CVI
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moss, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moss, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, T. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, Jul 1996, 371-373, Vol 3, No. 4
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of absolute CD4+ lymphocyte counts determined by enzyme immunoassay (TRAx CD4 test kit) and flow cytometry

MW Moss, AV Carella, V Provost and TC Quinn
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Currently, CD4+ lymphocyte counts are one of the most widely used surrogate markers for monitoring disease progression in and initiating therapy for human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals. However, the process of obtaining lymphocyte subset counts can be complex and expensive, often rendering the test inaccessible to many patients. In contrast to standard laser-based flow cytometry, the TRAx CD4 Test Kit utilizes an enzyme-linked immunoassay format to provide CD4+ lymphocyte counts by a simple and more cost-effective means. In order to evaluate the utility of the TRAx CD4+ assay in comparison with flow cytometry, heparinized blood samples were drawn from 188 infected and uninfected adult patients and 24 infected pediatric patients and evaluated by both assays. The correlation coefficient for all adult individuals tested was 0.94, and the mean absolute counts (in cells per milliliter, +/- standard deviation) were 510 +/- 358 for TRAx and 480 +/- 361 for flow cytometry. The correlation for the pediatric group was 0.93, with mean absolute counts of 956 +/- 767 for TRAx and 1,521 +/-a 1,438 for flow cytometry. Overall the TRAx CD4 Test Kit performed well in comparison to flow cytometry, and its lower cost and ease of use make it an encouraging alternative for the routine determination of CD4+ lymphocyte counts.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. Infect. Immun.
J. Clin. Microbiol. J. Virol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.