Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 2004, p. 131-136, Vol. 11, No. 1
1071-412X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.11.1.131-136.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institute of Immunology,1 Department of Gastroenterology,3 Department of Pathology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg,4 Institute of Medical Technology Magdeburg (IMTM) GmbH, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany2
Received 1 August 2003/ Returned for modification 26 September 2003/ Accepted 7 November 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serological studies have shown that the presence of antibodies against several antigens, particularly against VacA and CagA, might be related to the severity of gastroduodenal disease. Anti-CagA antibodies have been detected significantly more frequently in sera of patients with gastric cancer or duodenal ulcer than in patients with chronic gastritis or other gastroduodenal diseases (3).
Diagnostic tests for detection of H. pylori infections in patients should be reliable, easy and quick to perform, and noninvasive. The identification of strains with high pathogenic potential will definitely support therapeutic decisions and thus decrease costs. For detection of H. pylori infections, serological methods play an important role in clinical practice. A number of serological tests for detection of anti-H. pylori antibodies have been developed during recent years. Serological diagnosis is usually performed as a two-step process. First, sera are screened with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), which investigate crude antigen preparations. These assays are characterized by a high sensitivity, and they are rapid and may be automated to give quantitative results. On the other hand, they do not differentiate strains with high versus low pathogenic potential. Therefore, to identify anti-CagA or anti-VacA antibodies, positive samples are analyzed in a second step by Western blotting. Western blot analyses are highly specific but time-consuming. Furthermore, they are, despite computer-supported evaluation programs, difficult to evaluate, and they do not give quantitative results.
Alternatively, H. pylori infections can be detected by histological methods and cell culture. These methods are characterized by a high specificity, but their sensitivity is low and depends very much on the experience of the pathologist or the laboratory.
Here we report the development and evaluation of a new rapid flow microparticle immunofluorescence assay (FMIA) for detection of H. pylori antibodies. The assay allows the fast qualitative and quantitative detection of anti-H. pylori antibodies by using crude antigen preparations and single recombinant antigens simultaneously. Thus, it combines the values of the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot in a single quantitative assay.
|
|
|---|
Generation of H. pylori antigen extracts. Clinical isolates of H. pylori were cultured under microaerophilic conditions at 37°C in brucella broth (Difco Laboratories; Detroit, Mich.) for 4 days. Bacteria were centrifuged at 6,000 x g at 4°C and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or 0.1 M borate buffer (pH 8.5). Suspensions were sonicated on ice and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min. The protein concentration of the retained supernatants was measured with the Micro-BCA (bicinchoninic acid) assay (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany).
Generation of recombinant H. pylori antigens. (i) Plasmid construction. Clinical isolates of H. pylori were cultured under microaerophilic conditions at 37°C in brucella broth for 4 days. Bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation and washed and reconstituted in Tris-EDTA buffer. H. pylori DNA was prepared with the Invisorb genomic DNA kit III (Invitek, Berlin, Germany). The coding sequences of the urease A, urease B (GenBank accession no. AB032429), 26-kDa protein (GenBank accession no. AE000654 and AE000511), and CagA 50-kDa fragment (amino acids 30 to 460; LQVAF...DPKHL; GenBank accession no. AB003397) were amplified from H. pylori DNA by PCR. The characteristics of the primers used for amplification are given in Table 1. Add-on recognition sites for the restriction enzyme NdeI, used for cloning into the vectors, were introduced. Amplified DNA fragments were controlled by sequencing (GATC Biotech, Konstanz, Germany) and inserted into pET-14b expression vector (Novagen, Madison, Wis.), which also coded for an additional N-terminal His tag sequence that was used for purification by metal chelate chromatography.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primer sequences used for cloning and expression of H. pylori antigens
|
(iii) SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Antigen preparations were separated by SDS-PAGE (6). Proteins were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R250 or were transferred to a Hybond ECL membrane (Amersham Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany) using a Semi-dry transblot system (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). Filters were blocked with 1% nonfat dry milk and incubated for 1 h with 1-µg/ml anti-H. pylori antibody (DAKO) or 20-ng/ml anti-His tag antibody (Novagen) to identify recombinant fusion proteins. The immunoreaction was detected with a second alkaline phosphatase-labeled antibody (donkey anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G [IgG]; Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) and nitroblue tetrazolium-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate as a substrate.
Histological detection of H. pylori infection. For histology, paraffin-embedded step sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to grade gastritis according to the updated Sydney system (4) and with Warthin-Starry-Silver stain to detect H. pylori. Histological evaluation was performed by an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist (M.V.) who was not aware of clinical history or symptoms.
Detection of H. pylori antibodies by using commercial assay systems. Sera were analyzed with a commercially available ELISA system (Pyloriset EIA-G III) and two Western blot assays obtained from Viramed (Munich, Germany) and Biosens (Oberhaching, Germany), referred to as Blot 1 and Blot 2, respectively. All procedures were performed according to the manufacturers' instructions. Unless indicated otherwise, serum probes were diluted 1:75 or 1:100 for Western blots and 1:200 for ELISA.
