Previous Article | Next Article 
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, September 2007, p. 1102-1107, Vol. 14, No. 9
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00386-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Cervicovaginal Levels of Lactoferrin, Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor, and RANTES and the Effects of Coexisting Vaginoses in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Seronegative Women with a High Risk of Heterosexual Acquisition of HIV Infection
Richard M. Novak,1*
Betty A. Donoval,2
Parrie J. Graham,1
Lucy A. Boksa,1
Gregory Spear,2
Ronald C. Hershow,1
Hua Yun Chen,1 and
Alan Landay2
University of Illinois at Chicago,1
Rush University, Chicago, Illinois2
Received 17 October 2006/
Returned for modification 16 January 2007/
Accepted 23 July 2007

ABSTRACT
Innate immune factors in mucosal secretions may influence human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission. This study
examined the levels of three such factors, genital tract lactoferrin
[Lf], secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor [SLPI], and RANTES,
in women at risk for acquiring HIV infection, as well as cofactors
that may be associated with their presence. Women at high risk
for HIV infection meeting established criteria (
n = 62) and
low-risk controls (
n = 33) underwent cervicovaginal lavage (CVL),
and the CVL fluid samples were assayed for Lf and SLPI. Subsets
of 26 and 10 samples, respectively, were assayed for RANTES.
Coexisting sexually transmitted infections and vaginoses were
also assessed, and detailed behavioral information was collected.
Lf levels were higher in high-risk (mean, 204 ng/ml) versus
low-risk (mean, 160 ng/ml,
P = 0.007) women, but SLPI levels
did not differ, and RANTES levels were higher in only the highest-risk
subset. Lf was positively associated only with the presence
of leukocytes in the CVL fluid (
P < 0.0001). SLPI levels
were lower in women with bacterial vaginosis [BV] than in those
without BV (
P = 0.04). Treatment of BV reduced RANTES levels
(
P = 0.05). The influence, if any, of these three cofactors
on HIV transmission in women cannot be determined from this
study. The higher Lf concentrations observed in high-risk women
were strongly associated with the presence of leukocytes, suggesting
a leukocyte source and consistent with greater genital tract
inflammation in the high-risk group. Reduced SLPI levels during
BV infection are consistent with an increased risk of HIV infection,
which has been associated with BV. However, the increased RANTES
levels in a higher-risk subset of high-risk women were reduced
after BV treatment.

INTRODUCTION
A number of studies suggest that innate factors in mucosal secretions
from a variety of sources are capable of modifying human immunodeficiency
virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in vitro. Secretory leukocyte
protease inhibitor [SLPI], a serine protease inhibitor which
can be found in oral and genital tract secretions, appeared
to inhibit in vitro infection with HIV in several studies (
13,
19,
23,
24), although this effect was not consistently found
(
27). The antiviral effect of SLPI appears to occur in both
monocytes and lymphocytes after viral binding to the host cell
but before reverse transcription (
20), possibly through inhibition
of HIV interaction with annexin II (
18).
Lactoferrin [Lf], a protein also found in a variety of mucosal secretions, has similarly been shown to have anti-HIV properties (4, 21, 28). RANTES has been demonstrated to be the natural ligand for CCR5 and to be capable of inhibiting HIV infection of macrophages in vitro (2, 5, 7). Both Lf and SLPI have been identified in saliva, and SLPI in an infant's saliva may play a role in mitigating mother-to-child transmission of HIV (10, 11). SLPI has recently been shown to play a role in the regulation of immunoglobulin class switching at mucosal surfaces (29).
A recent study of commercial sex workers (CSW) who are exposed to HIV but remain uninfected has found elevated RANTES expression in cervical lymphocytes compared with low-risk controls (12) and in HIV-resistant CSW compared to non-HIV-infected CSW (14). There is a paucity of data regarding Lf and SLPI levels in the vaginal mucosal secretions in women with a low or increased risk of acquiring HIV infection that might support a role for these innate antimicrobial factors in vivo, and there has been no study to date which specifically investigated the effect of treatment of BV on genital tract RANTES levels. The present study examined Lf, SLPI, and RANTES levels in cervicovaginal secretions from women with a low or high risk of acquiring HIV infection.
