Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, December 2007, p. 1550-1554, Vol. 14, No. 12
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00242-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

D. L. Goldman,2,
X. Shao,2
A. Casadevall,2
S. Husain,3
A. P. Limaye,4
M. Lyon,5
J. Somani,5
K. Pursell,6
T. L. Pruett,7 and
N. Singh3*
All India Institute of Medicine, New Delhi, India,1 Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York,2 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,3 University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington,4 Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia,5 University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,6 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia7
Received 12 June 2007/ Returned for modification 19 September 2007/ Accepted 15 October 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In previous studies, we developed an immunoblot assay to study subclinical cryptococcosis in immunocompetent individuals (1, 4). Using this approach, we documented that subclinical cryptococcosis was common among children living in the Bronx, NY (4), but not among children living in a northern suburb of New York (2). In the present study, we used serology to study the pathogenesis of cryptococcosis in solid-organ transplant recipients. Results from our studies provide evidence for reactivation of cryptococcosis in a significant proportion of affected transplant recipients. Our findings also highlight the potential for serology to identify transplant recipients at risk for reactivation-type cryptococcosis.
|
|
|---|
Fungal protein extracts. Whole-cell and cytosolic protein extracts of C. neoformans were used in these studies. Cells were centrifuged at 4,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C, and the pellet was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The pellet was resuspended in PBS containing a protease inhibitor cocktail buffer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and 0.5-mm zirconia-silica beads (Sigma). Cells were disrupted using a mini bead beater. The resulting suspension was centrifuged at 4,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C to obtain whole-cell 32 extracts and at 100,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C to obtain cytosolic extracts. The membrane fractions were washed and centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was pooled with the previous supernatant as part of the cytosolic fraction. Protein extracts were stored at –80°C prior to use. The same approach was used to obtain cytosolic C. albicans protein antigens.
Rat studies. Rats (three to five per group) were infected intratracheally with 1 x 107 C. neoformans (ATCC 24067) organisms as described previously (1). At different times, rats were sacrificed and sera were obtained. To establish a model of resolved cryptococcal infection, another group of rats were intratracheally infected with 1 x 104 of the unencapsulated strain Cap 67. Sera were collected at 3 months. No lung fungal burden was detected in rats with resolved infection (limit of detection, 50 organisms per lung).
Study population. Subjects included in the study were identified from a larger cohort of organ transplant recipients with cryptococcosis in a prospective study (12). Cryptococcosis was defined as having cultures positive for C. neoformans in a clinical specimen, including blood cultures, or positive cryptococcal antigen in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid in a patient with compatible clinical presentation (12). Sera obtained before and after solid-organ transplantation from patients who developed cryptococcosis and those who did not develop cryptococcosis were studied. For patients with cryptococcosis, the posttransplant sera were collected at the time of diagnosis of cryptococcal disease. Pre- and posttransplant sera from patients who did not develop cryptococcosis at the same follow-up as the patients with cryptococcosis cases were also studied. All serum samples were stored at –80°C prior to use. Upon thawing, the samples were heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min and then stored at 4°C.
Definitions. Sera were divided into four groups as follows: (i) sera obtained before transplant from patients who did not develop cryptococcosis (over 10 years) (Pre/–) (n = 11), (ii) sera obtained before transplant from patients who developed cryptococcosis after transplant (Pre/+) (n = 21), (iii) sera obtained after transplant from patients who did not have cryptococcosis (Post/–) (n = 10), and (iv) sera obtained after transplant from patients with active cryptococcosis (Post/+) (n = 21).
Patients. A total of 63 sera from 48 transplant recipients were studied. The patients were recipients of a lung, liver, kidney, or heart transplant. Sera were available from 21 transplant recipients with cryptococcosis; this group of recipients included 15 patients from whom paired (i.e., pre- and posttransplant) sera were available. The clinical characteristics of study patients are shown in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Clinical characteristics of the patients with cryptococcosisa
|
Interpretation of data.
Reactivity to cytoplasmic proteins was analyzed with respect to overall reactivity (i.e., to all proteins) or to a set of nine designated proteins most commonly recognized by the sera of infected patients. Reactivity to these nine designated bands was further characterized as extensive (
6), moderate (3 to 5) and minimal (0 to 2) (4). Investigator scoring was blinded with respect to cohort.
Statistical analysis. The median numbers of reactive bands among various groups were compared with the Mann-Whitney test or, if the comparisons were done between multiple groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test. The proportions of sera demonstrating reactivity were compared by a chi-square test. Comparisons of clinical characteristics based on serologic findings were done with either Mann-Whitney or chi-square tests. Statistics were calculated using GraphPad InStat software (San Diego, CA). A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (100K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Immunoblots for rats infected intratracheally with Cryptococcus neoformans. Representative sera from rats at different times following infection are shown. Rats with resolved infection were inoculated intratracheally with an acapsular strain of C. neoformans and demonstrated to have no lung fungal burden. Some rats (10MOS/DEXA) were infected with C. neoformans for 9 months and then treated with dexamethasone for a month. The top and bottom panels show blots obtained with whole-cell protein and cytoplasmic extracts of C. neoformans, respectively. Molecular mass markers in kDa are shown on the right.
|
6) of the 9 designated proteins, while 24% reacted with all 9 proteins. Five of these proteins (82, 75, 71, 56, and 40 kDa) were also recognized by the majority (65%) of sera from infected rats. In contrast, sera from other groups demonstrated less reactivity against the nine designated proteins. The median numbers of designated proteins recognized by Pre/–, Pre/+ Post/–, and Post/+ sera were 2, 3, 1, and 7, respectively (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2B).