In the ELISA, microtiter wells were coated with inactivated H. pylori antigen extracts and used for qualitative and quantitative antibody testing. The results were expressed in arbitrary enzyme units (EU) per milliliter of serum. They were considered positive if the number of H. pylori antibodies was equal to or above that of a calibrator serum (20 EU/ml), which was part of the assay system. Probes with values lower than 20 EU/ml were negative.
In both Western blot systems, defined isolates of several H. pylori strains were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted on nitrocellulose membranes. The antigen preparations contained the following strain-specific proteins: CagA, VacA, 30-kDa protein, UreA, APR, UreB, heat shock protein, and flagellin (Fig. 1A). The immunoreactions of individual patient sera were analyzed visually. They were classified positive or negative when compared with the reference strips.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Detection of antibodies against defined H. pylori antigens using Western blot analyses. (A) Commercially available Western blots were incubated with rabbit H. pylori antiserum. (B) Recombinant antigens prepared as described in Materials and Methods and separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted on nitrocellulose, and stained with rabbit H. pylori antiserum.
|
Microparticle assay. Nonfluorescent paramagnetic polystyrene microparticles (Kisker GmbH, Mühlhausen, Germany) with diameters of 6.5, 8, 10, and 12 µm and containing functional carboxyl groups were used. When indicated, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled microparticles (8 µm) were used. Each microparticle population was covalently coated with either H. pylori antigen extract or a distinct recombinant antigen by using the carbodiimide kit for carboxylated microparticles (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, Pa.). Different antigen concentrations were used for determination of optimal coating conditions, taking into consideration the amount of bound antigen and the homogeneity of coating. A concentration of 400 µg of antigen per ml was chosen for the coating of a 2.5% microparticle suspension.
For analysis, coated microparticles were mixed, and about 100,000 microparticles were incubated with 100 µl of patient serum in 96-well plates (serum dilutions of 1:200 and 1:1,000) in PBS (pH 7.4) supplemented with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, Deissenhofen, Germany) at room temperature for 1 h. Next, microparticles were washed with a Promega MagneSphere 96 rack in PBS-1% BSA-0.1% Tween 20. The immunoreaction was detected with phycoerythrin-conjugated antihuman IgG (heavy and light chains) serum (Dianova).
Flow cytometric analyses were carried out with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD, Heidelberg, Germany), equipped with an argon laser operating at 488 nm. Different microparticle populations were gated considering their forward scatter and their fluorescence intensity in the green channel (FL1, around 520 nm). The immunoreaction was quantified by registration of mean fluorescence intensities and peak channels of the respective microparticle populations in the red channel (FL2, around 560 nm). Results derived from the mean fluorescence intensities and the peak channel analyses showed no significant differences. Therefore, only mean fluorescence intensities are shown. The fluorescence intensity is given in arbitrary fluorescence units (FU). Nonhomogeneous staining resulting in a skewed fluorescence distribution was found in single patient samples and did not result in significant differences between peak channels and mean fluorescence intensities.
Cutoff values for each antigen-microparticle population were calculated from the fluorescence intensities measured from a pool of at least 10 negative samples (according to commercial test systems). The cutoff value was calculated by the following formula: cutoff fluorescence intensity = mean fluorescence intensity of negative samples + (3 x standard deviation).
Statistical evaluation. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 10.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, Ill.).
Bivariate correlation coefficients were calculated according to Pearson.
|
|
|---|
Characterization of the microparticle assay. To establish an assay system that combines the diagnostic value of ELISA and Western blotting, microparticle populations were coated with either crude H. pylori extracts or purified recombinant antigens. Then the populations were mixed in equal amounts and incubated with patient sera and phycoerythrin-labeled anti-human IgG. The immunoreactivity of single microparticles was measured by flow cytometry (Fig. 2). Populations coated with various proteins were differentiated according to their size (forward scatter) and their fluorescence in the green channel. Thus, five populations were gated (12 µm, R5; 10 µm, R4; 8 µm [with FITC], R3; 8 µm, R2; and 6.5 µm, R1). The immunoreactivity mediated by anti-H. pylori antibodies in the patient sera correlated with the mean fluorescence intensity in the red channel.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Detection of anti-H. pylori antibodies using FMIA. Antigen-coated microparticles were prepared as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Defined microparticle populations were separated by size (forward scatter) and FITC fluorescence (around 520 nm). (B) Specific anti-H. pylori immunoreactivity was analyzed by using phycoerythrin-labeled anti-human IgG antibodies. The fluorescence intensity around 560 nm correlated with the concentration of anti-H. pylori antibodies in the serum samples. For each microparticle population, a sample that was incubated with patient serum (shaded curve) and a sample that was incubated with buffer alone (negative control, open curve) are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Determination of measurement range by the ELISA (A) and FMIA (B) systems. Three H. pylori-positive serum samples (solid symbols) and one negative sample (open squares) were diluted between 12- and 100,000-fold. The immunoreactivity was analyzed with the ELISA and FMIA.
