Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, September 2006, p. 1052-1056, Vol. 13, No. 9
1071-412X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00144-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institute for Tropical Medicine Pedro Kouri, Autopista Novia del Mediodía, Km 6, La Lisa, Apdo 601, Marianao 13, Havana 11300, Cuba,1 Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Apdo 6162, Cubanacan, Playa, Havana 10600, Cuba,2 Center for the Study of Synthetic Antigens, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la Habana, Havana 10400, Cuba3
Received 16 April 2006/ Returned for modification 9 June 2006/ Accepted 14 July 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hib conjugate vaccines are produced largely by methods based on fermentation/isolation of the natural capsular Hib polysaccharide prior to conjugation. Recently, a new alternative strategy in the fight against Hib infections was proposed, with the development of a synthetic methodology amenable to the large-scale manufacture of Hib polysaccharide fragments. The resulting conjugate vaccine incorporating a synthetic bacterial antigen was demonstrated to be as safe and immunogenic for humans as already-licensed vaccines incorporating the native polysaccharide. This vaccine (Quimi-Hib) was recently approved in Cuba and is now part of the country's National Immunization Program (24).
As part of the clinical evaluation of the investigational vaccine, leading to its registration in Cuba in 2003, two phase I clinical trials were conducted in healthy adult volunteers to assess the safety and preliminary immunogenicity of the Quimi-Hib vaccine candidate. This article will discuss the major results obtained from this initial clinical evaluation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The two vaccine presentations were prepared by following the good manufacturing practice established at the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology and at the Center for the Study of Synthetic Antigens, Havana, Cuba (24). The following investigational lots of the test vaccine were prepared for the purpose of these trials: for N1, vaccine lots 1019E, 1016E, 1017E, and 1024E, and for N2, vaccine lots 1021E and 1022E, with aluminum phosphate AP 1003T.
A licensed, commercially available vaccine (Vaxem-Hib from Chiron) was used as a control. This vaccine is composed of oligosaccharide fragments obtained from the capsular polysaccharide by acid hydrolysis, coupled to the cross-reacting mutant 197 (CRM197) carrier protein and adsorbed on either aluminum hydroxide (vaccine lot 3581) or phosphate (vaccine lot 0101).
Study design. The clinical protocol was first approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Tropical Medicine Institute Pedro Kouri (IPK) and then peer reviewed and approved by the National Regulatory Authority (CECMED) from Havana, Cuba.
Two phase I clinical trials (studies 1 and 2) were conducted on a double blind basis in accordance with good clinical practice (national regulations and ICH E6) and the principles of the Helsinki declaration. A total of 40 subjects were enrolled in each study and randomly assigned to four groups by using a standard table of random numbers. The participants were all healthy males between 20 and 35 years old and without history of chronic disease or vaccination with Hib vaccine. In study 1, the participants were admitted to the special unit at the Institute for Tropical Medicine Pedro Kouri hospital and remained there for 72 h after immunization. In study 2, the participants were asked to remain in surveillance for 3 h after immunization. All subjects provided written informed consent.
In the first trial (study 1, August to September 2001), using 40 volunteers, the investigational vaccine N1 (groups A, B, and D) was compared to a control vaccine (group C) that was in use in Cuba at that time (Vaxem-Hib, mixed with aluminum hydroxide just before use).
In the second phase I trial (study 2, March to April 2002), using 40 volunteers, the investigational vaccine N2 (groups G and H) was compared to the control vaccine (group E; Vaxem-Hib, adsorbed on aluminum phosphate). An additional group (F) received the reference vaccine N1 for comparison.
In both studies, the volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four groups, and each group received a single dose of one of the vaccines, i.e., either the control vaccine (Vaxem-Hib) or different production batches of the Quimi-Hib candidate vaccine, adsorbed on aluminum phosphate or without adjuvant. Each subject received a single injection in the deltoid muscle with 0.5 ml of the investigational or control vaccine. Blood samples were collected for antibody measurement and clinical laboratory testing, at the time of vaccination and 1 month later. Antibody response was measured according to the methods described below. The collected sera were separated and stored at 20°C until use for analysis.
