Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, May 2007, p. 510-517, Vol. 14, No. 5
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00005-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene,1 Departments of Bacteriology,2 Medical Microbiology and Immunology,3 Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin,4 Department of Pathology, Veterans Administration Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin,5 Microbiology Research Laboratory and Section of Infectious Diseases, Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin6
Received 3 January 2007/ Returned for modification 22 February 2007/ Accepted 1 March 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Considerable effort has been made to elucidate the immune agents and mechanisms responsible for Lyme arthritis (3, 5-7, 10, 20, 21, 40, 42). It is generally accepted that T cells, particularly CD4+ T cells (5, 7, 20, 51) and CD4+ CD25+ T cells (35-37), participate in the induction, resolution, and prevention of the arthritis. Similarly, accumulating evidence suggests that cytokines, especially interleukin-17 (IL-17) (11) and IL-15 (4), can also influence the activation and maintenance of the immune responses that cause Lyme arthritis. Other cellular immune mechanisms may also be involved (5, 7, 10, 20, 21). Moreover, a paradigm for the molecular regulation of arthritis involving CD4+ T cells, CD4+ CD25+ T cells, and cell-associated cytokine production has emerged in recent years. This involves cell cycle-regulating molecules (13, 22, 26) like protein (p) 19, also referred to as p19INK4D (22, 50). This 165-amino-acid protein participates in the G1 phase arrest of T cells in the cell cycle (13, 16, 29). Disruption of p19 activity has been associated with the development of acute T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (15, 18, 44) and other cellular diseases (30, 48). This protein may also be important for controlling T-cell proliferation, differentiation, and activation and the release of cytokines that promote the pathology associated with Borrelia-induced arthritis.
We hypothesized that treatment with anti-p19 antibody of Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice would enhance arthritis. In this report, we show that treatment of Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice with anti-p19 antibody augments the arthritic response. In addition, anti-p19 antibody treatment caused an increase in borreliacidal antibody production.
|
|
|---|
Organisms. Low-passage-number (<10) virulent B. burgdorferi senso stricto isolate 297 (human cerebrospinal fluid) and Borrelia bissettii (isolated by S.M.C. from Microtus pennsylvanicus) were grown at 32°C in modified Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK) medium to a concentration of 107 spirochetes/ml. Aliquots (500 µl) were then dispensed into 1.5-ml screw-cap tubes (Sarstedt, Newton, NC) containing 500 µl of BSK medium supplemented with 10% glycerol (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). The tubes were sealed and stored at 70°C.
Vaccine preparation. Frozen aliquots (10 ml) of B. burgdorferi 297 culture were thawed and pelleted by centrifugation (10,000 x g at 23°C for 10 min) and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 (Grand Island, NY). The washed pellet was then resuspended and mixed with 10% neutral buffered zinc formalin (Sigma Chemical Co.), incubated at ambient temperature with periodic mixing for 30 min, washed three times by centrifugation (10,000 x g at 23°C for 10 min) with PBS, and resuspended in PBS. Subsequently, the formalin-inactivated spirochetes were mixed with a sufficient volume of 3% aluminum hydroxide (Reheis, Berkeley Heights, NJ) to yield 2 x 107 spirochetes/ml.
Vaccination of mice. Mice were anesthetized with ether (Sigma Chemical Co.) or 15% isoflurane in mineral oil (Sigma Chemical Co.) contained in a nose-and-mouth cup and injected subcutaneously in the inguinal regions with 0.25 ml of the formalin-inactivated whole-cell vaccine preparation. Whole cells of Borrelia are not recommended for vaccination of humans, based on concerns associated with other types of whole-cell vaccines (28). However, we have shown that whole cells of Borrelia can consistently induce arthritis in gamma interferon-deficient and wild-type C57BL/6 mice after Borrelia infection (4, 11, 37).
Infection of mice. A frozen aliquot (1 ml) of B. bissettii culture was thawed and added to 4 ml of fresh BSK medium and incubated at 32°C for 24 h. Twenty-one or 28 days after vaccination of mice with B. burgdorferi 297 in alum, mice were anesthetized with ether or 15% isoflurane in mineral oil contained in a nose-and-mouth cup and were injected subcutaneously in both hind paws with 50 µl of BSK medium containing 106 viable B. bissettii organisms. Vaccinated mice were also challenged the following day with 106 viable B. bissettii organisms that had been incubating at 32°C in BSK medium.