(This paper was presented as a poster on 14 August 2006 at the XVI International AIDS Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.)

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Participants and sample collection.
Women at high risk for heterosexual acquisition of HIV were
recruited as part of a study of behavioral change resulting
from participation in a phase 3 preventive vaccine trial (Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention Project Vision). Women at
low risk were recruited independently. The protocol was approved
by the local institutional review board, and written informed
consent was obtained in accordance with institutional review
board policies for both cohorts. All participants were HIV seronegative
and had never injected drugs. High-risk participants (
n = 62)
had to have had at least one HIV-seropositive sex partner or
at least two of the following risk factors: crack cocaine use
during the last 6 months; exchange of sex for money, drugs,
or shelter during the last 6 months; at least five sex partners
during the last 6 months; or a history of sexually transmitted
diseases during the last year. Low-risk participants (
n = 33)
had to have had no HIV-seropositive sex partners; never to have
used crack cocaine; never to have exchanged sex for money, drugs,
or shelter; to have had no more than one sex partner during
the last 6 months and no more than five sex partners during
the last 5 years; and to have no history of sexually transmitted
diseases. Participants were given physical examinations. For
all subjects, a pelvic examination was performed and vaginal
secretions were collected from the posterior fornix by use of
a swab for the preparation of a wet-mount slide. For the Lf
and SLPI studies, only baseline samples were used. An endocervical
sponge (Weck-Cel; Medtronic, Jacksonville, FL) was inserted
into the cervical os for 1 min. The fluid was removed from the
sponge by centrifugation and aliquoted. These samples were used
for RANTES measurements and included baseline samples. Where
BV was present, treatment was given and posttreatment samples
were collected for RANTES testing. CVL fluid samples were collected
after the swab by directing a 10-ml stream of sterile normal
saline at the cervical os and the endocervix. Fluid was aspirated
and centrifuged to pellet cells. For these experiments, clarified
CVL fluid was used. Fluid pooled in the posterior fornix of
the vagina was aspirated and processed within 2 h of collection.
The samples were evaluated for the presence of blood by ChemStrip
analysis (Roche Diagnostics). Seminal p30 was detected with
the Abacard test kit. The CVL fluid samples were centrifuged
at 600
x g for 15 min, and the supernatant was frozen at –70°C.
All of the samples used in this study were screened for
Chlamydia infection and gonorrhea as determined by Gen-Probe and BDProbeTec
tests (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, CA; Becton Dickinson, Sparks,
MD). Samples were screened for BV by use of the criteria of
Amsel et al. (
3), which require the presence of three of the
following four factors: (i) a vaginal pH above 4.5; (ii) a thin,
homogeneous vaginal discharge; (iii) a positive potassium hydroxide
odor; and (iv) clue cells on a saline wet mount (
1).
Wet-mount slides were prepared in saline for the diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis.
Lf and SLPI assays.
Lf, SLPI, and RANTES levels were measured with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. The sensitivity of the Lf kit (Calbiochem, EMD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) is >1 ng/ml. Those of the SLPI and RANTES kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) are 25 pg/ml (range exceeds 50,000 pg/ml) and 2.0 pg/ml, (range, 2,000 pg/ml), respectively.
Statistical methods.
Summary statistics were obtained for Lf, SLPI, and risk factors that characterize the low- and high-risk groups (the cohort identity) and other measurements such as erythrocyte and leukocyte counts. The high-risk and low-risk groups were compared for both Lf and SLPI concentrations by the t test. Associations between the response variables (Lf and SLPI) and risk factors and other measurements were examined individually with linear regression models before and after adjusting for the cohort effect. Multivariate linear-regression models were used to examine the association between the response variables (Lf and SLPI, respectively) and the cohort after adjusting for other covariates. The stepwise variable selection procedure was used to find the final multivariate linear models. Analysis of the RANTES data was done by using the random-effect model for repeated measures.

