Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Diaz, D. Articles by Pluschke, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Diaz, D. Articles by Pluschke, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, December 2006, p. 1314-1321, Vol. 13, No. 12
1071-412X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00254-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Use of the Immunodominant 18-Kilodalton Small Heat Shock Protein as a Serological Marker for Exposure to Mycobacterium ulcerans

Diana Diaz,¹ Heinz Döbeli,² Dorothy Yeboah-Manu,^1,3 Ernestina Mensah-Quainoo,⁴ Arno Friedlein,² Nicole Soder,² Simona Rondini,¹ Thomas Bodmer,⁵ and Gerd Pluschke^1*

Molecular Immunology, Swiss Tropical Institute, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland,¹ F. Hoffmann La-Roche, Ltd., CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland,² Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Legon, Ghana,³ Ghana Health Service, Tema District, Ghana,⁴ Institute for Infectious Diseases, Berne, Switzerland⁵

Received 12 July 2006/ Returned for modification 7 August 2006/ Accepted 22 September 2006

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
While it is well established that proximity to wetlands is a risk factor for contracting Buruli ulcer, it is not clear what proportion of a population living in an area where the etiologic agent, Mycobacterium ulcerans, is endemic is actually exposed to this disease. Immunological cross-reactivity among mycobacterial species complicates the development of a specific serological test. Among immunodominant proteins recognized by a panel of anti-M. ulcerans monoclonal antibodies, the M. ulcerans homologue of the M. leprae 18-kDa small heat shock protein (shsp) was identified. Since this shsp has no homologues in M. bovis and M. tuberculosis, we evaluated its use as a target antigen for a serological test. Anti-18-kDa shsp antibodies were frequently found in the sera of Buruli ulcer patients and of healthy household contacts but rarely found in controls from regions where the infection is not endemic. The results indicate that only a small proportion of M. ulcerans-infected individuals contract the clinical disease.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Buruli ulcer is a chronic necrotizing disease of skin and soft tissue caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans. The disease starts as a subcutaneous nodule, papule, or plaque that eventually ulcerates and progresses over months to years. After tuberculosis and leprosy, Buruli ulcer is the third most common mycobacterial infection in immunocompetent humans. The main burden of disease falls on children living in sub-Saharan Africa, but healthy people of all ages, races, and socioeconomic class are susceptible as well (2). Buruli ulcer has been reported in over 30 countries, mainly those with tropical and subtropical climates, but it may also occur in some countries where it has not yet been recognized. The full extent of the Buruli disease burden is unknown because this disease occurs primarily in remote and rural areas, but the numbers of cases reported in some countries of West Africa are substantial (5,700 cases between 1989 and 2003 in Benin, 17,000 cases between 1978 and 2003 in Côte d'Ivoire, and 5,619 cases in 1999 in Ghana).

In Buruli ulcer lesions, clumps of extracellular acid-fast organisms surrounded by areas of necrosis are often found in subcutaneous fat tissue (19). M ulcerans produces a family of macrolide toxin molecules, the mycolactones, which are associated with tissue destruction and local immunosuppression (13). In cell culture experiments, mycolactones produce apoptosis and necrosis in many human cell types (8, 14). The toxin appears to play a role in inhibiting the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the site of infection, which explains at least in part why inflammatory responses are poor in Buruli ulcer lesions (19). Downregulation of Th-1 responses may play a role in the progression of early Buruli ulcer disease (15-17, 34), but this may reverse in later stages (11). Intralesional influx of leukocytes and granulomatous responses in the dermis and panniculus has been reported in late stages of the disease (11, 18). Spontaneous healing can occur and is often accompanied by a conversion of the Burulin (M. ulcerans sonicate) skin test from negative to positive.

In spite of some degree of local and peripheral T-cell anergy, Buruli ulcer patients seem to be able to raise a humoral immune response against M. ulcerans antigens (15), and analysis of the serological responses to culture filtrate antigens of M. ulcerans has suggested that serological tests may be useful in the diagnosis and surveillance of the disease (9, 31). Broad antigenic cross-reactivity between mycobacterial species represents a major problem for the development of a serological test that is specific and sensitive enough to monitor immune responses against M. ulcerans in populations where exposure to M. tuberculosis and BCG vaccination is common.

