Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, July 2004, p. 795-798, Vol. 11, No. 4
1071-412X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.11.4.795-798.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Immunology, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology,1 Department of Farm Animal Health,2 Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands3
Received 29 July 2003/ Returned for modification 8 October 2003/ Accepted 2 February 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several approaches have been described for the identification of leukocyte subpopulations in BAL fluid on the basis of light scatter characteristics, selection by one or more MAbs, or a combination of these. Procedures to identify neutrophils by flow cytometry have used similar techniques: light scatter profile characteristics (13) or differences in the expression of nonspecific markers such as major histocompatibility complex class I or CD45 (7, 8, 13). Hitherto, techniques that have been used in the bovine system have been primarily aimed at detection and characterization of lymphocytes in BAL fluid.
The aim of this study was to establish a dual-laser flow cytometry technique that permits identification and subsequent phenotyping of leukocytes in bovine BAL fluid and that is applicable to healthy calves and calves with lower respiratory tract disease.
Animals. All animal procedures were carried out with the prior consent of the Faculty Ethical Review Committee of Utrecht University. BAL fluid samples were from Holstein Friesian calves, 6 to 15 weeks of age, kept at a farm in crates. Animals were identified as suffering from severe inflammation of the respiratory tract or as nondiseased on the basis of clinical examination results (i.e., respiratory rate and rectal temperature) as described earlier (15). BAL fluid samples were taken from 10 healthy calves and 10 with respiratory disease. The BAL procedure was performed on the standing, nonsedated calves as described earlier (15). In pilot studies, radiological examination had ascertained reproducible positioning of the tube in seven healthy calves, confirming earlier findings (6).
Flow cytometer setup and data acquisition. BAL fluid cells were kept on melting ice, stained, and fixed in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% formalin before analysis in a dual-laser flow cytometer (FACScalibur; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, Calif.). Viability (>95%) was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Staining was performed in buffer containing 25% bovine serum for blocking of nonspecific binding. Unlike forward scatter (FSC)-side scatter (SSC) plots of peripheral blood leukocytes, BAL fluid cells did not show well-defined cell populations (Fig. 1) in samples of both pneumonic and nonpneumonic calves. However, in the lower left quadrant characteristically granulocytes and lymphocytes appeared, which was confirmed by application of the same settings to formalin-fixed peripheral blood leukocytes (data not shown). Broad neutrophil and lymphocyte gates in the light scatter plot were defined (Fig. 2 C1, C2, E1, and E2) and used in the procedure to identify neutrophils and lymphocytes in BAL fluid.
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. FSC-SSC plots of BAL fluid. BAL fluid samples from a representative nondiseased calf (A) and a calf with respiratory disease (B) reveal relatively homogeneous populations, comprising AM, granulocytes, and lymphocytes. FSC, a measure of cell size, is plotted against SSC, a measure of granularity.
|
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Identification of neutrophils and lymphocytes in representative samples of BAL fluid from a nondiseased calf and a calf with respiratory disease. IL-A110-positive (B1 and B2) and CD2-positive (D1 and D2) events in FL-3 versus FL-4 plots were identified, compared to staining with an isotype control MAb (A1 and A2), and were subsequently backgated to preset neutrophil (C1 and C2) and lymphocyte (E1 and E2) gates to finally identify neutrophils and CD2+ lymphocytes, respectively.
|
Identification of AM by selecting for autofluorescence was preferred to an AM-specific MAb because of aspecific binding of the MAb to other cell populations. In addition, as the FL4 channel was used for detection of a leukocyte-specific marker, the AM-specific marker was to be analyzed in FL1, FL2, or FL3, where autofluorescence hampered detection. Pilot studies had shown that fluorescence of AM, induced by a marker for CD14 such as VPM65 (3), was low compared to the background level (data not shown). Plotting autofluorescence against the isotype control-induced fluorescence in the FL3-FL4 plot showed an open area that was filled with events when MAbs were used that were specific for neutrophils or CD2+ lymphocytes. Correlation of these gated events to their respective FSC-SSC gates made the procedure highly selective and finally identified the neutrophil and lymphocyte populations.
The numbers of neutrophils and CD2+ lymphocytes were represented as percentages of the total number of events in the FL3-FL4 gate and the FSC-SSC gate for neutrophils and lymphocytes, respectively. The percentages of neutrophils in the FL3-FL4 gate were significantly lower than the percentages of lymphocytes in the FL3-FL4 gate (Table 1). Therefore, the final step in the isolation procedure, i.e., backgating of FL3-FL4 positive events to the respective FSC-SSC gates, was more selective for neutrophils than it was for lymphocytes. Differences in binding affinity of the MAbs specific for lymphocytes and neutrophils and differences in their cognate antigen expression may account for the specificity of the FL3-FL4 gate. In addition, it may be due to differences in autofluorescence, which is higher in granulocytes than in lymphocytes (7).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Numbers of neutrophils and CD2+ lymphocytesa in BAL fluid after the flow cytometric identification procedure
|
Phenotyping leukocytes.
To demonstrate the suitability of the method described for subsequent phenotyping, leukocytes in BAL fluid from a calf with respiratory disease were additionally labeled by MAbs, isolated from hybridoma culture supernatants, and conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; Conjugation kit; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). To quantify CAM expression of neutrophils in BAL fluid, fluorescence was determined by MAbs specific for ß2-integrin (R15.7-FITC [2]),
4-integrin (BII218.1-FITC [10]), and an isotype control (UD15-FITC [11]). The expression index was used to quantify CAM expression on neutrophils in arbitrary units and was defined as the quotient of the geometric mean of the mean specific fluorescence and the geometric mean of the mean isotype control fluorescence (Fig. 3A). In addition, CD2+ lymphocytes from this calf were phenotyped for CD4 (IL-A11-FITC [1]) and CD8 (IL-A105-FITC [9]) (Fig. 3B). These additional labelings show that the procedure may be used to characterize leukocytes in BAL fluid.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phenotyping of BAL fluid leukocytes from a calf with respiratory disease. (A) Neutrophilic granulocyte expression of 4-integrin (with MAb BII 218.1) and ß2-integrin (R15.7) relative to isotype control fluorescence (UD15) was quantified with directly FITC-labeled MAbs. The expression index was determined as the quotient of integrin fluorescence and isotype control fluorescence. (B) CD2+ lymphocytes were phenotyped by MAbs for CD4 (IL-A11) and CD8 (IL-A105). The percentage of gated cells within each quadrant is shown at the top. IgG1, immunoglobulin G1.
|
|
|
|---|
4-Integrin (CD49d) expression on bovine peripheral blood neutrophils is related to inflammation of the respiratory system. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 93:21-29.[CrossRef][Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»