It is necessary to infect B. burgdorferi 297-vaccinated mice with B. bissettii because vaccination induces protective antibodies that prevent a homologous infection from eliciting arthritis (17, 32, 43). Other infectious Borrelia isolates, besides B. bissettii, can also elicit the arthritis (32). Controls included vaccinated mice injected with only BSK medium, which does not induce arthritis.
Administration of anti-p19 antibody. Purified mouse anti-p19INK4d monoclonal antibody (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and nonspecific isotype immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody (BD PharMingen) were diluted in filter-sterilized (0.2-µm-pore-size Acrodisk filter; Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI) PBS (pH 7.4) to yield a final concentration of 20 µg/ml. Coomassie blue-stained gels and Western blot analysis showed the solution of anti-p19 antibody to be free of contaminating protein. The salts and preservatives present were identical to those found in the isotype control. One hour after infection of vaccinated mice, mice were anesthetized with ether or 15% isoflurane in mineral oil contained in a nose-and-mouth cup and were injected subcutaneously in both hind paws with 50 µl of anti-p19 antibody or isotype antibody. Treatment with anti-p19 antibody and isotype was administered daily thereafter for 6 or 9 days. In other studies, anti-p19 antibody was administered 7 or 15 days after challenge and continued daily for 6 days.
Flow cytometry. The popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes were obtained from four groups of three mice vaccinated with or without challenge and with or without treatment with anti-p19 antibody. In addition, popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes were obtained from non-anti-p19 antibody-treated nonvaccinated and noninfected mice. Single-cell suspensions of the lymph node cells were prepared by teasing apart the lymph nodes with forceps and passing them through a sterile nylon mesh screen (Fisher, Hanover Park, IL) into cold filter-sterilized PBS. The total number of viable lymphocytes was determined. Cells (5 x 105) were then dispensed into chilled centrifuge tubes and mixed with 2.5 µl each of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD4 antibody (BD PharMingen) and R-phycoerythrin-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD25 (BD PharMingen) and incubated at 4°C for 30 min under dark conditions. Subsequently, the cells were washed with 1% fetal calf serum (heat inactivated; Sigma Chemical Co.) in PBS at 4°C (500 x g for 5 min), and the pellets were resuspended in 300 µl of cold 1% fetal calf serum in PBS. The cells were then fixed in 1% methanol-free formaldehyde (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) for 24 h. Data were acquired using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) using CellQuest acquisition and FlowJo fluorescence-activated cell sorting data analysis software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR). Events were gated to include only the fixed lymphocytes. Twenty-five thousand gated events were collected and analyzed using a gated dot plot. The percentage of CD4+ CD25+ T cells was determined by comparing samples of lymph node cells stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD4 antibody and R-phycoerythrin-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD25 with those stained with either R-phycoerythrin-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD25 or fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD4 antibody. Total cell populations for CD4+ and CD4+ CD25+ T cells in the lymph nodes were calculated by multiplying the percentage of occurrence in a dot plot of a cell population by the total number of cells counted in the node.
Detection of borreliacidal antibodies.
Borreliacidal antibodies were detected by a flow cytometric procedure (12). Viable B. burgdorferi 297 or B. bissettii organisms in logarithmic growth phase were enumerated with a Petroff-Hausser counting chamber and diluted with fresh BSK medium to a concentration of approximately 5 x 105 organisms/ml. Concomitantly, serum samples were diluted 1:20 with BSK and filter sterilized by passage through a 0.2-µm-pore-size microcentrifuge filter (Costar, Cambridge, MA). The filtered serum samples were then transferred to sterile 1.5-ml screw-cap microcentrifuge tubes (Sarstedt, Newton, NC) and diluted serially (1:40 to 1:40,960) with BSK. Serum samples were heat inactivated at 56°C for 10 min, and a 100-µl aliquot of the spirochetes and 10 µl of sterile guinea pig serum (50% hemolytic component of
200 units/ml) were added. The assay mixtures were mixed thoroughly and incubated for 16 to 24 h at 35°C.