We reasoned that the identification, recombinant expression, and immunological profiling of immunodominant proteins will provide target structures for analyzing protective immune mechanisms and for the development of a serological test suitable for detecting M. ulcerans exposure and/or disease. We describe here serological responses against a highly immunogenic 18-kDa small heat shock protein (shsp) of M. ulcerans which has no homologue in M. bovis and M. tuberculosis. Serological analysis indicates that this protein represents a suitable target antigen for monitoring exposure to M. ulcerans.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Mycobacterial isolates. The mycobacterial species included in the present study are M. abscessus (ATCC 19977), M. avium subsp. avium (MAC101), M. bohemicum (clinical isolate), M. bovis biovar BCG (ATCC 35734), M. chelonae (DSM 43804), M. fortuitum (ATCC 49403), M. gordonae (Pasteur 14021.001), M. haemophilum (ATCC 29548), M. intracellulare (clinical isolate), M. kansasii (NCTC 10268), M. lentiflavum (clinical isolate), M. malmoense (NCTC 11298), M. marinum (ATCC 927), M. scrofulaceum (Pasteur 14022.0031), M. simiae (clinical isolate), M. smegmatis (Pasteur 14133.0001), M. terrae (clinical isolate), M. tuberculosis (Pasteur 14001.0001), and M. leprae (kindly provided by P. J. Brennan). The M. ulcerans isolates of diverse geographical origin analyzed in the present study were from the Democratic Republic of Congo (5151), Angola (960657), Ghana (97-483), Australia (ITM 5147, ITM 9540, ITM 9550, and 94-1324), Mexico (ITM 5114), Malaysia (941328), French Guiana (ITM 7922), and Japan (ITM 8756). The mycobacteria were cultured as described previously (37).

Mycobacterial lysates and subcellular fractions. Mycobacterial cells were heat inactivated at 80°C for 1 h and suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (50 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride [pH 7.4]) containing 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 µg each of leupeptin and soybean trypsin inhibitor (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.)/ml. A total of 200 mg of cell suspension was subjected to a bead beater (Mikro-Dismembrator; Braun Biotech International) treatment with 400 µl of 0.1-mm zirconia beads (BioSpec Products) at 2,300 rpm for 15 min. Beads and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min. The protein content of the lysate was quantified by using a BCA protein assay (Pierce).

For the preparation of subcellular fractions, 400 mg of heat-inactivated M. ulcerans cells was suspended in 3 ml of PBS containing 0.1% Tween 80 and the proteinase inhibitor cocktail described above. The cells were broken by three cycles of ultrasonic disruption (Branson Sonifier 250) on ice for 10 min with 50% duty cycle and 40% output using a microtip probe. Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 3,000 x g for 10 min. A cell wall fraction was prepared from the supernatant by centrifugation at 27,000 x g for 1 h and was washed twice with PBS. The supernatant was subjected to centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 4 h; a cytosol fraction was obtained from the supernatant, and the membrane fraction was obtained from the pellet. The membrane fraction was washed with PBS and dialyzed against 0.01 M ammonium bicarbonate (3).

Western blot analysis. Mycobacterial lysates and subcellular fractions (10 µg of total protein/lane) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using 12% gels under reducing conditions in Laemmli buffer. The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) in Tris glycine buffer (25 mM Tris and 192 mM glycine [pH 8.3]). Filters were blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 overnight. Mouse sera or monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) diluted in blocking solution were incubated with the membranes for 2 h. Bound antibodies were detected by using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Sigma) as secondary antibodies and BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate)-nitroblue tetrazolium (Bio-Rad) as a substrate.

For the analysis of human sera, 1 µg of recombinant 18-kDa shsp of M. ulcerans was separated on SDS-12% PAGE preparative gels and transferred as described above. Human sera diluted 1:100 were incubated with the antigen strips for 1 h. These were washed five times with either nonstringent (0.15 M PBS [pH 7.2], 0.1% Tween 20) or stringent (0.3 M PBS [pH 7.2], 1% Tween 20) wash buffer. After incubation for 1 h with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated AffiniPure F(ab')₂ fragment goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories), BCIP-nitroblue tetrazolium (Bio-Rad) was used as a substrate.

Generation of MAbs. Hybridoma cell lines were generated as described previously (32) from mice immunized intraperitoneally three times with 20 µg of a lysate of the M. ulcerans strain 97-610 from Ghana formulated in MPL+TDM adjuvant (Sigma). Three days before cell fusion, mice received an intravenous booster injection with 20 µg of M. ulcerans lysate in PBS. Antibodies specific for M. ulcerans antigens were identified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using Immunolon 4 plates (Dynes Technologies, Inc., Chantilly, Va.) coated with M. ulcerans lysate. From the panel of hybridomas generated, Western blot analysis identified three (designated DD2.5, DD2.6, and DD3.6), that secreted MAbs specific for an 18-kDa protein.

Partial purification and identification of the MAb DD2.5/6/3.6 reactive protein. A total of 300 mg of heat-inactivated M. ulcerans cells (wet weight) was washed once with 1% sodium sarcosylate, washed five times with PBS, and dissolved in 20 ml of 8 M urea. After centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 30 min, the supernatant was applied onto a RP-8 HPLC column (Nucleosil 300-5 C8). The column was washed with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water and then eluted with a gradient of acetonitrile. After separation on a SDS-12% PAGE gel, a band with an apparent molecular mass of 18 kDa was excised and digested with trypsin as described previously (12). For nanoelectrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (MS), the peptides obtained were desalted and concentrated on POROS R2 reverse-phase material (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The peptides were then eluted with 60% acetonitrile in 5% formic acid directly into a nanoelectrospray capillary needle. Mass spectra were acquired on a QSTAR Pulsar i quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS-Sciex, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Proxeon, Odense, Denmark) as described previously (42). Fragmentation by tandem MS yielded a stretch of amino acid sequence, together with its location in the peptide (sequence tag). With this sequence tag information, appropriate protein databases were searched using MASCOT search software (Matrix Science, London, United Kingdom). These searches were not successful because the corresponding protein from M. ulcerans was not in the database. Therefore, the amino acid sequences of the peptides were determined (de novo tandem MS sequencing) to perform database searches based on sequence homology using FastA software (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI).

