Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, June 2006, p. 678-683, Vol. 13, No. 6
1071-412X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00015-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of General Dentistry,1 Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology,2 Center of Excellence in Oral and Craniofacial Biology, Louisiana State University School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana 701193
Received 6 January 2006/ Returned for modification 15 March 2006/ Accepted 8 April 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been postulated that protection against OPC is multifactorial, albeit primarily dependent on a threshold level of blood CD4+ T cells (usually 200 cells/µl). Below the CD4+ cell threshold, systemic Th1-type cell-mediated immunity is no longer protective and protection becomes dependent on several locally associated immune mechanisms (9), including Th cytokines in saliva, epithelial cell anti-Candida activity, and the local presence of CD8+ T cells. The major lymphocyte population in OPC lesions is
ß T-cell receptor-positive CD8+ T cells that accumulate at the epithelium-lamina propria interface within OPC lesions but at a considerable distance from the site of infection at the outer epithelium (21). The increased levels of CD8+ cells at this junction is associated with higher levels of mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 in OPC+ tissue, indicating cellular migration from the peripheral circulation rather than proliferation within the tissue. On the other hand, decreased levels of tissue-associated E-cadherin are consistent with the inability of CD8+ organisms to migrate further through the epithelium to Candida organisms at the outer epithelium, resulting in cellular accumulation (21).
The purpose of this study was to explore the immune status of the CD8+ T cells located at the epithelium-lamina propria interface of the oral tissue during episodes of OPC.
|
|
|---|
Diagnosis of OPC and detection of oral yeast colonization. The diagnosis of OPC and detection of oral yeast colonization were described previously (22, 25). Briefly, diagnosis of OPC was made on the basis of the clinical appearance of the oral mucosa, i.e., red, atrophic areas (erythematous) or white, curd-like plaques (pseudomembranous). To confirm the presence of Candida in each biopsy sample taken, the specific site was swabbed and cultured. Oral swabs were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and CHROMagar (CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France). Identification of OPC was further confirmed by Candida hyphae or blastoconidia present on a wet-mount slide preparation with potassium hydroxide (KOH), a positive swab culture with characteristic colony morphology, and a silver stain of the tissue section from the lesions, as previously described (22). Initial identification to the species level was done by screening for a color reaction on CHROMagar. Green colonies, representing probable C. albicans, were processed for germ tube formation, and nongreen colonies were further identified to the species level by API biochemical tests (API ID 32C; BioMérieux, Durham, NC). Only those patients with pseudomembranous OPC were included in the subcohort because of the extremely small number of erythematous OPC cases, as well as the difference in the site of infection that would not allow appropriate comparisons. Of the OPC+ subjects in the subcohort (n = 10), lesions from six patients were identified as having C. albicans exclusively. Of the remaining four patients, lesions from three patients were positive for both C. albicans and C. glabrata and the other patient was positive for C. albicans and C. krusei. These data were comparable to our previous study (22).
Specimen collection and processing. (i) Biopsy. Collection of buccal mucosa biopy samples was done as described previously (22). For immunohistochemistry analysis, tissue sections (5 µm) were collected on glass slides, fixed in ice-cold acetone (5 min), and stored at 20°C.
(ii) PBLs. Venous blood (10 ml) was collected, and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were isolated by differential centrifugation with Ficoll-Paque (Amersham Biosciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ). Cells were pelleted on slides by cytospin and used for controls in immunohistochemistry analysis.
