CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Author's Correction for Marques et al., Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 12 (9) 1036-1040.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marques, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Philipp, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marques, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Philipp, M. T.

 Previous Article

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, February 2006, p. 307, Vol. 13, No. 2
1071-412X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.13.2.307.2006

AUTHOR'S CORRECTION

Detection of Immune Complexes Is Not Independent of Detection of Antibodies in Lyme Disease Patients and Does Not Confirm Active Infection with Borrelia burgdorferi

Adriana R. Marques, Ronald L. Hornung, Len Dally, and Mario T. Philipp

Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland; Clinical Services Program, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 21702;
The EMMES Corporation, Rockville, Maryland; and Tulane National Primate Research Center,
Tulane University Health Sciences Center, Covington, Louisiana

Volume 12, no. 9, p. 1036-1040, 2005. In reviewing the data, we realized that the concentrations of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM in immune complexes were erroneously multiplied by a factor of 6, and we consequently overreported by this factor.

Page 1039, column 1, line 2: "111.69 mg/dl" should read "18.6 mg/dl."

Page 1039, column 1, line 3: "103.82 mg/dl" should read "17.3 mg/dl."

Page 1039, column 1, lines 9 and 10: "558.5 mg/dl" should read "93 mg/dl," and "519 mg/dl" should read "86.5 mg/dl."

Page 1039, column 1: Lines 10-12 should read as follows. "Therefore, the IgM values in the PEG-ICs were decreased by a factor of almost 2 while the IgG values were diminished 11-fold from the respective serum values."

Page 1039, column 2: Lines 4-11 should read as follows. "This possibility could explain the cases where positive PEG-IC test results occur in the face of a negative serum ELISA result."

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, February 2006, p. 307, Vol. 13, No. 2
1071-412X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.13.2.307.2006





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marques, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Philipp, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marques, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Philipp, M. T.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS