Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, June 2007, p. 785-788, Vol. 14, No. 6
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00048-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, California 94158,1 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94121,2 Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461,3 Positive Health Program, San Francisco General Hospital, UCSF, San Francisco, California 941434
Received 23 January 2007/ Returned for modification 16 February 2007/ Accepted 21 March 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, we describe a quantitative method for selecting panels of individual peptides to maximize data on the breadth and magnitude of a response while minimizing the number of PBMC and peptides needed and taking into account the underlying HLA structure of the sampled population.
Our method selects a pool of peptides for interrogation that fall under epitopes of higher HLA prevalence in the studied population, weighted (penalized) for cases of high entropy (sequence variation). In so doing, we focus on regions of the HIV-1 proteome that are most likely to elicit immunogenic responses from the greatest fraction of the population. Moreover, our weighting strategy leads to higher peptide scores for peptides of low entropy, even for those epitopes falling under low-prevalence HLA types, ensuring the study of immunogenic peptides even among that fraction of the sampled population that bears low-frequency HLA types.
We targeted regions of the HIV-1 proteome that were rich in CTL epitopes (3, 11, 12). These regions were then weighted according to the diversity of the HLA restrictions of the epitopes and with further biased selection toward HLA types of higher frequency within the study population. Finally, to reduce the chance of false-negative results, as described by Altfeld et al., we incorporated the entropy of each amino acid within the selected region (1). This method is described in greater detail below.
Identification of epitopes. We based our analysis on the usage of peptides of 15 amino acids in length. To determine the number of epitopes each peptide contained, we mapped major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I)-restricted epitopes, obtained from the Los Alamos database (http://hiv-web.lanl.gov/content/immunology/tables/ctl_summary.html), onto the HIV-1 HXB2 proteome. The HLA restrictions were standardized to the two-digit molecular HLA type nomenclature (8). The epitopes were mapped onto the HXB2 proteome as shown in the examples from HIV-1 Gag p17 (Fig. 1A).
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Generation of peptide scores. (A) Epitopes were mapped onto the HXB2 genome. Epitopes are shown as white boxes under their specific amino acid sequences; their HLA restriction is shown within. Overlapping epitopes were combined to make one continuous epitope region. A hypothetical example is shown in blue (part i); the joined epitope constitutes the HLA-A2-restricted SLYNTVTAL epitope. (B) Generation of HLA. Each amino acid received a score equal to that of the HLA prevalences for each epitope that covers it. In parts i and ii, examples are given showing the HLA prevalences mapped onto their respective epitopes. For example, the first residue (glutamic acid [E]) is covered by a single HLA-A1-restricted epitope. HLA-A1 has an 8% prevalence within the North American population; therefore, for this amino acid, its HLA is 0.08. (iii) The HLA for each amino acid across the whole of p17 is displayed as a heat map above a skyline graph. (C) Entropy is shown for the example sequence (parts i and ii) and mapped across p17 as a heat map above and skyline graph below (part iii). (D) The final peptide score is generated from the division of the sum of the HLA from each amino acid within the peptide by the sum of the entropy from each amino acid within the peptide. In this example, from peptide 7890, the total HLA across the peptide equaled 7.00 and the total entropy was 5.98, giving a final peptide score of 1.17.
|
HLA); an example from two 15-mer peptides from p17 is shown (Fig. 1B). When extended across all of HIV-1 Gag p17, the
HLA can be displayed as a heat map (Fig. 1B, part iii). The sum of each amino acid's
HLA contributed to the final peptide score (Fig. 1D). Entropy. The variability of HIV-1 antigens is known to interfere with the accurate detection and measurement of HIV-1-specific T-cell responses (1). Differences in sequence between the consensus-based synthetic peptide antigens and an individual's autologous virus often result in false-negative responses. In order to minimize this bias and systematically focus on conserved regions of HIV-1, we computed the amino acid entropy (variability) of sites across the HIV-1 proteome and incorporated this information into our peptide scoring scheme.
In this example, the entropy of each amino acid was determined with full-length subtype B protein sequence alignments of all HIV-1 proteins, downloaded from the Los Alamos database (http://hiv.lanl.gov/content/hiv-db/ALIGN_CURRENT/ALIGN-INDEX.html). Alignments were restricted to one sequence per individual to minimize the sampling bias. Sequences were then realigned by using ClustalW with default gap parameters and the "IUB" DNA weight matrix (10). Manual aligning of variable regions was performed with the Se-Al sequence alignment editor, version 2.0 (http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/). The HyPhy software package was implemented to compute site-specific Shannon entropy scores for each coding region from the frequency, f, of amino acid A at position i, according to the formula –
A f(Ai) ln[f(Ai)] (6, 9). Sites within each protein were aligned with the HIV-1 HXB2 sequence (4) (Fig. 1C, parts i and ii). The sum of each amino acid's entropy within a peptide was used in the final peptide score (Fig. 1D).
Final peptide score.
In this example, the HIV-1 group M consensus (15-mer) peptide sequences, from the NIH ARRRP, were mapped onto the HIV-1 proteome. The final peptide scores were based on the sum of the amino acid's
HLA from across the peptide divided by the sum of the entropy from each amino acid within the peptide (Fig. 1D). Peptides from each HIV-1 protein were then ranked; Table 1 shows an example for HIV-1 Gag p17. To determine the breadth of responses, top-ranking peptides from each protein were selected for use in an ELISPOT assay.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Peptide scores for the p17 proteina
|
) responses from 10 HIV-1-infected subjects. The HLA types of the individuals were unknown. The North American HLA prevalence was applied to generate two panels of peptides (Table 2). Panel A contained peptides that had the highest peptide scores, and panel B contained peptides with the lowest (but still greater than 0) peptide scores. Based on our hypothesis, we predicted that panel A would show the highest number of responses. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Peptide panelsa
|
ELISPOT assay was conducted by the standard protocol, as previously described (5, 7). In this example, approximately 4 million PBMC were used to cover each peptide panel and controls. As predicted, the highest number of responses was directed toward panel A (Fig. 2). An average of 7.4 peptides induced responses in panel A, compared to 0 in panel B (P = 0.0053) (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (5K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Proof of principle. Two panels of 21 peptides were generated by the method described in the legend to Fig. 1. Panel A was selected from the 21 highest-scoring peptides, while panel B was selected from the 21 lowest-scoring (but still scoring >0) peptides. IFN- responses from nine (panel A) and five (panel B) HIV-1-infected subjects revealed that panel A was significantly better recognized than panel B (P = 0.0053).
|
This method could easily be adapted to other viruses, such as hepatitis C virus and human cytomegalovirus, and/or expanded to incorporate CD4+ T-cell epitopes. Due to the low number of resources needed, this approach will be of particular benefit to in-field therapeutic and vaccine studies, as well as studies conducted under resource-limited conditions.
We thank J. E. Snyder-Cappione, K. E. Garrison, and L. C. Ndhlovu for critical reading of the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 4 April 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»