Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smithson, A. Articles by Lozano, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smithson, A. Articles by Lozano, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, December 2005, p. 1358-1363, Vol. 12, No. 12
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.12.1358-1363.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Expression of Interleukin-8 Receptors (CXCR1 and CXCR2) in Premenopausal Women with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections

Alex Smithson,^1* Maria Rosa Sarrias,² Juanjo Barcelo,² Belen Suarez,² Juan Pablo Horcajada,¹ Sara Maria Soto,³ Alex Soriano,¹ Jordi Vila,³ Jose Antonio Martinez,¹ Jordi Vives,² Jose Mensa,¹ and Francisco Lozano²

Infectious Diseases Unit,¹ Department of Immunology,² Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain³

Received 3 August 2005/ Returned for modification 25 August 2005/ Accepted 29 September 2005

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The migration of neutrophils through infected tissues is mediated by the CXC chemokines and its receptors (CXCR1 and CXCR2). It has been proposed that a CXCR1 deficiency could confer susceptibility to acute pyelonephritis in children. The objective of the study is to assess the surface expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2 and the existence of polymorphisms in the CXCR1 gene in premenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infections. The study included 20 premenopausal women with recurrent urinary infections, with normal urinary tracts, and without diseases potentially associated with relapsing urinary infections and 30 controls without previous urinary infections. The levels of CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression on neutrophils were measured and analyzed by flow cytometry by measuring the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) channel. The promoter and coding regions of the CXCR1 gene were analyzed for the presence of polymorphisms by a sequence-based typing method. Patients with recurrent urinary tract infections exhibited median levels of CXCR1 expression, determined from MFI values, similar to those of the controls. The analysis of CXCR2 showed that patients with recurrent urinary infections had lower median levels of expression, determined from the MFI values, than the controls (P = 0.002, Mann-Whitney U test). No polymorphisms were detected at the promoter or at the exon 1 region of the CXCR1 gene either in the patients or in the controls. Polymorphisms were detected at the exon 2 of CXCR1, but their frequencies did not differ between patients and controls. We have found a low level of CXCR2 expression in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections. These results suggest that a low level of CXCR2 expression may increase the susceptibilities of premenopausal women to urinary tract infections.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs) are frequent among healthy young women who generally have anatomically and physiologically normal urinary tracts (23). It has been estimated that each year in the United States about 6 million to 8 million young women have acute cystitis (20). Moreover, about 25% of these women who have had an initial infection will experience RUTIs, resulting in considerable morbidity and the associated health care costs (25). There is no satisfactory theory to explain the predisposition of some young healthy women with normal urinary tracts to RUTIs, but it seems to be the result of the combination of various factors inherited by the host and several behavioral conditions (5).

In response to infection with uropathogenic Escherichia coli, the most common pathogen involved in community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) (28), human uroepithelial cells secrete interleukin-8 (IL-8) as well as other members of the CXC cytokine family, which are potent neutrophil chemotactic and activating peptides (15, 10, 16). Neutrophils respond to the CXC cytokine gradient by leaving the general circulation and crossing the epithelial barrier into the lumen of the urinary tract, where they contact and phagocytose uropathogenic bacteria. In humans, the CXC chemokines mediate their biologic activities by binding to two specific seven-span transmembrane receptors coupled to G proteins, CXCR1 and CXCR2. These receptors are expressed on the surfaces of neutrophils and are encoded by two single-copy genes located at chromosome 2q35 (12). They share 78% of their amino acid sequences and bind to the IL-8 chemokine with different affinities. CXCR1 is highly specific for IL-8, while CXCR2 is more promiscuous and binds to IL-8 as well as to other CXC chemokines containing a common amino-terminal Glu-Leu-Arg (ELR) sequence, including the epithelial cell-derived neutrophil-activating protein 78 (ENA-78), growth-related oncogene alpha (GRO-), GRO-ß, GRO-, and lipopolysaccharide-induced CXC chemokine (13, 1). The importance of the IL-8 receptors in the process of transepithelial migration of neutrophils has been demonstrated in an experimental UTI model in which IL-8 receptor homologue-knockout mice were unable to clear an E. coli infection. Mice lack CXCR1, and CXCR2 exclusively mediates the granulocyte response to ELR-positive chemokines, e.g., macrophage inflammatory protein 2, cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant, and ENA-78 (3). In these IL-8 receptor homologue-knockout mice, neutrophils fail to cross the epithelium, accumulate in the subepithelial tissue, and cause renal scarring and, eventually, end-stage renal disease (9, 29). Additional evidence of the importance of the IL-8 receptors in the neutrophil migration process comes from the observation of the absence of neutrophil recruitment to the urinary tract after the administration of a blocking IL-8 receptor homologue antibody in mice (14).

