This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bannantine, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Paustian, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bannantine, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Paustian, M. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, March 2007, p. 312-317, Vol. 14, No. 3
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00353-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Production and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies against a Major Membrane Protein of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis{triangledown}

John P. Bannantine,1* Thomas J. Radosevich,1 Judith R. Stabel,1 Sven Berger,2 J. Frank T. Griffin,2 and Michael L. Paustian1

National Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, Ames, Iowa 50010,1 Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand2

Received 28 September 2006/ Returned for modification 11 December 2006/ Accepted 20 January 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis 35-kDa major membrane protein (MMP) encoded by MAP2121c is an important membrane antigen recognized in cattle with Johne's disease. In this study, purified recombinant MMP was used to produce two stable monoclonal antibodies, termed 8G2 and 13E1, which were characterized by immunoblotting, epitope mapping, and immunofluorescence microscopy.


arrow
TEXT
 
Despite the 100-year history since the discovery of Johne's disease and the economic consequences of its continued dissemination, there are very few reports describing specific, antigen-based detection reagents for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, the causative agent of the disease. One study described the use of three monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to characterize culture filtrate proteins of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, whose identities were never defined (20). Very recently, single-chain antibodies were selected by cloning heavy and light chains from sheep with Johne's disease (7). This effort has resulted in two very promising antibodies; however, the M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis proteins with which these antibodies react remain undefined. A major program initiative, funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and entitled the Johne's Disease Integrated Program, has as one of its many objectives the development of monoclonal antibody reagents. This research priority was identified because of the distinct lack of such reagents and the blockade this void creates in moving along newly developed technologies and assays. Some technologies that are especially critical for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis research, such as immunomagnetic separation (12, 16) and biosensor detection (18), highlight the need to raise mAbs to this bacterium.

The major membrane protein (MMP), encoded by MAP2121c, is a 35-kDa surface-located mycobacterial antigen that is recognized by cells from humans and cattle infected with mycobacteria (1, 29). In addition, it has been shown to have an effect on the invasion of bovine epithelial cells (1). Originally discovered in M. leprae, this 35-kDa protein is a strong antigen in leprosy patients (28, 29). The M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis 35-kDa protein was initially discovered through a serological screen of a lambda phage expression library (3). Subsequent studies have shown that this M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis protein elicits a cellular immune response in mice (5) as well as a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction (6). Collectively, these findings suggest that this antigen deserves further study. However, no antibodies that specifically detect this protein have been available.

The National Animal Disease Center's mycobacterial culture collection served as the source of all strains used in this study (Table 1). All mycobacteria were cultivated in Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with OADC (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA). For the cultivation of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, mycobactin J (2 mg/liter; Allied Monitor, Fayette, MO) was added to the Middlebrook-OADC medium. Whole-cell sonicated extracts of mycobacterial species and isolates were prepared for use as antigens in immunoassays as described previously (30). Membrane-enriched and cytosol-enriched fractionated lysates were prepared as described previously (24).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Mycobacterial isolates used in this study

Expression clones producing recombinant M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis proteins were obtained using methods previously described in detail (2). All recombinant fusion proteins contained maltose-binding protein (MBP) as the tag used in affinity purification. For cloning, the full-length gene was amplified using 2121c-F and 2121c-R primers (Table 2) whereas primers 2121c-F and 2121c-N-R were used to amplify the 5' half and primers 2121c-C-F and 2121c-R were used to amplify the 3' end. The central segment of the MAP2121c open reading frame was amplified using 2121c-CenF and 2121c-CenR. Details of the methods used for the induction and affinity purification of MBP-MAP2121c gene product fusion proteins have been described previously (2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Oligonucleotide primers used to amplify MAP2121c

mAbs were produced using standard methods (13). Briefly, 6-week-old female BALB/c mice were immunized three times intraperitoneally with the recombinant fusion protein (100 µg per injection) suspended in 0.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.3) at 14-day intervals. The antigen was emulsified in incomplete Freund adjuvant (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Antigen-specific-antibody-secreting hybridomas were identified by preparative immunoblot screening of the recombinant protein against culture supernatants. Each well containing tissue culture supernatant was used to probe two preparative immunoblots, one containing the recombinant fusion protein and a second containing the MBP affinity tag alone. This process enabled the identification of those antibodies that reacted specifically with MMP and not the affinity purification tag. mAbs were immunotyped using isotype kit I (Pierce, Rockford, IL) to define the heavy and light chains.

