Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, October 2007, p. 1307-1310, Vol. 14, No. 10
1071-412X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00114-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, QLD, Australia
Received 9 March 2007/ Returned for modification 15 May 2007/ Accepted 30 July 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
An alternative, non-serum-derived positive control that overcomes these disadvantages would be greatly beneficial for routine inclusion in commercial ELISA kits. Such a reagent must fulfill two essential criteria: it must specifically bind to a particular antigen, and it must contain epitopes recognized by the enzyme-conjugated antihuman antibody used to generate the assay end point.
Chimeric antibodies containing variable regions cloned from specific mouse hybridomas and constant regions obtained from human peripheral blood lymphocytes satisfy these requirements. Chimeric antibodies were shown to be useful positive controls in an ELISA for Toxoplasma gondii (2). We have furthered this concept using our chimerization techniques reported previously (4) and show here its application in an ELISA for the diagnosis of rickettsia scrub typhus.
Rickettsia scrub typhus results from infection with Orientia tsutsugamushi, a bacterium transmitted to humans by bites from Leptotrombidium mite larvae. Patients with this infection present with the nonspecific symptoms of fever, headache, muscle aches, and rash, while the characteristic eschars (scabbing) are not seen in all patients (7). Thus, the disease is often misdiagnosed in patients with diseases with similar symptoms and is incorrectly treated with penicillin, to which O. tsutsugamushi is resistant, allowing progression of the disease to more serious conditions. Therefore, assays which specifically diagnose scrub typhus are very useful, and an antibody ELISA is a practical format for use in regions where facilities and trained personnel may be limited.
O. tsutsugamushi expresses a 56-kDa protein in its cell envelope which is recognized by antibodies present in the serum of patients and of experimentally immunized animals (6). A recombinant version of this protein (r56) (1) is used as the capture antigen in the commercially available rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG and group IgM ELISA kits (Panbio, Brisbane, Australia). Therefore, the chimeric antibody that we have tested in this assay contains r56-specific mouse-derived variable regions and human constant regions for recognition by the enzyme-conjugated signal antibody.
|
|
|---|
Purification of chimeric IgG. To harvest chimeric IgG for purification, four flasks of 30-ml stable cell line cultures at 2 x 105 cells/ml were incubated with shaking for 7 days at 37°C. The supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 250 x g for 3 min at ambient temperature and were then passed through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter. Purification of chimeric IgG was performed with a 1-ml HiTrap protein G Sepharose column (Amersham Biosciences, Sydney, Australia), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Quantitation of chimeric IgG. The purified IgG preparation was quantitated by an in-house ELISA. Microtiter plates coated with a goat anti-human IgG antibody were obtained from a dengue virus capture IgG ELISA kit (Panbio). A standard curve was produced for each assay run by using known concentrations of purified IgG from human serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) as the standard. Standards and samples were detected by using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-human IgG and tetramethylbenzidine substrate (both obtained from the rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG ELISA kit [Panbio]). After quantitation, the purified preparation was diluted twofold in control serum diluent (CSD; Panbio) to enhance its stability.
Titration of chimeric IgG. The chimeric IgG preparation was diluted in CSD to produce a series of concentrations down to 0.1 µg/ml. These were assayed, following the manufacturer's instructions, by using a rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG ELISA kit (Panbio), which uses immobilized r56 antigen to capture anti-r56 antibodies. Detection uses horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-human IgG and tetramethylbenzidine. The assay results were compared with those obtained with the kit's positive and cutoff calibrator controls. The purpose was to obtain preparations of the chimeric IgG which return results equivalent to those for the serum-derived controls, which could then be used as alternative controls.
Serial dilutions of both the serum-derived controls and the alternative chimeric controls were then prepared in CSD and assayed by using the rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG ELISA kit to determine if the dilutions of a non-serum-based preparation behave the same as dilutions of the serum reagents in the assay.