It has been proposed that the increased susceptibility to UTIs observed in IL-8 receptor-knockout mice could have a human counterpart. Frendeus et al. have demonstrated that neutrophils from children prone to acute pyelonephritis show decreased levels of expression of CXCR1 but not CXCR2 compared with those of age-matched controls, which may explain their susceptibilities to recurrent acute pyelonephritis (6). In addition, preliminary results suggest that the low level of expression of CXCR1 could be related to polymorphisms in the promoter region of the CXCR1 gene (7). Therefore, the confirmation of a deficient expression or function of the CXC receptors in humans could provide new genetic clues to explain individual susceptibilities to UTIs.

To our knowledge the expression of CXC receptors in adults with RUTIs has not been previously assessed. The objective of the present study was to investigate the surface expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2 on human neutrophils as well as the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the CXCR1 gene from premenopausal women with RUTIs and from a healthy control group.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Study population. The study group included 20 premenopausal women with a history of RUTIs and normal urinary tracts identified from the Infectious Diseases Outpatient Unit between January 2002 and January 2003. For further comparison, 30 volunteer premenopausal females who were not matched with the patients and who did not have a history of UTIs were also studied. The present study was conducted with the approval of the hospital Ethics Committee and the informed consent of all participants. The human experimentation guidelines of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and those of the authors' institution were followed in the conduct of the clinical research.

Women were considered to meet the case definition for RUTIs if they had experienced either three or more symptomatic UTIs in the past year or two such episodes in the past 6 months. A UTI was defined by bacterial growth 10⁵ CFU/ml in a culture of midstream urine from a women experiencing two or more symptoms of cystitis (dysuria, urgency, frequency, suprapubic pain, or hematuria) or, in the absence of culture, the demonstration of pyuria on urine analysis and two or more urinary tract symptoms, as well as the complete and rapid resolution of symptoms after the start of antibiotic therapy. Acute pyelonephritis was clinically defined as an armpit temperature of >38°C, pyuria, and lumbar tenderness.

Premenopausal women with a history of urological abnormalities or urological manipulation or in which the imaging evaluation (echography and pyelography) had demonstrated urological abnormalities potentially related to RUTIs were excluded. Patients with diseases associated with RUTIs (diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, immunosuppressive treatments, transplant recipients) were also excluded.

Patient samples. Samples were obtained during an infection-free interval. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture into Vacutainers (Becton Dickinson) with EDTA anticoagulant. The blood samples were immediately transported on ice to the laboratory and analyzed by flow cytometry within 1 to 6 h of collection.

Reagents. Phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled mouse immunoglobulin G2a (IgG2a) monoclonal antibodies to human CXCR1 (clone 42705.111) and CXCR2 (clone 48311.211) were from R&D Systems Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled mouse IgG1 monoclonal antibody to human CD45 (clone 2D1) was from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). FITC-labeled mouse IgG2a (clone X39) and PE-labeled mouse IgG1 were from BD Biosciences.

Immunofluorescence and flow cytometry analysis. Direct immunofluorescence staining of whole blood was performed by using a lysis, no-wash procedure, according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciencies). Briefly, 50 µl of EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood was mixed with 5 to 20 µl fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (PE-labeled anti-CXCR1 and anti-CXRC2 or FITC-labeled anti-CD45) and incubated for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. As negative controls, additional samples were incubated with PE-labeled mouse IgG2a or FITC-labeled mouse IgG1. The staining with FITC-labeled anti-CD45 monoclonal antibody, which recognizes the common leukocyte antigen present on neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes, was used as an internal control to verify the integrity of the target cell population among different individuals and to exclude fragments of red blood cells. Then, 450 µl of fluorescence-activated cell sorter lysing solution was added by gentle vortexing, and the mixture was left for an additional 15 to 30 min in the dark at room temperature before analysis on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) equipped with an argon laser (excitation wavelength, 488 nm). The data were analyzed with 1.0 CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). Forward and side light-scatter parameters were used for the gating of the neutrophil population. A histogram of fluorescence distribution was constructed, and the relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was obtained from the histogram and expressed as an index of membrane surface expression.