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed using 12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gels or 4 to 12% NuPage precast gels (Invitrogen) run with MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) buffer (Invitrogen) to resolve membrane-enriched and cytoplasm-enriched fractions. Polyacrylamide gels were stained with GelCode Blue (Pierce). Either Precision Plus protein standards (Bio-Rad) or SeaBlue Plus2 prestained standards (Invitrogen) served as size references for protein gels. The electrophoretic transfer of proteins onto pure nitrocellulose and the immunoblot assays were accomplished as described previously (22). mAb 8G2 was diluted 1:1,000 and mAb 13E1 was diluted 1:500 routinely for experiments described herein.

Mycobacterium-infected BoMac cells were cultured in sterile glass chamber slides (Nalgene Nunc International, Naperville, IL) for 48 h and fixed in 100% methanol as described previously (3). Multiplicities of infection were five mycobacteria to one macrophage. Fixed cells were washed in PBS following the 5-min methanol fixation and stored at 4°C in PBS until ready to use. Fixed cells were blocked in PBS plus 2% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin (PBS-BSA). Each monoclonal antibody was diluted in PBS-BSA as indicated above for immunoblot experiments and placed on the chamber slide for 1 h. The slide was washed three times with PBS, and primary antibodies were detected with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Invitrogen) at a dilution of 1:500 in PBS-BSA. The slide was incubated at room temperature in the dark for 1 h and then washed again three times with PBS. Excess PBS was drained away, and the slide was prepared for microscopy with a drop of Vectashield mounting medium containing 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and a coverslip. Labeled cells were visualized by differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence microscopy with a Nikon E800 series microscope.

An M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis protein encoded by MAP2121c was previously shown to play a role in the invasion of epithelial cells (1). The protein was heterologously expressed as a full-length fusion protein in Escherichia coli to serve as an antigen. To obtain mAbs against MMP, BALB/c mice were immunized with the recombinant fusion protein. The fusion of immune splenocytes with SP2/0 myeloma cells resulted in six hybridomas initially testing positive in immunoblot screens, but only two stable cell lines secreting antibody to MMP were obtained, and these antibodies were designated 8G2 and 13E1.

Supernatants from the 8G2- and 13E1-secreting cell lines were evaluated by immunoblotting with the recombinant protein expressed in E. coli as well as whole-cell lysates of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Both 8G2 and 13E1 detected a 35-kDa protein in M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis as well as the E. coli-expressed recombinant MBP-MAP2121c fusion protein (Fig. 1). However, neither antibody detected the MBP-LacZ fusion protein, suggesting that neither mAb reacts with the affinity tag (Fig. 1). As a control, a third immunoblot was probed with a mAb that binds to the MBP affinity tag. This antibody, developed in our laboratory during this study, detected both MBP-LacZ and MBP-MAP2121c gene product fusion proteins, but nothing was detected in M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis whole-cell lysates. Isotype analysis revealed that both 8G2 and 13E1 mAbs were immunoglobulin G1 heavy-chain and kappa light-chain antibodies.


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Immunoblot analysis of mAbs 8G2 and 13E1 shows reactivity with the E. coli-expressed recombinant protein as well as the native M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis 35-kDa protein. Shown are three identical immunoblots that were exposed to the antibodies indicated beneath each filter. Note that anti-MBP ({alpha}-MBP) is a mAb to the MBP affinity tag that does not detect any M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis proteins whereas 8G2 and 13E1 detect only the E. coli-expressed MBP-MAP2121c gene product fusion protein and the MAP2121c gene product in M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Lanes: 1, MBP-LacZ; 2, MBP-MAP2121c gene product fusion protein; 3, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis whole-cell lysate. Kilodalton size markers are shown in the left margin and indicated by corresponding notches between the blots.

