undetectable concentrations of serum and salivary anti-PspA antibodies after exposure to pneumococci (24, 33). Similar kinetics were observed for Kenyan children: anti-PspA IgG and IgA developed later than antibodies to other surface proteins, with concentrations slowly increasing until early childhood (16). In the sera of young Filipino infants, antibodies to PspA were detected only rarely in spite of frequent pneumococcal colonization (13).
Given that in mice PspA is an immunogenic and protective surface protein (2, 3, 5), the results of the studies of anti-PspA antibody production in young children were unexpected. In the above studies (13, 16, 24, 33), only one PspA antigen, family 1 PspA from strain Rx1, was used as a target antigen in an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), which may be insufficient to detect antibodies to representatives of the other major PspA family. Anti-PspA antibodies might develop in a PspA family-specific manner in early life, depending on the types of PspAs the children have encountered. In this study, we reanalyzed the sera and saliva of children and adults by using both family 1 and family 2 antigens. The sera for this study were selected from the first 47 consecutive children with pneumococcal exposures (acute otitis media [AOM] and/or nasopharynx carriage) and from 60 adults participating in the FinOM Cohort Study (24). The PspA families of the pneumococci isolated from the children have been analyzed in another study (M. M. Melin et al., submitted for publication). In this study, we describe the PspA family-specific antibody development in children in relation to the PspA family of the pneumococcus they have encountered. We also compare the antibody profiles of children to those of adults.
|
|
|---|
Clinical samples selected for this study. (i) Serum samples. For this study, we selected a subset of the FinOM cohort, comprising the children with pneumococcal exposures, who were thus expected to have antibodies to PspA. At least two sera (n = 136) from the first 47 consecutive children with pneumococcal exposures were selected (Fig. 1). Most children had multiple pneumococcal cultures. Serum samples collected prior to and closely after the pneumococcal exposures were selected for analysis. Sera taken at less than 3 months of age were excluded because of the possible existence of maternal antibodies in infant sera. Serum antibodies to PspA and other pneumococcal antigens in Filipino infants decreased consistently with the disappearance of maternal antibodies up to 18 weeks of age (13). Most of the 47 children in this study had had pneumococcal exposures before the first selected serum sample, and thus, the majority of the sera in this study were collected after pneumococcal exposure (122/136). Approximately half of the selected serum samples were negative for anti-PspA (family 1) in the previous study (24). To compare the antibodies of children and adults, randomly picked sera of 60 mothers of the FinOM Cohort Study (24) were analyzed (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Numbers of subjects and samples selected for the study from among the whole cohort of 329 children and adults participating in the FinOM Cohort Study. The adult saliva samples were from donors not enrolled in the FinOM Cohort Study.
|
(iii) Pneumococcal strains. Nasopharyngeal carriage isolates (n = 172) and isolates from MEF samples (n = 30) collected prior to or at the same time as the serum samples of the 47 children were included in this study (Fig. 1). The isolation and capsular serotyping of pneumococcal strains have been described elsewhere (15, 37). In case multiple pneumococcal isolates of the same capsular serotype were cultured from different anatomical sites at the same time, only one was selected for analysis, since isolates of the same serotype found in aspirate/nasopharyngeal-swab and MEF samples are believed to be the same strain (7). PspA families of the isolates were determined as described elsewhere (Melin et al., submitted).
Antibody determinations by EIA. (i) PspA antigens. Two PspA antigens (representatives of families 1 and 2) were used for separate EIA analyses of anti-PspA family 1 and anti-PspA family 2 antibodies in serum and salivary samples. The recombinant PspA/Rx1aa1...303 is a family 1, clade 2 antigen (PspA1) comprised of the N-terminal 303 amino acids of Streptococcus pneumoniae strain Rx1. The antigen PspA/V-24aa1...350 belongs to family 2 and clade 3 (PspA2), and it consists of amino acids 1 to 350 of the wild-type mature PspA from S. pneumoniae strain V-24. A third PspA antigen, PspA/JCP56aa1...330 belongs to family 2 and clade 4. It was used for analyses of a small subset of serum samples that remained negative for anti-PspA2 with the family 2, clade 3 antigen. PspA antigens were purified as previously described (1). The PspA antigen used in the previous studies (24, 33) consisted of the first 315 amino acids of Rx1 PspA and was thus nearly identical to the family 1 antigen used in this study, except that it was manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur (formerly Pasteur Mérieux Connaught).