Sequence analysis of the M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp encoding gene. For sequence analysis, the 18-kDa shsp encoding gene was amplified by PCR using the primers 5'-CCATGGTGATGCGTACCGACCCG-3' and 5'-CTCGAGGGCTTCTATCACCTCAGG-3'. DNA was extracted as described previously (37), and amplifications were performed using the following profile: 5 min at 96°C; followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 96°C, 1 min at 63°C, and 1 min at 72°C; and finally by 7 min at 72°C. Amplicons were purified by using a PCR product purification kit (QIAGEN) and then sequenced by using an ABI Prism 310 genetic analyzer (Perkin-Elmer). All sequences were reconfirmed at least twice using independent PCR products.

Recombinant expression of the M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp. The M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp was recombinantly expressed in Escherichia coli as His-tagged fusion protein (M¹V²M³—A¹⁴⁹LEH₆), comprising the entire open reading frame of 149 codons with one amino acid exchange (L² to V²). Briefly, the 453-bp PCR product generated from genomic DNA of the Ghanaian M. ulcerans isolate ITM 97-483, using the primers described above, was digested with the restriction enzymes NcoI and XhoI and cloned into the pETBLUE2 vector using its NcoI and XhoI sites. Competent E. coli Tuner cells (pLac; Novagen) were transformed and expression of the fusion protein was induced by the addition of 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside; Calbiochem) for 4 h at 37°C. Cells were lysed on ice for 30 min with 8 M urea-0.1 M NaH₂PO₄-0.01 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). After centrifugation at 10,000 x g, the protein was purified from the supernatant by nitrilotriacetic acid column chromatography (QIAGEN) and subsequent reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography using a C8 column (Nucleosil 300-5 C; Agilent Technologies).

Immunization of mice with M. ulcerans r18-kDa shsp. Antiserum was obtained from mice immunized three times with 20 µg of M. ulcerans r18-kDa shsp formulated in the MPL+TDM adjuvant (Sigma).

Human sera and tissue lysates. Tissue specimens were taken from the IS2404 PCR-positive center and the PCR-negative margin of an excised Buruli ulcer lesion described by Rondini et al. (37). Samples of about 100 mg were heat inactivated at 80°C for 1 h, suspended in reducing Laemmli buffer (39), and subjected to bead beater treatment as described above. Sera from Buruli ulcer patients and household contacts residing in the Buruli ulcer-endemic Ga district of Ghana were collected after informed consent was obtained. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the local ethical review board of the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Legon, Ghana.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Interspecies cross-reactivity patterns of MAbs raised against a whole-cell lysate of M. ulcerans. To identify immunodominant antigens of M. ulcerans, mice were immunized with a complete lysate of the Ghanaian M. ulcerans strain 97-610. In Western blot analysis, the generated antisera exhibited cross-reactivity with a broad range of M. bovis and M. tuberculosis antigens (data not shown). In order to identify M. ulcerans antigens not present in these two mycobacterial pathogens, B-cell hybridomas were generated with spleen cells of the immunized mice. Although some of the obtained MAbs showed cross-reactivity with all 21 mycobacterial species tested, others were more selective (Fig. 1). The highest selectivity was observed with three MAbs, designated DD2.5, DD2.6, and DD3.6, which stained an M. ulcerans protein with an apparent molecular mass of 18 kDa. Although generated from two different mice, all three MAbs shared the same limited interspecies cross-reactivity pattern, i.e., they only reacted with M. chelonae, where a protein with an apparent mass of 20-kDa was recognized. In indirect immunofluorescence assays only M. ulcerans was stained by MAbs DD2.5, DD2.6, and DD3.6 (data not shown), indicating that cross-reactivity with M. chelonae was too low in affinity to be detectable in this assay. The MAbs stained an 18-kDa band in all 10 M. ulcerans isolates of different geographical origins tested (data not shown).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Western blot analysis of lysates of different mycobacterial species with MAbs DD3.4 (A) and DD3.7 (B). Lanes: 1, M. abscessus; 2, M. avium; 3, M. bohemicum; 4, M. fortuitum; 5, M. gordonae; 6, M. haemophilum; 7, M. intracellulare; 8, M. kansasii; 9, M. scrofulaceum; 10, M. malmoense; 11, M. lentiflavum; 12, M. simiae; 13, M. smegmatis; 14, M. terrae; 15, M. xenopi; 16, M. chelonae; 17, M. leprae; 18, M. ulcerans; 19, M. tuberculosis; 20, M. marinum; 21, M. bovis; 22, recombinant M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp. Although no reactivity with M. marinum ATCC 927 was observed, the M. marinum strain used for the genome project harbors an 18-kDa shsp gene that is nearly identical to the M. ulcerans gene.

