Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, May 2004, p. 496-502, Vol. 11, No. 3
1071-412X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.11.3.496-502.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Jae-Chul Lee,1 Yoshihiko Sakaguchi,1 Yuji Hayakawa,2 Michiko Hayashi,2 Miki Nakaura,2 Hikaru Takai,2 Song-Nan Lin,1 Masafumi Mukamoto,3 Tom Murphy,4 and Keiji Oguma1*
Department of Bacteriology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, Okayama 700-8558,1 Nanbu Livestock Hygiene Service Center, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-3101,2 Department of Veterinary Epidemiology, University of Osaka Prefecture, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan,3 National Water Research Institute, Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6, Canada4
Received 15 November 2003/ Returned for modification 22 December 2003/ Accepted 28 January 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Type C and D toxins provoke botulism in many animal species, including the avian form (14). In Japan, some farmers have used ducks, named "Aigamo" in Japanese, which are cross strain of Japanese Mallard and Khaki Campbell, for reducing the chemicals in the rice. Young ducks are released into a rice field to exterminate harmful insects or unwanted plants, grow up during the rice crop, and are finally used as meats after the harvest is finished. However, a few hundred ducks died of botulism in a certain area of Ishikawa prefecture. These ducks showed symptoms of leg and wing paralysis and became weak and listless. C. botulinum type C organisms were isolated from the contents of the gastric tract of the carcass and environmental materials such as soil, maggots, food, and (or) straw mats. We therefore planned to vaccinate these ducks.
At present, the most widely available vaccine for human and animals is formalin-inactivated toxoids. Although these are very effective, they are expensive and time-consuming to prepare and are slightly hazardous during detoxification. To solve these problems, a recombinant vaccine has been considered; HC of types A and F (1, 4) and a type C whole neurotoxin that becomes nontoxigenic by modifying some amino acids in its active domain (8). Since it appears difficult to prepare a large amount of recombinant whole neurotoxin, we attempted to prepare recombinant HC. In a previous study, we prepared HC containing the histidine (His) tag of types C and D, and the vaccine effects were analyzed in mice (17). Protective effects were observed in both types C and D; however, their effects were not as significant as expected. Since it was thought that increased efficacy could be induced by injecting whole H chain (HN and HC; 100 kDa) rather than the HC, we have used here the whole recombinant type C- and D-H chains and studied their effectiveness in both mice and ducks.
|
|
|---|
Purification of toxins. The C. botulinum type C strain, C-Stockholm (C-St), and the type D strain, D-1873, were used for the production and purification of type C and D toxins, respectively, according to the procedure of Inoue et al. (5, 6).
Construction of expression plasmid. The following primers were designed to amplify the nucleotides encoding amino acids Asp442 through Glu1291 and Asp446 through Glu1276 of the type C- and D-H chain fragments, respectively (7, 10): C-7SH Bam-1f (5'-CGC GGA TCC GCG GAT GGT AGA TCA TTA TAT AAT AAA ACA T-3'), C-7SH Xho-1r (5'-CCG CTC GAG CGG TTA TTC ACT TAC AGG TAC AAA ACC C-3'), D-7SH EcoR-1f (5'-CCG GAA TTC CGG CGA TGA TTC AAC ATG TAT TAA AGT TAA AA-3'), and D-7SH Xho-1r (5'-CCG CTC GAG CGG TTA CTC TAC CCA TCC TGG ATC CC-3'). The underlined restriction enzyme sites were incorporated into the primers (type C [BamHI and XhoI] and type D [EcoRI and XhoI]). Purified DNAs from C-St and D-1873 were used as templates for amplification by PCR. The PCR product encoding type C-H chain was restricted with BamHI and XhoI, and that of type D-H chain was restricted with EcoRI and XhoI. The products were purified from agarose gel electrophoresis bands by using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, Calif.) and then inserted into an expression vector pGEX-6P-3 (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N.J.) restricted with the same enzymes.
Protein expression and purification. The plasmids constructed as described above were transformed into competent cells (BL21). The cells were cultured in 400 ml of Luria-Bertani broth containing 50 µg of ampicillin/ml (final concentration) at 37°C until the optical density at 600 nm reached 0.5. After induction with a 0.1 mM final concentration of IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside), the cells were cultured for 30 h at 25°C. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 6,500 x g for 20 min, lysed by sonication, and centrifuged again at 15,000 x g for 20 min. From these lysates, the glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins were affinity purified by glutathione-Sepharose 4B as recommended by the supplier (Amersham Biosciences). GST tag was eliminated by treating the fusion proteins with PreScission protease (Amersham Biosciences) and reapplying them to the glutathione-Sepharose 4B column.