Safety and reactogenicity. Acute safety data were obtained from reports of local and systemic adverse events. The adverse events detected were erythema, inflammation, swelling, local pain on the injection site, temperature, headache, and general uneasiness. The volunteers were carefully observed for 72 h after the immunization. The temperatures of the injection sites and of the body as well as other reactions were monitored by a medically credentialed provider or nurse, before and every 2 h after injection, over a period of 12 h. Clinical laboratory tests (hematological panel, hepatic, and renal functions) were performed only during study 1.
Antibody assays. The following assays were performed.
(i) ELISA. Immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgG, and IgM anti-PRP antibodies in pre- and postvaccination sera were determined using a slightly modified version of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) previously published (17). The coating antigen used was HbOHA (supplied by NIBSC, Potters Bar, United Kingdom). In the second study, only IgG antibodies were measured. A standard curve was generated by using reference serum (lot 1983; Center for Biological Evaluation and Review, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD) with a calculated Ig antibody concentration. The immunoglobulin concentrations were logarithmically transformed, and the geometric-mean concentrations were calculated (5, 10).
(ii) Antibody specificity. The specificities of the antibodies were evaluated by inhibition studies with the same ELISA. The sera used were diluted to an optical density of up to 1 and then incubated separately overnight with a serial dilution of the natural capsular polysaccharide of Hib (PRP; supplied by NVI, Biltjoven, The Netherlands), starting at a concentration of 0.5 µg/ml. The geometric means of the PRP concentrations inhibiting 50% of the ELISA were compared for different groups.
(iii) Relative antibody avidity. The relative avidities of antibodies were measured only for serum samples from study 1, by using the above-described ELISA, with slight modifications.
The serum dilution was chosen to obtain an optical density of 1. After the plates were washed, the serum dilution was incubated with concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 M of ammonium thiocyanate. The plates were then allowed to stand for 15 min at room temperature before being washed, and the assay was continued as described above. The avidity index (AI) was calculated by the formula AI = C x
, where C is the concentration of ammonium thiocyanate destabilizing 50% of the antigen-antibody interaction and
is the dilution factor of serum (4). The avidity index was logarithmically transformed, and both the geometric mean and the standard deviations were calculated.
SBA. The complement-mediated bactericidal activities of the antibodies elicited in the first study's volunteers were measured by using a serum bactericidal assay (4, 18). The final reaction mixture contained different dilutions of the test serum samples that had been heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min, with 0.15 mmol/liter of calcium chloride, 0.50 mmol/liter of magnesium chloride, 12.5 µl of an 8 x 103/ml log-phase Hib cell suspension (strain Eagan), and 25% of agammaglobulinemic serum as the complement source. Serum bactericidal activity (SBA) titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution that resulted in the killing of 50% of the initial inoculum at 30 min.
Statistical analysis.
The geometric means for the groups in each study were compared using the t test. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used when appropriate to compare the proportions of both adverse reactions and the proportions of volunteers who attained
4-fold increases in antibody titers in different groups. Overall effect measures were calculated using risk ratios for 95% confidence intervals. The statistical computer program SPSS 10.00 was used for the statistical analysis.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Safety and reactogenicity. There were no serious local or systemic reactions in either study. All the reactions observed were slight, transient, self-limiting in time, without lasting more than 72 h after the administration of the vaccine, and resolved without medical intervention. The adverse reactions after injection are listed in Table 1. None of the local reactions was debilitating or prolonged. There was no significant difference in symptoms between the vaccinated groups, except for group D in the first study, where only one subject presented fever above 38°C, slight headache, and general uneasiness. The subject later developed a respiratory infection that was not related to the vaccination effects. In addition, all subjects from study 1 showed normal values for hematological, hepatic, and renal parameters.
|
|
Immunoglobulin class composition. The IgA and IgM anti-PRP antibody responses from study 1 are shown in Table 3. Preimmunization levels of IgA and IgM were similar in the four vaccine groups. The different vaccines elicited increases in all three immunoglobulin classes; the highest levels and greatest increase (n-fold) were observed for the IgG isotype, with more moderate increases in IgM and IgA levels. There were no differences in postimmunization levels for the three immunoglobulin classes (P > 0.05).