Because the MAP2121c coding sequence is present in other mycobacteria, the cross-reactivities of 8G2 and 13E1 were determined. Each mAb was screened by immunoblotting with whole-cell lysate preparations from nine mycobacterial species and subspecies (Fig. 2). Both mAbs reacted to all three M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains, which included K-10 and the type strain, ATCC 19698, as well as a human isolate (Fig. 2A and B, lanes 5, 10, and 12). 13E1 detected a similarly sized protein in all members of the M. avium complex, which includes M. avium subsp. avium, M. avium subsp. silvaticum (15), M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, and M. intracellulare (Fig. 2A). Similar reactivity of 8G2 with M. avium complex members was observed; however, the epitope detected by this mAb may be more conserved than the one recognized by 13E1 as 8G2 also cross-reacts with M. abscessus and M. kansasii (Fig. 2B). A smaller protein than the MMP produced in M. avium complex mycobacteria was detected in those two species (Fig. 2B). Neither mAb detected any proteins in M. scrofulaceum, M. bovis, or M. phlei.


Figure 2
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. MMP mAbs are not subspecies specific for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Two identical immunoblots were probed with 13E1 (A) and 8G2 (B). In all lanes, 0.6 µg of a whole-cell lysate was loaded. Lanes: 1, protein standards; 2, M. avium subsp. silvaticum; 3, M. scrofulaceum; 4, M. abscessus; 5, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis K-10; 6, M. avium subsp. avium (TMC702); 7, M. bovis (strain 95-1315); 8, M. phlei; 9, M. bovis BCG; 10, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis ATCC 19698; 11, M. avium subsp. avium (TMC715); 12, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (isolate Linda); 13, M. intracellulare; 14, M. kansasii. Sizes in kilodaltons of protein standards are indicated in the left margin.

The results of specificity experiments, which showed distinct patterns of reactivity among the mycobacterial species, suggested that 8G2 and 13E1 may bind distinct epitopes within MMP. To determine if this hypothesis was true, fragments of the MAP2121c gene encoding the N-terminal, center, and C-terminal regions of the protein were cloned and expressed and the truncated proteins were purified from recombinant E. coli cells. The regions spanned by these truncated versions of MMP relative to full-length MMP are shown schematically to scale in Fig. 3A. The full-length gene is 924 bp, encoding a protein encompassing 307 amino acids. The MMP N-terminal truncation included the initial 154 amino acids, and the MMP C-terminal truncation included the final 153 amino acids. The MMP center truncation included the central 155 amino acids. These constructs were designed such that the epitopes could be quickly mapped to four specific quadrants within the protein as shown in Fig. 3A. These proteins, along with the corresponding full-length protein, were then analyzed by immunoblotting with each of the respective mAbs (Fig. 3B). These data show that, in addition to the full-length protein, 8G2 binds strongly to the N-terminal end as well as to the central region of MMP. This reactivity pattern suggests that the epitope lies within a 77-amino-acid region of overlap between the MMP N-terminal and center polypeptides (quadrant 2 in Fig. 3A). mAb 13E1 detected only the full-length protein (Fig. 3B). This experiment was repeated with polyhistidine-tagged recombinant fusion proteins, and the same results were obtained (data not shown). These data confirm that 8G2 and 13E1 recognize distinct epitopes within MMP and suggest that 13E1 may recognize either a very large linear or a conformational epitope that is disrupted in the truncated versions of MMP.