Identification of the MAb DD2.5/2.6/3.6-reactive protein. For the identification of the MAb DD2.5/2.6/3.6-reactive 18-kDa protein, an M. ulcerans whole-cell lysate was fractionated by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography. Fractions in which the immune reactive protein was enriched were identified by Western blot analysis, the peak fractions were pooled, and the 18-kDa band was cut out from an SDS-PAGE gel loaded with the pooled material. The excised protein was analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization MS (Fig. 2). The three peptide sequences obtained matched sequence stretches (Table 1) of an M. leprae protein (Swiss-Prot:18kd_mycle) designated 18-kDa shsp (HSP 16.5) (5). An M. ulcerans homologue with 79% protein identity (Fig. 3) and 85% identity at the DNA sequence level was identified by homology search in the M. ulcerans genome project database (genopole.pasteur.fr/Mulc/BuruList.html). Codon analysis of the M. ulcerans gene predicted a functional open reading frame of 149 amino acids and a molecular mass of 16,556 Da. A gene bank BLAST search identified homologues of 18-kDa shsp in M. intracellulare, M. avium, and M. leprae with protein sequence identities of 79.5, 71.5, and 78.8%, respectively, and extensive interspecies diversity focused on the carboxyl terminus (Fig. 3). In contrast, no homologues are present in the M. tuberculosis and M. bovis genomes.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Analysis of the in-gel-digested band with an apparent molecular mass of 18 kDa. (A) Survey mass spectrum of the tryptic in-gel digest. The arrows indicate the doubly charged ion signals of the three peptides, which were sequenced de novo by tandem MS. (B) Tandem mass spectrum of the [M+2H]2+ precursor ion (m/z = 576.32) of peptide M1 (mass determined = 1,150.64 Da). The database search was performed with the singly charged fragment ions labeled y1 to y10.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Amino acid sequences of the M. ulcerans 18-kDa protein-derived peptides determined by de novo tandem MS sequencinga

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequences of the 18-kDa shsp of different mycobacterial species. Identity with the M. ulcerans reference sequence is indicated by dashes (-), deletions are indicated by a dot (.). Gray boxes indicate the positions of peptides identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight tandem MS. The GenBank accession numbers were as follows: M. leprae, AL583923; M. intracellulare, LI2240; and M. avium, AE017238.

To confirm the identification of the 18-kDa shsp as a target for MAbs DD2.5, DD2.6, and DD3.6, the complete coding sequence of the M. ulcerans homologue was expressed as carboxy-terminally hexahistidine-tagged fusion protein in E. coli. All three MAbs showed reactivity with the affinity-purified recombinant protein in Western blot analysis (data not shown).

Interspecies immunological cross-reactivity of the 18-kDa shsp was analyzed further by Western blot analysis with mouse antisera raised against the recombinant M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp. Like the three MAbs DD2.5, DD2.6, and DD3.6, all six antisera tested exhibited cross-reactivity with M. chelonae (Fig. 4). In addition, antisera cross-reacted with an 18-kDa M. leprae protein, which was only stained by MAbs DD2.5, DD2.6, and DD3.6 when they were used at very high (5 µg/ml) concentrations (data not shown). When a set of 10 overlapping synthetic 20mer peptides spanning the entire sequence of the M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp was tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, MAbs DD2.5, DD2.6, and DD3.6 showed no reactivity, and only some of the antisera bound weakly to the C-terminal peptide.

View larger version (6K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Western blot analysis of lysates of different mycobacterial species with mouse antisera raised against the recombinant M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp. The lane numbering of the samples is the same as for Fig. 1.

Sequence conservation, subcellular localization, and expression of the M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp in Buruli ulcer lesions. Only four single-nucleotide polymorphisms were detected when the 18-kDa shsp encoding genes of 10 M. ulcerans isolates of diverse geographical origin were compared by PCR amplification and DNA sequence analysis of PCR products (Fig. 3). Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms, one nonsynonymous (G/T⁴²⁴) and one synonymous (T/C³⁷⁴), distinguished the sequence of strain 7922 from French Guiana from that of the Ghanaian genome project reference strain Agy-99. Strain 8756 from Japan exhibited two synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (G/A²⁷⁸ and C/T³⁹⁵) with respect to the reference sequence. Sequences from the other eight M. ulcerans strains analyzed were identical with the Agy-99 reference sequence.

