Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 2005, p. 81-85, Vol. 12, No. 1
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.1.81-85.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, MTC,1 Department of Medicine, Unit of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,3 National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam2
Received 24 March 2004/ Returned for modification 12 August 2004/ Accepted 6 October 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seroepidemiological investigations represent the most rapid and convenient way of obtaining a picture of the prevalence of H. pylori infection in a population, but the assays used need to be validated in the population studied (6, 10, 14). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) detection can be based either on whole-cell sonicate antigen or on one or several purified components of the bacterium as the antigen. A majority of serological studies are now conducted with commercial kits that have been evaluated in developed countries. These commercial kits are often too expensive for developing countries, and use of a validated in-house ELISA assay based on sonicate antigens would seem preferable.
We have previously evaluated with both Swedish and Vietnamese populations an in-house ELISA based on sonicated H. pylori antigen, supplemented with an absorption step with sonicated Campylobacter jejuni antigen to remove cross-reacting antibodies (2, 6, 15, 17). The studies showed that the local strains used for the H. pylori antigen give a better diagnostic performance and also that the cutoff level used for serodiagnosis in the general population needs to be adjusted (6, 17).
The aim of the present study was to apply the best-performing assay and cutoff level to an investigation of the seroprevalence of H. pylori infection in Vietnam, represented by an urban population (Hanoi) and a poor, rural area (Hatay).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Characteristics of participating subjects in urban Hanoi and rural Hatay
|
The upper limit of normal values for the healthy population was found in a previous study to need adjustment compared to cutoff levels used for peptic ulcer patients (6). The establishment of the cutoff levels for the present study was therefore based on levels for 431 healthy population controls, with immunoblotting as reference method.
(ii) Immunoblot. All sera were tested by immunoblotting, using the commercial available HelicoBlot 2.1 (Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore) for detection of antibodies against H. pylori-specific antigens. The kit consists of Western blot membrane strips, made with a surface antigen-enriched preparation of H. pylori, including CagA (116 kDa), VacA (89 kDa), and the urease A subunit (30 kDa). All buffer and reagents used were supplied with the kit and used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The assay was performed with an automated Western blot system (Autoblot system 36; Genelabs Diagnostics). The blots were evaluated as positive or negative according to the criteria supplied by the manufacturer.
(iii) Pyloriset EIA-G kit.
The kit from Orion Diagnostica (Espoo, Finland) was used according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Values of
20 U/ml were considered positive, and values of <20 U/ml were considered negative.
(iv) HM-cap kit. The kit from Enteric Products Inc.(E-Z-EM Inc., Westbury, N.Y.) was used according to the instructions of the manufacturer. ELISA values of <2.2 were considered positive, values of 1.8 to 2.2 were considered indeterminate, and values of <1.8 were considered negative.
Statistical methods. The optical density cutoff point that maximized sensitivity and specificity was selected, and the prevalence (number of subjects with an antibody titer above the selected cut point divided by the total number of tested subjects in the studied stratum) was calculated overall and in strata of age, gender, and region of residence. We computed 95% confidence intervals of prevalence, using the Wilson method (1). A trend line was drawn for age-specific prevalence (both genders and both regions combined), using a fourth-order polynomial. Differences between proportions were tested with the chi-square test. The independent effects of age (categorized in 5-year age groups), gender, and region of residence (Hanoi versus Hatay) on the probability of being infected with H. pylori were estimated with a multivariate logistic regression model with mutual adjustments for the variables included. Trend tests were done with the exposure transformed into a semiquantitative variable.
Ethical clearance. The project was approved by the Karolinska Hospital ethics committee in Sweden. Approval for the project was also granted in Vietnam by the relevant authorities.
|
|
|---|
H. pylori infection seroprevalence.
Table 2 shows the crude seroprevalence (defined as optical density of
0.22) by gender, region of residence, and 5-year age groups. The overall seroprevalence was high, 746 (95% confidence interval [CI], 717 to 772) per 1,000 individuals, slightly higher among women (766 per 1,000) than among men (720 per 1,000) (P = 0.099, chi-square test). The female predominance was not particularly consistent in age-specific analyses (Table 2). The seroprevalence already was substantial among children; below the age of 5, one-third of them were infected, and this proportion rose to three-quarters in late adolescence. The increase leveled off at around 80% from age 30 (Fig. 1). In Table 2, it is obvious that the overall seroprevalence was higher in urban Hanoi (788 per 1,000; 95% CI, 751 to 820) than in rural Hatay (692 per 1,000; 95% CI, 646 to 734) (P = 0.0007, chi-square test). The seroprevalence by 5-year age groups in the two regions is shown in Fig. 2. However, since the samples from Hanoi and Hatay differed with regard to age distributions (P < 0.0001), we had to disentangle the independent effects of region, age, and gender in a multivariate logistic regression model (Table 3).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Seroprevalence in percentage and 95% CI by age, gender, and region (univariate analyses)
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Seroprevalence of H. pylori infection in Vietnam. The dotted line gives the exact percentage of seropositives in each age group, and the smooth line represents the polynomial trend line of the third order.