Following incubation, 100 µl of each assay suspension was transferred to a 12- by 75-mm polystyrene tube (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) containing 400 µl of PBS and 1 µg of acridine orange (Sigma) per ml. A FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA) was then used to detect borreliacidal activity. Spirochetes were isolated by gating (CellQuest software; Becton Dickinson) and analyzed for 1 to 2 min with the flow rate set at low. Borreliacidal antibodies kill the spirochete by inducing a complement cascade that disrupts the outer membrane and causes the membrane to bleb. Borreliacidal antibodies were detected indirectly by monitoring the increased fluorescence intensity that occurs when the acridine orange intercalates into blebbed, nonviable spirochetes. A shift of
13% in the mean fluorescence intensity compared to a normal serum control was considered positive (12). The presence of blebbed, nonmotile spirochetes was then confirmed by dark-field microscopy.
Assessment of arthritis. Measurements of hind paw swelling were used to determine the level of the inflammatory response induced in Borrelia-vaccinated mice with or without treatment with anti-p19 antibody and challenge with B. bissettii. Paws were measured on day of challenge and every other day for approximately 3 weeks using a Vernifer digital caliper (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) with readout to 0.01 mm. Mice were anesthetized with ether or 15% isoflurane in mineral oil contained in a nose-and-mouth cup. The width and thickness of both hind tibiotarsal joints were measured. The caliper values within a group of mice were summed and divided by the number of measurements to obtain the mean value of the size of the joint for the day.
Preparation of tissues for histologic examination. Twenty-one days after infection, mice were euthanized with ether or 15% isoflurane in mineral oil, and their hind paws were amputated at mid-femur. The paws were fixed in 10% neutral buffered zinc formalin solution for 24 h. Subsequently, the paws were placed in a decalcifying solution (Fisher Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI) for 3 h, followed by the addition of fresh decalcifying solution for an additional 48 h. Following decalcification, the legs were placed in tissue-embedding cassettes (Fisher Scientific), embedded in paraffin, and cut into 6 µm-thick sections. These sections were placed on glass slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Sections were cryptically coded, and an unbiased histopathological examination was performed by a board-certified pathologist (T. F. Warner). The following word scale was used to define the neutrophilic infiltration in the tibiotarsal joint: mild (neutrophilic infiltration in the subsynovial tissues), moderate (neutrophilic infiltration of the subsynovial tissues, synovium, and synovial space), severe (profuse neutrophilic infiltration of the subsynovial tissues, synovium, and synovial space), and severe destructive (profuse neutrophilic infiltration of all tibiotarsal tissues along with bone and/or cartilage destruction).
Statistical analysis. Swelling of the hind paws and flow cytometry data among groups were tested by analysis of variance (45). The alpha level was set at 0.05 before the experiments were started. The standard error for the experiment was then determined.
|
|
|---|
Similar, significant (P < 0.05) swelling of the right and left hind paws was detected in vaccinated and infected mice with or without treatment with anti-p19 antibody (Fig. 1) or with treatment with an isotype IgG1 antibody. The hind paw swelling of untreated and anti-p19 antibody-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice peaked on days 7 and 9, respectively, and gradually decreased. In contrast, no swelling of the hind paws occurred with vaccinated, nonchallenged mice with or without treatment with anti-p19 antibody. Likewise, no swelling was detected in the nonvaccinated and nonchallenged mice. Similar results were obtained when these experiments were repeated four times with three or four mice per group.
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Development of swelling of the hind paws of vaccinated (solid line) and vaccinated and challenged (broken line) mice treated with () or without ( ) anti-p19 antibody. Additional controls included nonvaccinated and nonchallenged mice ( ) and vaccinated and challenged mice treated with an IgG1 isotype antibody (data not shown). The swelling detected in vaccinated and challenged mice treated with the isotype antibody was similar to the swelling observed in vaccinated and challenged mice. Data are means; standard errors for the experiment did not exceed 0.06.