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) Median numbers of total cytoplasmic proteins recognized by sera from Pre/– (n = 11), Pre/+ (n = 21), Post/+ (n = 21), and Post/– (n = 10) patients (P value was not significant). Panel B shows median numbers of designated cytoplasmic proteins recognized by sera from the same patients. (the asterisk indicates a P value of <0.01 for Post/+ sera compared to Post/– sera and for Post/+ sera versus Pre/– sera). Bars represent one standard deviation each.
|
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. (A) Representative immunoblots of paired sera from 10 transplant recipients that developed cryptococcosis. For each pair, blots on the left were made with sera obtained prior to transplant, while blots on right were made with sera obtained after transplant at the time that the diagnosis of cryptococcosis was made. (B) The corresponding median numbers of designated proteins recognized by these paired sera are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Proportions of sera demonstrating reactivity to designated cytoplasmic proteins among the various cohorts. White fills represent minimal reactivity (0 to 2 bands), black fills represent moderate reactivity (3 to 5 bands), and gray fills represent extensive reactivity ( 6 bands).
|
|
|
|---|
The reactivity profile of transplant recipients with cryptococcosis was considerably more complex than that of experimentally infected rats. We hypothesize that this complexity reflects individual differences in the timing and extent of exposure to cryptococcal antigens as well as differences in the genetic makeup and immunosuppression of our patients. It is also possible that exposure to other fungi contributes to some of the observed reactivity to C. neoformans proteins. This may explain the reactivity to total cytoplasmic proteins observed in the Pre/– group. A decrease in reactivity to the total cytoplasmic proteins among the posttransplant groups likely reflects the immunosuppression of these groups.
Nonetheless, there was a commonality in reactivity to certain bands in sera of affected patients. Sera from Post/+ patients most commonly recognized nine proteins (approximate masses of 133, 122, 106, 97, 82, 75, 71, 56, and 40 kDa). The specificity of this profile to indicate cryptococcal infection is suggested by several findings. Reactivity against five of these proteins (82, 75, 71, 56, and 40 kDa) was also observed for infected rats. Reactivity against proteins of similar sizes has been reported by other investigators. Vecchiarelli et al. reported in their study that sera from the majority of the human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals with cryptococcosis reacted with 106- and 82-kDa protein antigens (11). Hamilton et al. found reactivity to cryptococcal cytoplasmic proteins among sera from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with cryptococcosis (6). Several of these proteins were of the same approximate molecular masses as those observed in our study.
Among patients from whom sera were collected pretransplant, the proportion of those who developed cryptococcosis (Pre/+) exhibited seroreactivity to the designated cytoplasmic proteins was higher than that of the patients who did not develop cryptococcosis. Not all Pre/+ sera exhibited significant seroreactivity. We hypothesize that Pre/+ patients with moderate seroreactivity represent patients with reactivation-type cryptococcosis. Patients with preexisting reactivity against C. neoformans developed cryptococcosis earlier after transplant than patients without preexisting reactivity. These findings are consistent with a preexisting infection that reactivates in the setting of immunosuppression. In contrast, the relatively late presentation of cryptococcal disease among patients without preexisting reactivity could reflect the time needed to be exposed and acquire infection. The potential for C. neoformans to persist and cause reactivation-type disease is supported by several lines of evidence, including molecular typing (3), human pathology (7), and animal studies (5). An alternative explanation for this preexisting reactivity is the possibility of reinfection with C. neoformans. We note that rats that were infected with an avirulent strain of C. neoformans and allowed to resolve their infection did not demonstrate extensive reactivity to C. neoformans proteins. Nonetheless, the possibility of reinfection is difficult to exclude, though based on the timing of disease, we feel that reactivation is the most likely scenario.
Based on our findings, we suggest that an immunoblot assay may be useful in identifying transplant recipients at risk for cryptococcosis. This approach would be limited to identifying cases caused by reactivation. Identified patients could be potentially targeted to receive antifungal prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic disease. The utility of serology in this approach may be affected by a large number of factors, including the underlying prevalence of subclinical infection in the population.
In summary, our findings suggest that approximately 52% of adult transplant recipients with cryptococcosis have had prior exposure to cryptococcal infection. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that reactivation of latent infection may contribute significantly to the development of cryptococcosis in transplant recipients. Furthermore, these findings highlight the potential utility of serology in identifying transplant recipients at risk for cryptococcosis. We note that utility of this assay in predicting transplant recipients at risk for the development of cryptococcosis may be affected by several variables, including the prevalence of subclinical cryptococcal infection in the population and the type of immunosuppression used. We therefore recommend future studies to validate the utility of this approach.
S. Husain has received grant support from Astellas and Enzon and has received honoraria from Pfizer and Schering Plough for speaking. K. Pursell serves on the speaker's bureau for Merck. N. Singh has received grant support from Schering Plough, Astellas, and Enzon and is on the speaker's bureau for Pfizer. There are no conflicts of interest for the other authors.
Published ahead of print on 24 October 2007. ![]()
Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript and should both be considered first authors. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»