(ii) EIA for serum IgG. IgG-specific antibodies to PspA1 and PspA2 were measured by EIA as described previously (24), with minor modifications. The wells of microtiter plates (Maxi sorp; Nunc Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 2 µg/ml recombinant antigen in sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Polyclonal alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Sigma Immuno Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) was used for detection. IgG concentrations were calculated in µg/ml by using a reference serum (human serum pool A) for which the anti-PspA1 and anti-PspA2 IgG concentrations had been determined previously (21). Samples with antibody concentrations below the lower limit of quantitation (0.22 µg/ml for PspA1 and 0.26 µg/ml for PspA2) were assigned values equivalent to half of the quantitation limit.
(iii) EIA for salivary IgA.
The EIA method described previously (33), with minor modifications, was used. The coating concentration was 2 µg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline for each PspA antigen, and the coating volume was 100 µl/well. Monoclonal anti-human IgA antibodies produced in mice (M207; Bionostics) were used for detection. An optical density (OD) of
0.04 for anti-PspA was considered positive. Samples with ODs of <0.04 were given a value of 0.02. Since no reference for IgA anti-PspA was available, the actual concentrations could not be calculated, and the average ODs of triplicate wells are reported.
Statistical methods. Statistical analyses on anti-PspA concentrations and ODs were performed with log-transformed data. The levels of serum IgG anti-PspA are given as geometric mean concentrations with 95% confidence intervals. Anti-PspA levels of salivary IgA are given as the geometric means of ODs. The Pearson coefficient of correlation was calculated for anti-PspA1 and anti-PspA2 in the sera of children and adults. Student's paired t test (two-tailed) was applied in the comparison of IgG anti-PspA1 and anti-PspA2 geometric mean concentrations in the sera of children and adults. Due to the high proportion of anti-PspA negative salivary samples, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied in the comparison of anti-PspA IgA to families 1 and 2. In both tests, P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
|
|
|---|
All pneumococcal isolates from 16 children had PspA family 1, and all isolates from 15 children had PspA family 2. Pneumococcal strains representing both PspA families were isolated from 16 children. The sera of children were divided into three groups according to the PspA families of the pneumococci isolated before the serum sample was obtained: (i) family 1, (ii) family 2, or (iii) both family 1 and 2 PspAs. For statistical analyses, only one postcontact serum sample (the last one) from each child (n = 47) was included (Table 1). The concentrations of serum antibodies to the two PspA families were often unequal (Fig. 2). The correlation of antibody concentrations between PspA family 1 and family 2 in children's sera was better after exposure to both PspA families (r = 0.60) than after exposure only to family 1 (r = 0.27) or family 2 (r = 0.47). Anti-PspA concentrations to the PspA family the children had been exposed to were twice as high compared to those to the other PspA family (Table 1). Anti-PspA antibody concentrations were generally higher in adults than in children (Table 1). All adults had similar antibody concentrations to both PspA families, which correlated well with each other (r = 0.76; Fig. 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Antibodies to PspA in serum
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Anti-PspA antibodies in the sera of children (47 sera) with previous culture-proven pneumococcal exposures (nasopharyngeal or middle-ear isolates) and in the sera of adults (60 sera). The samples are distributed below and above the limits of detection in the four fields (0.22 µg/ml for PspA1 and 0.26 µg/ml for PspA2), and the number of samples in each of the four sections is given.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Salivary antibodies to PspA in children with recent pneumococcal exposures (n = 19) and in 12 adults. Only one sample per child was included in the comparison; the last sample was preceded by exposures to strains with either family 1 (n = 6) or family 2 PspAs (n = 13). Detection limits are indicated in the figures; samples with an OD of <0.04 remain beyond the antibody detection range; samples below that OD are assigned a common OD value equal to half of the detection limit (OD = 0.02).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Antibodies to PspA in saliva
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Kinetics of serum anti-PspA1 and -PspA2 antibody development in individual children. The circles indicate positive pneumococcal cultures, and the squares indicate the kinetics of antibodies to either PspA1 or PspA2. The children were divided into three groups based on the pattern of their serum anti-PspA antibody kinetics. Two representatives of each group are shown: PspA family-specific response (A and B), antibody responses to both PspA families in spite of exposure to only one PspA family (C and D), and no anti-PspA response in spite of exposure (E and F). Half of the children had an antibody response specific to the PspA family they had been exposed to (A and B). A simultaneous increase in both anti-PspA1 and -PspA2 concentrations was found in one-fifth of the children who had been exposed to only one of the PspA families (C and D). Acquisition of a strain with a different capsular serotype is indicated in panel D. One-fifth of the children had antibody concentrations below the detection limit (E), or they did not have any response to the PspA that was found in the isolated pneumococci (F).
