Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, December 2008, p. 1755-1759, Vol. 15, No. 12
1071-412X/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CVI.00148-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Microbiology, Leprosy Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 4-2-1 Aoba-cho, Higashimurayama, Tokyo 189-0002, Japan,1 Quyhoa National Leprosy & Dermato-Venereology Hospital, Ghenhrang District, Quynhon City, Binhdinh, Vietnam,2 Institute for Natural Science, Nara University, Nara 631-8502, Japan3
Received 21 April 2008/ Returned for modification 13 June 2008/ Accepted 12 October 2008
A serological diagnostic test using phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) developed in the 1980s is commercially available, but the method is still inefficient in detecting all forms of leprosy. Therefore, more-specific and -reliable serological methods have been sought. We have characterized major membrane protein II (MMP-II) as a candidate protein for a new serological antigen. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the MMP-II antigen (MMP-II ELISA) for detecting antibodies in leprosy patients and patients' contacts in the mid-region of Vietnam and compared to the results to those for the PGL-I method (PGL-I ELISA). The results showed that 85% of multibacillary patients and 48% of paucibacillary patients were positive by MMP-II ELISA. Comparison between the serological tests showed that positivity rates for leprosy patients were higher with MMP-II ELISA than with PGL-I ELISA. Household contacts (HHCs) showed low positivity rates, but medical staff members showed comparatively high positivity rates, with MMP-II ELISA. Furthermore, monitoring of results for leprosy patients and HHCs showed that MMP-II is a better index marker than PGL-I. Overall, the epidemiological study conducted in Vietnam suggests that serological testing with MMP-II would be beneficial in detecting leprosy.
Published ahead of print on 22 October 2008.
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»