Figure 3
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. Localization of mAb epitopes to regions of the MAP2121c gene product. Four constructs were produced and expressed in E. coli. (A) The full-length protein and truncated versions of the protein are shown schematically. Protein sizes and relative positions within the full-length protein are depicted to scale based on the start and stop codons contained within the expression clone. Each of four quadrants of the protein can be distinguished based on mAb reactivity patterns. (B) For determination of the approximate locations of mAb epitopes in the primary sequence of the MAP2121c gene product, purified recombinant peptides representing the full-length (lane 2), N-terminal half (lane 3), central region (lane 4), and C-terminal half (lane 5) of the protein were immunoblotted and probed with selected mAbs as indicated beneath each blot. Anti-MBP binds the affinity tag, and therefore the blot probed with anti-MBP shows all the proteins present and indicates their relative amounts and positions within each blot. The MBP-LacZ control protein is present in lane 6. No reactivity with the protein size standards (lane 1) was observed. The positions of the standards are indicated in the left margin. SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Antigen localization was performed by immunoblot analysis of cell-fractionated lysates prepared from five M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates. mAb 8G2 showed that MMP was present predominantly within the membrane-enriched fraction, although some reactivity in the cytoplasm-enriched fractions was observed (Fig. 4). Results similar to that shown for 8G2 were also obtained using 13E1 (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. MMP was present in the membrane-enriched fractions of five M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates. The resulting immunoblot was exposed to mAb 8G2. This antibody labeled a 35-kDa protein in the membrane-enriched fractions of the five M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolates. Sizes in kilodaltons of protein standards are indicated in the left margin.

A major obstacle in defining more precisely the role of MMP in the pathogenesis of Johne's disease is the lack of reagents that would facilitate the specific immunodetection of MMP. To determine if these mAbs might be useful in detecting M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis within infected macrophages, an indirect immunofluorescence assay was performed. Bovine macrophages immortalized with simian virus 40 (26) were infected with M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and fixed in methanol 48 h postinfection. Intracellular bacilli stained equally well with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled 13E1 and 8G2 (Fig. 5). In contrast, no staining with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled 13E1 and 8G2 in neighboring uninfected cells was observed (Fig. 5), although cells labeled with 8G2 showed a very slight increase in background fluorescence relative those labeled with 13E1.


Figure 5
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 5. Immunofluorescent-antibody staining of 48-h M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis-infected BoMac macrophages with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled 8G2 and 13E1. Each four-panel image shows cells visualized by using DIC, DAPI, Alexa Fluor 488, and DAPI merged with Alexa Fluor 488. Both 8G2 and 13E1 Alexa Fluor 488-labeled antibodies stained intracellular M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Arrows in the DIC and Alexa Fluor 488 panels indicate the locations of the mycobacteria. Note that the DAPI nuclear staining is in close proximity to the Alexa Fluor 488-labeled mycobacteria. The bar indicates 5 µm for all panels.

We present the first described mAbs that detect a known M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis protein. Membrane proteins are commonly immunodominant antigens recognized following infection with any of numerous bacterial pathogens (10, 23). While the M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis genome sequence has revealed a few hundred putative cell membrane proteins, using antibodies developed in this study, we were able to confirm experimentally that MMP is a surface protein in all five isolates tested. MMP has been reported to be immunodominant in patients with leprosy (28, 29). Although a previous study using immunoblotting found that this protein also shows reactivity with samples from cattle with Johne's disease (1), only 13 cows were clinically evaluated in that study. Therefore, more extensive studies are needed to further assess the immunodominance of this protein in the context of Johne's disease.

Both antibodies label intramacrophage bacilli for visualization by immunofluorescence microscopy, and although the possibility has not been tested, our data suggest that these antibodies may work for immunohistochemistry with infected tissues as well.