Antibodies. The antibodies used for immunohistochemical staining were monoclonal mouse anti-human CD8 (DAKO Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA), CD28 (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), CD27 (BD Biosciences Pharmingen), CD161 (natural killer [NK] T-cell marker; BD Biosciences Pharmingen), CD103 (vascular cell adhesion molecule [VCAM]; Serotec Inc., Raleigh, NC), CD45RA (Serotec Inc.), CD40L (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), CD62L (BD Biosciences Pharmingen), and CCR7 (BD Biosciences Pharmingen) antibodies with the appropriate isotype control antibody (mouse immunoglobulin G [IgG1]; DAKO Cytomation); monoclonal mouse anti-human CD45RO (Serotec Inc.), CD40 (Serotec Inc.), CD69 (Serotec Inc.), and CD152 (CTLA-4; Serotec Inc.) antibodies with the appropriate isotype control antibody (mouse IgG2a; Serotec Inc.); and monoclonal rat anti-human CD8 (Serotec Inc.) antibody with the appropriate isotype control antibody (rat IgG2b; Serotec Inc.).
Immunohistochemistry analysis. Immunohistochemical staining of buccal mucosa with chromogen and fluorescence has been previously described, as was hematoxylin-and-eosin staining (22).
Briefly, for chromogen staining, serial sections were rehydrated, blocked with various blocking reagents, and incubated with primary antibodies (1 µg/ml to 50 µg/ml), followed by the appropriate anti-mouse (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or anti-rat (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) biotinylated IgG secondary antibody (5 µg/ml). Finally, washed slides were incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (R&D Systems), washed, and developed with the substrate 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole chromogen (R&D Systems). Mayer's hematoxylin (Fisher Diagnostics, Fair Lawn, NJ) was used to counterstain. Slides were preserved by using Crystal Mount aqueous mounting medium solution (Biomedia, Foster City, CA). For dual-color fluorescence, serial sections were treated in ice-cold acetone, blocked with blocking solution, and incubated with the first primary antibody (2 µg/ml to 20 µg/ml), followed by the appropriate biotinylated IgG secondary antibody (5 µg/ml; Vector Laboratories, Inc.), and then incubated with streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 488 (green; 20 µg/ml; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). For the second label, slides were incubated with the second primary antibody (2 µg/ml to 20 µg/ml), followed by secondary antibody labels as described above and stained with streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 555 (red; 20 µg/ml; Invitrogen). Washed slides were rinsed with water, dried at 4°C, and preserved with Vectashield Hard Set mounting medium for fluorescence assay (Vector Laboratories). Slides were viewed on an E600 microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY) with Nikon B-2E/C and G-2E/C filter blocks. Colocalization was determined by image overlay.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Analysis of the memory phenotype of CD8+ cells in OPC lesions. Representative images of tissues from six OPC+ HIV+ persons are shown. A, CD8; B, CD45RO; C, CD45RA. Magnification, x100. Arrows point to positively labeled cells.
|
![]() View larger version (108K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Identification of memory T-cell subtype in OPC lesions. CD27 expression on CD8+ T cells was evaluated in OPC+ tissue with cell accumulation. Representative images of tissues from seven OPC+ HIV+ persons are shown. Panels A and B are images of chromogen-stained CD8+ and CD27+ cells in OPC+ persons, respectively. Original magnification, x100. Arrows point to positively labeled cells. Panel C shows CD8+ cells labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (green) and CD27 receptors labeled with Alexa Fluor 555 (red). Original magnification, x200.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Further analysis of central memory CD8+ T cells in OPC lesions from HIV-positive persons. OPC+ tissue with accumulated CD8+ T cells was labeled with CCR7 and CD62L. Representative images of tissues from five HIV+ OPC+ persons are shown. A, CD8; B, CCR7; C, CD62L. Magnification, x100. Arrows point to positive staining.
|
![]() View larger version (84K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Analysis of immune activation in tissue. Tissue was evaluated for CD40 in both OPC and OPC+ tissues of HIV-positive patients. Representative images of OPC tissue (panel A) from four HIV+ persons and OPC+ tissue with accumulated CD8+ T cells (panel B) from seven HIV+ patients are shown. Original magnification, x100. Arrows point to positively stained tissue.