Sequence-based typing. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood by using a commercially available kit (QIAamp blood DNA isolation kit; QIAGEN,Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer's instructions. Specific primers were designed for PCR amplification of the promoter and the coding regions of the CXCR1 gene, according to the published genomic DNA sequences (GenBank accession number L19592) (24). A 519-bp fragment encompassing the promoter region and exon 1 was generated by using primers IL8RAPro.Fw (5'-GAAGTCTCTGCTGTAAGTCA-3') and IL8RAPro.Rv (5'-CTCAGCTCCCACAGAAATG-3'). The whole coding region of exon 2 (a 1,203-bp fragment), from the end of intron 1 to beyond the natural stop codon, was generated by using primers IL8RAInt1.Fw (5'-GCCTTGAATCCGAGCTACTAAAT-3') and IL8RAEx2.Rv (5'-CCTCAGGGTGTTGGTTATTCTT-3'). The PCR was performed in a final volume of 50 µl containing 100 to 500 ng of genomic DNA, 2 pmol/ml of specific primers, 0.5 to 2 U Taq Expand DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim), 2 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.5). The cycling conditions were 8 min at 98°C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 90 s at 72°C; and a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. Samples (1 to 2 µl) of the resulting PCR products were subjected to direct sequencing by the dye-terminator method (ABI PRISM dRhodamine Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit) and analyzed with an automated ABI 3100 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The sequencing primers for the promoter-exon 1 and exon 2 fragments were IL8RAPro.Fw (see above) and IL8RA6072.Fw (5'-GAGGTCCTGGGAAATGACAC-3'), respectively.

Statistical analysis. The levels of expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2 on neutrophils from women with RUTIs and from healthy controls were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. Values are expressed as medians (25th and 75th percentiles). Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed P value of <0.05. Statistical analysis was carried out by the program SPSS (version 11.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Clinical data. The study group was composed of 20 premenopausal women with RUTIs (median age, 26 years; age range, 21 to 39 years) and 30 premenopausal female volunteers who had never experienced an UTI (median age, 27 years; age range, 18 to 46 years). The main clinical findings for the premenopausal patients with RUTIs are shown in Table 1. Nine of the 20 patients with RUTIs had experienced their first UTI before the age of 15 years. The lifetime number of UTIs was 10 in 65% of the women with RUTIs. By consideration of the total number of acute pyelonephritis episodes of each patient during their lives, 11 patients (55%) had experienced cystitis with or without one episode of acute pyelonephritis and 9 patients (45%) had experienced cystitis with more than one episode of acute pyelonephritis. The nine patients with an early onset of UTI had experienced a total of 32 episodes of acute pyelonephritis (74% of the total episodes of acute pyelonephritis of the study group), while the 11 patients with a late onset of UTI had experienced a total of 11 episodes of acute pyelonephritis.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Summary of clinical findings for patients with RUTIs included in the studya