RESULTS
Two cohorts were recruited for this study, 62 high-risk women
and 33 low-risk women. Their demographic data have been published
elsewhere and can be found in Table
1 (
15). Semen was detected
in eight samples but was not associated with any of the findings
studied, so these samples were included in the analyses (Table
2).
The mean Lf concentration in the high-risk group was 204 ng/ml
(standard deviation = 75 ng/ml; range, 19 to 371 ng/ml), which
was significantly higher than the mean in the low-risk cohort,
which was 160 ng/ml (standard deviation = 70 ng/ml; range, 13
to 252 ng/ml; Fig.
1A) (
P = 0.007). The mean SLPI concentration
in the high-risk group was 9,987 pg/ml (standard deviation =
3,292 pg/ml; range, 1,832 to 21,469 pg/ml), which did not differ
significantly from that of the low-risk cohort, with a mean
concentration of 9,257 pg/ml (standard deviation = 1,892 pg/ml;
range, 4,670 to 11,727 pg/ml; Fig.
2A). Subgroups of 26 high-risk
and 11 low-risk women were also tested for RANTES levels. For
these studies, paired endocervical fluid samples collected before
and after BV treatment were studied. Since BV was absent in
the low-risk women, we compared posttreatment samples from the
high-risk cohort with low-risk samples. The RANTES levels in
cervical fluid were 316.6 ± 175 pg/ml in the low-risk
women. In the high-risk women with BV, the RANTES level was
2,428.4 ± 9,307.1 pg/ml, and posttreatment it was 331.3
± 632.0 pg/ml (Fig.
3). The difference was significant
(
P = 0.05). However, 17 women had a reduction in RANTES levels
with treatment, compared to 9 who had increased RANTES levels
following treatment. There was no significant difference between
the posttreatment levels in the high-risk and low-risk groups.
However, the high-risk group is represented by women with a
range of risk behaviors. We further defined a higher-risk group
of women who reported having had >10 partners in 6 months
and using condoms sometimes or never. When we compared these
women to the remainder of the high-risk cohort, they had significantly
higher RANTES levels (
P = 0.03).
The concentrations of SLPI and Lf in the presence or absence
of BV or vaginal leukocytes are given in Table
2. It appears
that the presence of BV decreases the mean SLPI concentration
(
P = 0.04; Fig.
2B) but increases the mean Lf concentration
(
P = 0.004; Fig.
1B). In addition, increased levels of leukocytes
are associated with a decrease in SLPI (statistically insignificant,
P = 0.25) and an increase in Lf (
P = 0.0002).
A number of other cofactors that might influence the concentrations of SLPI and Lf were analyzed. With the exception of BV, none of the other risk factors studied was significantly associated with the concentration of SLPI (data not shown). On the other hand, as shown in Table 3, several risk factors, when considered individually, are significantly associated with the concentration of Lf. These include BV, the presence of red blood cells, the presence of leukocytes, and vaginitis, which includes both BV and Trichomonas infection. The phase of the menstrual cycle was not associated with either SLPI or Lf. In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment for the risk group, only the levels of leukocytes in the CVL fluid specimen remained strongly associated with the concentration of Lf (P < 0.0001). None of the other risk factors, including BV, were still associated with the concentration of Lf at a significance level of 0.05. In general, this suggests that most of the effects of the risk factors are explained by the risk group and the levels of leukocytes. The effects of leukocytes on the Lf concentration were similar for both the low- and high-risk groups (Table 3, analysis 2).
Several risk behaviors were positively associated with Lf concentrations
as part of the overall cohort effect but were not independently
associated with the Lf concentration after adjustment for the
cohort effect. It appears that the effect of risky behavior
on Lf is largely accounted for by the variable "exchange of
sex for drugs, money, or shelter" when the effect of leukocytes
in the CVL fluid specimen is adjusted for. We collected data
on contraceptive and antibiotic use. Only seven participants
used hormonal contraceptives. There was no association between
type of contraception and either SLPI or Lf. None of the participants
reported antibiotic use at the time these samples were taken.
The concentration of SLPI in the CVL fluid samples was not associated with risk behavior. However, the presence of bacterial vaginosis was negatively associated with the SPLI concentration (P = 0.04).