|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Seroprevalences of H. pylori infection in urban (Hanoi) and rural (Hatay) regions of Vietnam. Exact percentages and polynomial trend lines of the third order are shown.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Multivariate logistic regression modela
|
|
|
|---|
Similar, high infection rates have been reported from other developing countries, e.g., Thailand (3), Mexico (9), India (14), Japan and Korea (20), or parts of countries, e.g., Siberia (13). Also, a similarly high prevalence has been reported from an early, smaller study investigating the seroprevalence of H. pylori infection in Vietnam and other countries (11). Somewhat lower prevalence rates, 40 to 60%, have been reported from Mexico (18), Korea (8) and from parts of a multiracial population in Malaysia (5). Seroprevalence rates around or below 40% have been reported for ethnic Malay (5) and Seoul (9) populations.
The variability of H. pylori seropositivity in different populations is likely partly explained by technical factors. Many of the studies used commercial kits that have been validated in developed countries but not in the populations investigated. These kits are usually based on strains from developed countries, while recent studies by us and others have shown that using local strains led to a significantly improved sensitivity (6, 14) and specificity (6).
In addition, even if validated with a local population, some of the assays used in seroepidemiological studies had been validated with patients undergoing endoscopy for gastrointestinal diseases. This approach allows determination of the sensitivity of the assay against the "gold standard," i.e., culture of H. pylori. It entails, however, the risk of setting an erroneous cutoff level if antibody concentrations differ significantly between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. We found significantly higher IgG antibody concentrations in Vietnamese peptic ulcer patients (immunoblot and H. pylori culture positives) than in an immunoblot-positive Vietnamese healthy control population, indicating the need of a lower cutoff level in seroepidemiological studies (6).
For the present study, we have therefore given close attention to the parameters of the ELISA used for the study of seroprevalence of H. pylori infection in rural and urban Vietnam. The H. pylori strains used for antigen were sonicated Vietnamese strains, and cross-reacting antibodies were absorbed by sonicated C. jejuni antigen. Sensitivity and specificity were established both with Vietnamese peptic ulcer patients and with an immunoblot-positive control population (6). Since none of the commercial serological assays on the market had been validated with a Vietnamese population, specificity in the present study was established by using three different assays in order to exclude false positives in the population investigated.
Findings similar to those in our study, showing a higher overall infection rate in an urban population (78.8%) than in a rural population (69.2%), have previously been reported from Nepal, with an infection rate of 67.2% in a suburban village of Kathmandu compared to 41.5% in an isolated, rural village (7). Also, in a study from Mexico, persons living in the region with the highest socioeconomic development had the highest risk of seropositivity (9), consistent with our finding in Vietnam. Interestingly, a previous large community-based seroepidemiological study from Mexico (18) had not found a difference by regional development, but the authors of this last study speculate that this could be due to the multiplicity of variables used to construct their indexes.
The situation in Vietnam resembles that of many developing countries, with a growing population and rapid changes in socioeconomic and demographic variables. The total population of Vietnam was estimated in 2001 to be 78.7 million, up from 66 million in 1990, and projected to further increase to between 85.6 million and 87.1 million by year 2010 (4). The Red River delta region, where both Hanoi and Hatay are located, had an estimated population of 17.2 million in 2001, with 2.8 million in Hanoi and 2.4 million in Hatay. The proportion of urban population in the two areas was estimated to be 57.8 and 8.2%, respectively.
The level of economic development in Hanoi is higher than that in the Hatay province by any official measure, e.g., income per capita, rate of malnutrition in children <5 years of age, and access to medical care (4). These official data do not, however, include known risk factors for H. pylori infection, e.g., crowding in households. The level of crowding in the city of Hanoi is largely unknown but may be even more extensive than could be calculated, since a large number of people work and live in Hanoi although they are officially registered in their home province. In addition, the influx of people from other parts of the country was accelerated when the official ban on moving into the city from other areas was lifted in 1990.
In conclusion, our study has shown a high seroprevalence of H. pylori infection in Vietnam and in particular in the urban area of Hanoi. The high infection prevalence in children and adolescents indicates that the major public health problems of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer, one of the leading forms of cancer in Vietnam, will not be eliminated in the near future. The exact causes of the high prevalence of infection in urban Vietnam remain unknown, and although it may be speculated to be due to crowding, further studies are needed as a basis for future prevention and treatment strategies.
This study was done within the framework of KIRT, the Karolinska Institute Research Training program, supported by the Swedish International Development Agency, SIDA/SAREC.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»