Chemokine receptor expression. The surface expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2 was measured on neutrophils and expressed as arbitrary units of MFI. The values obtained for each premenopausal patient with RUTIs included in the study are represented in Table 1. The median MFI values (25th and 75th percentiles) of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in the healthy control group were 116.22 (103.67 and 139.46) and 18.94 (16.2 and 23.62), respectively. The median MFI values of CD45 were comparable between the patients and the healthy controls (18.38 [15.89 and 23.71]) for patients with RUTIs and 18.36 [16.62 and 23.41] for healthy controls for samples simultaneously stained for CXCR1; (19.22 [16.78 and 30.1] for patients with RUTIs and 18.84 [17.21 and 22.7] for the healthy controls for samples simultaneously stained for CXCR2). The median MFI value of CXCR1 observed in the premenopausal patients with RUTIs was 118.9 (102.66 and 158.89), similar to the median MFI values found for the healthy controls (Fig. 1). However, three patients with the onset of UTIs during childhood had CXCR1 MFI values below the 5th percentile of the CXCR1 MFI values for the healthy control group. The analysis of CXCR2 revealed that premenopausal women with RUTIs showed significantly lower median CXCR2 MFI values (14.96 [12.82 and 17.23]; P = 0.002) than the controls (Fig. 1). A deeper analysis in which the patients were classified by the age of onset of UTIs showed that although the median MFI values of CXCR1 (112.14 [63.58 and 169.01] for those with the onset of UTIs before the age of 15 years and 122.31 [103.29 and 143.56] for those with the onset of UTIs after the age of 15 years) and CXCR2 (14.56 [9.35 and 16.93] for those with the onset of UTIs before the age of 15 years and 15.16 [13.77 and 17.41] for those with the onset of UTIs after the age of 15 years) were lower in those premenopausal women with the early onset of UTIs, the differences were not statistically significant.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. CXCR1 and CXCR2 staining of neutrophils from healthy controls and RUTI patients. The corresponding MFI values are shown. Data are represented as medians (horizontal bar), 25th and 75th percentiles (boxes), and 10th and 90th percentiles (bars). Significant differences between groups are indicated (Mann-Whitney U test).

Analysis of CXCR1 polymorphisms. We have performed a sequence-based typing analysis of the promoter region and the coding region (exon 1 and exon 2) of the CXCR1 gene in our series of patients and controls. We could not detect any polymorphisms in the promoter or the exon 1 region of either the patients or the controls. Sequence analysis of exon 2 (from the initiation methionine to the natural stop codon) revealed the presence of individuals heterozygous for two previously reported nonsynonymous polymorphisms (11, 27): G827C, which leads to the change of serine to threonine at position 276 (S276T), and C1003T, which leads to the change of arginine to cysteine at position 335 (R335C). Among the patients, one individual carried the S276T polymorphism and another one carried the R335C polymorphism. Interestingly, a third patient presented a new variant of the nonsynonymous polymorphism at position 276 (S276R), in which S276 (AGC) was replaced by R276 (AGG). The correlation between the MFI values of CXCR1 and the polymorphisms at exon 2 of the CXCR1 gene of the RUTI patients included is shown in Table 1. Among the healthy controls, two individuals carried the S276T polymorphism and one individual carried the R335C polymorphism. The presence of two other previously reported synonymous polymorphisms (V247V and Y305Y) could not be detected in any of the individuals analyzed, either the patients or the controls.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Most recurring UTIs in women occur in healthy premenopausal individuals who do not have anatomical or functional abnormalities in the urinary tract. Numerous studies have suggested the presence of underlying host genetic factors to explain the increased susceptibilities of certain premenopausal women to RUTIs. Evidence of a genetic predisposition was initially proposed after the demonstration that women with RUTIs have increased adhesion of uropathogenic E. coli to vaginal and buccal epithelial cells compared with the level of adhesion for women without a history of recurrences (18). This observation suggested that differences in the density or expression of receptors to uropathogens in the mucosal epithelium of the urinary tract could be genetically determined, in part. Nowadays, it is well known that women with RUTIs are three to four times more likely to be nonsecretors of ABH blood group antigens than women without RUTIs and that vaginal epithelial cells from nonsecreting women express globoseries glysphingolipid receptors that bind to uropathogenic E. coli (22, 26). Additional evidence of the existence of a genetic predisposition to UTIs is the demonstration that specific HLA phenotypes are more prevalent in women with RUTIs than in women without such a history (19).

Defective expression of the IL-8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 is another factor that may contribute to a genetic predisposition to RUTIs. Children prone to recurrent acute pyelonephritis show low levels of CXCR1 neutrophil surface expression compared to those for age-matched controls. This deficient CXCR1 expression could be the result of genetic polymorphisms in the promoter region of the CXCR1 gene (6, 7). In our study, patients with RUTIs had a median CXCR1 MFI value comparable to that for the healthy controls, although the small number of patients included could have influenced these results. However, a closer analysis of the data revealed that three patients (patients 1, 2, and 3) with RUTIs had a median CXCR1 MFI value below the 5th percentile of the median MFI value for the healthy controls. These three patients began having UTIs before the age of 15 years, experienced their first sexual intercourse after that age, and have had more than one episode of acute pyelonephritis. The onset of UTIs before the age of 15 years, particularly before the first sexual intercourse, has been reported to be a risk factor for RUTIs, supporting the idea that inherited factors may be important in some women with relapsing UTIs (21). Therefore, our observation suggests that a deficient expression of CXCR1 could be implicated in the increased susceptibility to RUTIs in the subset of premenopausal women with an early onset of urinary tract infections through deficient neutrophil chemotaxis to the urinary tract.