Preparation of duck IgG and HRP-conjugated rabbit IgG against duck IgG. Duck serum (10 ml) was saturated with 33% ammonium sulfate and left at 4°C overnight. After centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 20 min, the pellet was dissolved in 3 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) containing 0.5 M NaCl and dialyzed against the same buffer. The sample was applied to a Sephacryl S-300 (Amersham Biosciences) column (1.4 by 90 cm) equilibrated with the same buffer and 2-ml fractions of the second protein peak (immunoglobulin G [IgG] rich) were collected. After dialysis against 0.015 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.3), the IgG-rich sample was applied to a DEAE-Toyopearl 650M (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) column (1.0 by 5 cm) equilibrated with the same buffer. The proteins bound to the column were eluted with stepwise increases in NaCl concentration (0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, and 1 M), and IgG fractions confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) were collected. The purified IgG was used to immunize a rabbit (New Zealand White, 13 weeks, female). The IgG (1 mg) was first mixed with Freund complete adjuvant and injected subcutaneously. Three weeks later, the IgG (1 mg) was mixed with Freund incomplete adjuvant and injected subcutaneously. After 2 weeks, serum was collected from the carotid artery, and IgG was purified by gel filtration as described for the purification of duck IgG, followed by protein A-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) affinity column chromatography. The antibody thus obtained was then conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) by using an EZ-Link maleimide-activated HRP kit (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.).
Adjuvant. Aluminum hydroxide was used as the adjuvant of the vaccine. A portion, 6.6 g, of aluminum sulfate 14-18 water (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) was dissolved in 10 ml of distilled water, and 60 ml of 1 N NaOH was added dropwise with gentle stirring with a magnetic stirrer at room temperature. After 10 min, the precipitate was centrifuged (1,000 x g, 10 min) and washed three times with distilled water. The precipitate was resuspended in 30 ml of PBS and mixed with a blender until the corpuscles remained suspended for more than 10 min. To calculate the concentration of the aluminum hydroxide slurry, 100 µl of the slurry sample was dried and weighed. The concentration of the adjuvant was adjusted to 10 mg/ml with PBS, and thimerosal was added to a final concentration of 0.02%.
Immunization of animals. Mice and ducks were immunized according to the protocol shown in Table 1. As a negative control, PBS instead of the antigen was mixed with the adjuvant. Each antigen solution was injected subcutaneously into the dorsal side of the mice (0.1 ml) or ducks (0.2 ml). At 3 weeks postimmunization, a second immunization was performed. Partial bleeding was performed via the tail vein (mice) or basilic vein (duck) at 3 and 5 weeks after the primary immunization, and the specific antibody titers were checked by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting tests as follows.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Immunization plan for GST-H-chain protein in mice and ducks
|
Western blotting. The 16 S toxin was separated by SDS-PAGE according to the method of Laemmli (9) and then electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon; Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) with semidry blotting apparatus (Nippon Eido, Tokyo, Japan) as reported by Hirano and Watanabe (3). The membrane blocked the nonspecific binding of the protein with S-PBS for 2 h at 37°C. After it was washed with T-PBS, the membrane was reacted with the 1,000-fold-diluted sera of immunized mice for 1 h at 37°C. After it was washed with T-PBS, the membrane was reacted with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin rabbit IgG (Dako) for 1 h at 37°C. After the membrane was washed, the reacted band was detected on an X-ray film by an enhanced chemiluminescence-Western blotting detection reagent (Amersham Biosciences).
Determination of toxin MLD. The 16 S toxin was diluted in serial 10-fold steps with 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), and 0.5 ml of each dilution was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) and intravenously (i.v.) into at least two mice and ducks, respectively. The animals were observed for 1 week, and deaths were recorded. The minimum lethal doses (MLD) per milliliter (mouse i.p. MLD/ml or duck i.v. MLD/ml) were calculated as the dilutions causing death in both animals.
Challenge of the toxin in animals. The mice were challenged i.p. with 103, 104, 105, and 106 MLD/0.5 ml of type C- or D-16 S toxin and observed for 1 week, and deaths were recorded. The mice that survived type C and D toxins were cross-challenged with type D- and C-16 S toxins, respectively.
All of the ducks were challenged i.v. with 10, 102, or 103 MLD/0.5 ml of type C-16 S toxin diluted with saline.