Cross-reactivity of serum standards and chimeric IgG. The positive control preparation of chimeric IgG was tested for its specificity toward the r56 antigen. Antigen-coated plates and their corresponding serum-derived controls were obtained from commercial ELISA kits used for the diagnosis of several infectious diseases (Panbio). Each plate was incubated with its corresponding control, with the rickettsia scrub typhus serum-derived controls, and with the chimeric anti-r56 IgG. Each control and the chimeric IgG were processed according to the ELISA kit instructions, and assay results were obtained as absorbance values at 450 nm.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Dilution series of purified chimeric IgG assayed by the rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG ELISA (Panbio) to determine concentrations which give assay results equivalent to those for the kit's serum-derived positive and cutoff calibrator controls. These were calculated by using the equation for the sigmoidal dose-response curve and the A450 values of the kit controls.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Dilution curves for rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG ELISA results for the current serum-derived kit controls and the alternative chimeric IgG controls. The chimeric IgG was prepared at initial concentrations which return ELISA results equivalent to those for the serum-derived positive and cutoff calibrator controls.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Cross-reactivities of the rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG ELISA controls and the r56-specific chimeric IgG with the immobilized capture antigens of several other infectious disease ELISA kits
|
|
|
|---|
We have determined the concentrations of chimeric mouse-human anti-r56 IgG which gave assay results equivalent to those for the serum-derived positive control and the cutoff calibrator and have shown that dilutions of these preparations made in CSD behave identically to the serum-derived reagents in the ELISA. This validates the use of purified recombinant chimeric antibodies as alternative positive control reagents, even though the matrix is not serum and is therefore different from the sample matrix. Additionally, we have studied the degradation of the chimeric IgG at elevated temperatures and predict that the preparation should remain stable for the shelf-life of an ELISA kit (nominally 15 months at 4°C for the rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG ELISA) (data not shown) (5).
Recombinant chimeric antibodies would be superior alternatives to serum-derived positive and cutoff calibrator controls for routine inclusion in ELISA kits, as they eliminate many of the disadvantages associated with serum-derived controls. The supply of serum-derived controls is finite, and so new batches must be obtained regularly from regions of the world where the disease is endemic. The chimeric antibodies, however, are expressed from a stable cell line, allowing consistent and continuous production. This also avoids the ethical problems associated with the collection of serum from individuals who are unwell and safety issues involving the handling of potentially infectious material.
The serum-derived controls from the rickettsia scrub typhus group IgG ELISA kit were found to cross-react with antigens from several other infectious agents. The serum is collected from several individuals with known O. tsutsugamushi infection and pooled; therefore, the batch contains a mixed population of antibodies reflecting the immune status of each individual. Therefore, it is conceivable that the positive control serum contains antibodies against many other antigens. This cross-reactivity will differ between each batch of control material collected. This is not a problem for the performance of each individual assay, as the controls are intended for use only with the corresponding kit. However, in a clinical laboratory that is processing several different assays at high throughput, the potential use of the incorrect standard may not be detected if it cross-reacts with the antigen. This will cause errors in the assay cutoff values, potentially leading to false-positive or false-negative results. The chimeric anti-r56 IgG is a monoclonal preparation which showed no cross-reactivity with the other antigens tested. Therefore, the chimeric antibody is a more reliable, safe, and consistent positive control.
By using the same principles described here, chimeric antibodies with specificity toward many different antigens can be created, making the procedures described in this study applicable to the production of alternative controls for other commercial ELISA kits. The human constant regions are cloned and ready for chimerization to specific variable-region cDNA, which can be isolated from hybridomas secreting specific antibodies, if they are available. The manufacturers of diagnostic kits may wish to outsource the creation of chimeric antibody DNA constructs and stable cell lines. The chimeric antibodies can then be expressed and purified in-house, providing a constant supply of consistent control reagents. Thus, the initial high cost of creating the antibodies will be offset by eliminating the high costs and risks associated with sourcing, transporting, and standardizing serum-derived reagents.
Portions of this study were jointly supported financially by an Australian Research Council Linkage grant and Panbio.
Published ahead of print on 8 August 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»