An unexpected observation of our study is the low median level of MFI CXCR2 surface expression on neutrophils from premenopausal women with RUTIs compared to that on neutrophils from healthy controls. This lower level of surface expression was even more marked in the subgroup of premenopausal women in whom the onset of UTIs occurred before the age of 15 years, which again strengthens the idea that individual factors could be particularly important in the pathogenesis of RUTIs in women with the onset of urinary tract infections during childhood. It is interesting that the two patients (patients 1 and 2) with the lowest levels of CXCR2 surface expression also had very low levels of CXCR1 surface expression. Different studies have suggested that CXCR1 and CXCR2 are regulated by agonist-dependent mechanisms. Binding of IL-8 and ENA-78 rapidly downmodulates CXCR1 and CXCR2 due to internalization of the ligand-receptor complex (4). It is probable that IL-8, ENA-78, as well as other chemotactic cytokines regulate the expression of CXCR1 and CXCR2 through similar or identical pathways. Therefore, the expression of both receptors may be regulated in a similar way.

Neutrophil recruitment is driven not only by IL-8 but also by other chemotactic factors, such as ENA-78 and GRO; and thus, a low level of surface expression of a multiligand-specific receptor such as CXCR2 could cause a deficient neutrophil chemotaxis. Our data demonstrating the low level of expression of CXCR2 in premenopausal women with RUTIs suggests a handicapped capacity of GRO- and ENA-78, and maybe of other CXCR2 binding chemokines, to exert their chemotactic activities. These data differ from those from previous in vitro studies that used kidney epithelial cell layers infected with E. coli and in which the addition of an anti-CXCR1 antibody but not an anti-CXCR2 antibody reduced E. coli transepithelial neutrophil migration (8). However, other studies have demonstrated a partial inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis by using specific neutralizing antibodies directed against ENA-78 and GRO, which are CXCR2-dependent chemokines (14). Further studies are needed to address whether the CXCR2-deficient surface expression in the patients with RUTIs is caused by specific gene defects or, alternatively, by upstream regulatory mechanisms.

In the second part of the study we screened the promoter and the entire coding region of the CXCR1 gene in 20 premenopausal patients with RUTIs and in 30 healthy controls and detected three missense exchanges. Two of these have already been reported (11, 27). Although previous studies have suggested the existence of polymorphisms in the promoter region and exon 1 of the CXCR1 gene in children prone to acute pyelonephritis, we were not able to detect such polymorphisms in either patients or healthy controls (7). The analysis of exon 2 has demonstrated that two patients were heterozygous for the two previously reported nonsynonymous polymorphisms, S276T and R335C of the mature protein. These two patients (patients 2 and 3) also had low levels of MFI CXCR1 surface expression (Table 1). Another patient (patient 20), who presented with the novel nonsynonymous S276R polymorphism, showed an average level of MFI CXCR1 surface expression in the flow cytometry analysis. In conclusion, no significant differences in the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter and the coding regions (exons 1 and 2) of the CXCR1 gene were detected between patients and controls. It is worth mentioning that the R335C polymorphism was observed in the only healthy control individual showing reduced surface expression of CXCR1. The same polymorphism was also observed in one of the three patients showing reduced surface expression of CXCR1.

The CXCR1 receptor is a member of the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors that consists of seven transmembrane domains, three intracellular loops, and three extracellular loops. The S276T and the S276R polymorphisms are located in the third extracellular loop, while the R335C polymorphism is located in the C-terminal tail of the CXCR1 gene. The C-terminal tail of CXCR1 is necessary for receptor phosphorylation and desensitization (17), and the replacement of arginine by cysteine at position 335 may confer the potential of homo- or heterodimerization through disulfide bonds (2). Therefore, the R335C polymorphism has the potential to influence receptor functions by changing the secondary or tertiary structure of the receptor. The S276T and S276R variations are not expected to lead to major differences in receptor structure or function. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relevance of the R335C polymorphism on CXCR1 functions.