|
Furthermore, corresponding mean fluorescence intensities derived from the measurement of the H. pylori-coated microparticle population were correlated to the enzyme units derived from ELISA (Fig. 4). The values derived from positive sera showed a significant bivariant correlation (r = 0.8, P = 0.01).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Correlation between FMIA, ELISA, and histology. (A) Immunoreactivity against crude H. pylori extracts was measured with the ELISA and FMIA systems. The corresponding results were blotted (n = 75). Solid lines indicate the threshold values for FMIA and ELISA. Pearson correlation analyses of H. pylori-positive samples (solid circles) showed a significant correlation between ELISA and FMIA (dashed line, r = 0.8, P < 0.01). Samples with low immunoreactivity in the ELISA (<13 EU) were negative in the FMIA (open circles), whereas samples with intermediate reactivity in the ELISA (14 to 19 EU [open squares]) were in part above the FMIA threshold (solid vertical line). The results obtained by FMIA (B) and ELISA (C) measurements were compared to the corresponding histological findings. In all sera from patients with positive histology, we found anti-H. pylori antibodies, whereas some sera from patients with negative histology were positive in the FMIA and/or ELISA.
|
Alternatively, the agreement of qualitative results between ELISA and FMIA could be increased above 90% if the cutoff value of FMIA was increased empirically to 700 FU.
Furthermore, the FMIA and the ELISA results were compared to histological findings derived from gastric biopsy samples (Fig. 4B and C). We found that samples from all patients with positive histology were positive in FMIA and ELISA. This corresponds to the high sensitivity of both methods. On the other hand, in sera of some patients that were negative in histology, we found anti-H- pylori antibodies in FMIA and ELISA (51 and 30%, respectively). Considering also the detection of specific bands in the Western blot, we suggest that these differences between histology and FMIA or ELISA support the lower specificity of all three methods (1). Again, the number of false-positive samples in FMIA could be decreased to a number similar to that of the ELISA by increasing the cutoff value to 700 FU.
Comparative evaluation of the microparticle assay and Western blot. Mean fluorescence intensities derived from the measurement of beads, which were coated with single recombinant H. pylori antigens, were correlated to the semiquantitative evaluation of the Western blots (Fig. 5). FMIA results of UreA-coated beads showed an agreement rate of 87% with those derived from Blot 1. Five percent of the samples were false positive and 8% were false negative in the FMIA compared to Western blot. Immunoreactivities for UreB showed similar results: an agreement of 87%, a false-positive identification of 4%, and a false-negative identification of 10%. The highest correlation was found for CagA, with an agreement of 90% between the microparticle assay and Blot 1, whereas 6% were false positive and 4% were false negative. The lowest correlation was found for APR with 66% agreement (4% false positive and 30% false negative).
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Comparative analysis of antibodies against single H. pylori antigens in Blot 1 (Viramed) and FMIA. ELISA-positive patient samples (n = 60) were analyzed in FMIA and Blot 1. The corresponding results were depicted in dot blots. The calculated FMIA threshold is indicated by a horizontal solid line. Only those samples that could be clearly evaluated in a Western blot were used for comparative analyses (urease A, 50 of 60 samples; urease B, 55 of 60 samples; CagA, 60 of 60 samples; APR, 43 of 60 samples).
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Comparative analysis of antibodies against single H. pylori antigens in Blot 1 (Viramed) and Blot 2 (Biosens). Patient samples (n = 29) were each analyzed in Blot 1 and Blot 2. The corresponding results were depicted in dot blots. Only those samples that could be clearly evaluated in both Western blots were used for comparative analyses (urease A, 23 of 29 samples; urease B, 24 of 29 samples; CagA, 26 of 29 samples; APR, 23 of 29 samples).
|
Seroprevalence of antibodies against defined H. pylori antigens. Recombinant H. pylori antigens were used to evaluate the specificity of antibodies in patient sera. We tested whether it was possible to assign a specific immunoreactivity to each serum that stained the microparticles coupled to the crude H. pylori extract. The highest seroprevalence was found for anti-UreA, anti-UreB, and anti-CagA antibodies. All samples from seropositive patients, retrieved in the assay using H. pylori extract, contained antibodies against either UreA or UreB; about 30% of the positive sera contained antibodies against both urease isoforms. CagA antibodies were found in 68% of the seropositive samples, while anti-APR antibodies were found only in 17% according to the microparticle assay and 43 or 67% of the patient sera according to the blot systems (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Seroprevalence of antibodies against specific H. pylori antigens in seropositive patients
|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»