The MAb DD2.5/6/3.6-reactive band was primarily found in M. ulcerans cell wall fractions (Fig. 5A) but was undetectable in cytosol fractions (Fig. 5A) and in culture filtrate (not shown). The M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp was detectable in human tissue lysates from the center of excised Buruli ulcer lesions (Fig. 5B). No staining was observed in lysates from the healthy margins of the excised tissue (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. Western blot analysis of subcellular fractions and of M. ulcerans infected tissue with MAb DD3.6. (A) Lanes: 1, M. ulcerans lysate; 2, membrane fraction of M. ulcerans; 3, cytosol fraction of M. ulcerans; 4, cell wall fraction of M. ulcerans. (B) Lanes: 1, lysate of in vitro cultivated M. ulcerans cells; 2, human tissue lysate from the healthy margin of a Buruli ulcer lesion; 3, human tissue lysate from the center of a Buruli ulcer lesion.

Reactivity of human sera with the recombinant 18-kDa shsp of M. ulcerans. In Western blot analyses, the majority of sera from preulcerative (Fig. 6A), early ulcerative (Fig. 6B), and late-ulcerative (Fig. 6C) Buruli ulcer patients showed reactivity with the recombinant 18-kDa protein of M. ulcerans. Whereas 75% (24 of 32) of the patient sera were tested positive, 38% (9 of 24) of the sera from household contacts also showed reactivity (Fig. 6D). Samples from Europeans (Fig. 6F) and from the vast majority of Africans living in regions where Buruli ulcer is not endemic (Fig. 6E) were negative.

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 6. Western blot analysis of human sera with the recombinant M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp using stringent washing conditions. Sera from Ghanaian patients with preulcerative (A), early-ulcerative (B), and late-ulcerative (C) lesions and from their healthy household contacts (D); from Africans living in regions where Buruli ulcer is not endemic (E); and from Europeans (F) were analyzed at a dilution of 1:100. (G) MAb DD3.6 and a negative control.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
At present it is not clear what proportion of a population living in an African Buruli ulcer focus area is exposed to M. ulcerans. In the case of M. tuberculosis, an infection remains latent in 90 to 95% of individuals, and progressive disease development is only observed in a minority of infected individuals. Likewise, a significant proportion of individuals infected by M. ulcerans may not develop the disease. Few data are available on coinfections of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and M. ulcerans, and it is not entirely clear whether HIV infection is a risk factor for Buruli ulcer (1). Anecdotal evidence indicates that HIV infection affects the outcome of Buruli ulcer disease (21).

For the assessment of the prevalence of exposure, a test is required that is negative for nonexposed persons from regions where the disease is not endemic and positive for a significant proportion of exposed individuals in region where it is endemic. The test should discriminate between immune responses against M. ulcerans and other mycobacteria, in particular M. tuberculosis and M. bovis BCG. Serological studies performed with complex antigen preparations have suggested that serological tests may be useful in the diagnosis and surveillance of Buruli ulcer (9, 16, 31). In view of the presence of species cross-reactive antibodies in sera of Africans living in regions where Buruli ulcer is endemic, thoroughly selected recombinantly expressed target antigens are required. Our search for immunodominant proteins of M. ulcerans has identified the 18-kDa shsp as promising candidate for a serological test suitable to monitor the exposure of a population to M. ulcerans. While the 18-kDa shsp has no homologue in the genomes of M. bovis and M. tuberculosis, homologues have been described in M. leprae, M. marinum, M. intracellulare, and M. avium. Mouse sera raised against the recombinantly expressed M. ulcerans protein showed cross-reactivity with a 18-kDa protein of M. leprae and a 20-kDa protein of M. chelonae but not with M. intracellulare and M. avium lysates. The 18-kDa shsp of M. leprae has been evaluated as target antigen for serological and cellular diagnostic tests for leprosy (10, 29, 43). Whereas the M. leprae protein seems to share epitopes with an unidentified M. tuberculosis antigen (30, 36, 41), our MAbs and mouse sera specific for the M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp did not cross-react with M. tuberculosis and M. bovis BCG lysates. Furthermore, sera from individuals living in regions where Buruli ulcer is not endemic were largely negative. These results indicate that immune responses against environmental mycobacteria, such M. chelonae, which is widely distributed in the environment (4, 22) and expresses a cross-reactive homologue of the 18-kDa shsp, do not obscure the results with the M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp-based serological test.

Like its homologue in M. leprae (23), the 18-kDa shsp of M. ulcerans is associated with the cell wall fraction. It has been postulated that the 18-kDa shsp of M. leprae is relevant for the survival of the mycobacteria within macrophages (7). While M. ulcerans is largely an extracellular pathogen, it appears to be captured by phagocytes and transported to draining lymph nodes within host cells during the early stage of infection (6). The M. ulcerans 18-kDa shsp may play a role in this early intracellular stage of the infection and protect the mycobacteria in extreme environmental conditions by stabilizing the cell wall (25, 26).