In conclusion, we have found no differences regarding the average level of neutrophil CXCR1 expression between premenopausal patients with RUTIs and healthy controls. However, three patients that began having UTIs during childhood presented low, below-average CXCR1 levels on the neutrophil surface. These low levels of CXCR1 on the neutrophil surface were not related to specific polymorphisms in the CXCR1 gene. We have also found an average lower level of expression of CXCR2 in premenopausal women with RUTIs, particularly in those with an early onset of urinary tract infections, compared with that for the healthy controls. These results suggest that a low level of expression of CXCR2 could be associated with increased susceptibilities to RUTIs in certain patients, particularly in those premenopausal women with the onset of UTIs during childhood. The identification of these women at high risk of developing serious and repetitive urinary tract infections could justify the implementation of preventive antibiotic therapeutic strategies.

 
This work was supported by grants from the Fundacion Maximo Soriano.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Edificio Helios, 1 planta. C/ Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain. Phone: 34-93 227 54 00. Fax: 34-93 227 93 22. E-mail: asa30412{at}hotmail.com.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Ahuja, S. K., and P. M. Murphy. 1996. The CXC chemokines growth-regulated oncogene (GRO) alpha, GRObeta, GROgamma, neutrophil-activating peptide-2, and epithelial cell-derived neutrophil activating peptide-78 are potent agonists for the type B, but not the type A, human interleukin-8 receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271:20545-20550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Bockaert, J., and J. P. Pin. 1999. Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success. EMBO J. 18:1723-1729.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Cacalano, G., J. Lee, K. Kikly, A. M. Ryan, S. PittsMeek, B. Hultgren, W. I. Wood, and M. W. Moore. 1994. Neutrophil and B cell expansion in mice that lack the murine IL-8 receptor homolog. Science 265:682-684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Chuntharapai, A., and K. J. Kim. 1995. Regulation of the expression of IL-8 receptor A/B by IL-8: possible functions of each receptor. J. Immunol. 155:2587-2594.[Abstract]
5
5. Finer, G., and D. Landau. 2004. Pathogenesis of urinary tract infections with normal female anatomy. Lancet Infect. Dis. 4:631-635.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Frendeus, B., G. Godaly, L. Hang, D. Karpman, A. C. Lundstedt, and C. Svanborg. 2000. Interleukin 8 receptor deficiency confers susceptibility to acute experimental pyelonephritis and may have a human counterpart. J. Exp. Med. 192:881-890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Godaly, G., G. Bergsten, L. Hang, H. Fischer, B. Frendeus, A. C. Lundstedt, M. Samuelsson, P. Samuelsson, and C. Svanborg. 2001. Neutrophil recruitment, chemokine receptors and resistance to mucosal infection. J. Leukoc. Biol. 69:899-906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Godaly, G., L. Hang, B. Frendeus, and C. Svanborg. 2000. Transepithelial neutrophil migration is CXCR1 dependent in vitro and is defective in IL-8 receptor knock-out mice. J. Immunol. 165:5287-5294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Hang, L., B. Frendeus, G. Godaly, and C. Svanborg. 2000. Interleukin-8 receptor knockout mice have subepithelial neutrophil entrapment and renal scarring following acute pyelonephritis. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1738-1748.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Horcajada, J. P., M. Velasco, X. Filella, L. Alvarez, E. De Lazzari, J. L. Marin, B. Collvinent, A. Smithson, J. A. Martínez, M. Noguero, J. Vila, and J. Mensa. 2004. Evaluation of inflammatory and renal-injury markers in women treated with antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis caused by Escherichia coli. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 11:142-146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Kato, H., N. Tsuchiya, and K. Tokunaga. 2000. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the coding regions of human CXC-chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2 and CXCR3. Genes Immun. 1:330-337.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Morris, S. W., N. Nelson, M. B. Valentine, D. N. Shapiro, A. T. Look, C. J. Kozlosky, M. P. Beckmann, and D. P. Cerreti. 1992. Assignment of the genes encoding human interleukin-8 receptor types 1 and 2 and an interleukin-8 receptor pseudogene to chromosome 2q35. Genomics 14:685-691.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