DISCUSSION
This study of the innate immune factors SLPI, Lf, and RANTES
in the genital secretions of women at high risk for HIV infection
but who remain seronegative, compared to a low-risk control
group, was able to demonstrate an association of Lf levels with
risk behavior, but no similar association existed for SLPI levels
with the risk group. RANTES levels were not associated with
the risk group, but on further analysis of the high-risk cohort,
there did appear to be a positive relationship between RANTES
levels and risk behavior. These disparate results for RANTES
may reflect a smaller subgroup of the cohort in which this was
studied, as well as the use of cervical sponge samples rather
than CVL fluid samples. Additionally, we studied pre- and post-BV
treatment samples rather than only baseline samples. These paired
samples demonstrated a significant effect of BV treatment on
a reduction in RANTES levels. This effect was by no means universal,
however, with a third of the women experiencing an increase
in RANTES after BV treatment. Other reports of exposed, uninfected
women have demonstrated higher levels of RANTES compared to
low-risk or HIV-infected women (
12,
14). The methods used differed
somewhat from those of the present study. Our finding that RANTES
levels increased with risk behavior in the high-risk cohort
is consistent with these previous reports. Because we chose
to study paired samples pre- and posttreatment of BV, potential
confounders were better controlled. However, selection bias
may exist because the high-risk group does not represent the
general population. The effect of BV treatment in the paired
samples indicates that BV may raise RANTES levels. Since BV
is a highly prevalent infection in high-risk women (24% of this
cohort), it may be that the higher RANTES levels seen in other
studies may, at least in part, be attributable to coexisting
BV or another infection, in addition to the risk group.
None of the specific risk behaviors which define the high-risk group were found to be independently associated with Lf. Further analysis of the association with other measured factors after controlling for behavioral risk demonstrates a strong association with the presence of leukocytes, as well as erythrocytes. Since Lf is a product of leukocytes, this association is expected and consistent with the high level of vaginal leukocytes we have observed in high-risk women, both with and without a specific diagnosis of vaginosis or vaginitis (16, 26). However, there was also an association of Lf with bacterial vaginosis, which was independent of vaginal leukocytosis, unlike Trichomonas infection. Several reports have described the effect of BV on neutrophil numbers and activation and indicated no substantial difference in neutrophil numbers in women with BV compared to healthy controls but a much higher level of inflammatory cytokines in the presence of BV (6). There are numerous studies describing the presence of Lf in neutrophilic granules, so it could be inferred that higher levels of neutrophil activation could lead to their degranulation and subsequent release of Lf (1, 17).
There have been several reports of BV as a risk factor for HIV transmission in women (22, 25) suggesting that the antiviral effect observed with Lf is not adequate to counter the enhancing effect of BV on transmission. The vaginal milieu is complex, and any effect that Lf and/or SLPI may have on HIV transmission must be seen in the context of a multifactorial process in which these two factors may be involved.
While no association was seen between SLPI levels and the risk group, there was a significantly lower level of SLPI in women with coexisting BV than in those without BV. In the oral cavity and the genital tract, SLPI, a product of epithelial cells and phagocytes, is degraded by cysteine proteases such as cathepsin B, which are increased in inflammatory tissue (8, 9). One role of SLPI is to inactivate elastases, which can damage mucosal surfaces, so it is possible that the inflammation induced by BV may release cysteine proteases which degrade SLPI, as has been demonstrated with Trichomonas infection (9). Alternatively, the organisms or by-products of BV may down-regulate SLPI production or release. If SLPI does have an in vivo effect on HIV infection, this finding is consistent with the enhancing effect of BV on transmission, at least in part, through an effect on the SLPI concentration. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the role, if any, of these innate factors in the heterosexual transmission of HIV-1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The work described herein was supported by National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development program project HD40539
and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vision study
contract 200-2000-00051.
We do not have a commercial association that would pose a conflict of interest with this work.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St., M/C 735, Rm. 888, Chicago, IL 60612. Phone: (312) 996-6763. Fax: (312) 413-1657. E-mail:
rmnovak{at}uic.edu 
Published ahead of print on 1 August 2007. 