Although it is clear from many epidemiological studies that proximity to wetlands is a risk factor for M. ulcerans infection, the exact mode of transmission is not clear (20). Recent field and laboratory studies have implicated aquatic insects in the transmission of the pathogen (25, 33), and it has been demonstrated that mycolactone toxin-producing M. ulcerans isolates are able to invade the salivary glands of water insects (24). M. ulcerans DNA has also been detected by PCR in aquatic snails, fish, and the biofilm of aquatic plants (27, 38, 40), but the contributions of these elements of the environment in transmission has remained largely unknown. M. ulcerans may often reach the human dermis through minor wounds or skin abrasions via contact with M. ulcerans-containing environmental reservoirs (28). Our analysis of sera from healthy household contacts indicates that exposure to M. ulcerans leads only in a minority of exposed individuals to clinical disease. Most of the others may only develop transient infection foci, and even nodular lesions may resolve spontaneously (35). Immune responses in healthy household contacts have also been described in an Australian study (16), where a lower background staining than with African sera facilitated analysis with cellular extracts. Our preliminary analysis of sera from Africans living in regions where Buruli ulcer is endemic indicate that exposure is common in these environments also among nonhousehold contacts. Future prospective analysis of cellular and humoral immune responses with recombinant M. ulcerans proteins in a population living in a region of Africa where this organism is highly endemic should give better insight into patterns of exposure. Such studies may also lead to the identification of surrogate markers of protection crucial for the development of a vaccine against M. ulcerans infection.

 
We thank Dan Anderegg for critical reading of the manuscript, Martin Naegeli for support with DNA sequencing, and Francoise Portaels and Gisela Bretzel for supplying M. ulcerans isolates. We acknowledge the BuruList World-Wide Web Server for making the M. ulcerans genome sequencing data available. The M. leprae cell lysate was kindly provided by Patrick J. Brennan and John S. Spencer of the Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology at Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo., through NIH/NIAID contract AI-25469.

D.D. and D.Y.-M. received support from the Amt für Ausbildungsbeiträge of the county of Basel-Stadt. This study was supported in part by Aide aux Lépreux Emmaüs-Suisse.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Socinstr. 57, Swiss Tropical Institute, CH 4002 Basel, Switzerland. Phone: 41 61 2848235. Fax: 41 61 2848101. E-mail: Gerd.Pluschke{at}unibas.ch.