13. Murphy, P. M. 1997. Neutrophil receptors for interleukin-8 and related CXC chemokines. Semin. Hematol. 34:311-318.[Medline]
14
14. Olszyna, D. P., S. Florquin, M. Sewnath, J. Branger, P. Speelman, S. J. van Deventer, R. M. Strieter, and T. van der Poll. 2001. CXC chemokine receptor 2 contributes to host defense in murine urinary tract infection. J. Infect. Dis. 184:301-317.[CrossRef][Medline]
15
15. Olszyna, D. P., S. M. Opal, J. M. Prins, D. L. Horn, P. Speelman, S. J. van Deventer, and T. van der Poll. 2000. Chemotactic activity of CXC chemokines interleukin-8, growth related oncogen-alpha and epithelial cell-derived neutrophil-activating protein-78 in urine in patients with urosepsis. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1731-1737.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Otto, G., M. Burdick, R. Strieter, and G. Godaly. 2005. Chemokine response to febrile urinary tract infection. Kidney Int. 68:62-70.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
17. Richardson, R. M., R. J. Marjoram, L. S. Barak, and R. Snyderman. 2003. Role of the cytoplasmatic tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in mediating leukocyte migration, activation, and regulation. J. Immunol. 170:2904-2911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Schaeffer, A. J., J. M. Jones, and J. K. Dunn. 1981. Association of in vitro Escherichia coli adherence to vaginal and buccal epithelial cells with susceptibility of women to recurrent urinary-tract infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 304:1062-1066.[Abstract]
19
19. Schaeffer, A. J., R. M. Radvany, and J. S. Chmiel. 1983. Human leukocyte antigens in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. J. Infect. Dis. 148:604.[Medline]
20
20. Schappert, S. M. 1999. Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1997. Vital Health Stat. Ser. 13 143:i-iv, 1-39.
21
21. Scholes, D., T. M. Hooton, P. L. Roberts, A. E. Stapleton, K. Gupta, and W. Stamm. 2000. Risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infection in young women. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1177-1182.[CrossRef][Medline]
22
22. Sheinfeld, J., A. J. Schaeffer, C. Cordon-Cardo, A. Rogatko, and W. R. Fair. 1989. Association of Lewis blood-groups phenotype with recurrent urinary tract infections in women. N. Engl. J. Med. 320:773-777.[Abstract]
23
23. Sobel, J. D. 1997. Pathogenesis of urinary tract infection: role of host defenses. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 11:531-549.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
24. Sprenger, H., A. R. Lloyd, R. G. Meyer, J. A. Johnston, and D. J. Kelvin. 1994. Genomic structure, characterization, and identification of the promoter of the human IL-8 receptor A gene. J. Immunol. 153:2524-2532.[Abstract]
25
25. Stamm, W. E., and T. M. Hotoon. 1993. Management of urinary tract infections in adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 329:1328-1334.[Free Full Text]
26
26. Stapleton, A., E. Nudelman, H. Clausen, S. Hakomori, and W. E. Stamm. 1992. Binding of uropathogenic Escherichia coli R45 to glycolipids extracted from vaginal epithelial cells is dependent on histo-blood group secretor status. J. Clin. Investig. 90:965-972.
27
27. Stemmler, S., U. Arinir, W. Klein, G. Rohde, S. Hoffjan, N. Wirkus, K. Reinitz-Rademacher, A. Bufe, G. Schultze-Werninghaus, and J. T. Epplen. 2005. Association of interleukin-8 receptor alpha polymorphisms with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases and asthma. Genes Immun. 6:225-230.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Svanborg, C., and G. Godaly. 1997. Bacterial virulence in urinary tract infection. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 11:513-529.[CrossRef][Medline]
29
29. Svensson, M., H. Irjala, P. Alm, B. Holmqvist, A. C. Lundstedt, and C. Svanborg. 2005. Natural history of renal scarring in susceptible mIL-8Rh–/– mice. Kidney Int. 67:103-110.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, December 2005, p. 1358-1363, Vol. 12, No. 12
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.12.1358-1363.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smithson, A. Articles by Lozano, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smithson, A. Articles by Lozano, F.