For quickly mapping the epitopes of MMP, three truncated recombinant MMP proteins were produced in addition to the full-length protein. Although the precise epitopes for each mAb were not defined at a high resolution by using synthetic overlapping peptides (19), the production of truncated versions of MMP clearly showed that 8G2 and 13E1 recognize distinct epitopes. The 8G2 epitope mapped to a 77-amino-acid region on the N-terminal half of MMP, whereas 13E1 detected the full-length protein but none of the truncated proteins. It is unknown why 13E1 detects only the full-length protein; however, one possibility is that the mAb detects a discontinuous epitope formed by the natural aggregation or folding of the N- and C-terminal sections that is disrupted when one section of the protein is missing. The reducing agent 2-mercaptoethanol apparently does not disrupt this conformational epitope as it is detected by immunoblotting. In addition, if conformational changes in MMP do occur by bringing each end of the protein together, this may explain why the truncated MMP observed in M. kansasii and M. abscessus may not be detected by 13E1, because one end may be missing in the MMP produced by those species. Regardless of the possible explanation, it is clear that distinct epitopes within MMP are recognized by the two mAbs.

From the immunoblot experiments with several mycobacterial species, it can be concluded that 13E1 is specific for the M. avium complex, comprising M. intracellulare and the three subspecies of M. avium (14, 27). However, the finding that 8G2 recognized MMP in M. kansasii provides evidence of determinants shared between this species and members of the M. avium complex. This cross-reactivity was also observed with M. abscessus, which was previously classified as M. chelonae (17). The detection of MMP in M. abscessus was surprising as this species is a fast-growing mycobacterium that is distantly related to the M. avium complex (11). M. kansasii is more closely related to the M. avium complex than M. bovis and more distantly related than M. scrofulaceum (11), yet paradoxically, antibodies did not react with any protein in M. bovis or M. scrofulaceum. To the best of our knowledge, no antibody has been reported that detects only M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis; therefore, with the recognition of the potential value of such an antibody, the search for this elusive reagent will likely continue. This search is difficult considering the very close genetic relatedness between M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and M. avium subsp. avium (4); however, genomic comparisons between these two subspecies suggest that there are some proteins that may serve as good initial targets (22).

It is noteworthy that a smaller protein than the MMP produced by members of the M. avium complex was detected in both M. kansasii and M. abscessus (Fig. 2B). It is unclear whether the decreased size is due to proteolytic processing or if it is simply a natural truncation in these more distantly related species. Bioinformatic analysis of the MAP2121c gene product does not reveal any type of signal peptidase cleavage sequence normally associated with membrane-targeted proteins; however, it is unknown whether M. kansasii or M. abscessus may have such a cleaved signal sequence, which may account for the smaller size. An insertion sequence in the MAP2121c gene of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and corresponding orthologs in M. avium complex members seem unlikely as no similarity to any known insertion sequence elements appears upon BLAST analysis.

In conclusion, these mAb reagents will open new lines of research in Johne's disease. They have already been shown to be useful for detection by immunofluorescence microscopy, making them useful in cell biology and pathogenesis studies. Although not subspecies specific, these mAbs nonetheless have potential clinical use as immunodiagnostic reagents for histopathology (9), sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and general research applications. They may be of particular importance for experimental or epidemiologic studies with samples in which enrichment with M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis among high levels of other environmental bacteria is beneficial (7). Such samples include water (31) and bulk milk tank (12, 21) samples as well as other environmental samples (8, 25).


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The expert technical assistance of Janis Hanson was critical in these experiments.