Statistical analysis. The antibody level in ELISA was statistically analyzed by using the Student t test between H chain and adjuvant groups or with the paired t test between once- and twice-immunized groups.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. SDS-PAGE profile of recombinant H chain fragments of type C and D neurotoxins. GST fusion proteins were extracted from transformed BL21 cells by sonication and partially purified by using a glutathione-Sepharose 4B column. GST was removed in some preparations, followed by analysis by SDS-PAGE. Lanes: 1, GST-fused C-H chain protein; 2, C-H chain protein with GST removed; 3, GST-fused D-H chain protein; 4, D-H chain protein with GST removed.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) Antibody levels in antisera of mice immunized with recombinant C-H chain (C-H) and adjuvant alone (Cont.) against botulinum type C-16 S toxin. The sera were bled at 3 weeks after primary immunization (Once) and 2 weeks after secondary immunization (Twice).
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. (A) Antibody levels in antisera of mice immunized with recombinant D-H chain (D-H) and adjuvant alone (Cont.) against botulinum type D-16 S toxin. The mice were bled at 3 weeks after primary immunization (Once) and at 2 weeks after secondary immunization (Twice).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Result of challenge to mice immunized with recombinant type C- or D-H chaina
|
As shown in Fig. 4, the antibody level in ducks significantly increased after immunization similar to the result seen in mice. These ducks were then challenged with type C-16 S toxin. Prior to the challenge, we tried to determine the MLD of type C-16 S toxin in ducks by both the oral and the i.v. routes. The 1 MLD values for the duck oral and i.v. routes were 1 x 105 and 3 x 103 mouse i.p. MLD, respectively. Since a lot of toxin is needed in an oral challenge, we used i.v. injection as a challenge route. All seven immunized ducks resisted the challenge with 10 duck i.v. MLD, but the survival rate decreased to 5 of 7 (71.4%) and 4 of 7 (57.1%) when the birds were challenged with 102 and 103 duck i.v. MLD. All of the control ducks receiving adjuvant alone died, even with a 10 duck i.v. MLD (Table 3).
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Antibody levels in antisera of ducks immunized with recombinant type C-H chain (C-H) and adjuvant alone (Cont.) against botulinum type C-16 S toxin. The sera were bled at 3 weeks after primary immunization (Once) and 2 weeks after secondary immunization (Twice).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Result of challenge to ducks immunized with recombinant C-H chaina
|
|
|
|---|
In the case of mice, all animals immunized with the recombinant type C- and D-H chains produced antibodies reacting with only H chains of type C- and D-16 S toxins, respectively, in both ELISA and immunoblot analyses and resisted challenges with up to 105 and 106 mouse i.p. MLD of type C- and D-16 S toxins, respectively. Therefore, we concluded that both whole C- and D-H chains can be used as efficient vaccines. In previous experiments with C- and D-HC as immunogens, the production of antibodies was adequate, but their ability to neutralize 16 S toxins was somewhat low. Previously, the recombinant proteins were extracted from E. coli cells by sonication with a buffer containing 8 M urea, but this time they were extracted with only sonication. We therefore speculated that the reason for the low neutralization activity of the previous experiments was that the tertiary structure of the recombinant proteins denatured by urea treatment was not refolded effectively during dialysis, in addition to the shorter size of the product. We are now planning to prepare the recombinant HC extracted from E. coli cells only by sonication and check for its effectiveness as a vaccine.
We had also reported that the polyclonal antibodies prepared in rabbits by hyperimmunization with purified type C- and D whole H chains can cross-neutralize type D and C toxins to some extent, respectively, though the rates of cross-neutralization vary depending on the C and D strains (toxins) used (11, 12). This time, we used C-St and D-1873 strains. The homology of neurotoxins produced by these two strains is low, but some conserved amino acid sequences exist on HN regions as indicated in Fig. 5. Therefore, it was speculated that cross-neutralization may be caused by antibodies reacting with the epitopes existing on HN. This time, little cross-reaction was observed either in vitro (Western blotting analysis; data not shown) or in vivo (toxin challenge test), indicating that few antibodies reacting with HN are produced. We suggested the following two reasons for this phenomenon: the immunization level may be low compared to the study previously performed with rabbits and/or the GST molecule (26 kDa) may cover some epitopes of HN that exist close to the GST molecule, but not those of HC, which are far from the GST, inhibiting the contact of the epitopes with the immune cells.
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Comparative alignments of the H-chain region of type C (C-St; upper) and D (D-1873; lower) neurotoxins. These sequences were derived from references 7 and 10. Asterisks and dots indicate the homologous and identical amino acid sequences, respectively.
|
In the present study, it became clear that whole H chains of type C and D can be used as safe and effective vaccines. However, in the case of avian, hundreds of animals need to be immunized by using a simple method. To resolve this problem, we are now studying different vaccination methods with different adjuvants and routes.
Present address: Department of Microbiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»