|
![]() View larger version (130K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Histopathology of the tibiotarsal joints of vaccinated mice (A), vaccinated mice treated with anti-p19 antibody (B), vaccinated and challenged mice (C), and vaccinated and challenged mice treated with anti-p19 antibody (D) at day 21 after Borrelia infection or day 42 after vaccination. A fifth tibiotarsal joint is shown from a nonvaccinated and nonchallenged mouse (E). Arrows indicate inflammation. Additional controls (not shown) included vaccinated and challenged mice treated with an IgG1 isotype antibody. The histopathology detected in vaccinated and challenged mice treated with the isotype antibody was similar to the histopathology observed in vaccinated and challenged mice, shown in panel C. Magnification, x100.
|
Effects of anti-p19 antibody treatment on the number of lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells and CD4+ CD25+ T cells in the lymph nodes.
Popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes were obtained from nonvaccinated mice, Borrelia-vaccinated mice with or without treatment with anti-p19 antibody, and Borrelia-vaccinated and -infected mice with or without treatment with anti-p19 antibody on day 8 after infection. Table 1 shows a slight increase in the total number of lymphocytes and CD4+ T cells in all groups of mice except vaccinated mice and vaccinated mice treated with anti-p19 antibody. Likewise, vaccinated mice treated with or without anti-p19 antibody had decreased numbers of CD4+ CD25+ T cells compared to the number of CD4+ CD25+ T cells in the control group. In contrast, Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice treated with or without anti-p19 antibody had significantly (P
0.1) increased numbers of CD4+ CD25+ T cells (1.1 x 105 to 1.3 x 105). In summary, anti-p19 antibody treatment of Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice slightly increased the number of lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells, and CD4+ CD25+ T cells compared to the other control groups. However, these results were not statistically significant. There were four control groups (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Numbers of lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells, and CD4+ CD25+ T cells in the popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes of vaccinated and vaccinated and challenged mice with or without treatment with anti-p19 antibody
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Borreliacidal antibody titers directed against B. burgdorferi isolate 297 (A) and B. bissettii (B) obtained with sera from vaccinated mice (V), vaccinated mice treated with anti-p19 antibody (V anti-p19), vaccinated and challenged mice (VC), and vaccinated and challenged mice treated with anti-p19 antibody (VC anti-p19). Sera were collected on day 22 after infection or day 43 after vaccination. The titer represents the reciprocal of the last dilution with significant borreliacidal activity. A shift of 13% in the mean fluorescence intensity compared to the control serum was considered positive by flow cytometry. In most cases (90%), the same titer was obtained when the study was repeated.
|
|
|
|---|
We showed previously that B. burgdorferi-vaccinated mice challenged with B. bissettii develop arthritis at the tibiotarsal joint (4, 11, 35-37). This finding is confirmed in the present report. The synovial space, synovium, and subsynovial tissue of the tibiotarsal joint of Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice showed a severe inflammatory response involving a profuse infiltration of neutrophils. Subsequently, we hypothesized that the inflammatory arthritic response could be exacerbated by neutralizing p19 in Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice. We speculated that in the absence of the p19 inhibitor, the responding immune cells in the periarticular tissues would continue to proliferate and promote the inflammatory response in the tibiotarsal joint.
Here, we show that anti-p19 antibody treatment did augment the inflammatory response normally detected at the tibiotarsal joints of Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice. Although the synovial space, synovium, and subsynovial tissues contained a profuse infiltration of neutrophils, the most distinctive feature detected in anti-p19 antibody-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice was erosion of cartilage and bone at the tibiotarsal joint. In fact, the joints were destroyed in most of the anti-p19-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice compared to the non-anti-p19-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged control mice. These results show that treatment with anti-p19 antibody exacerbates the arthritic response.
Treatment with anti-p19 antibody also induced several other effects in Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice. Anti-p19 antibody treatment enhanced the borreliacidal antibody response of Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice. Borreliacidal antibody increased two- to fourfold against both the vaccine and challenge agent compared to the borreliacidal activity detected in non-p19 antibody-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice. In addition, anti-p19 treatment was effective in enhancing borreliacidal antibody even when administered several days after Borrelia-vaccinated mice were challenged, especially against the vaccine agent. These results support our claim that anti-p19 treatment can affect the immune response to Borrelia vaccination and challenge.