|
![]() View larger version (127K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Analysis of CD8+ T-cell activation in OPC+ tissue from HIV-positive patients. CD69 expression was evaluated in tissue from three HIV+ OPC patients and in tissue with accumulated CD8+ T cells from three HIV+ OPC+ patients. Representative images of OPC (panels A and B) and OPC+ (panels C and D) tissues stained for CD8 (panels A and C) and CD69 (panels B and D) expression are shown. Original magnification, x100. Arrows point to areas of positively stained cells.
|
20%) colocalization of CD8 and CD40L (data not shown). NK T cells in OPC+ tissue. To examine whether the accumulated CD8+ T cells were NK T cells that expressed CD8 (3), serial sections of OPC+ tissue were labeled with anti-CD161 antibodies. Results in Fig. 6 show little to no positive staining for CD161 (panel B), despite the presence of numerous CD8+ cells (panel A).
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Analysis of NK T cells in OPC+ tissue from HIV-positive persons. CD161 expression was evaluated in tissue with accumulated CD8+ T cells from six HIV+ OPC+ patients. Representative images of tissue stained for CD8 (panel A) and CD161 (panel B) are shown. Original magnification, x100. Arrows point to positively stained cells.
|
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Evaluation of VCAM-1 expression on CD8+ T cells in OPC lesions. CD106 expression was evaluated in tissue with CD8+ T-cell accumulation from seven HIV+ OPC+ patients. Representative images are shown. Panels A and B are images of tissue chromogen stained for CD8 and CD106, respectively. Original magnification, x100. Arrows point to positively stained areas. (C) CD8+ cells were labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (green), and CD106 receptors were labeled with Alexa Fluor 555 (red). Original magnification, x200.
|
|
|
|---|
Most of the CD8+ T cells in OPC+ tissue with accumulated CD8+ cells expressed the CD45RO memory T-cell marker rather than the CD45RA "naive" T-cell marker, consistent with memory T cells being present from prior exposure to Candida as a commensal organism. Further characterization of the memory phenotype for the CD8+ cells demonstrated a high percentage of accumulated CD8+ cells expressing CD27. These results suggest that the accumulated CD8+ cells in tissue from OPC lesions are "central" memory cells usually restricted to secondary lymphoid tissue that were recruited to the mucosa in response to the candidal infection. Humphreys et al., who conducted a similar characterization of CD8+ T cells in Haemophilus ducreyi skin lesions, showed a predominance of CD27 (effector memory) CD8+ T cells more appropriately found at mucosal sites (13). Interestingly, additional analyses of OPC+ tissue with two additional markers for central memory cells (CCR7 and CD62L) revealed that the same majority of CD8+ cells lacked CCR7 and CD62L, suggestive of an apparent mixed phenotype with properties of both central and effector memory cells. Given this, several explanations are possible. One is that the cells are indeed effector memory cells, despite the surface expression of CD27, but cannot function because of their reduced migration from the decreased E-cadherin within the tissue. Another is that since the CD8+ T-cell response to Candida infection is not a classic cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response (Candida is not an intracellular pathogen), the cells may represent central memory cells with an atypical mixed phenotype that similarly cannot migrate to the outer epithelium because of reduced tissue E-cadherin. Yet a third explanation is that the cells are effector memory cells in a transitioning phase and are reverting back to central memory cells (regaining CD27) because they have not been able to conduct any effector function because of the lack of an ability to migrate to Candida at the outer epithelium. We favor the latter explanation, but a longitudinal study where these memory cell markers, as well as E-cadherin expression, can be evaluated before, during, and after infection will be important to determine which, if any, of these explanations is correct. Evaluation of additional marker expression may also help clarify the cellular phenotype. Killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1) represents another effector memory marker, while CD57 and CD127 are markers for replicative senescence and longevity, respectively, on effector memory cells (14). If the effector phenotype is dominating, the evaluation of these markers will be useful and possibly provide clues regarding function.