REFERENCES
1 - Afeltra, A., D. Caccavo, G. M. Ferri, M. A. Addessi, F. G. De Rosa, A. Amoroso, and L. Bonomo. 1997. Expression of lactoferrin on human granulocytes: analysis with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 109:279-285.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Alkhatib, G., C. Combadiere, C. C. Broder, Y. Feng, P. E. Kennedy, P. M. Murphy, and E. A. Berger. 1996. CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1
, MIP-1β receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science 272:1955-1958.[Abstract] 3 - Amsel, R., P. A. Totten, C. A. Spiegel, K. C. Chen, D. Eschenbach, and K. K. Holmes. 1983. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 74:14-22.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Berkhout, B., R. Floris, I. Recio, and S. Visser. 2004. The antiviral activity of the milk protein lactoferrin against the human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Biometals 17:291-294.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Capobianchi, M. R., I. Abbate, G. Antonelli, O. Turriziani, A. Dolei, and F. Dianzani. 1998. Inhibition of HIV type 1 BaL replication by MIP-1
, MIP-1β, and RANTES in macrophages. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 14:233-240.[Medline] 6 - Cauci, S., S. Guaschino, D. De Aloysio, S. Driussi, D. De Santo, P. Penacchioni, and F. Quadrifoglio. 2003. Interrelationships of interleukin-8 with interleukin-1β and neutrophils in vaginal fluid of healthy and bacterial vaginosis positive women. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 9:53-58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Cocchi, F., A. L. DeVico, A. Garzino-Demo, S. K. Arya, R. C. Gallo, and P. Lusso. 1995. Identification of RANTES, MIP-1
, and MIP-1β as the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells. Science 270:1811-1815.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 8 - Cox, S. W., E. M. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, V. Booth, and B. M. Eley. 2006. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor and its potential interactions with elastase and cathepsin B in gingival crevicular fluid and saliva from patients with chronic periodontitis. J. Periodontal Res. 41:477-485.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Draper, D., W. Donohoe, L. Mortimer, and R. P. Heine. 1998. Cysteine proteases of Trichomonas vaginalis degrade secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor. J. Infect. Dis. 178:815-819.[Medline]
10 - Farquhar, C., T. C. VanCott, D. A. Mbori-Ngacha, L. Horani, R. K. Bosire, J. K. Kreiss, B. A. Richardson, and G. C. John-Stewart. 2002. Salivary secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor is associated with reduced transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 through breast milk. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1173-1176.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Florisa, R., I. Recio, B. Berkhout, and S. Visser. 2003. Antibacterial and antiviral effects of milk proteins and derivatives thereof. Curr. Pharm. Des. 9:1257-1275.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Hirbod, T., J. Nilsson, S. Andersson, C. Uberti-Foppa, D. Ferrari, M. Manghi, J. Andersson, L. Lopalco, and K. Broliden. 2006. Upregulation of interferon-alpha and regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted in the cervix of HIV-1-seronegative women with high-risk behavior. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 43:137-143.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Hocini, H., P. Becquart, H. Bouhlal, H. Adle-Biassette, M. D. Kazatchkine, and L. Belec. 2000. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor inhibits infection of monocytes and lymphocytes with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 but does not interfere with transcytosis of cell-associated virus across tight epithelial barriers. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 7:515-518.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Iqbal, S. M., T. B. Ball, J. Kimani, P. Kiama, P. Thottingal, J. E. Embree, K. R. Fowke, and F. A. Plummer. 2005. Elevated T cell counts and RANTES expression in the genital mucosa of HIV-1-resistant Kenyan commercial sex workers. J. Infect. Dis. 192:728-738.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Jendrysik, M. A., M. Ghassemi, P. J. Graham, L. A. Boksa, P. R. Williamson, and R. M. Novak. 2005. Human cervicovaginal lavage fluid contains an inhibitor of HIV binding to dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3-grabbing nonintegrin. J. Infect. Dis. 192:630-639.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - King, A. E., H. O. Critchley, and R. W. Kelly. 2003. Innate immune defences in the human endometrium. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 1:116.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Konttinen, Y. T., and S. Reitamo. 1979. Localization of lactoferrin in polymorphonuclear neutrophil leucocytes. Br. J. Haematol. 43:481.[Medline]
