Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, January 2005, p. 224-227, Vol. 12, No. 1
1071-412X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CDLI.12.1.224-227.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
AIDS Prevention Initiative Nigeria, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria,1 Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts2
Received 12 August 2004/ Returned for modification 13 October 2004/ Accepted 3 November 2004
We compared two techniques for CD4 T-lymphocyte counting: flow cytometry (Cyflow) and magnetic beads (Dynabead). Similar results with good correlation were obtained from the 40 adult blood samples counted (P = 0.057, r = 0.93). The Cyflow technique is more precise and cost-effective than the Dynabead method ($3 to $5 versus $12 to $22 per test, respectively), since as many as 200 samples can be measured per day.
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. | Infect. Immun. |
|---|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | J. Virol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |