Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2005, p. 665-667, Vol. 12, No. 5
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.5.665-667.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602,1 Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602,2 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, School of Forest Resources, Athens, Georgia 30602,3 Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Laboratories Tampa, 3602 Spectrum Blvd., Tampa, Florida 33612,4 Arthropod-Borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 805235
Received 10 January 2005/ Accepted 1 March 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The duration of the antibody response, test performance, and persistence of maternal antibodies can complicate interpretation of serologic results. Information on the persistence of antibodies to WNV in avian species is currently limited. Experimentally, persistence of neutralizing antibodies to the North American strain of WNV in rock pigeons (Columba livia) was demonstrated over a 9-week period postinoculation and in chickens over a 28-day period postinoculation (9, 11). Pigeons inoculated with an African strain of WNV maintained antibodies for 16 months (12). Recaptured naturally infected wild birds in South Africa with initial WNV antibody titers of >40 lost demonstrable antibody by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) in as few as 3 weeks (13).
The objectives of this study were the following: (i) to determine the long-term persistence of antibodies to WNV in naturally infected rock pigeons, (ii) to compare the long-term utility of commonly used WNV serologic techniques (plaque reduction neutralization test [PRNT], HAI, and epitope-blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]), and (iii) to determine the persistence of maternal antibodies to WNV in squabs derived from these naturally infected birds.
Thirty rock pigeons, 20 seropositive for WNV and 10 negative controls, were captured in April 2003 in Atlanta, Georgia. All birds were banded and housed in a mosquito-free facility for 60 weeks. Venipuncture was performed on each bird upon entry and at 3-week intervals by wing vein. Serum samples were stored at 70°C.
Using WNV (Georgia isolate DES-107-01) and SLEV (strain TBH-28), PRNTs were performed following standard protocols (1, 10). Titers were expressed as the reciprocal of serum dilutions reducing the number of plaques >90% (PRNT90). Samples with PRNT90 titers to WNV which were fourfold greater than titers to SLEV were considered seropositive for WNV. HAI assays were performed at the Florida Department of Health using a published protocol (5). The antigen used for HAI, SLEV (TBH-28), was prepared by following the sucrose-acetone procedure (4). Epitope-blocking ELISAs were performed using the WNV-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb) 3.1112G (Chemicon International, Inc., Temecula, CA) and the flavivirus-specific MAb 6B6C-1 (provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO) as previously described (2). MAb 3.1112G detects an NS1 protein epitope; MAb 6B6C-1 detects an envelope protein epitope.
All serum samples collected over the 60-week period were tested by PRNT using WNV to determine persistence and antibody titers. Serum samples collected on day 0 were also tested by PRNT using SLEV. To compare antibody persistence as measured by PRNT, HAI, and epitope-blocking ELISA, a subset of samples collected from five positive birds on day 0 to week 45 were tested with all three serologic tests. To compare performance of serologic assays, a second subset consisting of samples collected from all birds on weeks 3, 24, and 45 were tested by PRNT, HAI, and epitope-blocking ELISA. Concordance of results was determined using the Kappa statistic (15).
Persistence of maternal antibodies to WNV was determined in five squabs that hatched during the study. Blood samples were taken from all squabs 8 days after hatching and every several days thereafter until 6 weeks of age. PRNT was used to test all samples.
The 20 birds that had antibodies to WNV at the time of capture remained antibody positive during the 60-week study period; the 10 control birds that had no detectable antibody to WNV remained antibody negative (data not shown). From the first subset of samples, antibodies to flaviviruses were detected in two of the five PRNT-positive birds by HAI and in all five birds by ELISA at all time points tested (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Persistence of antibodies to WNV in naturally infected rock pigeons (Columba livia)a
|
Comparative results for serologic assays are shown in Table 2. HAI results were inconsistent with PRNT results (kappa = 0.14) (a kappa value of 0.8 to 1.0 indicates almost perfect agreement between tests). While good agreement was observed between ELISA (when positive with both MAbs) and PRNT results (kappa = 0.91), agreement improved slightly (kappa = 0.95) when results were considered positive by either MAb.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Comparison of serologic assays in determining flavivirus antibody titer or status of naturally infected rock pigeons (Columba livia)
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Persistence of maternal antibodies to WNV in squabs of naturally infected rock pigeons (Columba livia)a
|
The consistency of antibody titers observed over time during this study contrasts with the findings for experimentally infected pigeons (9). The antibody responses of those birds reflect an acute postinfection immunologic response, while the present study most likely reflects older infections. As a result, a direct comparison cannot be made between the two studies.
The persistence of antibodies to WNV in an avian species for more than a year complicates interpretation of multiyear studies involving serologic surveillance of wild bird populations. Because the antibody titers in this study remained at high levels, it suggests that pigeons maintain neutralizing-antibody titers to WNV for several years. Seroprevalence of WNV in avian populations may therefore increase while transmission of the virus in an area remains stable over time. Because species variation in the persistence of antibodies to WNV may exist, antibody persistence in other avian species should be evaluated.
The results in this study proved to be highly test dependent, and serologic results should be interpreted with this in mind. The HAI test was not as effective as the PRNT or ELISA in this study. Neutralizing antibodies are generally considered to persist longer than HAI antibodies, however, so the results of this study may reflect differences in the timing of infection in individual birds (3). Those pigeons positive by HAI in this study potentially represent more-recent infections. Additionally, the HAI assay was performed using SLEV antigen as a flavivirus group reactive antigen, rather than a specific WNV antigen, which may have affected test sensitivity.
To our knowledge, this is the first report detailing the persistence of avian maternal antibodies to the North American strain of WNV. Columbiformes are unique in that in addition to the maternal antibodies transferred through the egg yolk, they receive both maternal and paternal antibodies through crop milk after hatching. Immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G antibodies are present in the crop milk and are absorbed by 1-day-old squabs; further transfer of antibodies past day 1 appears to be limited (6).
The role of nestlings in WNV amplification cycles may be reduced by maternal-antibody persistence. In the case of pigeons, the additional opportunity for transfer of passive immunity from not only the hen but also the cock increases the proportion of squabs with resistance to WNV infection. How maternal antibody persistence in pigeons compares to that in indigenous North American avian species is unknown. When determined, this information will help to elucidate variations in WNV disease resistance among avian populations.
We thank Ben Wilcox for assistance with animal care and handling, Robert Lanciotti for supplying SLEV, and Maribel Casteneda, Rita Judge, and Eddie Tensley for their HAI expertise.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»