Published ahead of print on 4 October 2006.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Asiedu, K., and S. Etuaful. 1998. Socioeconomic implications of Buruli ulcer in Ghana: a three-year review. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 59:1015-1022.[Abstract]
2
2. Asiedu, K., R. Scherpbier, and M. Raviglione. 2000. Buruli ulcer, Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
3
3. Banu, S., N. Honore, B. Saint-Joanis, D. Philpott, M. C. Prevost, and S. T. Cole. 2002. Are the PE-PGRS proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis variable surface antigens? Mol. Microbiol. 44:9-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Bartralot, R., V. Garcia-Patos, D. Sitjas, L. Rodriguez-Cano, J. Mollet, N. Martin-Casabona, P. Coll, A. Castells, and R. M. Pujol. 2005. Clinical patterns of cutaneous nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Br. J. Dermatol. 152:727-734.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Cole, S. T., K. Eiglmeier, J. Parkhill, K. D. James, N. R. Thomson, P. R. Wheeler, N. Honore, T. Garnier, C. Churcher, D. Harris, K. Mungall, D. Basham, D. Brown, T. Chillingworth, R. Connor, R. M. Davies, K. Devlin, S. Duthoy, T. Feltwell, A. Fraser, N. Hamlin, S. Holroyd, T. Hornsby, K. Jagels, C. Lacroix, J. Maclean, S. Moule, L. Murphy, K. Oliver, M. A. Quail, M. A. Rajandream, K. M. Rutherford, S. Rutter, K. Seeger, S. Simon, M. Simmonds, J. Skelton, R. Squares, S. Squares, K. Stevens, K. Taylor, S. Whitehead, J. R. Woodward, and B. G. Barrell. 2001. Massive gene decay in the leprosy bacillus. Nature 409:1007-1011.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Coutanceau, E., L. Marsollier, R. Brosch, E. Perret, P. Goossens, M. Tanguy, S. T. Cole, P. L. Small, and C. Demangel. 2005. Modulation of the host immune response by a transient intracellular stage of Mycobacterium ulcerans: the contribution of endogenous mycolactone toxin. Cell Microbiol. 7:1187-1196.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Dellagostin, O. A., G. Esposito, L. J. Eales, J. W. Dale, and J. McFadden. 1995. Activity of mycobacterial promoters during intracellular and extracellular growth. Microbiology 141(Pt. 8):1785-1792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Dobos, K. M., P. L. Small, M. Deslauriers, F. D. Quinn, and C. H. King. 2001. Mycobacterium ulcerans cytotoxicity in an adipose cell model. Infect. Immun. 69:7182-7186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Dobos, K. M., E. A. Spotts, B. J. Marston, C. R. Horsburgh, Jr., and C. H. King. 2000. Serologic response to culture filtrate antigens of Mycobacterium ulcerans during Buruli ulcer disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 6:158-164.[Medline]
10
10. Dockrell, H. M. 1988. International meeting on the association between rheumatoid arthritis and mycobacterial infection. Autoimmunity 2:73-76.[Medline]
11
11. Dodge, O. G. 1964. Mycobacterial skin ulcers in Uganda: histopathological and experimental aspects. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 88:169-174.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Fountoulakis, M., and H. Langen. 1997. Identification of proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry following in-gel digestion in low-salt, nonvolatile buffer and simplified peptide recovery. Anal. Biochem. 250:153-156.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
13. George, K. M., D. Chatterjee, G. Gunawardana, D. Welty, J. Hayman, R. Lee, and P. L. Small. 1999. Mycolactone: a polyketide toxin from Mycobacterium ulcerans required for virulence. Science 283:854-857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. George, K. M., L. Pascopella, D. M. Welty, and P. L. Small. 2000. A Mycobacterium ulcerans toxin, mycolactone, causes apoptosis in guinea pig ulcers and tissue culture cells. Infect. Immun. 68:877-883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Gooding, T. M., P. D. Johnson, D. E. Campbell, J. A. Hayman, E. L. Hartland, A. S. Kemp, and R. M. Robins-Browne. 2001. Immune response to infection with Mycobacterium ulcerans. Infect. Immun. 69:1704-1707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Gooding, T. M., P. D. Johnson, M. Smith, A. S. Kemp, and R. M. Robins-Browne. 2002. Cytokine profiles of patients infected with Mycobacterium ulcerans and unaffected household contacts. Infect. Immun. 70:5562-5567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Gooding, T. M., A. S. Kemp, R. M. Robins-Browne, M. Smith, and P. D. Johnson. 2003. Acquired T-helper 1 lymphocyte anergy following infection with Mycobacterium ulcerans. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:1076-1077.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Hayman, J. 1993. Out of Africa: observations on the histopathology of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. J. Clin. Pathol. 46:5-9.[Free Full Text]
19
19. Hayman, J., and A. McQueen. 1985. The pathology of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. Pathology 17:594-600.[Medline]
20
20. Johnson, P. D., T. Stinear, P. L. Small, G. Pluschke, R. W. Merritt, F. Portaels, K. Huygen, J. A. Hayman, and K. Asiedu. 2005. Buruli ulcer (M. ulcerans infection): new insights, new hope for disease control. PLoS Med. 2:e108.[CrossRef][Medline]
21
21. Johnson, R. C., D. Ifebe, A. Hans-Moevi, L. Kestens, R. Houessou, A. Guedenon, W. M. Meyers, and F. Portaels. 2002. Disseminated Mycobacterium ulcerans disease in an HIV-positive patient: a case study. AIDS 16:1704-1705.[CrossRef][Medline]
22
22. Katoch, V. M. 2004. Infections due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Indian J. Med. Res. 120:290-304.[Medline]
23
23. Marques, M. A., S. Chitale, P. J. Brennan, and M. C. Pessolani. 1998. Mapping and identification of the major cell wall-associated components of Mycobacterium leprae. Infect. Immun. 66:2625-2631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Marsollier, L., J. Aubry, E. Coutanceau, J. P. Andre, P. L. Small, G. Milon, P. Legras, S. Guadagnini, B. Carbonnelle, and S. T. Cole. 2005. Colonization of the salivary glands of Naucoris cimicoides by Mycobacterium ulcerans requires host plasmatocytes and a macrolide toxin, mycolactone. Cell Microbiol. 7:935-943.[CrossRef][Medline]
25
25. Marsollier, L., R. Robert, J. Aubry, J. P. Saint Andre, H. Kouakou, P. Legras, A. L. Manceau, C. Mahaza, and B. Carbonnelle. 2002. Aquatic insects as a vector for Mycobacterium ulcerans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:4623-4628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Marsollier, L., T. Severin, J. Aubry, R. W. Merritt, J. P. Saint Andre, P. Legras, A. L. Manceau, A. Chauty, B. Carbonnelle, and S. T. Cole. 2004. Aquatic snails, passive hosts of Mycobacterium ulcerans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:6296-6298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
27. Marsollier, L., T. Stinear, J. Aubry, J. P. Saint Andre, R. Robert, P. Legras, A. L. Manceau, C. Audrain, S. Bourdon, H. Kouakou, and B. Carbonnelle. 2004. Aquatic plants stimulate the growth of and biofilm formation by Mycobacterium ulcerans in axenic culture and harbor these bacteria in the environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1097-1103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28
28. Meyers, W. M., W. M. Shelly, D. H. Connor, and E. K. Meyers. 1974. Human Mycobacterium ulcerans infections developing at sites of trauma to skin. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 23:919-923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
29. Mustafa, A. S., H. K. Gill, A. Nerland, W. J. Britton, V. Mehra, B. R. Bloom, R. A. Young, and T. Godal. 1986. Human T-cell clones recognize a major M. leprae protein antigen expressed in Escherichia coli. Nature 319:63-66.[CrossRef][Medline]
30
30. Mustafa, A. S., K. E. Lundin, R. H. Meloen, and F. Oftung. 2000. Cross-reactive epitopes and HLA-restriction elements in human T-cell recognition of the Mycobacterium leprae 18-kD heat shock protein. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 120:85-92.[CrossRef][Medline]
31
31. Okenu, D. M., L. O. Ofielu, K. A. Easley, J. Guarner, E. A. Spotts Whitney, P. L. Raghunathan, Y. Stienstra, K. Asamoa, T. S. van der Werf, W. T. van der Graaf, J. W. Tappero, D. A. Ashford, and C. H. King. 2004. Immunoglobulin M antibody responses to Mycobacterium ulcerans allow discrimination between cases of active Buruli ulcer disease and matched family controls in areas where the disease is endemic. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 11:387-391.
32
32. Pluschke, G., A. Joss, J. Marfurt, C. Daubenberger, O. Kashala, M. Zwickl, A. Stief, G. Sansig, B. Schlapfer, S. Linkert, H. van der Putten, N. Hardman, and M. Schroder. 1998. Generation of chimeric monoclonal antibodies from mice that carry human immunoglobulin C1 heavy of C light chain gene segments. J. Immunol. Methods 215:27-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
33
33. Portaels, F., P. Elsen, A. Guimaraes-Peres, P. A. Fonteyne, and W. M. Meyers. 1999. Insects in the transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. Lancet 353:986.[CrossRef][Medline]
34
34. Prevot, G., E. Bourreau, H. Pascalis, R. Pradinaud, A. Tanghe, K. Huygen, and P. Launois. 2004. Differential production of systemic and intralesional gamma interferon and interleukin-10 in nodular and ulcerative forms of Buruli disease. Infect. Immun. 72:958-965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35
35. Revill, W. D., R. H. Morrow, M. C. Pike, and J. Ateng. 1973. A controlled trial of the treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection with clofazimine. Lancet ii:873-877.
36
36. Roche, P. W., R. L. Prestidge, J. D. Watson, and W. J. Britton. 1992. Antibody responses to the 18-kDa protein of Mycobacterium leprae in leprosy and tuberculosis patients. Int. J. Lepr. Other Mycobact. Dis. 60:201-207.[Medline]
37
37. Rondini, S., E. Mensah-Quainoo, H. Troll, T. Bodmer, and G. Pluschke. 2003. Development and application of real-time PCR assay for quantification of Mycobacterium ulcerans DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4231-4237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38
38. Ross, B. C., P. D. Johnson, F. Oppedisano, L. Marino, A. Sievers, T. Stinear, J. A. Hayman, M. G. Veitch, and R. M. Robins-Browne. 1997. Detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in environmental samples during an outbreak of ulcerative disease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4135-4138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39
39. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, N.Y.
40
40. Stinear, T., J. K. Davies, G. A. Jenkin, J. A. Hayman, F. Oppedisano, and P. D. Johnson. 2000. Identification of Mycobacterium ulcerans in the environment from regions in Southeast Australia in which it is endemic with sequence capture-PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3206-3213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41
41. Vikerfors, T., P. Olcen, H. Wiker, and J. D. Watson. 1993. Serological response in leprosy and tuberculosis patients to the 18-kDa antigen of Mycobacterium leprae and antigen 85B of Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Int. J. Lepr. Other Mycobact. Dis. 61:571-580.[Medline]
42
42. Wilm, M., and M. Mann. 1996. Analytical properties of the nanoelectrospray ion source. Anal. Chem. 68:1-8.[Medline]
43
43. Young, R. A., V. Mehra, D. Sweetser, T. Buchanan, J. Clark-Curtiss, R. W. Davis, and B. R. Bloom. 1985. Genes for the major protein antigens of the leprosy parasite Mycobacterium leprae. Nature 316:450-452.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, December 2006, p. 1314-1321, Vol. 13, No. 12
1071-412X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CVI.00254-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Torrado, E., Fraga, A. G., Logarinho, E., Martins, T. G., Carmona, J. A., Gama, J. B., Carvalho, M. A., Proenca, F., Castro, A. G., Pedrosa, J. (2010). IFN-{gamma}-Dependent Activation of Macrophages during Experimental Infections by Mycobacterium ulcerans Is Impaired by the Toxin Mycolactone. J. Immunol. 184: 947-955 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kaser, M., Ruf, M.-T., Hauser, J., Marsollier, L., Pluschke, G. (2009). Optimized Method for Preparation of DNA from Pathogenic and Environmental Mycobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 414-418 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Diaz, D. Articles by Pluschke, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Diaz, D. Articles by Pluschke, G.