This work was funded by the USDA-Agricultural Research Service as well as the USDA-NRI-CAP program (Johne's Disease Integrated Program).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: National Animal Disease Center, ARS-USDA, 2300 North Dayton Ave., Ames, IA 50010. Phone: (515) 663-7340. Fax: (515) 663-7458. E-mail: jbannant{at}nadc.ars.usda.gov. Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 31 January 2007. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Bannantine, J. P., J. F. Huntley, E. Miltner, J. R. Stabel, and L. E. Bermudez. 2003. The Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis 35 kDa protein plays a role in invasion of bovine epithelial cells. Microbiology 149:2061-2069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Bannantine, J. P., and M. L. Paustian. 2006. Identification of diagnostic proteins in Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis by a whole genome analysis approach, p. 185-196. In L. O'Connor (ed.), Diagnostic bacteriology protocols, 2nd ed. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
    3. 3
  3. Bannantine, J. P., and J. R. Stabel. 2001. Identification of two Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis gene products differentially recognised by sera from rabbits immunised with live mycobacteria but not heat-killed mycobacteria. J. Med. Microbiol. 50:795-804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Bannantine, J. P., Q. Zhang, L. L. Li, and V. Kapur. 2003. Genomic homogeneity between Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis belies their divergent growth rates. BMC Microbiol. 3:10.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Basagoudanavar, S. H., P. P. Goswami, and V. Tiwari. 2006. Cellular immune responses to 35 kDa recombinant antigen of Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis. Vet. Res. Commun. 30:357-367.[Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Basagoudanavar, S. H., P. P. Goswami, V. Tiwari, A. K. Pandey, and N. Singh. 2004. Heterologous expression of a gene encoding a 35 kDa protein of Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis in Escherichia coli. Vet. Res. Commun. 28:209-224.[Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Berger, S., D. Hinz, J. P. Bannantine, and J. F. Griffin. 2006. Isolation of high-affinity single-chain antibodies against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis surface proteins from sheep with Johne's disease. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 13:1022-1029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Berghaus, R. D., T. B. Farver, R. J. Anderson, C. C. Jaravata, and I. A. Gardner. 2006. Environmental sampling for detection of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis on large California dairies. J. Dairy Sci. 89:963-970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Coetsier, C., X. Havaux, F. Mattelard, S. Sadatte, F. Cormont, K. Buergelt, B. Limbourg, D. Latinne, H. Bazin, J. F. Denef, and C. Cocito. 1998. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in infected tissues by new species-specific immunohistological procedures. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 5:446-451.
    10. 10
  10. Darji, A., D. Bruder, S. zur Lage, B. Gerstel, T. Chakraborty, J. Wehland, and S. Weiss. 1998. The role of the bacterial membrane protein ActA in immunity and protection against Listeria monocytogenes. J. Immunol. 161:2414-2420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Devulder, G., M. Perouse de Montclos, and J. P. Flandrois. 2005. A multigene approach to phylogenetic analysis using the genus Mycobacterium as a model. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55:293-302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Grant, I. R., C. M. Pope, L. M. O'Riordan, H. J. Ball, and M. T. Rowe. 2000. Improved detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk by immunomagnetic PCR. Vet. Microbiol. 77:369-378.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Harlow, E., and D. Lane (ed.). 1988. Antibodies: a laboratory manual, 1st ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
    14. 14
  14. Inderlied, C. B., C. A. Kemper, and L. E. Bermudez. 1993. The Mycobacterium avium complex. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 6:266-310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Jorgensen, J. B., and B. Clausen. 1976. Mycobacteriosis in a roe-deer caused by wood-pigeon mycobacteria. Nord. Vet. Med. 28:539-546.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Khare, S., T. A. Ficht, R. L. Santos, J. Romano, A. R. Ficht, S. Zhang, I. R. Grant, M. Libal, D. Hunter, and L. G. Adams. 2004. Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in bovine milk and feces by a combination of immunomagnetic bead separation-conventional PCR and real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1075-1081.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Kusunoki, S., and T. Ezaki. 1992. Proposal of Mycobacterium peregrinum sp. nov., nom. rev., and elevation of Mycobacterium chelonae subsp. abscessus (Kubica et al.) to species status: Mycobacterium abscessus comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42:240-245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Mathew, F. P., and E. C. Alocilja. 2005. Porous silicon-based biosensor for pathogen detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 20:1656-1661.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Mechin, M. C., E. Rousset, and J. P. Girardeau. 1996. Identification of surface-exposed linear B-cell epitopes of the nonfimbrial adhesin CS31A of Escherichia coli by using overlapping peptides and antipeptide antibodies. Infect. Immun. 64:3555-3564.[Abstract]
    20. 20
  20. Mutharia, L. M., W. Moreno, and M. Raymond. 1997. Analysis of culture filtrate and cell wall-associated antigens of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis with monoclonal antibodies. Infect. Immun. 65:387-394.[Abstract]
    21. 21
  21. O'Reilly, C. E., L. O'Connor, W. Anderson, P. Harvey, I. R. Grant, J. Donaghy, M. Rowe, and P. O'Mahony. 2004. Surveillance of bulk raw and commercially pasteurized cows' milk from approved Irish liquid-milk pasteurization plants to determine the incidence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5138-5144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Paustian, M. L., A. Amonsin, V. Kapur, and J. P. Bannantine. 2004. Characterization of novel coding sequences specific to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: implications for diagnosis of Johne's Disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2675-2681.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Podmore, M., J. L. Ebersole, and D. F. Kinane. 2001. Immunodominant antigens in periodontal disease: a real or illusive concept? Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 12:179-185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Radosevich, T. J., T. A. Reinhardt, J. D. Lippolis, J. P. Bannantine, and J. R. Stabel. 2007. Proteome and differential expression analysis of membrane and cytosolic proteins from Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains K-10 and 187. J. Bacteriol. 189:1109-1117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Raizman, E. A., S. J. Wells, S. M. Godden, R. F. Bey, M. J. Oakes, D. C. Bentley, and K. E. Olsen. 2004. The distribution of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in the environment surrounding Minnesota dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2959-2966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Stabel, J. R., and T. J. Stabel. 1995. Immortalization and characterization of bovine peritoneal macrophages transfected with SV40 plasmid DNA. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 45:211-220.[CrossRef][Medline]
    27. 27
  27. Thorel, M. F., M. Krichevsky, and V. V. Levy-Frebault. 1990. Numerical taxonomy of mycobactin-dependent mycobacteria, emended description of Mycobacterium avium, and description of Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium subsp. nov., Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis subsp. nov., and Mycobacterium avium subsp. silvaticum subsp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40:254-260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    28. 28
  28. Triccas, J. A., P. W. Roche, and W. J. Britton. 1998. Specific serological diagnosis of leprosy with a recombinant Mycobacterium leprae protein purified from a rapidly growing mycobacterial host. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2363-2365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    29. 29
  29. Triccas, J. A., P. W. Roche, N. Winter, C. G. Feng, C. R. Butlin, and W. J. Britton. 1996. A 35-kilodalton protein is a major target of the human immune response to Mycobacterium leprae. Infect. Immun. 64:5171-5177.[Abstract]
    30. 30
  30. Waters, W. R., J. M. Miller, M. V. Palmer, J. R. Stabel, D. E. Jones, K. A. Koistinen, E. M. Steadham, M. J. Hamilton, W. C. Davis, and J. P. Bannantine. 2003. Early induction of humoral and cellular immune responses during experimental Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection of calves. Infect. Immun. 71:5130-5138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    31. 31
  31. Whan, L., H. J. Ball, I. R. Grant, and M. T. Rowe. 2005. Development of an IMS-PCR assay for the detection of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in water. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 40:269-273.[CrossRef][Medline]

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, March 2007, p. 312-317, Vol. 14, No. 3
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00353-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bannantine, J. P., Paustian, M. L., Waters, W. R., Stabel, J. R., Palmer, M. V., Li, L., Kapur, V. (2008). Profiling Bovine Antibody Responses to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Infection by Using Protein Arrays. Infect. Immun. 76: 739-749 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yakes, B. J., Lipert, R. J., Bannantine, J. P., Porter, M. D. (2008). Impact of Protein Shedding on Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by a Whole-Cell Immunoassay Incorporating Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. CVI 15: 235-242 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yakes, B. J., Lipert, R. J., Bannantine, J. P., Porter, M. D. (2008). Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by a Sonicate Immunoassay Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. CVI 15: 227-234 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bannantine, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Paustian, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bannantine, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Paustian, M. L.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»