18 - Ma, G., T. Greenwell-Wild, K. Lei, W. Jin, J. Swisher, N. Hardegen, C. T. Wild, and S. M. Wahl. 2004. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor binds to annexin II, a cofactor for macrophage HIV-1 infection. J. Exp. Med. 200:1337-1346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - McNeely, T. B., M. Dealy, D. J. Dripps, J. M. Orenstein, S. P. Eisenberg, and S. M. Wahl. 1995. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor: a human saliva protein exhibiting anti-human immunodeficiency virus 1 activity in vitro. J. Clin. Investig. 96:456-464.[Medline]
20 - McNeely, T. B., D. C. Shugars, M. Rosendahl, C. Tucker, S. P. Eisenberg, and S. M. Wahl. 1997. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity by secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor occurs prior to viral reverse transcription. Blood 90:1141-1149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Moriuchi, M., and H. Moriuchi. 2001. A milk protein lactoferrin enhances human T cell leukemia virus type I and suppresses HIV-1 infection. J. Immunol. 166:4231-4236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Sewankambo, N., R. H. Gray, M. J. Wawer, L. Paxton, D. McNaim, F. Wabwire-Mangen, D. Serwadda, C. Li, N. Kiwanuka, S. L. Hillier, L. Rabe, C. A. Gaydos, T. C. Quinn, and J. Konde-Lule. 1997. HIV-1 infection associated with abnormal vaginal flora morphology and bacterial vaginosis. Lancet 350:546-550. (Erratum, 350:1036, 1997.)[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Shine, N. R., S. C. Wang, K. Konopka, E. A. Burks, N. Duzgunes, and C. P. Whitman. 2002. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor: inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection of monocytic THP-1 cells by a newly cloned protein. Bioorg. Chem. 30:249-263.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Skott, P., E. Lucht, M. Ehnlund, and E. Bjorling. 2002. Inhibitory function of secretory leukocyte proteinase inhibitor (SLPI) in human saliva is HIV-1 specific and varies with virus tropism. Oral Dis. 8:160-167.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 - Taha, T. E., R. H. Gray, N. I. Kumwenda, D. R. Hoover, L. A. Mtimavalye, G. N. Liomba, J. D. Chiphangwi, G. A. Dallabetta, and P. G. Miotti. 1999. HIV infection and disturbances of vaginal flora during pregnancy. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 20:52-59.[Medline]
26 - Theilgaard-Monch, K., L. C. Jacobsen, T. Rasmussen, C. U. Niemann, L. Udby, R. Borup, M. Gharib, P. D. Arkwright, A. F. Gombart, J. Calafat, B. T. Porse, and N. Borregaard. 2005. Highly glycosylated
1-acid glycoprotein is synthesized in myelocytes, stored in secondary granules, and released by activated neutrophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 78:462-470.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 27 - Turpin, J. A., C. A. Schaeffer, M. Bu, L. Graham, R. W. Buckheit, Jr., D. Clanton, and W. G. Rice. 1996. Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) replication is unaffected by human secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor. Antiviral Res. 29:269-277.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Viani, R. M., T. J. Gutteberg, J. L. Lathey, and S. A. Spector. 1999. Lactoferrin inhibits HIV-1 replication in vitro and exhibits synergy when combined with zidovudine. AIDS 13:1273-1274.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 - Xu, W., B. He, A. Chiu, A. Chadburn, M. Shan, M. Buldys, A. Ding, D. M. Knowles, P. A. Santini, and A. Cerutti. 2007. Epithelial cells trigger frontline immunoglobulin class switching through a pathway regulated by the inhibitor SLPI. Nat. Immunol. 8:294-303.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, September 2007, p. 1102-1107, Vol. 14, No. 9
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00386-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.