The accumulated CD8+ T cells present within OPC lesions appear to be immune activated. Evidence for this comes from the upregulation of CD40 within the tissue and CD69 expression on the CD8+ T cells. The CD40 expression in the tissue likely comes from antigen-presenting cells (12). We also attempted to evaluate CD40L and CTLA-4 on the CD8+ cells in these studies, but results demonstrated little to no expression. This may be a function of the cellular phenotype where CD40L and CTLA-4 are expressed more on CD4+ than on CD8+ T cells (26), which was confirmed by analyzing PHA-activated PBLs. The costimulatory molecule CD28 is also a useful marker for activation, but similar to CD40L and CTLA-4 in tissue, the CD8+ cells had little to no detectable expression of CD28. This is expected, though, since activated CD8+ T cells in HIV-infected persons have been shown to lose CD28 expression during progression of disease (2, 24).
Taken together, the evidence indicates that, despite these nuances, CD8+ T cells are activated as one would expect of memory T cells recruited in response to infection. Although the increased expression of the adhesion molecule mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (21) suggests that, indeed, the CD8+ T cells were recruited to the tissue from the peripheral circulation, it is also possible, on the basis of the atypical phenotype, that the cells are resident mucosal cells expanded within the tissue. In relation to this concept, studies have shown that some CD8+ T cells in mucosal tissues are actually NK T cells on the basis of their expression of CD161 (3, 15). Such cells provide innate surveillance at mucosal sites to protect against infectious breeches. Thus, despite the memory phenotype, but taking into account a lack of evidence for Candida antigen specificity, it was reasonable to investigate for the presence of NK T cells. However, the lack of CD161 expression on the cells significantly reduces this possibility. This also provides additional evidence for cellular recruitment rather than resident mucosal cellular expansion.
Finally, on the basis of a study by Diaz et al. showing that peripheral anti-HIV CD8+ T cells present in HIV-infected persons could be identified by the unlikely expression of surface VCAM-1, a cell adhesion molecule found on endothelial cells (6), it was reasonable to evaluate this phenotype in CD8+ cells in OPC. If so, CD8+ T cells could be present because of HIV infection and not Candida infection. However, it appears that the cells are not part of the HIV response repertoire on the basis of the absence of cellular VCAM-1, although tissue expression of VCAM-1 served as a representative positive control.
On the basis of our present data, as well as our prior data (21, 22), the lesion-associated CD8+ T cells appear to be normal relative to their activation and presence within the tissue. The issue of a central versus an effector memory phenotype remains unclear, but this interesting finding may be a function of the response to Candida and/or the cells being inhibited from migrating further in the tissue to function against Candida. The evidence for activation status is somewhat limited or atypical, but this is not uncommon for CD8+ T cells. Future studies will attempt to evaluate the effector function of CD8+ T cells. We may identify an interesting scenario with atypical memory cells having an atypical or nonclassical effector function against Candida. Indeed, Beno et al. have shown that interleukin-2 (IL-2)-activated CD8+ mouse splenocytes are capable of inhibiting the growth of Candida in a non-major histocompatibility complex-restricted manner (1) and a similar population of cells was identified in PBLs of HIV+ persons with a recent episode of OPC (5). This is entirely possible given that IL-2 is increased within OPC lesions along with IL-15 and gamma interferon, among other cytokines and chemokines (19).
Taken together, the evidence indicates that tissue adhesion molecules (E-cadherin), and not CD8+ T cells, appear to be a major factor in susceptibility to OPC with reduced tissue-associated E-cadherin as a dysfunction contributing to OPC in those HIV+ persons with low CD4+ T-cell levels. Current studies are evaluating tissue-associated E-cadherin and the memory phenotype of CD8+ T cells in a longitudinal analysis. These and future studies will shed considerable light on the function of CD8+ T cells against Candida and the immune factors and mechanisms associated with susceptibility to OPC when CD4+ T cells are not available.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»