In an attempt to elucidate the mechanism by which treatment with anti-p19 antibody exacerbated arthritis, we determined the number of lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells, and CD4+ CD25+ T cells in the lymph nodes (popliteal and inguinal) draining the site of the arthritic response. In general, the number of these cells was increased in anti-p19 antibody-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice compared to the controls. This suggests that treatment with anti-p19 antibody prolongs or amplifies the immune response. In support of this hypothesis, it is known that increases in the number of lymph node cells and CD4+ T cells are associated with antigenic stimulation, cell proliferation, and activation (39). Of special interest is the number of CD4+ CD25+ T cells in the anti-p19-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice. Although CD4+ CD25+ T cells may play a major role in suppressing immune reactivity (8, 14, 27, 31, 41), initially CD4+ T cells expressing CD25, the IL-2
receptor, are active participants in developing the immune response (19, 23, 52). The increase (13%) in CD4+ CD25+ T cells found in the lymph nodes of anti-p19 antibody-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice may have aided the arthritis-inducing effector CD4+ T cells by binding the T-cell growth-promoting factor, IL-2, to the CD25 receptor. This would further stimulate proliferation of arthritic reactive CD4+ T cells (19) and account for the enhanced histopathology of the tibiotarsal joint found in anti-p19 antibody-treated Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice.
The ability of anti-p19 antibody treatment to augment the borreliacidal antibody response of Borrelia-vaccinated and Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice, especially against the vaccine isolate, was a surprise. Sustained high levels of borreliacidal antibody is an important feature for establishing the efficacy of the next generation of Lyme vaccines. A major concern, however, for vaccine manufacturers is how to stimulate production of a strong and long-lived borreliacidal antibody response that has minimal side effects. Our results show that considerable enhancement of borreliacidal antibody can be achieved with anti-p19 antibody treatment; however, the mechanism of enhancement needs to be determined. By contrast, Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice treated with anti-p19 antibody exhibited enhanced lymphocyte responses and borreliacidal activity to the vaccine isolate. Anti-p19 antibody treatment of Borrelia-vaccinated mice and Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice may have caused a restricted clonal expansion of T cells specifically dedicated to stimulate production of anti-297 borreliacidal antibody (vaccine isolate). This restriction may have limited the borreliacidal antibody response to the challenge agent, B. bissettii. Our results show that anti-19 antibody treatment of vaccinated mice can enhance borreliacidal antibody which kills the homologous challenge agent, even when anti-p19 antibody treatment is delayed for 7 or 15 days. Additional studies with anti-p19 antibody are needed to determine the mechanism of antibody enhancement.
The novel activities of anti-p19 antibody are difficult to explain. How was the intracellular protein, p19, neutralized by treatment with anti-p19 antibody? It is generally accepted that antibodies cannot cross the cell membrane of eukaryotic cells (33, 39). However, there are antibodies called intrabodies that can function within a cell (24, 33, 49), and these can inhibit protein function (24, 33, 49). Intrabodies contain the antigen-binding regions and are generally small fragments (light chain) of the antibody molecule (24, 33). Presumably, anti-p19 antibody was altered in Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice to form intrabodies that crossed the cell membrane and neutralized p19. Another explanation may be that p19 is expressed transiently on the surface of T cells and that interaction with anti-p19 antibody inactivates or down-regulates production of intracellular p19. A similar mechanism has been described for down-regulation or prevention of the production of cytokines (19, 39). Finally, anti-p19 antibody may be cross-reactive and bind to the cell receptors of alpha interferon or IL-10. These cytokines have been shown to increase the CDK inhibitor p19 (34, 38) and inhibit proliferation of immune cells (34, 38). Blockage of the receptors would prevent production of p19. Presently, we are investigating this latter hypothesis.
In conclusion, we show that treatment with anti-p19 antibody can alter the immune response, especially the severity of the arthritis induced in Borrelia-vaccinated and -challenged mice.
We also thank Dean Jobe and Krista Asp for their assistance in performing the borreliacidal assays and the Flow Cytometry Facility at the University of Wisconsin Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI.
Published ahead of print on 14 March 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-chain (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155:1151-1164.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»