|
|
|
|---|
The results of our previous studies measuring antibodies to pneumolysin, pneumococcal surface adhesin A, and a PspA family 1 antigen suggested that young children develop only low concentrations of antibodies to PspA after pneumococcal carriage or AOM (24, 33). By the age of 24 months, only 58% of the sera from children with pneumococcal exposure contained serum antibodies to PspA, whereas antibodies to the two other pneumococcal proteins were found in well over 90% of the sera (24). However, almost every adult serum sample (320/325) was positive for anti-PspA family 1 antibodies (24). Similarly, salivary IgA to PspA family 1 was found in 15/17 of the samples of adults, but only 25% of the salivary samples from children with pneumococcal exposure had PspA antibodies at 24 months of age (33). The higher coating concentration and the use of an additional PspA antigen increased the number of positive serum and saliva samples in our previous study (34). In this study, too, the number of anti-PspA-positive samples was higher; antibody to family 1 PspA was detected in 79% of the sera and 48% of the saliva from children with pneumococcal exposure. The use of an additional PspA antigen for PspA family 2 further increased the proportion of anti-PspA-positive samples; as much as 90% of the sera and 80% of the saliva collected after pneumococcal exposure were positive for either anti-PspA family 1 or 2 or both.
Most of the children with pneumococcal carriage or AOM included in this study had antibodies detectable with either of the two PspA antigens, which indicates that antibodies targeted against clades within a PspA family are generally cross-reactive within the PspA family. Sera that were negative to family 2 anti-PspA, despite family 2 exposure, were reanalyzed with another family 2 antigen to exclude the possibility of clade specificity of anti-PspA; however, the result remained the same.
Even though as many as 75% of the children's serum samples were positive for both anti-PspA family 1 and 2, the anti-PspA concentrations to the two PspA antigens could be very different, being generally higher for the PspA family the child had been exposed to. When looking at the individual antibody development (in Fig. 4), half of the children had "specific" responses, meaning a response was found only to the PspA family the children had been exposed or that the concentration of anti-PspA was higher to that PspA family. Some children produced antibodies to both PspA families, although only one of the PspA families was detected. One possible explanation is that some pneumococcal infections or carriages may not have been cultured. Nasopharyngeal cultures were taken monthly during the first 6 months of age but only once in 3 months after that (37).
The different anti-PspA antibody responses of the children might partly be explained by variability in the cross-reactivity of the PspAs of the pneumococci the children have been exposed to. The results of a previous study suggested that some PspA molecules may share a more cross-reacting pattern; pneumococci with such a cross-reacting PspA were detected with both antisera raised against family 1 (clade 1) and family 2 (clades 3 and 4) (11). Thus, children who have carried a pneumococcus with a cross-reacting character could have elicited antibodies that recognize both family 1 and 2 antigens. On the other hand, a child with a strictly specific antibody response to one PspA family only may have been infected with a strain with a more "pure" antigenic profile.
Adult sera contained substantial and rather similar concentrations of antibodies to both family 1 and 2 PspAs. Even though the children selected for this study all had frequent pneumococcal exposures, their overall mean anti-PspA IgG concentrations were significantly lower than those of adults (Table 1). It can be speculated that this could be associated with the low protective capacity of natural anti-PspA in young children. Moreover, only one-third of the children had encountered both family 1 and family 2 PspAs. The anti-PspA concentration in the sera of the children who had been exposed to both PspA families was higher than that in the sera of the children with exposure to only one PspA family, suggesting that these children had had more pneumococcal encounters. We have previously shown that in young children, serum anti-PspA IgG rises as a result of an increasing number of pneumococcal exposures (34). It is likely that the adults are well immunized as a result of several pneumococcal exposures. Because of this, the adult sera presumably contain more cross-reactive antibodies, or a wider repertoire of antibodies recognizing different kinds of PspAs, than the sera of children. The sera from children with exposures to both PspA families appeared to be more cross-reacting. The sera from adults immunized with recombinant PspA (21), like the sera from healthy adults shown here, showed virtually no family specificity. These findings strongly argue that when immunizing infants, a PspA vaccine will need to contain PspAs from both families.
The FinOM studies were supported by Merck & Co. Inc., Sanofi Pasteur, Wyeth Vaccines, and the World Health Organization (GPV/VRD contract V23/181/116). This work was supported in part by the Meningitis Research Foundation (project 13/00). D.E.B. and S.K.H. were supported by grant AI21548 from the National Institutes of Health.
T.M.K. has consulted on advisory boards for GSK Bio and Wyeth Vaccines, has had travel paid for by Sanofi Pasteur and Wyeth as an expert at symposia, and has received honoraria from Wyeth. H.M.K. has consulted on advisory boards for GSK Bio, has had travel paid for by GSK Bio and Wyeth Vaccines as an invited speaker or expert at symposia, and has received honoraria from GSK Bio. D.E.B. and S.K.H. are consultants with Sanofi Pasteur and have done research in collaboration with Sanofi Pasteur that has been supported in part or in total by Sanofi Pasteur.
Published ahead of print on 27 August 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»