|
|
Bactericidal activity. As can be seen in Table 4, the sera of the subjects immunized with Quimi-Hib or with the control vaccine displayed bactericidal activity. An increase in the bactericidal activities of the sera was reached after the administration of a single vaccine dose for each group of volunteers.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We developed a new, improved procedure for the synthesis of H. influenzae type b oligosaccharide fragments, leading to additional possibilities for vaccine production (24). The synthetic antigen conjugated to tetanus toxoid was further investigated as a vaccine candidate against Hib. The initial pharmaceutical presentation that was available for testing with humans consisted of the phosphate buffer solution of the conjugate without any additive. This was tested in the first clinical trial described herein. A second pharmaceutical presentation was later developed. It consists of two separated vials, each with a one-half volume of material. One vial contained a phosphate buffer solution of the conjugate and the other one a phosphate buffer solution of the aluminum phosphate adjuvant. The contents of both vials were mixed just before use. This latter presentation was the one evaluated in the second trial.
In the first trial, a total of 30 of the 40 adult volunteers enrolled received for the first time the investigational vaccine containing the synthetic Hib antigen. Therefore, all participants were admitted to the hospital special unit during the first 72 h after injection. They were also submitted to a very rigorous follow-up including hematological, renal, and hepatic parameters. As a result, we observed an excellent safety profile, very similar to that observed for the control vaccine.
The safety profile for the pharmaceutical formulation containing aluminum phosphate was assessed in the second clinical trial. As can be seen in Table 1, a very good safety profile was observed for all groups included in the study. No significant differences were observed between the two formulations for the group receiving the investigational vaccines and the control group.
Although the adults' immune responses to the conjugate vaccine could not be extrapolated to infants, the characterization of the immune responses in both studies was an essential initial step before further vaccine testing in children and infants was allowed.
In most volunteers, antibodies to the capsular polysaccharide of Hib are regularly present in the serum before vaccination (10, 21). They are produced as a response to nasopharyngeal colonization by Hib. It is not clear to what extent cross-reacting bacteria, such as Escherichia coli K100, account for this natural immunization (12, 20).
The investigational and control vaccines elicited an increase in IgG anti-PRP over preinjection levels in a high number of volunteers, as shown in Table 2. Similar responses in adults injected with other conjugate vaccines have been reported (6, 9, 11, 19). A single dose of a synthetic conjugated polysaccharide vaccine against Hib also induces increases in anti-PRP IgM and IgA antibodies. The increment is more pronounced for IgG, as expected for a typical secondary immune response (Table 3).
The present study is the first evaluation of a synthetic conjugate vaccine against Hib in humans. The control vaccine used in both trials is composed of conjugated PRP oligosaccharides with similar structures but obtained from the native polysaccharide. Therefore, it was interesting to characterize the IgG anti-PRP antibodies in more detail and to compare them with the antibodies elicited by the control vaccine. Generally, the immune responses elicited by the vaccines had the same behavior regardless of the presence of the synthetic-oligosaccharide moiety attached to the protein carrier.
In a series of experiments with natural capsular Hib polysaccharide used as an inhibitor, we demonstrated the specificities of the antibodies elicited by the vaccine under study. The sera obtained from all groups were very specific, as shown in the inhibition index observed (Table 4).
Avidity is more likely than intrinsic affinity to have biologic relevance in understanding the protective capacity of antibody (5). Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the avidities of the antibodies elicited in adults after vaccination with the Quimi-Hib vaccine. An important finding was that both Quimi-Hib and the control vaccine elicited serum anti-PRP antibodies of similar average avidities.
Finally, the functional capacity of antibodies in vitro was assessed by using a bactericidal assay. Significant increases in dilutions of serum-killing Hib bacteria were observed in all groups, with no differences between them.
The excellent safety profile and the preliminary antibody responses in the adults observed during these studies were determinant factors in encouraging further clinical evaluations in children and infants (24).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We gratefully recognize J. L. DiFabio (PAHO) for many helpful discussions and support, M. Beurret (NVI, Biltjoven, The Netherlands) for providing the native PRP, and J. B. Robbins (NIH) for providing the Hib Eagan strain.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. | Infect. Immun. |
|---|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | J. Virol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |